'Unconstitutional': Immigration experts knock Florida 'blueprint' for mass deportation
Immigration experts argue that Florida's "blueprint" for mass deportation is not only unconstitutional but also an overreach of state authority, effectively displacing federal law.
On May 12, Florida officials unveiled a 37-page immigration enforcement operations plan they say will be a model for efforts across the country. It's a "road map" for detention and the transportation of detained immigrants, and it includes potential sites for mass detention centers and projected costs.
But immigration attorneys say parts of the plan may result in false imprisonment and exorbitant costs, as the federal government has been reluctant to pay for past and future projects.
'This basically would change how immigration detention is managed, and that flies in the face of several decades of litigation that have established constitutional protections for people in detention and how you even get to be put in detention,' said Elizabeth Ricci, an immigration attorney in Tallahassee.
'If we erode those protections, my concern is, what is going to be eroded, and for who next?'
The concerns portend a deepening divide between state-level crackdowns and federal immigration authority, which could lead to potentially far-reaching consequences for civil liberties and the future of immigration enforcement in the U.S.
For instance, the plan encourages the suspension of federal detention standards to allow county jails to temporarily house detainees. 'It is anomalous that facilities adequate to confine U.S. citizens are not deemed adequate to house illegal aliens,' the plan says. 'This self-limiting proposition works against achieving the President's goals."
But waiving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) guidelines isn't the state's call, Ricci said.
'Who is Florida to tell the federal government how to detain someone in what conditions?' Ricci said. 'That is not something for the Sunshine State to be doing. Is Florida now going to tell the Postmaster General how it should deliver mail or the Mint under what conditions and money should be printed? No.'
The state and the feds have different approaches, Ricci said. Florida empowers local officials to enforce minimum standards but the federal system uses uniform, outcome-focused regulations with national oversight.
In the plan, the state says the suspension of national detention standards would make space for more people to be housed in county jails and for soft-sided detention centers on state-owned airplane runways "to establish routine air corridors to those nations routinely receiving repatriated illegal aliens. This would be especially useful in prompt removal of aliens under unexecuted Final Orders of Removal."
U.S. border czar Tom Homan has previously said the Trump administration plans to lower detention standards, allowing local law enforcement to detain immigrants using state standards instead of more rigorous federal detention guidelines.
"As long as you follow your own state standards, if that's good enough for a U.S. citizen in your county, it's good enough for an illegal immigrant detained for us,' he told the National Association of Sheriffs earlier this year.
Immigration attorney Neil Rambana, Ricci's husband and law partner, argued that lowering detention standards will create more false imprisonment cases, as many jailers, even as they're deputized by the federal government, aren't getting the proper training in the state's rapid response to Trump's mass deportation mandate.
Rambana said since January, more of his clients have been detained beyond the limits of what's called 287(g), an ICE initiative that allows local law enforcement agencies to help "identify and remove criminal aliens who are amenable to removal from the U.S.," according to ICE.
Both county jails and ICE have failed to notify and communicate with each other, and immigrants are lingering in jails beyond the 48-hour limit that law enforcement is required to hold them by law, Rambana said. After 48 hours, if bail has been posted and ICE has not picked up the detainee, they can be released.
But what if they're not let go, Rambana asks: 'That's a problem that, to me, lays the foundation for false imprisonment. That's something that we, our office, is going to be working with other immigration attorneys to put out there … to keep these guys in check.'
The state says they need more detention centers to prevent detainees from being released due to lack of space in ICE detention facilities.
"At its current state, ICE is overwhelmed with the number of detainees that have been arrested prior to the state assisting with the process. With the state's assistance, this number will grow by multitudes, which will likely become unsustainable if ICE were to remain operating at its current state," the plan says.
The State of Florida Immigration Enforcement Operations Plan outlines the state's attempts to create a "road map" to assist the federal government in its mass deportation agenda. A request for comment from ICE is pending.
"The type of synergy envisioned is transformational, in that it provides sustainable, consistent andrepeatable operations through upward and downward flows in the identification-apprehension-detention-removal cycle and, not least, makes the best possible use of taxpayer dollars," the plan says.
It also includes plans on how the state can participate in mass deportation without the assistance of the federal government.
The state has identified "several brick-and-mortar locations" in northeast and south central Florida that could serve as detention centers and says the Florida Division of Emergency Management could "retrofit" the buildings to comply with federal detention standards.
The plan names Camp Blanding as an example of a detention center location and provides a bulleted list of "areas of improvement" to meet federal standards. Camp Blanding is a training site for the Florida National Guard in Clay County.
The state would use the 12 vendors they already have contracts with for emergency services to upgrade the facilities and advises that these improvements should be arranged at the same time as hurricane season to optimize the availability and funds.
The state has the capacity to house "up to 10,000 undocumented aliens and necessary support staff atlocations designated by the State of Florida or the federal government. These facilities can befully operational within 72 hours and require up to 96 hours to begin setup," the plan states.
The state argues the bureaucratic roadblocks are a result of the "deep state" within the federal government and asks the feds to waive or suspend federal rules to speed up Florida's mass deportation efforts.
The phones of Rambana, Ricci and Carolina Maluje, an immigration attorney in Miami Lakes, have been ringing even more since the Trump administration's mass deportation efforts began.
The first thing Maluje does when she wakes up, she says, is check to see how many new messages she has from family members who say loved ones have been arrested and detained.
'Everyone's nervous. We're scrambling,' she said.
Many of those who have been detained in Florida's mass deportation efforts are not criminals, she said. They are farmworkers, roofers, students and laborers with pending asylum cases who have driver's licenses and Social Security numbers.
Both Rambana and Maluje said they have clients who have been victims of crime who have chosen not to call law enforcement out of fear they will be detained. While the state has touted deputizing all law enforcement officers to become ICE agents or officers with immigration authority, the move has deterred immigrants, even those with documentation, from calling the police when a crime has been committed.
'Us taxpayers for the state of Florida, have we OK'd this? Have we voted on this?' Maluje said.
Previously, Gov. Ron DeSantis has used state funds to send law enforcement agencies to the Texas-Mexico border and to transport Venezuelan migrants to Martha's Vineyard. This year, the anti-illegal immigration package that the Florida Legislature and DeSantis passed during a special session set aside almost $300 million for new enforcement measures.
The immigration enforcement operations plan released on May 12 provides options for the state to purchase transportation for detainees. A 12-passenger van would cost $80,000 to $90,000 and an extra $34,000 for window tinting, a "3-compartment box" to hold detainees, the installation of live video equipment and law enforcement communications.
The state does not say how many vans would be needed, but it does estimate the lease of 21 vehicles for two weeks as approximately $1.5 million and $138,320 to pay the Florida State Guard to drive the vehicles.
The plan says FDEM could also hire 42 OPS staff (or "other personal services," basically temps paid by the hour) as drivers for $30 an hour. If the state used a 49-passenger bus retrofitted for detainees, 21 leased buses for two weeks labor including could cost $44.1 million.
The plan says ICE "must" reimburse the Florida Department of Emergency Management for actual costs for deportation transportation and for purchasing commercial flights for people eligible for voluntary deportation.
But it also says reimbursement by the federal government is unlikely.
'The federal government has shown itself to be very hesitant to commit to any form of reimbursement to past or future immigration operations. There may come a time when, without federal assistance, a long-term immigration support mission may become fiscally untenable,' the plan says.
'It's going to be very expensive for the state if it were to proceed, and I don't think it will, because it's going to be litigated, and then it's going to be expensive in a different way, because taxpayers are going to pay the brunt of defending that litigation,' Ricci said.
Ana Goñi-Lessan, state watchdog reporter for the USA TODAY Network – Florida, can be reached at agonilessan@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Florida mass deportation 'blueprint' is unconstitutional, lawyers say
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
34 minutes ago
- Politico
Claws out for Cuomo, Mamdani at debate as rivals dig into their missteps, weaknesses
NEW YORK — Mayoral candidates Brad Lander and Andrew Cuomo tussled at the second Democratic primary debate Thursday evening over the former governor's description of immigrants — an emotional flashpoint as protests over ICE arrests grip cities around the country. Zohran Mamdani, who is trailing in second place behind Cuomo in most polls, also went after the former governor repeatedly for mispronouncing his name. And the former New York governor returned fire, insisting the 33-year-old Mamdani is too young and inexperienced for the difficult job of running the nation's largest city. The clashes revealed cleaner lines of attack against Cuomo a week after the first debate — as well as how candidates hoping to shrink Cuomo's polling lead are seizing every opening, big and small, in an effort to weaken the frontrunner in the final days of the Democratic primary. Lander didn't relegate his broadsides against Cuomo to one topic. He honed in on the sexual harassment allegations against the former governor — which state Attorney General Letitia James concluded in a report and Cuomo denies — and his management of the MTA. 'The MTA goes through a rigorous contracting process,' Cuomo responded. 'They should never have hired illegal immigrants, if it is true.' 'What did you call them?' Lander, the progressive city comptroller, quickly challenged. 'If anyone was undocumented, or they didn't pay the proper wages, I had nothing to do with it,' Cuomo said, rephrasing with a term viewed as typically more acceptable in the city. Lander carried on with his targeting of Cuomo. 'You cheated them out of the prevailing wages they were due and the health care they were due.' Mamdani, a state assemblymember, separately ticked off the record that Cuomo's critics say disqualify him from returning to power, including the sexual harassment allegations that forced him from the statehouse in 2021. But Mamdani's focus on the pronunciation of his name appeared intended to spotlight how some supporters of Cuomo have cast the Muslim immigrant as an outsider. 'I have never had to resign in disgrace. … I have never hounded the 13 women who credibly accused me of sexual harassment. I have never sued for their gynecological records,' Mamdani said. 'And I have never done those things because I am not you, Mr. Cuomo. And furthermore, the name is Mamdani, M-a-m-d-a-n-i, you should learn how to say it, because we've got to get it right.'


Axios
40 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump signs bill blocking California gas car ban plan
President Trump signed legislation on Thursday blocking California's rules to phase out the sales of gas-powered cars by 2035. Why it matters: Trump is moving to roll back environmental initiatives that were a top Biden -era priority and his action against California comes amid an escalating feud with Golden State Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) amid fiery LA protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids. Driving the news: "It's been a disaster for this country," Trump said as he signed the measure. "We officially rescue the U.S. auto industry from destruction by terminating the California electric vehicle mandate once and for all." Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the state and 10 others will sue the Trump administration for what they called his "illegal resolutions targeting" California's clean vehicles program. "Trump's all-out assault on California continues — and this time he's destroying our clean air and America's global competitiveness in the process," Newsom said in a statement. "We are suing to stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters." The big picture: California has the largest car market, and roughly a dozen other states can follow its rules under the Clean Air Act. Bonata has already announced a lawsuit with 10 other state attorneys general after the Republican-led Senate approved a resolution last month to revoke a waiver allowing California to set its own air quality standards. Between the lines: What Trump signed are revocations of EPA waivers that enable the California EV rule (and separate rules on trucks and nitrogen oxide). Thought bubble, via Axios' Joann Muller: States can follow California or stick with the EPA. Eleven states decided to follow these latest rules but at least one (Vermont) announced it wouldn't enforce it because there was no way they could deliver.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republicans, including Sen. Lee, push to rein in D.C. sanctuary policies as anti-ICE protests heat up
WASHINGTON — A local law preventing D.C. police from cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement on deportations could be overturned as congressional Republicans seek to rein in sanctuary city policies nationwide. The House passed the District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act on Thursday, seeking to end sanctuary policies that block D.C. police from assisting ICE with arrests and bans. The bill would also overturn local laws prohibiting city officials from releasing detained individuals to ICE or allowing ICE to interview a suspect in D.C. custody without a judicial order. 'My bill requires the District of Columbia to comply with federal immigration law. What's wrong with that?' Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., who led the bill, said in a floor speech on Wednesday. 'We shouldn't have to bring this to the floor. We shouldn't have to explain these things. But we are going to ... require that our nation's capital comply with our nation's federal law.' The bill was introduced in early March, but its passage comes as immigration law enforcement and sanctuary city policies have become a political flashpoint in recent days. Protests and riots broke out in Los Angeles last weekend after ICE agents carried out raids in several locations across the city, prompting outrage from city residents. Although protests began peacefully, several turned violent after local law enforcement was called in to help quell the crowds. The protests have since spread across the country, and Republicans have renewed their calls to crack down on sanctuary city policies by urging stricter enforcement of immigration policies. 'It's sad that Gov. Newsom and Mayor Bass decided it was more important to refuse cooperation with ICE and posture against President Trump than make LA safe,' Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, told the Deseret News in a statement. 'I hope other blue states and cities avoid this mess by complying with federal immigration law and not tolerating any rioting or violence.' Lee has been at the forefront of reining in the D.C. government, hoping to reassert congressional authority over the nation's capital. Lee has consistently introduced legislation that would end the city's autonomy and has also promoted the BOWSER Act — ironically named after the city's mayor — to reclaim authority over the city's public safety. 'I'm glad that the House of Representatives is considering the District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act, so that our nation's capital can set a better example,' Lee said. 'The D.C. Council has proven itself incapable of keeping the city safe, and my BOWSER Act handing the reins back to Congress is our best bet to restore dignity and order to Washington.' Republicans have pushed for years to claw back D.C.'s autonomy by overturning the Home Rule Act. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., has been a leading voice on that issue in the House, successfully passing a bill in 2022 that would repeal the amended criminal code for the district that he argued was too soft on crime. That bill passed both chambers of Congress despite Democratic control of the Senate and was eventually signed by former President Joe Biden. President Donald Trump has expressed support for reining in D.C.'s local control, paving the way for Republicans to use their GOP trifecta in Washington to do so. 'I remain committed to reforming the unconstitutional and failed experiment of D.C. Home Rule,' Clyde told the Deseret News in a statement. 'Our nation's capital city is still in dire need of strong leadership and commonsense policies. Congress must continue using its constitutional authority over Washington's affairs to ensure America's capital city is a safe and prosperous place for years to come.' The bill now heads to the Senate, where it will require at least seven Democrats to buck party lines to support the measure. However, Democrats have supported bills to rein in the D.C. government before — and 11 Democrats in the House voted in favor of the bill on Thursday.