
Billionaire NFL owner wants to build affordable housing on a pristine NJ hilltop — and locals are mad as hell
Locals in West Orange, NJ aren't just shouting from the rooftops — they're shouting about what might be built above them.
A billionaire's bid to transform a pristine hilltop with Manhattan skyline views into a nearly 500-unit apartment complex is the latest drama in a decades-old land use battle in the tony town — and this time, the argument involves affordable housing.
Owned by the family of Minnesota Vikings co-owner Zygmunt 'Zygi' Wilf, the 120-acre wooded parcel in the Watchung Mountains will be developed by Wilf's Garden Homes, a real estate firm, NJ.com reported.
6 A controversial plan to build a 496-unit apartment complex—100 of which would be affordable housing—on a pristine 120-acre hilltop in West Orange, NJ, has reignited local opposition.
West Orange Planning Board
Besides clearing roughly 30 acres of woodland, the developer's vision includes a four-building, four-story complex with amenities like a clubhouse and pool. Of the 496 units, 100 are designated as affordable housing.
While the plan goes to help satisfy the township's state-mandated housing obligations, locals say the environmental and public safety risks are simply too steep.
'Public safety and irreparable environmental harm trump, if you will, affordable housing,' said Joseph Pannullo, president of grassroots group We Care NJ, in an interview with NJ.com.
The roots of the current plan trace back to New Jersey's controversial Mount Laurel Doctrine — a series of court rulings requiring municipalities to provide their fair share of affordable housing.
West Orange, like many other towns, has faced pressure to comply.
6 Spearheaded by billionaire Zygi Wilf's Garden Homes, who owns the Minnesota Vikings, the project stems from a 2020 settlement aimed at helping the township meet its affordable housing obligations under the Mount Laurel Doctrine.
Getty Images
The saga began back in 2006, when the Wilf's proposed a less inclusive project for the property, which was rejected over similar concerns — including flooding, steep slopes, and limited emergency access.
Finally, in 2020, local officials struck a court-approved deal with developers — Garden Homes got the go-ahead, so long as it introduced an affordable component that helped the town meet its mandate.
'It's a situation where the law is very coercive from a municipality's point of view,' West Orange Council President Joe Krakoviak told Realtor.com. 'Municipalities' hands are very much tied because they have little, if any, influence over how many units of affordable housing to approve.'
6 While the developers argue the plan supports housing goals, residents and environmental advocates say it endangers public safety and exploits affordable housing as a loophole.
Lithium6ion via Wikipedia
Despite the legal issues, Krakoviak has remained outspoken in his skepticism of the Wilf proposal, citing the project's remote location and complex terrain.
'I have a tremendous amount of concern about the environmental ramifications of this proposal, as well as the appropriateness of placing lower-income residents in the proposal so far away from all of the things they need to reach,' he said to Realtor.com, noting distance from public transit and basic services.
The project has already cleared several regulatory hurdles, including receiving a stormwater permit from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
6 Critics—including township council president Joe Krakoviak—cite concerns over flooding, isolation from public transit, and limited emergency access on the hilly, forested site.
Google Maps
Opposition is mounting, however.
In July, the West Orange Environmental Commission asked for a delay in site plan review, raising red flags over potential damage to state-protected wetlands and two tributaries of the Canoe Brook.
A November report by environmental consulting firm Princeton Hydro also stated that the site plans did not comply with state stormwater regulations, according to NJ.com.
6 Grassroots groups argue the land, untouched and far from basic amenities, is unsuitable for development, regardless of income level.
Lithium6ion via Wikipedia
Rachel Klein, a local resident and We Care NJ member, accused the developers of using affordable housing as a 'guise' to push through a plan that has previously been deemed unsafe.
'[They] thought we'd be afraid of being accused of NIMBYism,' she told Realtor.com. 'If it was unsafe for 136 homes that would have been worth $1 million at the time, why is suddenly throwing poor people into it making it safe? That makes no sense to us.'
Klein, who has lived near the mountain since 2016, emphasized that her objection is not to affordable housing itself, but to the placement.
6 The plan is under review by the West Orange Planning Board.
Lithium6ion via Wikipedia
'The need is there, for sure, and the town is working on it. But the problem is West Orange is already exceedingly overdeveloped,' she said. 'This is just not the appropriate place for it.'
As part of the plan, the remaining undeveloped acreage would be preserved as green space and recreational trails, and developers have proposed replanting trees lost to construction. But critics remain unconvinced that mitigation measures can reverse the impact of clear-cutting a mature forest.
According to Realtor.com, the median list price in the surrounding area is $599,725, underscoring the contrast between market-rate housing and the proposed affordable component.
While Garden Homes has not commented publicly, the township planning board is still reviewing site plans, with the next public hearing scheduled for Wednesday.
For now, the mountaintop remains a flashpoint — caught between the urgent need for affordable housing and the equally pressing calls to preserve what locals see as one of the last untouched natural spaces in Essex County.
'I fully expect opposition to the project to grow well beyond the board's decision,' Krakoviak told NJ.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Boeing (BA) Eyes Production Boost Without Compromising Quality
Boeing (BA) is reestablishing its presence in the Chinese market—a move that brings both notable opportunities and meaningful risks. The aerospace giant is operating within a challenging regulatory landscape, intensified by the January 2024 Alaska Airlines door plug incident, which drew global attention and even warranted a dedicated entry on Wikipedia. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Compounding the complexity are the lingering effects of President Trump's tariffs and trade tensions, which continue to affect Boeing's international operations. However, there has been a recent positive shift: China has lifted its temporary ban on Boeing aircraft, enabling the company to begin fulfilling its growing backlog of orders. As a result, Boeing's stock has regained much of the ground lost in the wake of the earlier safety incident. However, moving forward, Boeing must balance unpredictable geopolitical trade tensions and regulatory scrutiny that ushered in a 'new normal,' prioritizing safety over profits, making me cautiously neutral on its stock. Boeing is now operating under heightened regulatory oversight, with more inspectors present in its factories than in previous years—a direct consequence of several high-profile in-flight incidents involving its aircraft. Subsequent investigations uncovered deep-rooted quality control issues and broader cultural problems that contributed to these events. As part of this intensified scrutiny, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has imposed a strict production cap, limiting Boeing to 38 units per month of its 737 MAX jet—a model widely regarded as the 'workhorse' of the airline industry due to its dominance in short- and medium-haul routes. This cap is intended to slow production, allowing Boeing to prioritize safety and quality improvements. The FAA has made it clear that any increase in the production rate will be contingent on demonstrable improvements in manufacturing standards. However, this restriction poses a significant challenge for Boeing's business model. It not only curtails output during a period of strong demand and a large backlog of orders, but also delays revenue generation, since Boeing is typically paid upon aircraft delivery. Demand for Boeing remains strong, with a backlog exceeding 6,000 aircraft, equivalent to roughly 11 years of production at current rates. However, airline customers won't wait indefinitely. Boeing faces mounting pressure to deliver, especially as its main European rival, Airbus SE, is unlikely to cede any competitive ground. China represents a critical market for Boeing, accounting for nearly 10% of its total unfilled orders. As such, China's recent decision to resume accepting aircraft deliveries marks a significant positive development, likely helping Boeing reduce some of its existing inventory—aircraft that would otherwise remain idle. Complicating matters, planes built for Chinese airlines differ in configuration from those intended for U.S. carriers, making it costly and inefficient to reconfigure them for other markets. Looking ahead, Boeing has limited influence over the trajectory of U.S.-China trade relations. While a temporary truce provides some relief, long-term access to the Chinese market remains vulnerable to geopolitical uncertainty. All of this is unfolding against the backdrop of substantial cash outflows in recent quarters. In 2024, Boeing reported a net loss of nearly $12 billion, mirroring the amount of cash it consumed in operating activities. This financial strain was driven by a combination of safety incidents, ongoing quality control challenges, and a seven-week machinists' strike that disrupted production. While Boeing does hold almost $24 billion in cash and short-term investments as a financial cushion, the company remains heavily leveraged, adding further pressure to stabilize its operations and restore investor confidence. On Wall Street, Boeing's stock sports a Strong Buy consensus rating based on 16 Buy, three Hold, and one Sell ratings in the past three months. BA's average price target of $217.32 implies 2.77% upside potential over the next twelve months. Recently, Bank of America analyst Ronald Epstein upgraded Boeing from a Neutral rating to a Buy rating and set a price target of $260. The analyst is optimistic that production will stabilize and its cash burn will subside. He noted some uncertainties, such as the production cap and its ability to recapture public trust. Josh Sullivan of Benchmark Co. also has a Buy rating on Boeing. He noted that 'anticipated production increments, occurring no sooner than six months apart, suggest a structured and achievable growth path.' Boeing faces the difficult task of ramping up production while ensuring rigorous quality standards—a balance that's easier said than achieved. Each incremental increase in the production cap presents new challenges, requiring the company to meet strict performance benchmarks. Overcoming its deeply rooted legacy of quality issues will take time and sustained effort; it's not a transformation that can happen overnight. In the interim, Boeing must also navigate a complex mix of geopolitical tensions, supply chain constraints, and trade tariffs. The recent reopening of the Chinese market provides a much-needed tailwind, but it may prove to be temporary. Although Boeing's first-quarter earnings showed narrower losses and revenue growth, its return to consistent profitability will depend on a combination of internal execution and external stability, factors that remain highly uncertain. Still, the aerospace duopoly remains intact, and if Boeing can normalize production, its massive backlog positions it for significant upside. For risk-tolerant investors seeking to outperform the market, BA stock could present a compelling opportunity. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
6 days ago
- The Hill
Reddit sues AI company Anthropic for allegedly ‘scraping' user comments to train chatbot Claude
Social media platform Reddit sued the artificial intelligence company Anthropic on Wednesday, alleging that it is illegally 'scraping' the comments of millions of Reddit users to train its chatbot Claude. Reddit claims that Anthropic has used automated bots to access Reddit's content despite being asked not to do so, and 'intentionally trained on the personal data of Reddit users without ever requesting their consent.' Anthropic said in a statement that it disagreed with Reddit's claims 'and will defend ourselves vigorously.' Reddit filed the lawsuit Wednesday in California Superior Court in San Francisco, where both companies are based. 'AI companies should not be allowed to scrape information and content from people without clear limitations on how they can use that data,' said Ben Lee, Reddit's chief legal officer, in a statement Wednesday. Reddit has previously entered licensing agreements with Google, OpenAI and other companies that are paying to be able to train their AI systems on the public commentary of Reddit's more than 100 million daily users. Those agreements 'enable us to enforce meaningful protections for our users, including the right to delete your content, user privacy protections, and preventing users from being spammed using this content,' Lee said. The licensing deals also helped the 20-year-old online platform raise money ahead of its Wall Street debut as a publicly traded company last year. Anthropic was formed by former OpenAI executives in 2021 and its flagship Claude chatbot remains a key competitor to OpenAI's ChatGPT. While OpenAI has close ties to Microsoft, Anthropic's primary commercial partner is Amazon, which is using Claude to improve its widely used Alexa voice assistant. Much like other AI companies, Anthropic has relied heavily on websites such as Wikipedia and Reddit that are deep troves of written materials that can help teach an AI assistant the patterns of human language. In a 2021 paper co-authored by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei — cited in the lawsuit — researchers at the company identified the subreddits, or subject-matter forums, that contained the highest quality AI training data, such as those focused on gardening, history, relationship advice or thoughts people have in the shower. Anthropic in 2023 argued in a letter to the U.S. Copyright Office that the 'way Claude was trained qualifies as a quintessentially lawful use of materials,' by making copies of information to perform a statistical analysis of a large body of data. It is already battling a lawsuit from major music publishers alleging that Claude regurgitates the lyrics of copyrighted songs. But Reddit's lawsuit is different from others brought against AI companies because it doesn't allege copyright infringement. Instead, it focuses on the alleged breach of Reddit's terms of use, and the unfair competition, it says, was created. —— The Associated Press and OpenAI have a licensing and technology agreement that allows OpenAI access to part of AP's text archives.


San Francisco Chronicle
7 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Reddit sues AI company Anthropic for allegedly 'scraping' user comments to train chatbot Claude
Social media platform Reddit has sued the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, alleging that it is illegally "scraping" the comments of Reddit users to train its chatbot Claude. Reddit claims that Anthropic has used automated bots to access Reddit's content despite being asked not to do so, and 'intentionally trained on the personal data of Reddit users without ever requesting their consent.' Anthropic didn't immediately return a request for comment Wednesday. Reddit filed the lawsuit Wednesday in California Superior Court in San Francisco, where both companies are based. 'AI companies should not be allowed to scrape information and content from people without clear limitations on how they can use that data,' said Ben Lee, Reddit's chief legal officer, in a statement Wednesday. Reddit has previously entered licensing agreements with Google, OpenAI and other companies to enable them to train their AI systems on Reddit commentary. Those agreements 'enable us to enforce meaningful protections for our users, including the right to delete your content, user privacy protections, and preventing users from being spammed using this content,' Lee said. Anthropic was formed by former OpenAI executives in 2021 and its flagship Claude chatbot remains a key competitor to OpenAI's ChatGPT. Much like other AI companies, it's relied heavily on websites such as Wikipedia and Reddit that are full of rich sources of written materials to teach an AI assistant the patterns of human language In a 2021 paper co-authored by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei — cited in the lawsuit — researchers at the company identified the subreddits, or subject-matter forums, that contained the highest quality data, such as those focused on gardening, history or thoughts people have in the shower. Anthropic in 2023 argued in a letter to the U.S. Copyright Office that the "way Claude was trained qualifies as a quintessentially lawful use of materials,' by making copies of information to perform a statistical analysis of a large body of data.