Reddit sues AI company Anthropic for allegedly 'scraping' user comments to train chatbot Claude
Social media platform Reddit has sued the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, alleging that it is illegally "scraping" the comments of Reddit users to train its chatbot Claude.
Reddit claims that Anthropic has used automated bots to access Reddit's content despite being asked not to do so, and 'intentionally trained on the personal data of Reddit users without ever requesting their consent.'
Anthropic didn't immediately return a request for comment Wednesday. Reddit filed the lawsuit Wednesday in California Superior Court in San Francisco, where both companies are based.
'AI companies should not be allowed to scrape information and content from people without clear limitations on how they can use that data,' said Ben Lee, Reddit's chief legal officer, in a statement Wednesday.
Reddit has previously entered licensing agreements with Google, OpenAI and other companies to enable them to train their AI systems on Reddit commentary.
Those agreements 'enable us to enforce meaningful protections for our users, including the right to delete your content, user privacy protections, and preventing users from being spammed using this content,' Lee said.
Anthropic was formed by former OpenAI executives in 2021 and its flagship Claude chatbot remains a key competitor to OpenAI's ChatGPT. Much like other AI companies, it's relied heavily on websites such as Wikipedia and Reddit that are full of rich sources of written materials to teach an AI assistant the patterns of human language
In a 2021 paper co-authored by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei — cited in the lawsuit — researchers at the company identified the subreddits, or subject-matter forums, that contained the highest quality data, such as those focused on gardening, history or thoughts people have in the shower.
Anthropic in 2023 argued in a letter to the U.S. Copyright Office that the "way Claude was trained qualifies as a quintessentially lawful use of materials,' by making copies of information to perform a statistical analysis of a large body of data.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
32 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
This AI tool is like Perplexity, NotebookLM, and ChatGPT put together — here's why you need it
I don't know if you've noticed, but there are a lot of AI tools out there. An overwhelming number, some might say. So choosing the right option for you can be surprisingly challenging. Of course, there are the obvious options like ChatGPT, Gemini, or one of the other major AI brands, powered by billions in funding and massive supercomputers. However, that doesn't mean they are always the best option for what you need. For example, for students looking to get an edge on a research project, there are lots of other great options out there. After spending some time testing it, one of my new top picks is Logically. Logically, formerly known as Afforai, is an AI workspace. It can be used for both research and writing. In the Logically app or desktop system, you can have everything you need in one place. Start a new document, and you can set headings, write text, add bullet points, tables, images, code, and pretty much anything you would need to write a book, article, research paper, or essay. This alone is seen in countless places like Notion, Word or pretty much any other AI-powered writing software. Logically stands out by combining its writing technology with AI research tools in a few ways: Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Chatbot functionality Much like NotebookLM, you can add research documents, papers, or links for the tool to comb through. Alternatively, through the built-in chatbot, you can ask questions using AI models like Gemini, GPT-4o, or Claude 3.5. This is paired with Google search functions to work in the same way as you might use ChatGPT or Gemini to research a project. Research like a scholar Equally, you can use a feature called Semantic Scholar. Instead of searching the web and the training data of whichever AI model you're using, it will comb through a database of 200 million peer-review research papers. In this mode, it will not only offer the research papers that best answer your question, but it will also offer the reference, the best quote from the paper and allow you to save your reference straight into a bibliography if needed. Document retrival Finally, if you have an exact list of research documents you want to use, a third tool will change the chatbot to only answer questions from your list of research sources. This will also provide citations and references for any information it provides you. Referencing is, quite frankly, a nightmare. Trying to remember where you found a quote, figure or concept can take forever if you don't note it down. Even if you do, there is then the formatting to make it correct for the document. Part of the benefit of Logically is that it does it all for you. Upload documents and links to your project and it will keep them all in one place. By doing this, you can search these documents using the in-built chatbot or just use them for referencing down the line. You can also add tags to different sources, keeping them all organised in different categories. With all of the incredible things AI can do right now, this is hardly ground-breaking. In a lot of ways, this is a tool that is simply taking the best of other AI systems and using them all in one place. But, that is what works so well. Why split your time between ChatGPT, NotebookLM and Perplexity, when you can have them all in one place. On top of all those research tools, youa also have your actual project in the same place too. For the occasional quick project, this isn't all that useful. But if you're in school, working towards a PhD or in a research role that requires you to be constantly deep into a project, Logically feels like it has nailed the formula.
Tom's Guide
3 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I used every major AI assistant for one week — here's the one I'd actually keep using
I've written dozens of features about AI assistants. I've compared their features, broken down the latest updates and stress-tested prompts to determine the best ones. But to truly determine which one works best for me and my productivity, I had to use them exclusively one at a time without the temptation of jumping to you've been keeping up, you know how much I love prompt dusting, that is, using one chatbot and then entering the response into another chatbot to refine the results. But not this time. That was off limits for this particular one week, I ran a full-scale experiment. I rotated through ChatGPT (GPT-4o), Claude 4 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Perplexity and DeepSeek as my daily assistant. The only rule was I had to use each one exclusively for a full 24 hours, no switching mid-day. To ensure that I wouldn't cheat, I reluctantly logged out of every chatbot that I wasn't allowed to use. From researching why my dishwasher kept tripping and tips to help avoid toddler tantrums to planning meals and helping with my workflow, I put all of the assistants to the test to keep up with my chaotic life. And at the end of the week, only one of them felt like it could stay. ChatGPT offers Voice and Vision, which I use all the time for hands free assistance. When my son's soccer tournament got switched to a completely different park – while I was driving. I used the assistant to immediately figure out where I was supposed to be in ten minutes. The chatbot did not stumble and even told me to stay calm as I pulled over and searched for way I used ChatGPT on its designated day was summarizing text messages in a group chat of 15 very chatty moms. I needed to catch up fast so I took a few screenshots, uploaded them in the app and ChatGPT helped me get the gist of the conversaton without skipping a human-like element of ChatGPT, especially when it comes to life's craziest moments, is where this chatbot shines. I found the chatbot was faster and better at voice, image and memory tasks. It remembered my preferences when it came to planning meals for the day and even helped me brainstorm ideas for my father-in-law's birthday with surprising creativity. Where it shined: Memory and custom instructions made it feel personal Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Great for brainstorming and creativity Solid image interpretation Ideal emotional support Where it lagged: Sometimes still too eager to please, less critical than I wanted Multimodal features work best in the app, not browser I'll admit, going from ChatGPT to Claude was tricky. Although it has a new voice feature, it's definitely not as good so I opted to keep the chats with text messages. Claude is alo thoughtful, sometimes to a fault. The chatbot gave me deeply reasoned answers and beautiful prose but it could get a bit ChatGPT where I feel like I'm chatting with a friend, Claude can sometimes feel like I'm talking to a philosophy major. The chatbot feels far less personal. It also cannot handle as many sporadic example, I was meeting a friend for dinner at a restaurant I hadn't been to before and Claude had a hard time giving me directions. I said it was next to a park and the assistant suggested I call the park ranger. Not assistant was helpful when I got an extremely long email from my literary agent that I didn't have time to read at the moment, but needed to respond to. It helped craft an email that I was able to send based on a summary of the unexpected win? Claude is great for emotional nuance. When I was struggling to word a delicate message, not professional, but something personal with a little emotional weight, Claude really delivered. Claude's responses weren't just grammatically clean, they were empathetic, balanced and thoughtful. If you ever need to write a message that's both clear and kind, Claude is surprisingly good at finding that it shined: Incredible at nuanced reasoning and long-term structure Calm, articulate tone Great with analysis and summarization Where it lagged: Less helpful for immediate questions like directions Voice feature not great Gemini is a tool I use all the time and I definitely missed it on my ChatGPT and Claude days. The chatbot is fast, visually aware and connected to Google's ecosystem — which helps keep me in check throughout the week. From searching for real-time info or pulling from Gmail and Docs, this is always my go-to bot. However, when it comes to creativity, Gemini can be a little bit Live was helpful when I realized the chicken I purchased for dinner was expired by two days. Was it okay to eat? It told me no and then made suggestions based on what it could see in my fridge and pantry. I ended up making some crispy chicken wraps for the family that were a big way Gemini helped was at bedtime when my kids were just not having it. If you're a parent with young kids, you know just how hard bedtime can be. All you want to do is go to bed and all the kids want is find any excuse not to. I turned on Gemini Live and asked for help. With one prompt of 'Help me get my kids to bed!' It came up with some really helpful tips including whispering (even though I wanted to scream) to help calm the kids that were practically bouncing off the walls. Where it shined: Fantastic for Google Workspace integration Excellent at organizing info and finding sources Strong math and chart-making skills Where it lagged: Creativity was underwhelming Occasionally hallucinated formatting or skipped nuance Perplexity is like a turbo-charged research intern. It gives real citations, fast summaries, and real-time web results. But it's not really a conversation partner — more like a search engine in a chatbot the model's designated day, I used it while drafting a story. I needed to double-check when a specific AI model launched. Perplexity pulled the date instantly — along with three sources I could actually click and verify. No hallucinations. Actually, I've never seen Perplexity hallucinate. Have you? Let me know in the comments. I'm really curious about this same day, I was looking for a small but powerful fan for my office now that summer has officially hit New Jersey and wanted to compare prices. Perplexity laid out side-by-side specs and recent reviews from trusted sites — all in under 30 seconds. It felt like skipping three Google tabs. I also used Perplexity to dive into the news and catch up on newsletters that I'd been saving for my Perplexity day. Wait, was that cheating? It pulled from current articles, summarized the key updates and gave me links to explore more if I wanted. Less noise, more clarity. Where it shined: Best for fast, factual, source-backed answers Great for staying up-to-date with news or product research Fast and efficient Where it lagged: Lacks tone, personality or memory Not ideal for brainstorming or big creative projects DeepSeek was the dark horse of the week. I usually use this one for all things creativity, so I was genuinely impressed with how the chatbot stepped up to the plate for AI assistance. While it's not as well-known or widely used, it is quickly showing it can compete with the big names like ChatGPT and Gemini. DeepSeek is incredibly capable when it comes to reasoning, coding and vision-based tasks. In fact, my first test was visual. I uploaded a photo of my daughter's field trip supply list (crumpled and slightly coffee-stained) and asked DeepSeek to organize it into a shopping checklist by store. Not only did it read the handwriting correctly, it suggested which items I could get from Amazon, Target or Walmart. And get this, it even gave me estimated prices. Later, I asked DeepSeek to help explain why my cat was coughing and sneezing excessively. It gave me a detailed but understandable breakdown of possible causes and even helped me find vets in the area (although we have one, it proved it was doing it's job as an assistant). I noticed that it wasn't as chatty as ChatGPT, but definitely 'friendly.' DeepSeek shines when you need serious problem-solving or tech-heavy tasks done fast. Where it shined: Exceptional vision analysis and image-based reasoning Strong logical thinking and technical explanations Great for coding, math, and structured planning Where it lagged: Limited personality or warmth in conversation Not ideal for emotional tone or open-ended brainstorming With the unpredictablity of each day, the whole 'you get what you get' test turned into a wild ride. But, after a week of controlled AI-assisstance, ChatGPT came out on top with Gemini Live as a very close second. ChatGPT isn't perfect, but the memory aspect of this chatbot is a huge asset for me. It knows me best, so I don't have to repeat myself. With memory enabled and custom instructions dialed in, it was the only one that felt like it was adapting to me — not the other way around. This chatbot strikes the best balance between creativity, utiliy and usability. It also just feels the most like a true assistant. It knew my tone. It anticipated my needs. It helped me work and think better. That said, I have found that using them all in a hybrid way is the best way. I'll always keep Claude around for deep dives and Perplexity for quick research. Gemini is intertwined in my workflow so there's no way that one is going line: I'm glad I don't have to make a choice.
Business Journals
4 hours ago
- Business Journals
AI revolution: Navigating the promises and perils of a new era
At electronic health records innovator ModMed, its proprietary artificial intelligence application, ModMed Scribe, has been trained on millions of patient encounters. It is improving how doctors interact with, diagnose, and care for patients to improve office workflow. JM Family Enterprises use AI-powered tools to help create and test new applications. This is improving the quality of software development and reducing the time required to produce requirements and test cases by approximately 30%. A contact center platform with AI capabilities at BankUnited is exploring how sentiment analysis can help bankers and customers find the solutions that best fit a given situation. Miami Dade College, in collaboration with Microsoft, is applying the technology company's 365 Copilot AI-powered productivity tool atop its suite of applications to drive staff and faculty efficiency. Since implementation, nearly one year ago, adoption is over 90%, which is impressive, understanding that it's a brand-new tool, according to Antonio Delgado, the school's VP of Innovation and Technology Partnerships. This is simply some novel large language (LLM) model application; it's facilitating efficiencies across the school's technology suite. 'The results that we see even before getting to a full year of implementation is an enormous number of hours saved by leveraging the tool,' Delgado said. 'We see greater satisfaction. We see the productivity. And at the end, the outcomes with our students are better communication and better sense of belonging.' AI's promises and potential perils were explored during the recent AI Revolution Roundtable. Held at the Miami offices of the South Florida Business Journal and moderated by Andrew Duffell, president of the Research Park at Florida Atlantic University, leaders from some of the region's leading private and public sector employers discussed the challenges they're facing with artificial intelligence. Deploying AI in the workplace From the debut less than two years ago of generative AI applications like ChatGPT, companies today are turning to agentic AI. These systems can autonomously make decisions and act to achieve goals, often with minimal human intervention. Already, AI in all its forms is delivering a 'noticeable shift from prioritizing large, transformative use cases to simply understanding how to best integrate AI into routine tasks,' said John Damalas, group VP and CTO with JM Family Enterprises, the Deerfield Beach-based automotive distributor and services company. AI is creating an evolving narrative that positions it as a support tool for human-led activities, rather than a total replacement for cognitive work. JM Family's AI Center of Excellence has developed governance frameworks via its AI Council, a cross-functional team that promotes AI initiatives and ensures strategic alignment. It prioritizes responsible AI use with a 'formal process to review use cases for transparency and compliance with regulations, including monitoring proposed regulations in relevant jurisdictions,' Damalas said. Julio Jogaib, CIO with BankUnited, shared that employees must be trained on AI's best uses to advance their organization. This includes creating governance protocols to create standards and guardrails for proper AI usage by the workforce and organization. BankUnited's vendors are using AI in the applications they provide. Jogaib works to ensure the bank and its vendors 'have governance in place surrounding usage, data privacy, and other areas,' he said. It's especially important when client data is being used by vendors to train their systems. 'There is a lot of legal apparatus that needs to be in place and monitoring on what's being done by these platforms,' Jogaib said. 'They may say that they are not using our data. But you have to verify that.' As a health care technology company, ModMed works to ensure the company and its partners have the rights to use data or documents in the development of its platform, from widgets, chatbots, agents or generative AI. Daniel Cane, the company's co-founder and co-CEO, represented ModMed on the roundtable. 'They might have an asterisk by it now and say, 'if you use this new AI agent, we're collecting information to understand how our agent works and better train it in the future,'' Cane said. 'Be careful when you're using third party tools to understand how they're going to use your data.' Jogaib put it more fundamentally: 'You need to have people inside the company capable of thinking.' Training next-gen users Two cohorts of 'students' are emerging in the AI realm. One will be those traditional students in classrooms who are learning coursework to prepare them for future careers. Second are employees who are learning skills - including the use of AI - to serve their companies or future career opportunities. Technology has changed education delivery. Think back to the pandemic, when classrooms from grade school to higher education embraced portable devices and remote learning. AI is continuing that evolution. It's 'personalizing the education journey,' Delgado said. It can identify in-demand jobs, and the skills, degrees, or certificates needed to pursue them. The emergence of LLM applications, like ChatGPT, has students asking a question of the application, then copy/pasting the answer into their schoolwork. How do educators, or even employers, ensure students or workers actually learn and know the material? 'That's a big challenge that I see… the student is not doing the thinking anymore,' Delgado said. 'It's having the skills to embed AI in what you do and still add value, to defend the answer, to think about the abstract. We need to work on changing the way that academia is not only teaching but also assessing learning. Because if not, there is no learning happening.' JM Family invests in workforce development and views AI as an enhancement, not a replacement, for human capability. A critical part of its AI Center of Excellence is giving associates the tools and training needed to learn about AI and understand how to leverage it within their work. The roundtable's moderator, Andrew Duffell of Research Park at FAU, wondered how ModMed is encouraging employees to integrate their own knowledge with AI. Cane explained that the expectation is that employees are problem solvers and eager learners, and they arrive with a fundamental understanding of AI and its potential uses in the organization. Employees' natural curiosity must have them exploring how AI can be a tool to improve effectiveness, he emphasized. 'We are an employer that's using AI throughout our company, whether it's finance, accounting, marketing, software development,' Cane said. 'But we're also creating our AI to solve problems out in the wild.' AI's misperceptions, challenges and threats 'The belief that AI will automatically enhance processes and products can be inaccurate,' Damalas said. 'Similar to the digitization trend of the late 1990s and early 2000s, integrating AI into a business process with considerable inefficiencies may only heighten those inefficiencies, unless the process or product is carefully assessed concerning the specific outcomes or goals that AI is supposed to achieve within its context.' AI can create workplace challenges. According to Damalas, one involves managing change and promoting psychological safety for users as they adopt these technologies. He believes it is essential to address concerns that AI and other emerging technologies may replace jobs and instead encourage users to perceive them as enhancements to their skills and capabilities. Another will be how industries, such as health care, banking and financial services or education, for example, work with policy makers to enhance future regulations around AI. ModMed works with industry governing bodies to advocate for responsible AI applications and implementation. Internally, the company ensures its use of data complies with patient privacy laws, as well as emerging AI responsible-use and transparency guidelines. A company like ModMed's unique place as a developer and user of AI also gives it a role to play as advisor to governing bodies. 'Now is the time to be working with policy makers,' Cane said. 'It's essential that we bring policymakers and governing bodies up to speed on how this content and how this technology can be used in a way that can help people, and try to prevent people from getting hurt by it.' Where some may see regulators or governing bodies as 'the enemy,' Jogaib said the pace of industry innovation places developers and users in an important role as advisor. 'We call regulators our partners,' Jogaib said. 'We show them what they are doing, how we are doing it. We allow them to ask questions and through those questions they not only understand better how we are doing things, but they also take feedback. There must be this interaction, this exchange of experience.' As with any technology, strong internal policies can help thwart misuse and external threats. Companies must bolster and update their cybersecurity apparatus, Jogaib affirmed. Besides, as regulated industries, health care and banking, even education, face the prospect of government involvement - even suspension or revocation of licensure - should they not protect data or otherwise not meet regulations. Dispelling misperceptions Even as AI goes from headlines to frontline use in the workplace, developers and employers are still working to dispel fears and misperceptions that AI will replace workers. In physician practices, Cane said that AI won't replace doctors. Rather, its ModMed Scribe platform is helping doctors focus on practicing medicine, as opposed to rote tasks and administration 'and all of the back office overhead on billing and collecting and working on payers and all the things that happen in the middle where a doctor wants more than anything just to focus on the human being in front of them, the patient,' Cane said. 'It's not uncommon for doctors to spend two or three hours after work in what we call, 'pajama time,' catching up on their notes,' he said. His AI platform takes notes during the visit, writes prescriptions, orders and reviews labs, and handles other documentation - even following up with the patient to ensure compliance. From a more fundamental approach, Delgado noted that organizations need to educate their users - employees, customers, even students, in the case of educators - to ensure they're learning and using best practices. 'We need to really educate our constituents from that perspective about how to leverage it in a positive way, while still making sure they are open to including it as part of the journey,' he said. To Delgado, as business and society embrace agentic AI, or any AI applications for that matter, it still requires human intervention to supervise and hold AI accountable for its outcomes. 'Hallucinations' or incorrect responses remain a serious concern whose prevention requires human oversight. While future autonomous AI presents some dangers, the evolution brings tremendous promise. The embrace of AI 'is not an isolated event. It's a team sport,' Delgado said. 'Everybody, every function, no matter what type of company it is, has a place in the AI game, even if they don't know that yet.'
