logo
Bank surveillance and poverty risk: UBIC warns of devastating impact on Sassa beneficiaries

Bank surveillance and poverty risk: UBIC warns of devastating impact on Sassa beneficiaries

The Citizen10-06-2025
Since 2022, UBIC reports that 90% of SRD grant exclusions have been erroneous.
The Universal Basic Income Coalition (UBIC) has issued an urgent warning to parliament that new National Treasury budget conditions for the South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) could 'plunge millions of South Africa's most vulnerable into deeper poverty and exclusion'.
In a letter to parliament's portfolio committee on social development dated 9 June 2025, UBIC outlined how Treasury's requirements would subject beneficiaries of major social grants to intrusive verification systems that threaten constitutional rights and essential social protections.
The coalition warns that the measures could affect up to 6 million children and 3.5 million caregivers, along with potentially millions of seniors and persons with disabilities, through systems that have already proven fundamentally flawed in their application to other grants.
Mass surveillance and constitutional violations
According to the coalition, the new conditions, disclosed by Sassa and the Department of Social Development in a parliamentary presentation on 23 April 2025, would apply extensive verification systems across all major grants, including the Child Support Grant, Old Age Grant, Disability Grant and Care Dependency Grant.
UBIC warned in its letter to the committee that these measures 'will have devastating consequences for babies, children, caregivers (mostly women), older persons, and people with disabilities. They amount to a mass violation of constitutional rights and roll back access to essential social protections.'
As UBIC stated in its submission, 'many of these methods – first used to administer the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant, have been found to be unconstitutional by the High Court and have already wrongly excluded millions from accessing their entitlements.'
ALSO READ: Basic Income Grant implementation postponed again
Flawed systems extended despite court findings
There are approximately 9.2 million Sassa SRD recipients.
Since 2022, UBIC reports that 90% of SRD grant exclusions have been erroneous, yet Treasury is now requiring Sassa to extend these same flawed systems to all major social grants.
The coalition points to this track record as evidence that the new measures will create widespread wrongful exclusions rather than genuine fraud prevention.
It says the verification systems include invasive monthly bank surveillance combined with undisclosed credit bureau data, cross-referencing with inaccurate government databases, including UIF and Nsfas, profiling beneficiaries for fraud risk, and mandatory biometric verification requirements.
Particularly concerning to UBIC is a proposed reduction in the Child Support Grant's means test threshold, which they argue is unconscionable given that 70% of South African children live in poverty.
Mass suspensions without due process
The coalition warns that the new system would enable mass suspension of beneficiaries without notice, placing the burden on individuals to disprove blanket allegations of fraud rather than requiring Sassa to prove wrongdoing before suspending benefits.
This approach represents a fundamental shift in due process that could leave vulnerable families without essential support while they navigate complex bureaucratic processes to restore their benefits.
ALSO READ: Themba Matlou officially new Sassa's CEO: Here's what we know
Transparency crisis and hidden data
UBIC also flagged a growing transparency crisis, noting that Sassa has ceased publishing SRD grant data despite the program being the third-largest item in the country's social assistance budget.
In a media statement dated 27 May 2025, Sassa revealed that 210,000 beneficiaries have been placed under review based on credit bureau data, with grants potentially recoverable as debt.
The coalition argues this lack of transparency makes it impossible for civil society and Parliament to properly oversee the administration of social grants and protect beneficiaries' rights.
Basic income support policy concerns
UBIC's submission comes as the Department of Social Development and Treasury prepare to finalise a long-awaited Basic Income Support policy.
The coalition believes this policy has undergone substantial revisions since the last public consultations in March 2023 and is calling for the draft to be made public for consultation before it reaches Cabinet.
The coalition emphasised that 'this is not just about numbers—it's about people's dignity, survival and constitutional rights.' They urged 'the Committee to act swiftly, hold National Treasury accountable, demand transparency and open the BIS policy to public scrutiny.'
ALSO READ: Sassa SRD grant to be 'converted' to basic income grant – Mbalula says [VIDEO]
Parliamentary action demanded
UBIC has made specific demands to parliament's portfolio committee on social development, calling for immediate action to halt the implementation of Treasury's conditions and ensure proper democratic oversight of social grant reforms.
The coalition is requesting that parliament demand the public release of the Basic Income Support policy draft before Cabinet submission, ensure public consultation on all grant-related reforms, and require Sassa to provide full, disaggregated SRD grant data.
UBIC has also requested the opportunity to formally present to the committee on these urgent issues, emphasising the need for swift parliamentary intervention to protect vulnerable South Africans from further exclusion from social support systems.
NOW READ: Pensioners desperate for clarity after not receiving Sassa grants in June
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Social Development Minister to probe alleged grant fraud in Breede Valley
Social Development Minister to probe alleged grant fraud in Breede Valley

IOL News

time2 days ago

  • IOL News

Social Development Minister to probe alleged grant fraud in Breede Valley

Minister of Social Development Sisisi Tolashe. Image: Picture: Henk Kruger / Independent Newspapers SOCIAL Development Minister Sisisi Tolashe is set to probe a fraudulent scheme in which hundreds of Worcester and Rawsonville residents, mostly 18-year-olds, were allegedly unknowingly registered for a R370 monthly poverty grant but never received any payments. The alarm was raised by GOOD councillors in the Breede Valley Municipality who uncovered the alleged fraud while working with community activists on a programme to help destitute residents apply for the South African Social Security Agency's (Sassa) Social Relief of Distress Grant (SRD). 'GOOD submitted a complaint to Sassa and the Hawks together with a dossier of 34 separate affidavits from victims of the scheme and a list detailing more than 300 additional victims. 'In its submission to Sassa and the Hawks, the GOOD Party suggests that the fraud is being committed by an individual or individuals with access to information about recipients of Child Support Grants. The modus operandi appears to use the ID numbers of children when they turn 18, and no longer qualify for the child grant, to apply for the SRD grant. The scale of the fraud is impossible for GOOD to determine. GOOD only became aware of it because its Councillors and party activists were working with the community in the Breede Valley region. The same type of fraud could be occurring across the province or the country,' GOOD secretary-general and MPL, Brett Herron said. The pattern they picked up showed that where hundreds of applicants should qualify for the grant, many of whom recently turned 18-years-old, they had their applications declined on the basis that their ID numbers were already linked to the grant. In other words, according to Sassa's system, they are already receiving the grant. According to the applicants, they have never applied for or received the grant. Many report in their affidavits that telephone numbers on Sassa's system linked to their ID numbers don't belong to them. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading 'While the investigation may take some time, GOOD calls on Sassa to make urgent interim arrangements to ensure that people qualifying for grants are not denied them due to Sassa systemic weaknesses.' Sassa did not respond to several requests for comment on the matter. Sandi Mbatsha, spokesperson to Tolashe confirmed she would look into the matter. The Hawks said they were assessing the case. Hawks spokesperson, Siyabulela Vukubi said: 'The Hawks are aware of the matter but still need to ascertain if this falls with our mandate. At this stage there is nothing to report.' Last year, Stellenbosch University students uncovered a similar trend: a survey of 60 students found that 58 had active SRD grant applications in Sassa's system, yet 56 said they had never applied, suggesting widespread fraud. The students also analysed data from Sassa's public portal and found nearly 75 000 applications for people born in February 2005, despite StatsSA showing only about 82 000 births that month, which pointed to a suspicious 91% application rate. Further analysis revealed that while the average application rate from those born between 1960 to 2006 was 52%, it jumped to 90% for those born between 2002 and 2006, the age group turning 18 since the grant was introduced in 2020. It raised concerns not only about who was receiving the money, but also about eligible individuals potentially being excluded from the support they need. Tolashe earlier this year said a full investigation would be launched into vulnerabilities across all social grants, after irregularities were uncovered in the SRD system. Tolashe did not respond to further requests for comment on the status of the investigation and what measures have been implemented to curb the incidents. Cape Times

South Africa gets R8.4 billion loan to help fix and improve its energy sector
South Africa gets R8.4 billion loan to help fix and improve its energy sector

The Citizen

time4 days ago

  • The Citizen

South Africa gets R8.4 billion loan to help fix and improve its energy sector

The money will be used to support the implementation of the Just Energy Transition (JET). South Africa has secured a $474.6 million (approximately R8.4 billion) loan from the African Development Bank (AfDB) to support the country's energy sector transition efforts. The National Treasury stated on Thursday that the money will be used to support the implementation of the Just Energy Transition (JET). JET is a strategic shift towards a low-carbon economy, specifically focusing on reducing reliance on fossil fuels, particularly coal, while ensuring a fair and equitable transition for those affected by the change. ALSO READ: SA's just energy transition: Why investing in gas is a bad idea Second loan with AfDB This is the second loan that the Treasury gets from the AfDB. This first one was concluded in 2023. 'This new agreement highlights the importance of South Africa's partnership with the AfDB in advancing South Africa's development agenda.' Treasury believes that this loan will strengthen efforts to improve energy security measures, accelerate the decarbonisation of the economy, and enhance socio-economic benefits of the energy transition, thereby enabling inclusive economic growth and fostering job creation. Loan is part of third Development Policy 'The loan is part of the third Development Policy Operation which includes participation from the World Bank, KFW Development Bank, Japan International Cooperation Agency, and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries Fund for International Development (OPEC Fund) to support structural reforms to enhance the efficiency, resilience, and sustainability of the country's infrastructure services,' read the statement. One of the JET's key aspects is transitioning away from fossil fuels, especially coal, towards renewable energy sources such as solar and wind, and exploring other low-carbon technologies. ALSO READ: 'There is hope' for SA's Just Energy Transition despite concerns about funding gap US withdraws from JET Partnership In March, the US withdrew from the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP), leaving SA in need of about $1.56 billion (about R28 billion) for its JETP financing. The United States government had pledged $1.56 billion for the country's decarbonisation during the Joe Biden presidency. 'This funding either needs to be found elsewhere or SA's climate change programme will need to be reprioritised,' said Professor Raymond Parsons from the North-West University Business School. NOW READ: SA's R1.5 trillion Just Energy Transition Investment Plan unpacked

Gigaba doesn't believe drawn-out budget process damaged Treasury's credibility
Gigaba doesn't believe drawn-out budget process damaged Treasury's credibility

Eyewitness News

time6 days ago

  • Eyewitness News

Gigaba doesn't believe drawn-out budget process damaged Treasury's credibility

JOHANNESBURG - African National Congress (ANC) Member of Parliament (MP) and former Minister of Finance Malusi Gigaba said he doesn't believe 2025's drawn-out budget process has damaged National Treasury's credibility. Treasury's budget process was tested for the first time when parties in the Government of National Unity (GNU) disagreed on fiscal policy, forcing leaders to backtrack on proposals. ALSO READ: - Higher Education Dept's budget passed amidst fiery exchanges between political parties - Police ministry's budget approved but concerns linger over 'rot' in SAPS - National Assembly passes several dept budgets despite objections from most opposition parties After three attempts since the aborted budget speech in February, Budget 2025 was finally passed in the National Assembly on Wednesday night. Gigaba, who just recently obtained his PhD, spoke to EWN, reflecting on how Treasury fared during the recent headwinds. Generally thought to be a respected and credible institution, the frustrating budget process put the National Treasury in a tight spot somewhere between fiscal consolidation and political manoeuvring. 'It remains a strong institution for South Africa, but obviously, Treasury now relies on the rest of government and on political parties to be able to negotiate and find compromises to ensure budget processes go ahead within the regulated timelines,' said Gigaba. But he said there must be better mechanisms to avoid similar issues down the line. 'Otherwise, we will lose credibility in international bodies, and it will affect the credibility of our fiscal policy and processes. It will also affect the position of the country with regards to credit rating agencies, investor opinion, and just how the public views how government functions.' This is the first time the ANC has needed the buy-in of other parties to pass the budget after losing its parliamentary majority in the 2024 general elections.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store