Fragment of Viking Age arm ring declared treasure
A "rare" 1,000-year-old gold arm ring discovered in a field by a metal detectorist and declared treasure at an inquest has been put on display for the first time.
The fragment of jewellery, which is 1.4 inches (3.7cm) in length and weighs 1oz (27.26g), was unearthed by Ronald Clucas in spring 2025.
Mr Clucas said, who has been metal detecting for 50 years, said he had previously found "some wonderful things", but the Viking Age find was "really something else".
Manx National Heritage (MNH) curator of archaeology Allison Fox said the understanding of the island's "rich Viking legacy had been further enhanced by the discovery".
The piece, which dates back to about between 1,000 and 1,100 AD, was originally created by plaiting eight strands of gold rods together.
Ms Fox said such jewellery served as both "prized personal possessions and visible displays of wealth" during the period, which were also used for financial transactions.
Ms Fox said the "beautiful find" had been cut twice, to remove the terminal end of the arm ring, with the other cutting the original complete piece almost in half.
That suggested it had been used in transactions before being buried in the ground, possibly for safekeeping or "as an offering to the Viking Gods", she added.
A member of the Manx Detectorist Society, Mr Clucas has previously unearthed a silver ingot and a lead ingot on the island in 2005.
He said gold "generally gives a very low signal on the detector, so you can't really predict what is going to be uncovered".
"It was quite a big shock to discover this lovely piece of gold, I couldn't really believe it at first," he added.
The arm band has been put on display in the Viking Gallery at the Manx Museum in Douglas.
Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
Viking age coins declared treasure go on display
Viking coin 'savings account' declared treasure
Viking age silver found by metal detectorist
Detectorist's 'disbelief' at second Viking find
Manx National Heritage
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Chagos Islands: Starmer's 'lousy deal'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. "Keir Starmer has secured his legacy," said The Daily Telegraph: his "shameful surrender of the Chagos Islands will go down as this nation's foreign policy nadir". Last week, the PM signed a long-dreaded treaty that officially hands control of the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius – effectively ceding a strategically vital territory that sits in an area of interest for China. To add insult to injury, once the treaty is ratified by MPs, we will pay Mauritius £101 million a year for the next 99 years to rent back a key UK-US military base on the largest island, Diego Garcia. "This lousy deal essentially amounts to a massive gift from British taxpayers to the Mauritian government," said Andrew Tettenborn in The Spectator. So why sign it? The answer, I'm afraid, "is legalism": the UN's top court had issued a non-binding ruling calling on the UK to give up control of Chagos – and the PM, ever the lawyer, eagerly bowed to international law. Perhaps he was hoping to set a "shining example" to other countries; instead, they will "regard us with contempt for being a pushover". The deal looks "odd" on the face of it, said James Landale on BBC News. But there were plenty of "practical" reasons to sign the treaty. Multiple UN bodies have ruled that the islands belong to Mauritius; had the UK continued to ignore those rulings, the operation of the base could have become "unworkable". Diego Garcia's satellite communications would have been threatened because the UK relies on a UN agency in Geneva to maintain access to a particular electromagnetic spectrum; aircraft might not be able to fly in or out, for fear of breaching international law. As for national security, said Sean O'Grady in The Independent, without this deal, Mauritius could have lawfully granted China permission to establish a military base on another of the islands, sparking a serious crisis. The deal specifically forbids it. This is all true in theory, said John Rentoul in the same paper. But in reality, Mauritius' claim to the islands was "weak" – Chagos has never been part of its territory – and UN courts have "no powers of enforcement". The base wasn't threatened in any meaningful way. And yet Starmer's government doubled down on a deal that will outrage the British public, given the nation's dire finances. I suspect the biggest driver of this decision was "postcolonial guilt", said Matthew Syed in The Sunday Times – that sense that, as a nation, we must self-flagellate to atone for the sins of the empire. But Starmer's conscience-cleansing comes at "extravagant expense" – and will help "no one but our rivals".
Wall Street Journal
37 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Donald Trump vs. Bruce Springsteen
Opening his 'Land of Hope and Dreams' tour in Manchester, England, New Jersey rocker Bruce Springsteen called the Trump administration 'corrupt, incompetent and treasonous.' To be fair, Europeans are used to these kinds of leaders. President Trump fired back, calling Mr. Springsteen 'a pushy, obnoxious JERK, who fervently supported Crooked Joe Biden' and a 'dried out 'prune' of a rocker.' A billionaire slap-fest! I'm claiming authority on this matter, as I did shots of Old Grand-Dad with Mr. Springsteen on his 35th birthday at Big Man's West in Red Bank, N.J. As with this feud, I wasn't invited. I just happened to be there. Sure, both men think they're the boss, but it's more than that. Truth be told, Mr. Trump has been playing to Mr. Springsteen's original audience for quite a while. Think downtrodden, desperate, struggling, working class—though Springsteen fans are more likely middle-aged folks absolving their guilt through music, thankful they didn't grow up that way. 'Workin' in the field / You get your back burned / Workin' 'neath the wheels / You get your facts learned.' Anyway, the psyche fits the MAGA crowd, minus 50 years. No wonder these guys are feuding. Mr. Springsteen had the perfect invented persona in the 1970s and '80s—as we emerged with fits and starts from an industrial era to a digital age, Slate called him an 'endearing Jersey wharf rat.' His music was rebellious. Nonconformist. 'I hid in the clouded wrath of the crowd / But when they said, 'Sit down,' I stood up.' Have problems? Just jump in your 'chrome-wheeled, fuel-injected' Chevy and roar down the highway 'jammed with broken heroes.' No one actually did this, but it felt good to think about. Now we doom-scroll instead.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lisa Hogan reveals why Jeremy Clarkson hasn't proposed to her yet
Lisa Hogan has revealed why Jeremy Clarkson hasn't proposed to her yet. The pair star on Prime Video hit show Clarkson's Farm which showcases life on Diddly Squat farm in Chadlington Oxfordshire. Former Top Gear and The Grand Tour host Jeremy Clarkson has owned the spot since 2008 with four series of the programme to date. The fourth of these is currently mid-release with six episodes available to stream on Prime Video and two further to be released on Friday (June 6). READ MORE: Jeremy Clarkson pays Richard Hammond £20,000 in TV reunion Ms Hogan began dating Mr Clarkson in 2017 after the pair met at a party and she features in the show. "It was quite a long courtship, as I didn't know where he was in his life," she previously told The Times. "And I wasn't ready to start dating again; didn't want to go out with anyone. "He had to court me for three months." Despite being in a relationship for nine years, the couple are yet to get married with no proposal from the TV host as of yet. READ MORE: Emma Watson joins Oxford University rowing team and loses three races Jeremy Clarkson and Lisa Hogan have been together since 2017. (Image: Andrew Matthews / PA) Both have been married in the past with Mr Clarkson with Alexandra James from 1989 to 1990 and then Frances Cain from 1993 to 2014. Ms Hogan was with Steven Bentinck from the 1990s to 2005. They have three children each from these past relationships too with Mr Clarkon dad to daughters Emily and Katya, and son Finlo, Ms Hogan also has two daughters and a son, called Elizabeth, Alice and Wolfe. In a new interview with the Daily Mail, the 51-year-old hints that she's not truly "bothered" that her boyfriend has not yet proposed. READ MORE: Taylor Swift 'books £3.3m Oxfordshire cottage' in the Cotswolds The couple star on Prime Video show, Clarkson's Farm. (Image: Prime Video) Instead, she says that they both seem content with "being together 24/7" and adds that their children get on well. In the past when talking about marriage to Mr Clarkson, the topic has been dismissed such as in a previous report by Belfast Live. Lisa previously addressed the issue of marriage when questioned by Fabulous Magazine earlier this year. "Mrs Clarkson? No, thank you, I like Lisa Hogan," she said. READ MORE: Billie Piper becomes new Doctor Who after Ncuti Gatwa regeneration Flash Sale Alert! 🌟 Dive deeper into the stories that shape Oxfordshire with Oxford Mail. Unlimited local news, an ad-free app, and a digital replica of our print edition—all with 80 per cent fewer ads on our site. 🗞️ 👇#StayInformed — Oxford Mail (@TheOxfordMail) May 26, 2025 "We decided not to have children together. We're at a stage where we are not going to have kids. "I'm just happy pootling along. I think because of our age, it's much easier. You go: 'God, is it you I end up with? OK, that's it.' "But it's relaxing knowing you are not going to be with anybody else. It gives you a certain amount of liberation." Mr Clarkson revealed last year that a fifth series of Clarkson's Farm has been confirmed for which filming has already started.
