
Tax Challenges: Foreign Owned U.S. Real Estate Via Single-Member LLC
Foreign investors using single-member LLCs to hold U.S. real estate face complex U.S. income and ... More estate tax implications, including 30% withholding on rental income, FIRPTA withholding upon disposition and potential 40% estate tax. Various strategies can reduce the tax bite.
For some time, foreigners have been drawn to the U.S. real estate market due to its stability, potential for appreciation, and the reliable legal framework in America. A frequently used investment vehicle is a single-member limited liability company created under the laws of a U.S. state.
A SMLLC offers liability protection and flexibility. The U.S. tax implications for nonresident aliens or foreign entities owning U.S. real estate through an SMLLC are complicated, yet too often, investors do not consider the tax issues. These involve different U.S. tax regimes: income tax, estate tax, and compliance with rules under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act.
This article explores these tax consequences and key considerations for structuring such investments when the U.S. SMLLC is owned by an NRA individual.
A SMLLC is a business entity with one owner. Typically the SMLLC is treated as a "disregarded entity" for tax purposes unless the NRA owner makes an election for the SMLLC to be taxed as a corporation. Absent such an election, the LLC's income and expenses will flow through to the individual and the individual will be taxed as if he holds the real estate directly.
Certain non-tax benefits exist with the SMLLC structure. It provides liability protection, shielding the individual's personal assets from liability claims associated with the real property owned by the LLC. It can also simplify obtaining insurance when compared to direct ownership by a foreign individual. Many investors do not realize, however, that privacy can be compromised since many states require public disclosure of the LLC owner. States vary in their LLC disclosure requirements; investors concerned with confidentiality should investigate the rules prior to formation.
Unless the rental activity is regular and substantial such that the LLC is considered as engaged in a U.S. trade or business, rental income from U.S. real estate owned by an NRA through an SMLLC is generally classified as so-called Fixed, Determinable, Annual, or Periodical income. FDAP income is subject to a flat 30% withholding tax on the gross rental amount, with no deductions allowed for expenses such as depreciation, maintenance, advertising, or interest. Absent a lower tax rate that may apply under a relevant treaty, a 30% withholding tax can significantly reduce net rental returns.
To avert this problem the NRA can make a special election to instead be taxed on net rental income at graduated U.S. tax rates (up to 37% for individuals), thus enabling deductions for expenses such as depreciation, property taxes, and mortgage interest. The election is made by attaching a statement to the individual's U.S. income tax return or amended return. The NRA must also provide Form W-8ECI to the withholding agent/payor of the rental income. Once the election is properly made, it applies to all U.S. real property held for income production and remains in effect unless revoked. The rules for revoking the election can get tricky, as revocation may require IRS consent in certain cases.
The sale of U.S. real estate held through an SMLLC is subject to tax under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act. For a NRA investor, FIRPTA will tax the gain (sale price minus adjusted basis) at capital gains rates. If the property was held for more than one year, the long-term capital gains rate will not exceed 20%.
FIRPTA requires the buyer to withhold 15% of the gross sale price (not the gain) as a prepayment of the FIRPTA tax. FIRPTA was enacted to prevent tax evasion by ensuring that the IRS could collect the tax from the buyer. Collection from nonresident foreign investors would become very difficult once the sales proceeds were transferred offshore.
If the withholding exceeds the actual tax liability (for example, when the real property is sold at a loss), the NRA can file for a refund. With advance planning, a special FIRPTA withholding certificate can be obtained from the IRS to reduce or eliminate withholding when the expected tax liability would be less than the 15% withheld amount.
For example, if an NRA purchases a property for $1,000,000 and sells it for $1,200,000, the taxable gain is $200,000, potentially taxed at 15–20%. However, the buyer must withhold $180,000 (15% of $1,200,000), which may exceed the actual tax liability. Applying for an IRS withholding certificate could resolve the overwithholding in advance. Alternatively, the NRA can file Form 1040-NR to obtain a refund for tax that was overwithheld.
An NRA holding U.S. real estate through an SMLLC must file Form 1040-NR annually if they receive rental income or when the property is sold. Additionally, foreign-owned SMLLCs must file Form 5472 (Information Return of a 25% Foreign-Owned U.S. Corporation or a Foreign Corporation Engaged in a U.S. Trade or Business) to report transactions between the LLC and its foreign owner, even if no tax is owed. An Employer Identification Number is required for the SMLLC, and a responsible party must be designated.
The SMLLC is formed under the laws of a U.S. state and as a U.S. entity, it could have FBAR filing obligations. Even though the SMLLC is disregarded for U.S. income tax purposes, it is not disregarded for purposes of the Bank Secrecy Act. This means that if the SMLLC has any foreign financial accounts, an FBAR must be filed each year reporting these if the dollar threshold is met for all aggregated foreign accounts.
U.S. estate tax applies to NRAs on assets situated in the U.S., including U.S. real estate. What happens when U.S. real estate is held through a SMLLC? The IRS view is that since an SMLLC is disregarded for tax purposes, the underlying real estate is considered directly owned by the NRA, making it subject to estate tax upon the death. The estate tax rate can reach 40%, with a lifetime exemption of a paltry $60,000 for NRAs. This comes as a surprise when compared to the 2025 $13.99 million for U.S. citizens and domiciliaries. This creates significant estate tax exposure, especially for high-value properties. If the IRS view prevails, the SMLLC provides no inherent estate tax protection since the real estate is treated as directly owned by the NRA at death. If instead, the SMLLC interest were to be valued in the estate, there is the potential for valuation discounts.
The U.S. has negotiated estate tax treaties with 14 countries including France, Germany, and the UK. A treaty may reduce or eliminate estate tax liability by redefining situs rules or providing credits for foreign estate taxes that are paid. Foreign investors should work with tax professionals to understand if treaty benefits might be available to leverage certain benefits.
Estate tax exposure can be mitigated with use of alternative structures, such as holding the U.S. real estate through a foreign corporation or a multi-tier structure (e.g., a foreign corporation owning a U.S. LLC taxed as a corporation). Shares in a foreign corporation are generally not considered U.S. situs assets, and upon death they are not included in the NRA's taxable estate. These structures, however, will result in compliance complexities. They may also introduce corporate-level taxes (21% federal plus state) and potential branch profits tax (up to 30%, unless reduced by a treaty) on repatriated earnings.
The NRA can consider purchasing life insurance to cover potential estate tax liability as a cost-effective way to mitigate risk without restructuring ownership. Proceeds from life insurance policies on the NRA's life are generally exempt from U.S. estate tax.
Investors to the U.S. are warned that if they are taxpayers from certain countries that are treated as 'discriminatory foreign countries,' a proposed change to the tax laws in the One Big Beautiful Bill would increase the U.S. tax and withholding rates on their U.S. income, impacting for example, FIRPTA gains, FDAP, business income, branch profits). These foreign persons could be subject to significantly higher U.S. tax rates commencing at 5% and escalating annually (up to 20%) if their country of tax residence or incorporation is treated as a jurisdiction imposing unfair taxes (such as digital services tax) on Americans.
Holding U.S. real estate through a single-member LLC offers foreign investors liability protection and operational simplicity. Ownership through a SMLLC, however, does not inherently reduce U.S. income or estate tax burdens.
Certain steps can be taken to address U.S. tax concerns:
I help with tax matters around the globe.
Reach me at vljeker@us-taxes.org
Visit my US tax blog www.us-tax.org
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
37 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Dollar Hits Multiyear Lows
The dollar sank to its weakest level in years, losing ground against the euro, Japanese yen and other currencies. The WSJ Dollar Index traded as low as 94.48, the lowest intraday level since July 2023, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That gauge and the U.S. Dollar Index were recently both on pace to settle at their lowest levels in years. The euro surged above $1.16, and was on course for its strongest end-of-day level since October 2021.


Gizmodo
38 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Shaq Signs $1.8 Million Check to End His Crypto Drama
Shaquille O'Neal can finally breathe a sigh of relief. The basketball legend turned businessman and TV personality has agreed to pay $1.8 million to settle a class-action lawsuit over his role in promoting the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX. While the payment closes a legal chapter for the former Laker, it also marks a turning point in how courts are treating celebrity endorsements in the volatile world of crypto, a space where stardom once offered both hype and cover. O'Neal is among the first big names to reach a settlement in the high-profile FTX case, which also names football legend Tom Brady, his ex-wife Gisele Bündchen, NBA superstar Steph Curry, tennis player Naomi Osaka, and Seinfeld creator Larry David. Some of the claims against these celebrities, who say they weren't aware of the risks, have already been dismissed. But O'Neal's decision to settle stands out. He was accused of promoting FTX to his fans and investors, appearing in a string of marketing campaigns. In return, the company allegedly sponsored his music festival venture, Shaq's Fun House. According to the lawsuit, O'Neal promoted the partnership through social media posts and videos. He was allegedly paid $750,000 for his endorsement. 'Plaintiffs seek class-wide relief from Mr. O'Neal, who was an alleged influencer and celebrity paid by FTX to present FTX to his followers and event attendees as a safe and legitimate alternative to other cryptocurrency exchanges,' states the court document (FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange Collapse Litigation, Docket No. 1:23-md-03076, S.D. Fla. Jun 5, 2023). An initial settlement was reached last November. It was unveiled in May by the court, and on June 9, the final $1.8 million agreement was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Adam Moskowitz, the plaintiffs' attorney. O'Neal must pay the amount within 30 days. FTX, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Nov. 11, 2022, had become a crypto juggernaut thanks in part to its celebrity ambassadors. But behind the scenes, the platform was using customer assets as collateral to borrow funds that were funneled to its sister company, Alameda Research, for trading and investments. When the house of cards collapsed, both companies went under, sparking lawsuits against founder Sam Bankman-Fried, his inner circle, and the stars who endorsed the brand. O'Neal's settlement isn't just about resolving his personal liability. It's a wake-up call to celebrities who cashed in on the crypto boom without fully understanding, or disclosing, the risks. 'I don't understand it,' O'Neal told CNBC in 2021 about cryptocurrencies. 'So, I will probably stay away from it until I get a full understanding of what it is.' He added, 'From my experience, it is too good to be true.' Yet he didn't stay away. Since the FTX implosion, regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Trade Commission have been cracking down on undisclosed paid crypto endorsements. The SEC now emphasizes 'fair disclosure' and 'financial literacy,' warning that fame is no longer a shield. The message to celebrities is unequivocal: if you promote it, you are now expected to 'own' it, even if the venture collapses. And this isn't Shaq's only crypto-related legal headache. Last November, he was ordered to pay $11 million to settle a separate lawsuit involving Astrals, a failed non-fungible tokens (NFT) project he co-founded with his son Myles O'Neal. (NFTs are digital collectibles that can be owned, sold, or traded online.) The project promised a metaverse experience where users would interact via NFT avatars. But after FTX's downfall, Shaq reportedly distanced himself from the venture, leaving investors to fend for themselves. Now, with $12.8 million in crypto settlements under his belt, O'Neal may think twice before lending his name to another crypto venture.

Travel Weekly
39 minutes ago
- Travel Weekly
Cunard's Queen Elizabeth arrives in Seattle for summer of Alaska cruises
Cunard's Queen Elizabeth arrived in Seattle on June 12, where the ship will homeport for Alaska sailings for the first time. After its summer Alaska season, Queen Elizabeth will do another first -- a full season of Caribbean sailings from Miami, beginning in October. The roundtrip Seattle itineraries are between seven and 11 nights. Roundtrip cruises are convenient for U.S. guests, said Liz Fettes, Cunard's senior vice president of commercial North America. "We have such a good amount of guests that come from California and from the West Coast, so I think the whole travel with ease, travel from your backyard for Cunard, it really goes in alignment with that," Fettes said. Port of Seattle director Steve Metruck called it an honor to have Queen Elizabeth homeporting in the city for the first time. "This partnership marks a major milestone in our work to expand economic activity and to support local jobs through cruise, and we look forward to advancing together our shared vision for sustainability and responsible tourism," he said in a press release. The Alaska sailings will include lectures through Cunard's partnership with the Royal Canadian Geographical Society as well as 11 speakers from Alaska, including historians, photographers and a dance group. The ship's maiden season in the Caribbean that will follow marks the first time Cunard is dedicating a ship to the region for a full season. "We know how vital it is to not only have Caribbean voyages, but be in the cruise capital of the world," Fettes said. "Miami is the heart of cruising." Cunard completed a makeover of Queen Elizabeth on March 14, which included revitalizations of dining venues and the introduction the Harper's Bazaar Wellness at Sea Program. The program offers various physical treatments, workshops and nutritional programming. "It's got a full list of healthy cuisine options, including plant-based menus," Fettes said. "And they're forward-thinking plant-based menus, versus it being a secondary option of having a vegan or veggie component."