logo
Nature is dead. Nature remains dead. And we have killed it

Nature is dead. Nature remains dead. And we have killed it

Mail & Guardian04-05-2025

Deluded : Our belief in our superiority over other life forms is a mistake; we destroy the natural world with our 'intelligence'. Photo: Delwyn Verasamy
One of the most well-known quotes by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche begins with the statement, 'God is dead,' from his 1882 work, The Gay Science.
Quoted at length it reads: 'God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?'
A reading of the quote suggests that an analogy can be drawn between the 'God' Nietzsche refers to and the current degraded state of nature. Simply substituting the word 'God' with 'nature' underscores the severity of the present environmental crisis.
'God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers?'
In a similar vein, nature is dead. Nature remains dead. And we have killed it.
The environmental crisis we face today is one in which, through our daily actions, we continue to inflict profound harm on the natural world. The cumulative effect of human activity on the environment, now termed the Anthropocene, can be traced back to the early periods of 'civilisation' and industrialisation. In other words, since those times, humanity has been — and continues to be — responsible for the death of nature.
Despite numerous calls to action and a growing body of work by environmental philosophers and activists, only modest progress has been made, and much more remains to be desired. We are all complicit in this death. 'How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers?'
Too often, we attempt to console ourselves by adopting seemingly sustainable lifestyles, while ignoring the deeper structures that perpetuate environmental destruction. By structures here, I refer to, among others, capitalism and patriarchy. The persistent failure to implement effective environmental policies — either to avoid disrupting 'development' (capitalism) or to preserve the interests of a privileged few, predominantly white, heterosexual, male elites (patriarchy) — testifies to our collective unwillingness to confront the root causes of environmental degradation.
We busy ourselves with addressing symptoms rather than the structural causes we are reluctant to face. This highlights the superficial comfort we derive from 'doing something towards mitigation', even as the foundations of the crisis remain intact.
'What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves?'
There is little doubt that nature is the holiest and mightiest of all that the world has ever possessed. No matter how humans attempt to justify their status as 'masters of the universe' — whether through intellectual capacity or advances in science and technology — none of these so-called achievements would have been possible without nature. We depend on nature not only for our basic sustenance but also for the resources that enable our scientific and technological advancements. Without nature, we are nothing.
Yet, time and again, we focus on traits we value in our own species and extrapolate from them a supposed superiority over the rest of the natural world. We rarely cite, for instance, the keen vision of an eagle as evidence that the eagle is superior to humans, or the incredible speed of a cheetah as proof that the cheetah is greater than us. Instead, we highlight intelligence — a trait we prize within our own species — and from this narrow vantage point, proclaim ourselves better than the wider natural world, of which we are but a small — and often highly destructive — part.
I recognise that the analysis I offer here is a simplified account compared to the more nuanced debates in the broader literature on human superiority over nature. Nevertheless, it serves to illustrate the deep-seated bias we harbour as a species: a bias that blinds us to the consequences of our actions, to our own ultimate detriment in the grand order of things.
The knives with which we continue to bleed nature are the very structures we uphold as emblems of our so-called civilisation: patriarchy and capitalism. These structures, along with other forms of systemic oppression — various 'isms' often used to justify the exploitation of both marginalised peoples and the natural world — are entrenched as markers of 'development' or 'progress', making them difficult to challenge or dismantle.
'What water is there for us to clean ourselves?'
This is where theories such as deep ecology, social ecology, ecofeminism and ecowomanism become crucial. These frameworks challenge us to recognise that social and ecological justice are fundamentally intertwined. They illuminate the reality that the same structures which sustain social injustices among humans are also responsible for the ongoing injustice inflicted upon nature — and vice versa. Thus, if we are to cleanse ourselves of our transgressions against the Earth, we must also work to dismantle the systems that perpetuate social injustice.
'What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent?' This question evokes the growing movement within environmental philosophy to seek non-Western approaches to mitigating environmental degradation and promoting sustainability. The dominant, Western-centric models for addressing environmental crises are largely rooted in environmental science. But scientific approaches, while valuable, can be limited, because they often rely on controlled experiments that fail to capture the unpredictable and complex realities of environmental degradation as it occurs in the world.
This is where art — and particularly the art forms embedded in non-Western traditions — offers crucial contributions to the discourse on environmental crisis mitigation and sustainability. Many non-Western approaches to environmental stewardship are grounded in generations of lived experience with nature as it truly is, passed down through oral traditions, songs, dances, taboos, totems and other artistic expressions. Yet, these forms of ecological knowledge have often been marginalised by science and technology, and many are now at risk of being lost forever.
Because these ways of knowing are born from long-term, direct experience with the natural world, they hold insights and wisdom that could prove invaluable in the struggle against environmental degradation. It is imperative that we recognise, preserve and learn from these traditions rather than allowing them to be silenced in the name of progress.
'Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?'
Every day, headlines celebrate new scientific achievements: a successful cloning here, a breakthrough in life extension there, and elsewhere, experiments exploring the fusion of human and machine to enhance human capabilities. While these are remarkable feats, they seem to miss a crucial point. If the essence of human life is merely to persist — regardless of its quality — then perhaps such advancements are sufficient. But what would life be without the healing presence of non-human nature?
In our relentless pursuit of greatness — striving to become godlike — we have neglected what truly sustains and enriches us. A Native American proverb offers a sobering warning: 'Only when the last tree has been cut down, the last fish caught and the last stream poisoned, will we realise we cannot eat money.'
I therefore conclude: Nature is dead. Nature remains dead. And we have killed it. In our striving to transcend the limits of our humanity, we have forsaken the very foundation upon which our existence depends. In our pursuit to become gods, we have severed ourselves from the sacred web of life, forgetting that our greatness is meaningless in a barren and broken world.
The death of nature is not merely an ecological event — it is a profound existential crisis, a mirror reflecting the collapse of the human spirit itself. Until we recognise that our fate is inextricably bound to the fate of the Earth, all our triumphs will be hollow victories.
In the end, the question remains: if we have killed what was holiest and mightiest among us, what is left within us worth saving?
Emmanuel Anoghena Oboh is a PhD student of philosophy at the Centre of Applied Ethics at Stellenbosch University.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Colossal Biosciences' mission to reawaken Earth's lost wilds
Colossal Biosciences' mission to reawaken Earth's lost wilds

The South African

time3 days ago

  • The South African

Colossal Biosciences' mission to reawaken Earth's lost wilds

Ben Lamm, co-founder and CEO of Colossal Biosciences, recently shared insights in a lively interview on the TechStuff podcast, hosted by Oz Woloshyn. The Dallas-based biotech firm is making headlines with its bold mission to resurrect extinct species. This included the dire wolf and woolly mammoth through pioneering genetic engineering. Lamm addressed the ethical debates head-on. When accused of 'playing God,' he fired back, 'We play God every day. Taking cholesterol medication is playing God on a personal level. Cutting down rainforests or overfishing oceans is playing God. So why not do it in a way that helps conservation and inspires science?' His frankness cuts through the noise, positioning Colossal's work as a natural extension of humanity's ongoing impact on nature. The company's first breakthrough came with the dire wolf. Lamm described the moment he saw the pups at five weeks old as deeply emotional. 'I got chills bumps. I teared up. It's very, very emotional.' The viral video of the dire wolf pups howling even moved Peter Jackson. The Lord of the Rings director and Colossal investor, was 'overwhelmed' seeing them for the first time, according to Time Magazine. Colossal's approach is rigorous and ethical. Lamm emphasised their 90 %+ efficiency in genome editing, achieved without unintended side effects. 'We read the DNA at every step. It's computationally heavy and costly, but we ensure every embryo is healthy. We're certified by the American Humane Society because we care about animal welfare and conservation,' he said. The company also sparked public fascination with its 'woolly mice' — a genetically engineered mouse with mammoth traits created in just one month. Lamm joked that the mice 'were objectively cute and took the Internet by storm,' proving their process works. He confirmed that similar edits have been made in Asian elephant cells. This is the closest living relative of the woolly mammoth, with hopes to bring a mammoth equivalent to term soon. Lamm called out what he sees as hypocrisy in popular culture. 'People love Jurassic Park's dinosaurs but don't want to call our dire wolves dire wolves. It's a semantic question, not scientific. It's a human construct.' This highlights the cultural challenges Colossal faces in gaining acceptance for de-extinction. With half the world's species forecasted to be extinct or endangered within 25 years, Lamm's vision offers hope through technology. His mission goes beyond spectacle; it aims to restore ecosystems and inspire new generations in science and conservation. Colossal Biosciences is reshaping how we think about nature, responsibility, and the future of biodiversity. As Lamm puts it, 'Sometimes when you work on new things, it's scary and hard. But I'm not backing off the mission.' This pioneering blend of cutting-edge science and bold vision could soon change the natural world Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Nature is dead. Nature remains dead. And we have killed it
Nature is dead. Nature remains dead. And we have killed it

Mail & Guardian

time04-05-2025

  • Mail & Guardian

Nature is dead. Nature remains dead. And we have killed it

Deluded : Our belief in our superiority over other life forms is a mistake; we destroy the natural world with our 'intelligence'. Photo: Delwyn Verasamy One of the most well-known quotes by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche begins with the statement, 'God is dead,' from his 1882 work, The Gay Science. Quoted at length it reads: 'God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?' A reading of the quote suggests that an analogy can be drawn between the 'God' Nietzsche refers to and the current degraded state of nature. Simply substituting the word 'God' with 'nature' underscores the severity of the present environmental crisis. 'God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers?' In a similar vein, nature is dead. Nature remains dead. And we have killed it. The environmental crisis we face today is one in which, through our daily actions, we continue to inflict profound harm on the natural world. The cumulative effect of human activity on the environment, now termed the Anthropocene, can be traced back to the early periods of 'civilisation' and industrialisation. In other words, since those times, humanity has been — and continues to be — responsible for the death of nature. Despite numerous calls to action and a growing body of work by environmental philosophers and activists, only modest progress has been made, and much more remains to be desired. We are all complicit in this death. 'How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers?' Too often, we attempt to console ourselves by adopting seemingly sustainable lifestyles, while ignoring the deeper structures that perpetuate environmental destruction. By structures here, I refer to, among others, capitalism and patriarchy. The persistent failure to implement effective environmental policies — either to avoid disrupting 'development' (capitalism) or to preserve the interests of a privileged few, predominantly white, heterosexual, male elites (patriarchy) — testifies to our collective unwillingness to confront the root causes of environmental degradation. We busy ourselves with addressing symptoms rather than the structural causes we are reluctant to face. This highlights the superficial comfort we derive from 'doing something towards mitigation', even as the foundations of the crisis remain intact. 'What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves?' There is little doubt that nature is the holiest and mightiest of all that the world has ever possessed. No matter how humans attempt to justify their status as 'masters of the universe' — whether through intellectual capacity or advances in science and technology — none of these so-called achievements would have been possible without nature. We depend on nature not only for our basic sustenance but also for the resources that enable our scientific and technological advancements. Without nature, we are nothing. Yet, time and again, we focus on traits we value in our own species and extrapolate from them a supposed superiority over the rest of the natural world. We rarely cite, for instance, the keen vision of an eagle as evidence that the eagle is superior to humans, or the incredible speed of a cheetah as proof that the cheetah is greater than us. Instead, we highlight intelligence — a trait we prize within our own species — and from this narrow vantage point, proclaim ourselves better than the wider natural world, of which we are but a small — and often highly destructive — part. I recognise that the analysis I offer here is a simplified account compared to the more nuanced debates in the broader literature on human superiority over nature. Nevertheless, it serves to illustrate the deep-seated bias we harbour as a species: a bias that blinds us to the consequences of our actions, to our own ultimate detriment in the grand order of things. The knives with which we continue to bleed nature are the very structures we uphold as emblems of our so-called civilisation: patriarchy and capitalism. These structures, along with other forms of systemic oppression — various 'isms' often used to justify the exploitation of both marginalised peoples and the natural world — are entrenched as markers of 'development' or 'progress', making them difficult to challenge or dismantle. 'What water is there for us to clean ourselves?' This is where theories such as deep ecology, social ecology, ecofeminism and ecowomanism become crucial. These frameworks challenge us to recognise that social and ecological justice are fundamentally intertwined. They illuminate the reality that the same structures which sustain social injustices among humans are also responsible for the ongoing injustice inflicted upon nature — and vice versa. Thus, if we are to cleanse ourselves of our transgressions against the Earth, we must also work to dismantle the systems that perpetuate social injustice. 'What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent?' This question evokes the growing movement within environmental philosophy to seek non-Western approaches to mitigating environmental degradation and promoting sustainability. The dominant, Western-centric models for addressing environmental crises are largely rooted in environmental science. But scientific approaches, while valuable, can be limited, because they often rely on controlled experiments that fail to capture the unpredictable and complex realities of environmental degradation as it occurs in the world. This is where art — and particularly the art forms embedded in non-Western traditions — offers crucial contributions to the discourse on environmental crisis mitigation and sustainability. Many non-Western approaches to environmental stewardship are grounded in generations of lived experience with nature as it truly is, passed down through oral traditions, songs, dances, taboos, totems and other artistic expressions. Yet, these forms of ecological knowledge have often been marginalised by science and technology, and many are now at risk of being lost forever. Because these ways of knowing are born from long-term, direct experience with the natural world, they hold insights and wisdom that could prove invaluable in the struggle against environmental degradation. It is imperative that we recognise, preserve and learn from these traditions rather than allowing them to be silenced in the name of progress. 'Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?' Every day, headlines celebrate new scientific achievements: a successful cloning here, a breakthrough in life extension there, and elsewhere, experiments exploring the fusion of human and machine to enhance human capabilities. While these are remarkable feats, they seem to miss a crucial point. If the essence of human life is merely to persist — regardless of its quality — then perhaps such advancements are sufficient. But what would life be without the healing presence of non-human nature? In our relentless pursuit of greatness — striving to become godlike — we have neglected what truly sustains and enriches us. A Native American proverb offers a sobering warning: 'Only when the last tree has been cut down, the last fish caught and the last stream poisoned, will we realise we cannot eat money.' I therefore conclude: Nature is dead. Nature remains dead. And we have killed it. In our striving to transcend the limits of our humanity, we have forsaken the very foundation upon which our existence depends. In our pursuit to become gods, we have severed ourselves from the sacred web of life, forgetting that our greatness is meaningless in a barren and broken world. The death of nature is not merely an ecological event — it is a profound existential crisis, a mirror reflecting the collapse of the human spirit itself. Until we recognise that our fate is inextricably bound to the fate of the Earth, all our triumphs will be hollow victories. In the end, the question remains: if we have killed what was holiest and mightiest among us, what is left within us worth saving? Emmanuel Anoghena Oboh is a PhD student of philosophy at the Centre of Applied Ethics at Stellenbosch University.

Our brains are being fried — here's why (and what to do about it)
Our brains are being fried — here's why (and what to do about it)

Daily Maverick

time22-04-2025

  • Daily Maverick

Our brains are being fried — here's why (and what to do about it)

You sit down to read a book. Two pages in and your eyes are moving but your brain is somewhere else. You're having dinner with someone you love, but your mind keeps flitting back to emails, calendar invites and that buzz in your pocket that wasn't actually a buzz. Congrats: you've entered the great brain fog of the 21st century. In 2012, German neuroscientist Manfred Spitzer coined the term digital dementia. It sounds a bit like something out of a Black Mirror plotline, but this phenomenon is real and rising. Today, the term digital dementia is used by researchers all over the world to describe the forgetfulness, mental fatigue and chronic inability to focus that results from tech overuse. In plain speak: our brains weren't built for this much screen time. We're living in a state of partial attention, constantly switching between tabs, chats and apps. Never going deep, always skimming the surface. Our phones aren't just stealing our attention, they're actually making changes to our brains and rewiring how we think, feel and connect. This is your brain on phones Scientists have found mounting evidence that frequent smartphone use takes a toll on our brain's ability to think clearly and flexibly. A review in Frontiers in Psychology shows that media multitasking (common when we're switching between apps, messages and tabs) disrupts working memory, shortens attention spans and reduces cognitive flexibility. This happens because our brains are fundamentally bad at multitasking, yet our devices constantly demand it. Each ping or vibration yanks our attention in a new direction, interrupting focus and pushing us into what researchers call a state of 'continuous partial attention', a fragmented mental mode that has been directly linked to decreased cognitive performance. These constant interruptions don't just break concentration, they activate our stress response repeatedly, creating microstressors with no physical outlet. It's like preparing to run from a tiger over and over again… but never actually running. Over time, this invisible mental load builds up, leaving us foggy, irritable and on the brink of burnout. The cognitive consequences don't stop when we put our phones down either. A study in the Journal of the Association for Consumer Research found that even the sound of a notification (without checking the phone) reduced people's ability to stay focused on demanding tasks. And in a separate experiment from the University of Texas, participants with their phones placed in another room significantly outperformed those who had their phones nearby, even if the devices were turned off. Follow-up research confirms that merely having an electronic device in sight can drain working memory and diminish attention. One Athabasca University (Canada) study found that in-class multitasking with a laptop is negatively correlated with academic performance, not just for the user, but for all others within sightline of the screen. How to reclaim your brain Okay, deep breath. We're not here to fearmonger, we're here to problem-solve. If digital dementia is the enemy, here are a few small but mighty ways to push back. 1 Out of sight, out of mind Leaving your phone on silent clearly isn't enough. Studies show that even seeing someone else's phone on a table is enough to tank your focus. We've trained our brains to see that glowing rectangle as the epicentre of everything: work, social life, entertainment, responsibility. Even when it's doing nothing, it's screaming everything. Try this: when you want to focus, put your phone in another room. Out of sight, out of temptation's reach. 2 Stop charging it in the bedroom The bedroom is ground zero for bad phone habits. Most people charge their phones on their bedside tables. That means easy access to late-night reading, doomscrolling and waking up to a blaring notification instead of a calm morning. Want to sleep better, stress less and maybe even wake up in a good mood? Plug your phone in somewhere else and get yourself an old-school alarm clock. It may feel like an inconvenience, but your brain will thank you. 3 Take a digital sabbath Pick a day and go completely device-free. Yes, it'll feel weird at first, like reaching for a phantom limb. But eventually it becomes a reset button. Studies show that even short breaks from tech – especially when spent outdoors – can restore focus and boost cognitive function in very little time. Call it a digital detox, or just call it Saturday. Either way, give your mind a break. 4 Train for depth If reading a book feels impossible right now, don't despair. Attention is a muscle. All it needs is reps. Start with 10 minutes of deep reading a day – ideally a real book, not an article with 17 pop-ups and a cookie warning. At first, your brain will squirm, but stick with it, and you'll notice that it gets easier. Deeper focus leads to deeper thinking, and that's a skill worth rebuilding. 5 Spend time in your head Remember when being bored was just… normal? Waiting in line, sitting in traffic, staring out the window? Not anymore. Now every micro-moment gets filled with a scroll, a tap, a podcast, a refresh. We've replaced daydreaming and quiet with constant input. But if we never let ourselves just be, then our inner world starts to feel unfamiliar, even uncomfortable. The more uncomfortable we feel in these quiet moments, the more tempted we will be to reach for our devices to fill the void. Try reclaiming those small windows instead. A walk without a podcast. A drive without Spotify. A wait without the feed. Let your mind wander – after all, that's where ideas live. Don't aim for the moon, just put in some boundaries Look, we're not aiming for digital purity here. Nobody's throwing their phone in the ocean. For better or worse, we are part of a connected world and we need to be reachable. We just need better boundaries. Right now, our phones are winning, dictating how we spend our time, how we focus, even how we feel. But we can fight back, one habit, one choice and one new boundary at a time. You don't need a complete lifestyle overhaul. You just need a little more intention. And maybe an alarm clock that isn't also a pocket-sized casino. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store