
Why health education belongs in our classrooms
It's easy to say a child is "too young" to know something. But the reality is, many are already finding out — through social media, peers, or internet algorithms that don't ask for parental consent or cultural context. When schools don't teach them, when parents don't talk to them, children don't stop being curious. They just go looking. And on the internet, what they find can range from confusing to dangerous.
There's no shortage of videos, memes, and influencers willing to explain the world to them — often in ways that are inaccurate, sensationalized, or even predatory. A child trying to understand changes in their body may end up on content designed for adults. A teenager trying to learn about emotional relationships may stumble into forums or DMs that exploit their confusion. These aren't hypotheticals — they are happening every day, in every city, on every smartphone.
This is why health education in schools is no longer optional. It's necessary.
When we talk about health education, especially around puberty, reproduction, and emotional wellbeing, we're not talking about anything inappropriate. We're talking about facts — about helping children understand themselves before the world teaches them the wrong lessons. It's about giving a girl the confidence to know her first period is normal, not shameful. It's about giving a boy the language to talk about feelings without fear. It's about letting every child know that their body belongs to them, and that they have the right to speak up if something feels wrong.
There is a quiet kind of strength in giving a child knowledge. It doesn't encourage behavior — it encourages understanding. When a child knows the proper names for their body parts, understands boundaries, and can recognize signs of harm or abuse, they are safer. Not just in their own homes or classrooms, but in the wider world that's becoming harder and harder to control.
The reality is that children are growing up faster than ever. They are more connected, more exposed, and more influenced by what they see and hear online. But their emotional development is still fragile. They need guidance — gentle, accurate, respectful guidance — delivered in an environment of trust.
This isn't about introducing complicated new subjects into the curriculum. Health education can easily be integrated into what is already taught. It can be done in a way that reflects our cultural values and sensitivities. Other Muslim-majority countries have done it — quietly, respectfully, and effectively. It's not about pushing boundaries. It's about protecting them.
There's a difference between innocence and ignorance. We must preserve the innocence of childhood — but that doesn't mean keeping children in the dark. It means giving them just enough light to see where they're going. To understand the changes happening inside them. To respect themselves and others. To ask questions without fear, and to know they deserve answers that are true.
Parents want what's best for their children. So do teachers. But we must stop expecting these conversations to happen behind closed doors if we've never created a safe space for them. Schools can offer that space — structured, age-appropriate, and guided by trained educators. When done properly, health education doesn't undermine family values. It strengthens them.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
8 hours ago
- NDTV
Bomb And The Button: Time To Call Pakistan's Nuclear Blackmail By Its Name
From 1947 to Kargil, Pakistan's generals have lost every conventional war they've fought. But they've mastered a far more insidious weapon: nuclear blackmail. It's not the bomb itself that poses the gravest danger, but the hand that hovers over the button. Today, that hand belongs to "Field Marshal" Asim Munir, a man whose rhetoric is not merely bellicose but openly sectarian, divisive and bigoted. In statements one can hardly imagine being uttered in the 21st century, Munir posits the impossibility of Muslims living in a non-Muslim majority India to justify his claim that Muslim-majority Kashmir is the "jugular vein" of Pakistan. His intention was to stoke hatred of India and of Hindus, and to justify Pakistani belligerence. But to suggest that Muslims cannot live in a non-Muslim majority country was all the more preposterous for being made to a Pakistani diaspora audience living in the United States - a non-Muslim majority country! The Warm Washington Welcome The choice of audience highlighted the fact that Munir's threats aren't confined to Rawalpindi or Islamabad. They're made on American soil, under the warm glow of Washington's welcome. At a White House-hosted dinner during the Trump administration, Munir reportedly warned that Pakistan could "take half the world down" if provoked - a statement that should have triggered alarm, not applause. Instead, it was met with diplomatic indulgence, a familiar pattern in the US-Pakistan relationship, where strategic convenience often trumps - apologies for my choice of word! - moral clarity. For decades, Pakistan's military has wielded its nuclear arsenal not as a deterrent, but as a diplomatic cudgel - a tool to intimidate India, extract concessions, and shield itself from accountability. The world remembers A.Q. Khan's nuclear bazaar, where technology was trafficked to North Korea, Iran, and Libya. Yet, Pakistan faced no meaningful consequences, thanks to the world's (read: America's) leniency and the enduring illusion of partnership. Nothing Explains America's Approach Such an illusion might have been understood, and even forgiven, in the years of the US presence in Afghanistan, when Pakistan's indispensability lay in its geography - the mere fact that the United States' logistics routes into Afghanistan ran through that country gave Islamabad a level of leverage over Washington that only professional soldiers can fully understand. (One American general gruffly told me: "amateurs focus on strategy, rank amateurs obsess with tactics, but true military professionals know what really matters is logistics".) Since America could not supply its troops or rotate them without going through Pakistan, Islamabad was a truly indispensable partner. But now that US forces are no longer deployed in Afghanistan, what is it that makes Americans regard Pakistan as a partner? Improbably enough - since we are talking about the country run by the leading military sponsors of terrorism on the planet - it is supposed to be counter-terrorism co-operation. The US Department of State has publicly applauded Pakistan's "continued successes" in containing terrorist entities like ISIS-K, Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), and the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA). Well, hello, these entities happen to be attacking the Pakistani state - surely Pakistan doesn't need applause for defending itself? Hold on, say the Americans. Pakistan has also participated in joint intelligence operations with the US, including the 2025 arrest of ISIS-K conspirator Mohammad Sharifullah, who was involved in the Kabul Abbey Gate bombing that killed 23 US Marines at the time of the American withdrawal from Afghanistan. But just talk to experts like Prof C. Christine Fair, and they will tell you the Americans have been "played" by the ISI - that Sharifullah is nowhere close to being among the top leaders of ISIS-K. Fool's Gold But it does seem that the Americans are happy to be fooled. The US-Pakistan Counterterrorism Dialogue, held most recently this month (August 2025) in Islamabad, has again reaffirmed both nations' engagement. The irony is that the US simply overlooks Pakistan's inconsistencies, including the military's confirmed ties to many extremist groups it has incubated on its soil to use against its neighbours. And Pakistan, as we saw in Pahalgam, continues to build on its long record of employing terrorism as a strategic tool. Also Read | "Osama Bin Laden In Suit": Ex-Pentagon Official On Pakistan's Asim Munir Today, though, America's illusions are more dangerous than ever. Munir's recent chest-thumping in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack, which claimed innocent lives and reignited fears of cross-border escalation, is virtually an admission of responsibility. His justification of sectarian violence is not just morally repugnant - it's strategically destabilising. Pakistan's military, facing internal political and economic collapse, now threatens even India's water supplies, invoking nuclear escalation as a response to any future Indian dam-building. Instead of slapping him down, Americans are urging India to embark on conciliatory hydro-diplomacy. More Than The Bomb The additional peril lies in the possibility that Munir - now self-promoted as only the second Field Marshal in the Pakistani Army's bloody history - could seize full political control, formalising the military's grip on Pakistan's state apparatus. In such a scenario, permanent brinkmanship becomes policy, and the risks to India and global stability multiply exponentially. India must remain vigilant, but so must the world. The danger is not just Pakistan's bomb - it is the cosy geopolitical arrangement that allows nuclear threats to flourish unchecked. When the international community rewards provocation with partnership, it emboldens the very forces that imperil peace. It is time to call nuclear blackmail by its name. And it is time for those who host its practitioners at diplomatic dinners to face up to the implications, rather than utter bromides about "partnership". But at the end of the day, it is we in India who will have to live with the consequences. (Shashi Tharoor is an author, former diplomat, and Member of Parliament from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, since 2009) Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author


Business Recorder
19 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Growing population challenge
EDITORIAL: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's recent remarks at a high-level meeting, describing Pakistan's annual population growth rate of 2.55 percent as an 'alarming trend,' are timely. However, they also shine a light on years of policy inaction. While population planning is a provincial subject post the 18th Amendment, the ramifications of such rapid growth are national in scope, spanning healthcare, education, food security, social services, and, most crucially, unemployment. In his address, the Prime Minister called for the formation of a committee to draft a national policy on population control, collaborating with provincial governments, and urged the establishment of a coordinated federal-provincial framework. This recognition of the issue is important, but his concern would carry more weight had he demonstrated similar urgency during his two terms as chief minister of Punjab — the country's most populous province. Sceptics point out that little was done at the provincial level during that time to curb population growth. However, the situation across other provinces is no different either. One of the most critical consequences of unchecked population growth is increasing unemployment. Each year, millions are added to Pakistan's population, and while a youthful demographic can be an asset, the economy struggles to keep pace. With the labour force increasing by 3 percent annually, the economy simply cannot absorb the sheer number of people entering the job market. As a result, unemployment continues to rise, while frustration among young people fuels social unrest, crime, and a growing sense of hopelessness. Resistance from religious groups is often cited as a key reason behind the lack of a strong national population control programme. Yet, Pakistan could learn valuable lessons from other Muslim-majority countries that have successfully tackled this issue. Bangladesh, with similar cultural and religious dynamics, has brought its total fertility rate at 2.1 percent, a rate considered to be at or near the replacement level. Through investments in women's education, the deployment of community health workers, widespread availability of contraceptives, and support from local religious leaders, Bangladesh has demonstrated that population control can be both feasible and socially acceptable in conservative societies. Similarly, Iran offers another compelling case. In the late 1980s, the country faced a population boom but responded with a comprehensive family planning campaign, including free contraceptives, mandatory pre-marriage counselling, and close collaboration with religious authorities. These efforts have resulted in a dramatic reduction in the population growth rate, which currently stands at just 1.2 percent. A key factor behind the success of both countries has been the prioritisation of education — particularly for girls and women. Education is, without a doubt, the most effective form of population control. Educated women tend to have fewer children, marry later, and make informed decisions about family planning, while striving to secure better futures for their families. In contrast, Pakistan's embarrassingly low literacy rates, persistent gender gaps in schooling, and cultural and infrastructural barriers continue to pose major obstacles. To address the population explosion effectively, Prime Minister Sharif, together with provincial governments, should now follow through with a national strategy that includes substantial investments in girls' education, improved access to reproductive healthcare, and coordinated awareness campaigns. These efforts should also engage religious scholars and local communities to create a shared support for the issue. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


New Straits Times
21 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Dzulkefly: 10,800 awaiting organ transplants
KUALA LUMPUR: Some 10,800 people are waiting for organ transplants in Malaysia, an increase of 5.4 per cent from last year, said the health minister. Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad said the figure highlighted the urgent need to increase Malaysia's organ donation rate, which was significantly lower compared with other countries such as Muslim-majority Turkiye and Iran. "In Malaysia, the ratio stands at only 1.33 donors per one million people, while Turkiye has reached 7.5, the United States 36.9, and Spain at the top with 50.26 per million," he said after launching the National Organ Donation Awareness Week at Taman Tasik Titiwangsa here yesterday. Dzulkefly said family refusal was one of the main barriers to the harvesting of organs despite more than 400,000 Malaysians pledging to donate since 1997. "This is the main hurdle we need to overcome. That is why this year's campaign theme is 'Warisku, Hormati Ikrarku' (to my family, respect my pledge), which seeks to ensure that the wishes of pledged donors are honoured by their families." As of July this year, 404,975 Malaysians have pledged their organs. However, only 3,359 transplants have been carried out since records began, comprising 1,121 cadaveric and 2,238 living donations. Dzulkefly said Malaysia planned to discuss organ donation at the Asean level. "I have asked for proposals to be prepared so that the issue can be tabled at the Asean health ministers' meeting later this year." He added that Malaysia's low organ donation rate must be addressed through governance reforms, better coordination at the National Transplant Resource Centre and public campaigns. Organ donation pledges, he said, had been rising steadily - with 29,960 new pledges in 2022, 31,058 in 2023, and 7,802 so far this year. Actual donations, however, remained low, with 43 cadaveric and 145 living transplants performed in 2022, compared with 82 cadaveric and 165 living transplants in 2023. Last year, there were 79 cadaveric and 135 living transplants.