
Mexico's Upcoming Election May Redefine Power
This Sunday's election is not just about judges—it's a controversial moment in Mexico's democracy. For some, it marks the end of the rule of law as we know it. For others—and according to the data, the majority—it's the beginning of a long-overdue democratization of the judiciary. Everything depends on your point of view. If you've always had access to the justice system, the election looks like a threat. If you never have, this feels like the first real opportunity for justice.
That divide runs deep: polls show Mexico's population is split roughly 60–40 in favor of reform. It's a clash between those who want to preserve the status quo and those who've never benefited from it.
A voting station inside a Mexico City high school is pictured.
A voting station inside a Mexico City high school is pictured.
Getty Images
But beyond the controversy, this election gives us a unique window into three key dynamics that will define the rest of this decade: the strength of President Claudia Sheinbaum's leadership within her movement, the rise of a new Indigenous political force, and the capacity of Mexico's most trusted institution—the Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE)—to protect democracy under pressure.
First, this election is a test of the president's control. Sheinbaum has a project for the judiciary and made it known—distributing acordeones (candidate cheat sheets) to allies and mobilizers. This isn't a campaign of TV ads and media tours. It's grassroots. It's local operators, governors, unions, NGOs, and party bosses moving votes in coordinated blocs. According to our latest survey, 77 percent of the votes will be mobilized, not spontaneous. This is not about convincing—it's about delivering.
Participation will offer the first signal—20 percent would be a political win. Anything lower will almost certainly be read by the president's adversaries as a defeat, or at least a sign of limited control. But turnout alone won't tell the full story. This moment offers a first glimpse not just of loyalty, but of the real mobilization strength of each political bloc—Morena and its allies, the opposition, and the Indigenous movement alike.
In about a month, once results are final, we shouldn't be surprised to see that several states controlled by Morena adversaries vote against the president's line—nor should it be shocking if opposition territories quietly back her lists. The political map won't split neatly by party. Instead, it may reveal a deeper realignment—one that cuts across traditional affiliations. And before her first year in office ends, President Sheinbaum will know exactly who's with her—and who isn't.
Second, this election marks the most organized Indigenous political effort in decades. With over 23 million Indigenous people in Mexico, their historical relationship with electoral politics has been complex. They've supported causes from the outside—1994's Zapatista uprising, Marichuy's 2017 candidacy—but rarely entered electoral institutions directly. That's changed.
Led by Hugo Aguilar Ortiz, Indigenous communities have mobilized not just around identity, but around a structured, credible, and serious ballot. Hugo isn't alone—he's backed by legal scholars, respected professionals, and a powerful community base. This is not a protest candidacy. He's part of a coordinated political project. If he wins, Hugo could become the first Indigenous president of the Supreme Court—and the most powerful Indigenous leader in Mexico since former President Benito Juárez.
Third, none of this would be possible without the INE. The INE isn't just an electoral organizer; it's the institutional memory of Mexico's democratic transition. It was built after decades of fraud to guarantee that votes are counted, verified, and trusted. While elections in the U.S. rely heavily on local discretion and good faith, Mexico's system is designed around safeguards, not trust. Every step is certified, reviewed, and secured.
This election has tested the INE like never before: thousands of candidates, multiple new ballots, limited funding, and intense political pressure. Despite all that, the system is holding. Yes, the rollout has been messy. Yes, some rules came too late. But the election is happening, and the votes will be counted. And in a country with our history, that fact alone is no small victory.
This isn't just a judicial election. It's a map. A test. A reckoning. And a mirror.
It will tell us what kind of democracy Mexico wants, and more importantly, who really holds power in the Mexico being built.
Roberto Trad is a Mexican political scientist and author with over 25 years of experience advising presidential and local campaigns across Latin America and the United States.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Brazil's Lula signs law to expand affirmative action, boosting quotas for Blacks in government jobs
SAO PAULO (AP) — Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on Tuesday signed a new law to expand the country's affirmative action policies, increasing the quota for government jobs reserved for Blacks from 20% to 30% and adding Indigenous people and descendants of Afro-Brazilian enslaved people as beneficiaries. The changes apply to candidates applying for permanent and public employment positions across Brazil's federal administration, agencies, public foundations, public companies and state-run mixed-capital companies. As approved by Congress, the quota will be revised in 2035. 'It is important to allow this country for one day to have a society reflected in its public offices, in the Prosecutors' Office, in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in the Attorney-General's Office, in the Internal Revenue Service, everywhere,' Lula said at the presidential palace in the capital, Brasilia. 'We still have few women, few Black people, almost no Indigenous people.' Brazil's first law on racial quotas for government jobs was approved in 2014 by then President Dilma Rousseff, and it extended to public administration positions an affirmative action policy that was in place for access to state-run universities. Brazil's government said in a statement that Blacks and mixed-race people held 25% of top government jobs in 2014, a figure that rose to 36% in 2024. 'Still, Black people are under-represented in the public service and hold lower-wage positions,' the government added. Management and Innovation Minister Esther Dweck said the new law was needed due to a low number of new government jobs being opened for candidates in the last decade, when the previous quota was in place. 'We could not reverse the scenario of low representation (for minorities) in the public service,' Dweck said in a speech Tuesday. Brazil's government said 55% of the country's population is made up of Black or mixed-race people. It added that more than 70% of Brazilians living below the poverty line are also Black or mixed race, while only 1% of people from those ethnicities are in leadership positions in the private sector. ____ Follow AP's coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Mexico's ruling party headed toward control of newly elected Supreme Court, vote tallies show
MEXICO CITY — Mexico's ruling Morena party appeared to be heading toward control over the Supreme Court, preliminary vote tallies of the country's first judicial election indicated. While votes were still being counted Tuesday for the majority of the 2,600 federal, state and local judge positions up for grabs in Sunday's elections, results rolled in for the nine Supreme Court positions. The majority of the newly elected justices share strong ties and ideological alignments with the ruling party, shifting a once fairly balanced high court into the hands of the very party that overhauled the judicial system to elect judges for the first time. Experts warned the shift would undercut checks and balances in the Latin American nation: The governing party would now be close to controlling all three branches of government, and President Claudia Sheinbaum and her party would have an easier path to push through their agenda. 'We're watching as power is falling almost entirely into the hands of one party,' said Georgina De la Fuente, election specialist with the Mexican consulting firm Strategia Electoral. 'There isn't any balance of power.' Despite that, officials have continued to fiercely reject democratic concerns. Some of those headed toward election were members or former members of the party. A number of them, who were Supreme Court justices prior to the election, were appointed by former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, Sheinbaum's mentor who pushed through the judicial overhaul last year. Others were advisers to the president or the party or campaigned with politically aligned visions for the judiciary. Not all of the prospective winners were explicitly aligned with Morena. One standout was Hugo Aguilar Ortiz, an Indigenous lawyer from the southern state of Oaxaca. He has no clear party affiliation, though Sheinbaum said repeatedly she hoped to have an Indigenous judge on the court and said on Tuesday she was happy to see he would be. Critics had feared that Morena would emerge from the election with control of the judiciary. The vote came after months of fierce debate, prompted when López Obrador and the party jammed through the reforms for judges to be elected instead of being appointed based on merits. The overhaul will notably limit the Supreme Court as a counterweight to the president. Judges, experts and political opposition say the reform was an attempt to take advantage of high popularity levels to stack courts in favor of Morena. Sheinbaum and her mentor have insisted that electing judges will root out corruption in a system most Mexicans agree is broken. On Tuesday, Sheinbaum brushed off complaints by Mexico's opposition – which called for a boycott of the vote – that the Supreme Court was now unfairly stacked against them, saying 'they're the ones who decided not to participate in the election.' The elections were marred by low participation — about 13% — and confusion by voters who struggled to understand the new system, something opponents quickly latched onto as a failure. De la Fuente said Morena is likely to use its new lack of counterweight in the high court to push through rounds of reforms, including reforms to Mexico's electoral systems, a proposal that has stirred controversy and was previously blocked by courts. Guadalupe Taddei Zavala, chief counselor of Mexico's electoral authority, on Tuesday rejected democratic concerns. 'I don't see any (constitutional) crisis after the election,' she said. As of Tuesday afternoon, more than 93% of the ballots had been tallied.


Business Upturn
an hour ago
- Business Upturn
Bill 33 attacks local democracy, public education and Ontario's most vulnerable kids
Toronto, ON, June 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Last week, the Ontario government introduced Bill 33, a sweeping piece of legislation that hands more control over education to the premier's office at the direct expense of school boards, post-secondary institutions, and the communities that depend on them. 'Bill 33 is a power grab, and a dangerous one,' said OPSEU/SEFPO President JP Hornick. 'This government is using isolated examples of financial mismanagement to justify sweeping changes to multiple levels of our public education system, instead of addressing the real issue—underfunding.' If passed, Bill 33 would: make it easier for the province to take control of democratically elected local school boards; mandate School Resource Officers (i.e., police) in schools (even though such programs have previously been ended for their discriminatory and harmful impacts and do not offer the solutions needed to address increasing violence in schools); regulate which fees post-secondary students can pay (opening the door to defunding crucial student supports); and threaten access to education with new admissions policies at the province's colleges and universities, among other measures. 'These moves represent an unwarranted expansion of provincial authority. Instead of fixing the funding crisis it created, the Ford government is seizing control and calling it reform,' said Hornick. 'Our colleges, our schools, and our students deserve better.' Public educational institutions are meant to be built on equitable access and student success, but Bill 33 will undercut these principles while failing to address the systemic issues that face Ontario's education system. 'The mandated placement of SROs outlined in this bill does nothing to support the students and staff that are dealing with unprecedented levels of violence in Ontario schools,' said Kelly Martin, President of OPSEU/SEFPO Local 330, representing workers at Simcoe County District School Board. 'We need solutions that give children access to the wrap around supports that they need to thrive – like more education workers, smaller class sizes, increased mental health supports and special education supports that meet the needs of students.' 'It is unconscionable that this government is considering mandating police in schools when the Ontario Human Rights Commission and mountains of evidence have already found that a police presence not only introduces unnecessary surveillance but also significantly impacts the mental health and education of Indigenous, black and racialized kids,' said Hornick. The legislation reaches into post-secondary education as well. Requiring colleges and universities to adopt rigid and restrictive admissions policies – defined by the province – ignores decades of work done to widen access for underrepresented groups. Stripping away access-focused admissions pathways threatens the socio-economic mobility of entire communities. 'They want to surveil and criminalize our kids from a young age and then make it even harder to access post-secondary education later on in their academic careers. Ontario's future depends on an inclusive education system, not one that intentionally keeps people out,' said Hornick. The province's colleges system is already in crisis, receiving the lowest level of provincial funding per student in the country. Bill 33 threatens to further destabilize campuses by adding more ministerial oversight over ancillary fees that fund student-led services like mental health supports, food banks, and student career services. 'This legislation would not only strip students of their ability to democratically decide which of these services matter to them,' said Hornick. 'It is clearly intended to defund these services in our colleges.' Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.