Shocking video appears to show father of three US Marines being beaten by masked agents in parking lot
Graphic new video footage appears to show the moment multiple masked men in U.S. Border Patrol vests beat a father of three U.S. Marines in the street, before he was bundled into the back of an unmarked car.
Narciso Barranco, 48, a landscaper from Tustin in Southern California, was left bloodied and visibly shaken after being violently detained by at least seven alleged immigration officers while working outside of an IHOP on Saturday.
In one short video first posted by Santa Ana Councilman Johnathan Hernandez and the social Instagram account @Santaanaproblems, alleged Customs and Border Protection agents struck Barranco in the head at least six times, thrusting his face into the concrete and kneeling on his neck, before he was forced into the back of a light-colored Chevrolet SUV using a truncheon.
Barranco's shoulder was left dislocated, his eldest son, Alejandro, a 25-year-old Marine veteran, told the Los Angeles Times.
Councilman Hernandez's office has 'made themselves available to help with City resources,' according to the post.
In a second, close-up recording shared by the social media account, alleged agents wrestled a string trimmer from Barranco's hands.
Screams and high-pitched whines could be heard from Barranco as several alleged officers knelt on top of his body, pinning him to the floor as cars drove past honking their horns.
'Give me your hand,' one agent said to Barranco, which was returned with further squeals.
'Ey, leave him alone bro!,' a person filming from a nearby vehicle shouted.
One of the alleged agents, sporting a balaclava and sunglasses, briefly unholstered what appears to be a pistol before placing it back on his hip.
Barranco's arrest comes against the backdrop of the Trump administration's ongoing workplace raids across the nation. They sparked a wave of demonstrations that resulted in the president deploying the National Guard and U.S. Marines to LA in an attempt to end the unrest.
Alejandro Barranco, who served with the Marine Cops in Afghanistan, told the Santanero that his father was transferred to a detention facility in LA.
The younger Barranco, who said his two younger brothers are active serving with the Marines, said his father was able to make a call and asked him to 'finish the job he was doing when he got detained.'
He confirmed to the newspaper that his father had already begun the process of establishing his citizenship before Saturday's arrest.
'I didn't really know what to say. I was still in shock and distress. I do believe my father was racially profiled – they didn't ask him anything,' Alejandro Barranco said. 'They just started chasing him, and he ran because he was scared. He didn't know who was after him.'
The military veteran added that his father was a law-abiding person who was kind and courteous to those in his neighborhood.
'He has always worked hard to put food on the table for us and my mom,' he said. 'He was always careful and always did his taxes on time. He never caused any problems and he is known as a kind and helping person by everyone in our community.'
The family has launched a GoFundMe campaign called 'Justice for Narciso: Assaulted and detained by CBP,' which had raised more than $64,500 by Monday morning to help cover Barranco's legal and medical costs.
'He was pepper sprayed and punched in the face multiple times by these masked and unidentified 'officers,'' the fundraiser organizer wrote. 'He is a good, hard working man. He has raised his family here and has established himself here. What we ALL saw today was disgusting and heart wrenching.'
The Independent has contacted the CBP for more information.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Nationwide McDonald's Boycott This Week: Latest Update From Organizer
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The organization behind a nationwide boycott of McDonald's that is set to start on Tuesday said the movement is "about more than burgers and fries." As part of its ongoing "Economic Blackout Tour," The People's Union USA, the movement behind recent boycotts of Target and Walmart, is urging Americans to refrain from eating at the fast-food chain between June 24 and June 30. "This is about power," the organization said in a post shared by its founder John Schwarz on Instagram on Saturday. "When we unite and hit corporations in their wallets, they listen." Newsweek has reached out to McDonald's via email for comment. Why It Matters The first half of 2025 has been marked by boycotts of several household-name companies, sparked by certain corporations rolling back diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, as well as wider pushback against practices such as tax avoidance and underpaying workers. Since late 2023, McDonald's has also been battling a boycott led by the pro-Palestinian Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement for alleged complicity with the actions of the Israeli military in the Gaza Strip. What To Know The People's Union USA describes itself on its website as "a grassroots movement focused on economic resistance, corporate accountability, and real justice for the working class." Since February, the group has orchestrated boycotts of Amazon, Walmart and Target, as well as periodic "economic blackouts," during which it says Americans should "avoid shopping, streaming, online orders, fast food, and everything in between," and rely exclusively on small, local businesses. The movement said it is demanding "fair taxes, an end to price gouging, real equality, and corporate accountability" through its upcoming boycott of McDonald's. Last week, The People's Union USA accused McDonald's in an Instagram post of engaging in "performative DEI with no meaningful change." The movement also alleged that the company pays its workers low wages and suppresses workers' rights and union efforts. An exterior view of the McDonald's restaurant at the Lycoming Mall. An exterior view of the McDonald's restaurant at the Lycoming Mall. Alamy Live News via AP What People Are Saying The People's Union USA in an Instagram post shared by founder John Schwarz: "This is a show of strength, solidarity, and people powered change. Let them feel it. Let them hear us. Let this be just the beginning." Chris Kempczinski, chairman and CEO of McDonald's Corporation, in a January 2024 LinkedIn post: "I also recognize that several markets in the Middle East and some outside the region are experiencing a meaningful business impact due to the war and associated misinformation that is affecting brands like McDonald's. This is disheartening and ill-founded." Genna Gent, vice president of government relations for McDonald's, in a 2019 letter to the National Restaurant Association and obtained by Politico: "Going forward, McDonald's Corporation will not use our resources, including lobbyists or staff, to oppose minimum wage increases at the federal, state or local levels. Nor will we participate in the association advocacy efforts designed expressly to defeat wage increases." What Happens Next? The People's Union USA said it is planning an economic blackout for July 4, along with boycotts of Starbucks, Amazon and Home Depot throughout the month. During the month of August, the movement is planning boycotts of Walmart, McDonald's and Lowe's. Do you have a story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Detained man would rather return to Venezuela than remain in harsh conditions at Krome
A Venezuelan man currently detained at the Krome detention center in Miami says he would rather return to the country he fled, despite fearing for his life, than remain locked up in what he describes as inhumane conditions in U.S. immigration detention. Nerwys Alexandro Reyes Pineda, 42, entered the U.S. in July 2024 through the Mexican border using a Customs and Border Protection app known as CBP One that the Biden administration had set up to schedule entries by migrants seeking asylum. After being granted parole by an immigration officer, he initially settled in Houston, where he lived with his girlfriend for eight months and obtained a work permit and driver's license. But his situation changed dramatically on June 10, when his asylum claim was dismissed. He was arrested during a routine appointment at the Miramar Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility and has since been held at the Krome detention center. He has told his family that the conditions are so unbearable he is now considering returning on his own to Venezuela. Reyes Pineda's girlfriend, Kelly Bormita, said he and more than 100 other detainees at Krome are being held without access to showers, beds or blankets. He has remained in the same black shirt, gray pants, and black shoes he wore to his ICE appointment and was not permitted to shower for the first seven days of his detention, she said. 'They treat us like animals. We're shackled at the feet, hands, and waist,' Bormita says Reyes Pineda told her during a recent phone call. 'He told me he would rather be deported than wait in detention for months just to see if he qualifies for a credible fear interview,' she said, referring to the screening by immigration officials to see if a migrant facing deportation removal has a 'credible fear' of persecution or torture if they are returned to their country. 'He doesn't want to be locked up like a criminal.' He also told her that several Cuban detainees in Krome have been waiting over four months to argue their asylum claims, and he fears going through the same ordeal. Reyes didn't sign his deportation order when he first arrived at Krome and is now waiting for a deportation officer to process it while still awaiting his credible-fear interview, Bormita said. She says he no longer wants to remain at Krome. 'If they don't grant him parole to fight his case, he would rather be deported to Venezuela,' she said. Earlier this year, the Miami Herald reported that hundreds of immigrants swept up in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown remain detained at Krome under dire conditions. The Herald interviewed former detainees, as well as attorneys and family members, who described a facility stretched to its breaking point, with detainees in a state of physical and emotional desperation, conditions that echo Reyes Pineda's account. Read More: 'Inhumane:' Overcrowding strains Krome detention center amid Trump's immigrant crackdown In recent months, members of Congress, including U.S. Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Frederica Wilson and Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick have visited the Krome North Service Processing Center, the Broward Transitional Center and other South Florida facilities holding ICE detainees. The Democratic lawmakers have been outspoken critics of conditions at the centers amid concerns over overcrowding and detainee deaths. In January and February, two men died while detained at Krome. Although autopsies ruled their deaths natural, the Herald uncovered reports suggesting questionable medical treatment. In April, a Haitian woman also died at the Broward Transitional Center. The Trump administration is encouraging migrants to self-deport using the CBP One mobile app — the same platform previously used under the Biden administration to schedule lawful entry appointments at the U.S.-Mexico border — to notify U.S. immigration authorities of their intent to leave. Under this new policy, the administration is offering $1,000 and a free flight home to undocumented immigrants who voluntarily return to their countries of origin. However, it remains unclear whether Reyes would be eligible, as he is already in detention and could face forced deportation if the asylum officer determines he does not have a credible fear of returning to Venezuela. System in crisis Maria Zequeira, an immigration attorney consulted by Reyes' family though not formally retained, says he followed all government procedures when he filed his asylum petition after she met with him at Krome. She believes immigration authorities denied his case based on a far stricter and more punitive interpretation of the law — an approach that gained traction under the Trump administration. 'The administration is ignoring years of established legal procedures meant to protect asylum seekers,' said Zequeira, who has practiced immigration law since 1990. 'These claims are being dismissed based on a far harsher reading of the law, and often in alignment with policy shifts rather than legal merits. In Reyes Pineda's case, the judge ruled on the matter over his objection without any discussion.' Reyes Pineda's case raises broader questions about how immigration cases are being managed. Attorneys for the Department of Homeland Security moved to dismiss deportation cases that were already pending before immigration judges. That is significant because people with active cases in immigration court cannot be placed into expedited removal, a fast-track administrative process that bypasses judicial review and is commonly used by the government to deport people quickly. By dismissing the court cases, DHS effectively opened the door for ICE to transfer those people into expedited removal proceedings, where they have far fewer legal protections. Several immigration attorneys told the Herald they believe recent arrests are being driven by a DHS memo in January that instructs ICE agents to consider placing immigrants into expedited removal proceedings if they have been in the U.S. for less than two years. Those proceedings allow for deportations without a hearing before an immigration judge. 'Take all steps necessary to review the alien's case and consider, in exercising your enforcement discretion, whether to apply expedited removal. This may include steps to terminate any ongoing removal proceeding,' the memo reads. READ MORE: ICE agents in Miami find new spot to carry out arrests: Immigration court 'I've never seen anything like this before,' Zequeira added. 'Such draconian interpretations of long-established processes meant to protect refugees and asylees simply didn't exist before the Trump era. It seems this administration is determined to dismantle the legal protections designed for the most vulnerable: asylees.' Fleeing Venezuela Before fleeing Venezuela, Reyes Pineda worked as a taxi driver in Zulia, a border state undergoing by economic collapse and plagued by armed bandits. In 2015, he was arrested for allegedly smuggling basic groceries—sugar, rice, pasta, soap, milk and toothpaste—after buying them at a local supermarket and crossing into Colombia to find medicine for his youngest son. He was stopped by Venezuelan border guards, detained and imprisoned for 45 days. In a sworn affidavit submitted as part of his U.S. asylum case, Reyes Pineda described being threatened and robbed by Colombian guerrilla groups operating near the border. He later made the treacherous journey through the Darién Gap on the Colombia-Panama border to reach the United States. In his 2024 application for asylum, he cited the risk of psychological torture and ongoing persecution if he were forced to return. Although he was sentenced in Venezuela to two years and 10 months in prison for the alleged smuggling offense, he never served time. His case was delayed for six years due to procedural backlogs, and the charges were ultimately dropped after the statute of limitations expired. According to Venezuelan legal experts, he is no longer at risk of imprisonment for that offense if he returns home. However, it remains unclear how deported Venezuelans are treated upon arrival, as there is little public information about the thousands of Venezuelans deported during the first five months of the Trump administration under agreements with the Nicolás Maduro regime. READ MORE: U.S. speeds up Venezuelan deportations as thousands are sent back under Trump crackdown In his 2024 affidavit, Reyes Pineda said his fear of returning to Venezuela remains real. Yet he now faces a painful dilemma: endure what he describes as inhumane detention conditions while awaiting a credible fear parole hearing, or risk returning to the very country he once fled. 'The economic crisis in Venezuela was devastating. Access to healthcare was nearly impossible, and I was forced to flee the country due to the imminent danger I faced,' Reyes said in his affidavit. 'I continue to live in fear of returning, as the psychological trauma remains — and I know that Maduro does not forget those who have dared to oppose him.'
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
How this lawyer used AI to help him win a $1.5 million case
Some lawyers continue to fall for made-up cases generated by artificial intelligence. Others are quietly finding ways to make the technology work for them. Joseph McMullen, a San Diego civil rights and criminal defense attorney, is one of them. Last year, he said, he used AI-powered legal software to help him win a major case by sifting through evidence and making his filings more persuasive. The case that led McMullen to rethink his tools started with a 9-year-old girl, a passport photo, and a border agent who thought something didn't add up. In 2019, Julia, a fourth grader, and her 14-year-old brother, Oscar, rose early every weekday morning to cross the US-Mexico border to go to school. The siblings were born in the US but lived in a Tijuana border town, court records show. For local kids, the commute was as familiar as brushing their teeth. They'd crossed the border many times without incident until March 18, when a US Customs and Border Protection officer noticed a dot on Julia's passport photo that looked like a mole she didn't have in person. Julia was taken to a secondary inspection area and interviewed alone, which the court would later find violated the agency's policy on questioning children. In a lawsuit, the family alleged that border officers pressured her to claim she was her Mexican cousin. The government denied any coercion and argued that the length of the children's detention was justified because Julia repeatedly identified herself as her cousin. A Customs and Border Protection spokesperson declined to comment. Julia was detained for 34 hours, and Oscar for roughly 14 hours, before they were reunited with their mother. Swearing off ChatGPT As he built his lawsuit against Customs and Border Protection over the children's detention, McMullen, who runs his own law practice, turned to technology to interpret the evidence. By early 2024, he had three federal civil trials in three months. Time was short, and help was scarce. He approached tools such as ChatGPT with deep skepticism. In one of his early tests, the chatbot surfaced a case that seemed perfect — until he realized it didn't exist. "That was it. Never again," he said. Barely a month went by without another story of a lawyer getting burned by bogus case law. Judges were catching on. A public database maintained by the legal data analyst Damien Charlotin lists 120 cases in which courts caught lawyers using fake or hallucinated citations. Most of the cases were in the US in the past 18 months. Still, the idea of using AI stuck with McMullen. Unlike lawyers who lean heavily on case law, he spends most of his time combing through police reports, surveillance footage, transcripts, and emails, then figuring out what he has, what's missing, and what story the evidence tells. He wondered how better tech could help him, like taking a metal detector to a haystack. Get to the point There was no jury in his trial against CBP, which meant US District Judge Gonzalo Curiel would make the decision. That made written filings even more crucial. "It was important to make it as easy as possible for [Curiel] to get the information that I really wanted him to look at," McMullen said. Another attorney recommended Clearbrief, a tool that integrates with Microsoft Word and lets lawyers link every factual claim to the underlying evidence. The plug-in recognizes citations using natural language processing and automatically generates links to relevant case law or documents. When an attorney files a brief using Clearbrief, a judge or any recipient can open a hyperlinked version in Word or a browser. Each citation becomes interactive: Clicking on one pulls up the exact source text side-by-side with the brief, allowing the reader to verify claims faster without digging through exhibits or databases. While preparing for trial, McMullen found a California unlawful detainment case that had resulted in a large damages award. To try to steer Curiel toward a similar judgment, he used Clearbrief to link an appellate brief from that case — buried deep in a district court docket — directly in his trial memo. McMullen said being concise in briefs isn't just about saving time; it's a persuasive strategy in itself. Effective advocacy, he said, isn't about "inundating a finder of fact with all the evidence," but presenting "the most important things that you need to know." (He's certain Curiel and his clerks were thorough in their review.) "Being efficient with anyone's time is persuasive," he said. Clearbrief and the competition Lawyers can also use Microsoft Word to hyperlink text. The Clearbrief difference, its founder and CEO, Jacqueline Schafer, said, is that it automatically creates the hyperlinks and checks the citations against databases such as LexisNexis and vLex Fastcase. The tool flags any mismatch between what the lawyer writes and what the source says. Schafer said it speeds up drafting and reduces the burden on judges to confirm that every citation is accurate and not the product of an AI hallucination. Clearbrief's client list includes law firms, courts, and legal departments with names such as Hogan Lovells, Microsoft, and the American Arbitration Association. The service starts at $200 a month per user for solo practitioners and small teams, with higher rates for larger organizations. Westlaw and LexisNexis also offer tools to assist with legal research and drafting, but they don't affect how the final document appears to the court or recipient. Another Clearbrief feature McMullen relied on was timelines. The tool turned over dozens of depositions and other records and created a case chronology, complete with hyperlinks to the source documents that support the dates and events shown in the timeline. McMullen didn't submit the timeline in court — it was "maybe a thousand lines," he said — but he read it closely in trial prep to make sure he hadn't missed anything. Better outcomes Last year, Curiel ruled that CBP falsely imprisoned the siblings and was liable for the "intentional infliction of emotional distress" in the 2019 incident. Oscar's grades went down. Julia suffered from insomnia and nightmares. Their parents sought therapy for them both. Curiel wrote in his decision that the government's conduct was "beyond the bounds" of what is "usually tolerated in a civilized community. " He ruled that the agency must pay the family $1.5 million in total damages. The US government appealed the decision and then dropped its appeal. Many legal tech startups promise lawyers they'll be able to take on more cases. For McMullen, the promise of AI isn't about churning through more cases so much as going deeper on the ones he has. He said he used the time he saved to visit Julia's family in Mexico. "There are several aspects of the practice that are gratifying," McMullen said. But, "there's not a single person who says, 'I really love the tedium of formatting that table.'"
