Granderson: Taxpayer money for a church school? We know where that leads
While Pontius Pilate knew Jesus was an innocent man, the Roman governor authorized his crucifixion in large part because he was afraid of appearing disloyal to Caesar and losing power.
The constitutional crisis our country currently finds itself in may be new to America, but as we see in the Gospel of Matthew, the wreckage caused by political expediency began in ancient times.
Which brings us to St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, a proposed online faith-based charter school in Oklahoma that is seeking public funding, a decision to be determined by the U.S. Supreme Court this year. Last summer, the state's Supreme Court rejected the contract St. Isidore had with Oklahoma. However, Gov. Kevin Stitt objected, saying in a statement, 'I'm concerned we've sent a troubling message that religious groups are second-class participants in our education system.'
Now, let me tell you what I'm concerned with: the 2019 audits by the Catholic Church in Oklahoma that found abuse allegations against 22 clerics to be substantiated. Alleged predators responsible for the care of children were systemically transferred by superiors from state to state from 1960 until 2018.
'The long and the short of it is you trusted us, and we failed,' Oklahoma City Archbishop Paul Coakley wrote in a public letter following the reports. 'I also am sorry for the complicity and negligence of those who failed to respond adequately to reports of abuse, for whatever reason, whether they are bishops, priests, deacons, religious or lay persons representing the Church.'
While Catholic leaders in Oklahoma were applauded for acknowledging past failures, that did not protect the church from facing millions in lawsuits over those allegations and others. In fact, in 2022, 10 current and former students filed a $75-million lawsuit accusing Mount St. Mary Catholic High School in Oklahoma City of fostering 'a rape culture,' saying the school 'did not take reasonable steps to report or stop the rampant rape culture and ongoing sexual abuse.' A federal judge dismissed the case in 2023 because the statute of limitations had run out — not ruling on the merits of the allegations.
These are just recent headlines from one state. From 2004-23, the Catholic Church paid more than $5 billion to settle sexual abuse cases tracked by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and certain U.S. religious communities.
Whatever else you take from those examples and statistics, this much is clear: The Catholic Church isn't hurting for cash. I can't help but wonder why on Earth taxpayer money would be needed to fund Catholic schools.
It's not that I'm against faith-based education. My son attended a private Christian school. But I am against any attempt to tear down the wall between church and state. Just turn to the example of Pontius Pilate to see what can happen when secular power tries to exert control over religious life.
History is full of enough evidence to warn us away from this mingling. We don't need a test case in Oklahoma to prove the point.
In 1534, when England's Parliament passed the Act of Supremacy, King Henry VIII became the supreme head of the Church of England, breaking with the papacy. Because Henry wanted to divorce his first wife, the pope's rule had become … inconvenient.
The king pressured English church officials who knew better into making him the religious leader as well as the monarch. And when Henry's second wife did not produce a male heir, he had her executed so he could marry a third woman. He faced no consequences. Why? Political expediency. Parliament washed its hands of the controversy, because lawmakers could tell themselves the king was above the law and above the church. And as with Pontius Pilate, history shows the attempt to sidestep accountability was futile.
The people who founded the United States were trying to leave behind that entanglement and corruption. They embraced the 1st Amendment to keep the government out of religious life and to keep religion out of government.
For taxpayers to fund a religious school would pull us back toward tyranny.
This week White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said he wanted the country's children to 'be taught to love America.' I agree. And that begins with protecting America from becoming a theocracy.
@LZGranderson
If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
DAVID MARCUS: Trump understands that safety is for every citizen, not just the lucky few
For decades, Washington, D.C. has been synonymous with crime, murder, and more recently vagrancy, but this week, President Donald Trump is taking a page from an ancient political playbook and looking to finally clean up our nation's capital. "Salus Populi Suprema Lex Est," wrote Marcus Tullius Cicero over 2,000 years ago. It roughly means, "the safety of the people should be the supreme law," and the safety of the ancient Roman citizen, at least for a while, was almost unquestioned. Trump wants Americans to feel just as safe as they live in or visit the seat of our great democracy. Democrats' immediate reaction to Trump's common-sense plan to fight crime in D.C. by surging federal resources and approaches was to play deaf, dumb and blind to the plight of residents, citing statistics that show a recent drop in an already sky-high crime rate. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., perhaps from his Whites only beach club, took to X to claim that this use of the Home Rule act was only triggered by an assault on a DOGE team member. He conveniently left out the two Israeli embassy staff workers recently murdered in cold blood, the congressional aide killed by mistake in a drive-by, and the rise of 15-year-old carjackers. Meanwhile, Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., taking time off from his TikTok movie productions, posted several examples of crime in D.C. this week with the insane comment, "Trump owns it." One of these crimes, a murder, took place on Monday, just hours after Trump's anti-crime announcement. Setting aside the congressman's heartless glee in snarking at the president over the murder of an innocent, his ridiculous attack on Trump at least admits that, yes, crime is a big problem in Washington, D.C., one that will finally be tackled. Nobody likes crime, and nobody likes being told they are just imagining it. This is yet another example of Trump's incendiary common sense, by which he does something outlandish, like taking over the D.C. police department, to outrage from opponents who a day later have to admit, OK, yeah, crime is bad. Public safety is a gut issue, and it is also the foundation of all other blessings of good government. This is why Cicero called it supreme. Everyone in D.C. either knows, or has been, a victim or witness of a crime. You can't show them statistics and pretend everything is fine. Opponents of crime prevention display graphs that say the crime rate is down 30 percent this year, but from an already staggeringly high level that has been ignored for years. This is like a guy who loses his entire year's salary playing blackjack. He can likely circle a few weekends when he won big, but he still needs to call Gambler's Anonymous. The obvious model for Trump's anti-crime action in D.C. is the success of Rudy Giuliani in the 1990s in New York City, who slashed violent crime with almost impossible speed. He accomplished this by embracing new police tactics like Compstat crime computing, stop and frisk, and broken windows policing that focuses on smaller quality of life crimes. And the benefits of this miraculous turnaround were not limited to Gotham. Indeed, other cities across America used these innovations to lower crime nationwide. Trump and his administration have the chance to do the same thing with their D.C. efforts, by actually punishing juvenile crime, by seeking to end cashless bail, and by clearing out drug users and vagrants from D.C. parks, national trends could be set. One Democrat who has taken the high road, more or less, amid this takeover by Trump is D.C.'s Mayor Muriel Bowser, who knows exactly how bad crime in D.C. is, having put in place a juvenile curfew just this week, and she has shown an open mind to the endeavor. Traditionally, the Latin word "salus," in the famous quote from Cicero above, means safety, but the word, derived from the Goddess Salus, can also mean health, well-being and prosperity, because, as the ancients knew, all of these are of a piece. Donald Trump envisages a gleaming capital city where even at 2 am one can walk freely, admiring the moon atop the Washington monument in the big skies of D.C., and not just in D.C., but in all American cities. So, let the Democrats hoot and holler a little more if they must. Most Americans are hopeful about this move by the president. Nobody likes crime, and nobody likes being told they are just imagining it. Salus Populi Suprema Lex Est, the primacy of safety is as true today as when it was coined in the days before Christ, and whether he succeeds or fails, Donald Trump is going to try to provide that safety. It should be an effort we can all get behind and support.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
On Sanctuary Cities, It's Trump vs. the 10th Amendment
Over the past three months, the Trump administration has filed lawsuits against Los Angeles, Illinois, Colorado, New York state, New York City, and other places for the express purpose of forcing them to abolish their "sanctuary city" policies and start aiding the feds in rounding up undocumented immigrants and enforcing federal immigration laws. But unless the U.S. Supreme Court rapidly overturns several of its own precedents, including a recent one from 2018, all of these cases will be constitutional losers for President Donald Trump. Why? Here is how the late conservative legal hero and long-serving Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia once spelled it out. "The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems," Scalia wrote for the Court's majority in Printz v. United States (1997), "nor command the States' officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program." At issue in Printz was the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, which, among other things, required state and local police to help the feds enforce federal gun control laws. However, Scalia held, such "federal commandeering of state governments" violated the constitutional principles of federalism secured by the 10th Amendment. Scalia's ruling in Printz was recently reaffirmed and expanded by the Supreme Court in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018), which struck down a federal law that prohibited states from legalizing sports gambling. At the time it was decided, Printz was widely criticized by liberals, who objected to the idea of state and local officials stymying a federal gun control scheme. Now, the same anticommandeering doctrine that led to a "conservative" result in Printz is standing in the way of Trump's immigration crackdown. According to Trump's Justice Department, sanctuary city policies, such as when local police are generally forbidden from notifying the feds about a noncitizen's custody status or release date from custody, "reflect an intentional effort to obstruct federal law enforcement." But federal agents still retain their own independent authority to enforce federal immigration law inside of sanctuary states and cities, just as federal authorities retain the independent authority to enforce other federal laws in states and cities. The key point under Printz is that it is unconstitutional for the feds to compel local officials to lend them a helping hand in carrying out the enforcement of federal law. Because these sanctuary cases all feature the federal government in direct and open conflict with a state or city, one or more of them will probably end up before the Supreme Court in due time. Perhaps it will be United States v. Illinois. Last week, Judge Lindsay Jenkins of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division ruled that the Prairie State's various sanctuary laws were safeguarded from the Trump administration's lawsuit by the anticommandeering principle embraced in Printz, Murphy, and related precedents. "The Sanctuary Policies reflect [Illinois'] decision to not participate in enforcing civil immigration law—a decision protected by the Tenth Amendment and not preempted by" the Immigration and Nationality Act, the judge wrote. I expect a majority of the Supreme Court to adopt the same position if or when the opportunity arises. If it is unconstitutional for the feds to mandate local cooperation in enforcing federal gun control, it is unconstitutional for the feds to mandate local cooperation in enforcing federal immigration control. The national policies under dispute may be different, but the underlying constitutional issue is the same. As long as Printz remains good law, Trump's efforts to override the actions of sanctuary states and cities will be thwarted by Scalia's judgment. The post On Sanctuary Cities, It's Trump vs. the 10th Amendment appeared first on Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ashley Biden's Late Brother Beau Set Her Up with Husband Howard Krein Before His Death: Inside the Couple's 15-Year Relationship
The former first daughter, who reportedly filed for divorce on Aug. 11, met Krein at a hospital while Beau was recovering from a stroke in 2010NEED TO KNOW Former first daughter Ashley Biden filed for divorce from her husband, Dr. Howard Krein, on Aug. 11, according to The Philadelphia Inquirer Ashley was introduced to Krein by her late older brother, Beau Biden, who was in the hospital after suffering a stroke when he facilitated their first date Beau's stroke would later be recognized as a symptom of the aggressive brain cancer that killed him in May 2015 at age 46Ashley Biden, the daughter of former President Joe Biden and former first lady Dr. Jill Biden, has reportedly filed for divorce from her husband, Dr. Howard Krein, after 13 years of marriage. The Philadelphia Inquirer reported that Ashley, 44, filed the the documents in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas on Monday, Aug. 11. She and Krein, 58, have been married since June 2, 2012. Ashley was initially set up with Krein by her late brother, Beau Biden. President Biden told the story of their unfortunate meet-cute in a December 2014 conversation with Politico. In 2010, Beau was hospitalized after suffering a stroke. The medical emergency, as it turns out, would change the life of both the Delaware attorney general and his younger sister in drastically different ways. While Beau was recovering, Joe recalled, Ashley came to the hospital to check on him at the same time that her future husband, who knew Beau, stopped by for a visit. "Ashley walked in the room, panicked about her brother and jumped in bed with him and [said] 'Beau, you okay, honey?' " the former president remembered in the 2014 interview. "This guy [Krein] was at the foot of the bed visiting. And after it was all over, Howard walked up to Beau and said, 'Beau, you think you could set me up with your sister?' " Joe added. Ashley initially refused the idea, her father claimed, but Beau wore her down. "He said, 'As a favor, please, for me, do this.' [She said], 'Okay, alright, alright.' " Krein, who is 15 years her senior, was an impressive candidate. A plastic surgeon with both an M.D. and a Ph.D., he would also become an associate professor of otolaryngology at Thomas Jefferson University, a founding partner and co-director of the school's Facial Aesthetic and Reconstructive Center, and the chief medical officer at StartUp Health, which helps entrepreneurs build sustainable health and wellness companies. Later on, when Joe asked his daughter how the date went, "She said, 'Ah, he's alright.' " Two years later, they were married, in an interfaith Catholic and Jewish ceremony at the same Delaware church where Ashley was baptized. Their wedding reception was held in the Bidens' backyard. Ashley shared an anecdote about the ceremony in a speech at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, recalling, "At the time, my dad was vice president, but he was also that dad who literally set up the entire reception. He was riding around in his John Deere four-wheeler, fixing the place settings, arranging the plants." Thankfully, the big brother who introduced the couple got to see his sister's special day. But it was a close call. As it turned out, the stroke that landed Beau in the hospital in 2010 was part of the reason doctors eventually discovered he had glioblastoma multiforme, the most aggressive type of brain cancer. Chemotherapy and radiation kept the disease in check for a few years, but on May 20, 2015, he was admitted to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md. Ten days later, he died at the age of 46. Ashley has kept Beau's memory alive throughout the years. When she founded the clothing brand Livelihood in 2017, the logo — the letters LH being pierced by an arrow — was a tribute to her late brother. "We have to sometimes be pulled all the way down to shoot forward," Ashley explained to The Lily in 2020. "He was my bow. His cancer brought me to my knees. I had no choice but to shoot forward, keep going, keep aiming at my own dreams." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. While Ashley is technically a half-sister to Beau and Hunter — who are Joe's sons from his first marriage to late wife Neilia — the Biden family bond is strong. The former first daughter doesn't have much of a social media presence, but many of the photos she does post feature the smiling former president and first lady, as well as her nieces and nephews. In fact, Ashley traveled with Beau's daughter, Natalie, on Joe's final official international trip as president in December 2024. Ashley celebrated her adventure with "my girl" with an Instagram photo carousel of memories. Throughout Krein's 15-year relationship with Ashley, he has stayed mostly out of public view, first while his father-in-law was vice president, then throughout Joe's presidency. Ashley frequently attended events with the Biden family while her father was in office, usually without Krein, a practicing physician and professor who specializes in plastic surgery and facial reconstruction. In 2013 and 2016, Krein was out in the spotlight with Joe and Jill on international diplomacy trips, and he was notably in the Oval Office beside Ashley in July 2025 as President Biden delivered a speech from the Resolute Desk about his historic decision to end his reelection campaign. After the Bidens left the White House in January, Ashley and Krein returned to living largely private lives. The divorce filing was confirmed to the Inquirer through a representative for Ashley, and she has not yet publicly commented on the news. Read the original article on People