logo
How much will you save or lose with Trump's ‘big' tax bill?

How much will you save or lose with Trump's ‘big' tax bill?

Washington Post4 hours ago

How much will you save or lose with Trump's 'big' tax bill?
President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress are on the cusp of passing legislation to make permanent trillions of dollars of tax cuts enacted in 2017.
Besides extending those tax cuts, which disproportionately benefit high earners, the measure also would reduce spending on safety net programs, which benefit low-income households.
All told, the measure would mark a significant shift in federal benefits from low-income to high-income households, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and other independent analyses.
See how your finances — and those of other Americans — would change using this calculator, which was developed in partnership with Penn Wharton Budget Model. The calculator shows the estimated effects of the House-passed bill compared with the 2024 tax year.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Pick a profile
... or enter your info
We will not store your income or personal data.
Unmarried, 2 kids, $20K
Married, 2 kids, $60K
Married, 3 kids, $110K
Married, no kids, $450K
Senior, $90K
Your profile
Meet Tara
She makes $20,000 per year and has two kids. She files as single, and her whole family uses SNAP and Medicaid benefits. Because of benefit cuts in the bill, she would be about $870 worse off than last year.
HOUSEHOLD FINANCES Annual income $20,000 Household size 3 people Location California Government benefits Medicaid and SNAP
Effects of the tax bill
Tax changes
$751
Benefits/policy change
-$1,621 TOTAL CHANGE -$870
Key changes for Tara
Cuts to Medicaid and SNAP could hurt low-income earners
Families with low incomes, especially those that rely on SNAP and Medicaid, would have their finances hit hard. Republicans have proposed deep cuts to social safety net programs to try to reduce the bill's effect on the national debt.
The plans to cut Medicaid could lead to 16 million people losing health care coverage over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
It would also add new qualification and cost-sharing requirements, including co-pays for beneficiaries above 100 percent of the federal poverty level and work requirements for some adults. The bill would cap the expansion of future SNAP benefits and pass more of the cost to state governments. States could be forced to either find room in their budgets to keep funding the program at its current levels, or cut benefits.
How the tax bill affects
Tara compared to others
+0 +10k +20k +30k $500K+ $450-499K $400-449K $350-399K $300-349K $250-299K $200-249K $180-199K $160-179K $140-159K $120-139K $100-119K $80-99K $60-79K $40-59K $20-39K $0-19K Household income Total change 20th percentile 80th percentile Median $23,093
Read another profile
Unmarried, 2 kids, $20K
Married, 2 kids, $60K
Married, 3 kids, $110K
Married, no kids, $450K
Senior, $90K
Your profile
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Other key bill impacts
The One Big Beautiful Bill extends tax cuts from Trump's first term, implements new campaign proposals — including no taxes on tips and overtime wages — and seeks to offset the cost with large cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program formerly known as food stamps.
'The bill creates a fair amount of new debt, and somebody has to pay for that. It's not true that everybody's going to be a winner from it,' said Kent Smetters, faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model, which built a model for The Washington Post that shows how people's financial outcomes would be better or worse under the bill.
The legislation is expected to help many middle- and high-income earners, but it could deal a blow to low-income earners, especially those who rely on Medicaid and SNAP.
Republicans have argued that the bill will usher in a broad economic boom, while Democrats have expressed concern that the legislation would add trillions to the already high national debt.
No taxes on tips and overtime
One of Trump's campaign pledges, this provision would exempt overtime wages from taxes through a new deduction. The legislation wouldn't allow 'highly compensated employees,' or people without a Social Security number to claim the deduction.
Trump also campaigned on ending taxes on tips. The legislation would allow a deduction for the total amount of tipped income received. It contains some guardrails to prevent 'highly compensated employees' from claiming their earnings as tips and specifically identifies food service, hair care, nail care, aesthetics, and body and spa treatments as applicable professions that would be eligible for the deduction.
Boost to child tax credit
The bill includes a temporary $500 increase in the child tax credit, bringing it to $2,500 through 2028. It would then return to $2,000 and increase to account for inflation. The legislation limits eligibility to parents or guardians with Social Security numbers.
A deduction for seniors
The bill adds $4,000 to the standard deduction for taxpayers 65 or older, giving a financial boost to many seniors. The policy would be in place for four years and taper off as a recipient's income increases. Trump originally pledged to end taxes on Social Security benefits, which the bill did not include.
High income-earners benefit from many parts of the bill
High-income earners are among the biggest winners of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The measure extends the tax cuts enacted in 2017 and includes several provisions that benefit wealthy Americans, such as expanding the estate tax exemption, extending a tax cut for the highest income bracket and increasing a deduction for certain 'pass-through' business entities.
Specific provisions, such as the expanded child tax credit and a higher cap on the state and local tax deduction, or SALT, also benefit those with higher incomes.
House Republicans rejected a push to raise taxes on top earners, which Trump and some allies had suggested.
SALT deduction
One of the biggest issues dividing lawmakers during negotiations has been the cap on the state and local tax deduction, or SALT, which allows itemizing filers to write off what they paid in local taxes from their federal tax return. The legislation raises the cap from $10,000 to $40,000 for taxpayers earning up to $500,000.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NATO commits to higher spending sought by Trump and mutual defense
NATO commits to higher spending sought by Trump and mutual defense

USA Today

time7 minutes ago

  • USA Today

NATO commits to higher spending sought by Trump and mutual defense

While Trump got what he wanted at the brief NATO summit, his allies will be relieved he committed to the fundamental principle of collective defense. THE HAGUE, June 25 (Reuters) - NATO leaders on June 25 backed the big increase in defense spending that President Donald Trump had demanded, and restated their commitment to defend each other from attack. While Trump got what he wanted at the brief summit, tailor-made for him, his NATO allies will be relieved that he committed to the fundamental principle of collective defense after less clear-cut language on June 24. In a five-point statement, NATO endorsed a higher defence spending goal of 5% of GDP by 2035 - a response not only to Trump but also to Europeans' fears that Russia poses a growing threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. More: Israel-Iran ceasefire seems to hold as Trump lands in Europe for NATO summit The 32 allies' brief communique added: "We reaffirm our ironclad commitment to collective defense as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty – that an attack on one is an attack on all." Asked to clarify his own stance on Article 5, Trump said: "I stand with it. That's why I'm here. If I didn't stand with it, I wouldn't be here." Macron brings up trade war at NATO summit Trump had long demanded in no uncertain terms that for other countries step up their spending on defense to reduce NATO's heavy reliance on the U.S. Despite an appearance of general agreement, French President Emmanuel Macron raised the issue of the steep import tariffs threatened by Trump, and the damage they may do to transatlantic trade, as a barrier to increased defense spending. More: Can Trump pull off peace plans, trade deals at the G7? What to know about the summit "You cannot come to us as allies and ask that we spend more, tell us we will spend more at NATO - and do a trade war. It's an aberration," he told reporters. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who hosted the summit in his home city of The Hague, said NATO would emerge as a 'stronger, fairer and more lethal' alliance. He had earlier acknowledged that it was not easy for European countries and Canada to find the extra money, but said it was vital to do so. "There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that, given this threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative," the former Dutch prime minister told reporters in his home city of The Hague. The new spending target - to be achieved over the next 10 years - is a jump worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the current goal of 2% of GDP, although it will be measured differently. Countries would spend 3.5% of GDP on core defence - such as troops and weapons - and 1.5% on broader defence-related measures such as cyber security, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle heavy military vehicles. All NATO members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal and can meet its commitments by spending much less. More: Trump says US strike impaired Iran's nukes. What does Pentagon say? Live updates Rutte disputes that but accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez as part of his efforts to give Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly. Spain said on June 25 that it did not expect its stance to have any repercussions. Trump meets Zelenskyy after summit Rutte kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge to try to avert any friction with Trump. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had to settle for attending the pre-summit June 24 dinner rather than the main meeting on June 25, although he met Trump separately after the conference ended. The Kremlin on June 24 accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarization and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in defense spending.

Inside King Charles' Plans for Donald Trump's Historic State Visit
Inside King Charles' Plans for Donald Trump's Historic State Visit

Newsweek

time12 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Inside King Charles' Plans for Donald Trump's Historic State Visit

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. King Charles III's plan to invite Donald Trump for a private meeting in Scotland over the summer has been sunk by protocol paving the way for a historic formal state visit for the president later this year. The formal invitation, known as a "Manu Regia," was hand delivered last week and the wheels are in motion for Trump to be the first U.S. president to be treated to the grandeur of two State Visits to Britain. King Charles signed the formal invite by hand, as is tradition, and there will be formal confirmation of the dates in due course, though it is expected to come in September. King Charles III and Donald Trump raise their glasses during a dinner at Winfield House, in London, during the President's first state visit to Britain, on June 4, 2019. King Charles III and Donald Trump raise their glasses during a dinner at Winfield House, in London, during the President's first state visit to Britain, on June 4, one stage, the king had hoped for a more informal meeting in Scotland, where the royals spend their summer holiday. Balmoral and Dumfries House, the stately home he has brought back to life with his charity, The King's Foundation, were both mooted as possible venues. That would have provided a unique opportunity for the king to work the royal family's famous soft power diplomacy in private. It would enable them to discreetly exchange their differing views of Canada, Trump seeing the nation as a potential 51st state of the U.S, His Majesty standing by it as an independent country, and part of the British Commonwealth. Much of Trump's diplomacy is conducted in front of the cameras, including the moment Prime Minister Keir Starmer first handed Trump a letter from Charles indicating Britain wanted to host him for the second state visit. That was back in February and took many by surprise, with the actual text of Charles' letter readable in the high resolution press images captured as it was waved around the Oval Office. One passage read that there is "much on both estates which I think you might … enjoy—particularly as my Foundation at Dumfries House provides hospitality skills training for young people who often end up as staff in your establishments. "Quite apart from this presenting an opportunity to discuss a wide range of issues of mutual interest, it would also offer a valuable chance to plan a historic second State Visit to the United Kingdom." Needless to say, the Scottish visit has been scuppered by protocol which dictates that private meetings cannot come before a state visit. Newsweek understands all sides, including the British Government, are on the same page and relations remain good. And make no mistake, no matter how contentious a figure Trump may be internationally, and in Britain, the warmth is not just for show. The attitude at the palace is that leaders who like the royal family are generally easy to host, and Trump's team hold the British Monarchy in high regard. Earlier this year, a source summed up the feeling to Newsweek: "Everyone who was around at the time when the President visited recalls it with genuine warmth and actually both the team and the principals were incredibly courteous, polite, engaged and engaging. So it's one of those visits that's remembered with great affection and positivity here." There may not be all that many on the world stage who can describe the relationship in such uncomplicated terms, as Volodymyr Zelensky found out in the Oval Office earlier this year when he was ambushed by JD Vance. And indeed, both Israel and Iran got a dose of the other side of Trump this week when he told journalists: "They don't know what the f*** they're doing." But the Monarchy in the modern era has an uncomplicated relationship with Trump, who was glowing about the royal welcome he received on his first U.K. state visit in 2019. "London part of trip is going really well," he wrote on X, then known as Twitter, in 2019. "The Queen and the entire Royal family have been fantastic. The relationship with the United Kingdom is very strong. "Tremendous crowds of well-wishers and people that love our Country. Haven't seen any protests yet, but I'm sure the Fake News will be working hard to find them. Great love all around. Also, big Trade Deal is possible once U.K. gets rid of the shackles. Already starting to talk!" Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on Twitter at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page. Do you have a question about King Charles III, William and Kate, Meghan and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@ We'd love to hear from you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store