'It is an interesting time' - Tania Simpson takes over as chair of Waitangi Trust
Photo:
Supplied/Waitangi National Trust
Tania Te Rangingangana Simpson, new chair of the Waitangi National Trust Board.
The new chairperson of the Waitangi National Trust Board says she intends to hit the ground running in what will ultimately be a short term.
Tania Te Rangingangana Simpson ONZM becomes the first wāhine to hold the role of chair since the trust's establishment in 1932, replacing Pita Tipene who
stepped down last month
after serving for the maximum length of nine years.
Simpson has served as a trustee of the Waitangi National Trust since 2017 and as deputy chair since 2021, representing the descendants of the chief Pomare. Like Tipene, she too is approaching the nine-year term limit, but she said there is still time for her to help strengthen the governance and assist the continued development of Waitangi.
"So that just means I need to not waste any time but to use the time wisely. It also means thinking about succession and thinking about what will happen at the end of that term and supporting the board through its processes to prepare for that.
"So the time may be short but I think we can achieve a lot during that time."
The Waitangi National Trust is the guardian of the Waitangi Treaty Grounds and facilitates the annual Waitangi Day celebrations.
Simpson (Ngāpuhi, Ngāi Tahu, Tainui) currently serves on the boards of Auckland International Airport, Meridian Energy and Waste Management New Zealand. Her previous roles include board positions with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, AgResearch and Tainui Group Holdings.
Simpson said she is looking forward to taking on what may come in the new role, saying there is important work to do.
"[I'm] pleased that we have a woman chair so that it demonstrates to other women and to younger women that these positions are open to them to pursue."
Simpson said she prefers a collaborative style of leadership, something she plans to extend to the government despite
heightened tensions
during the last two Waitangi commemorations.
"While there may be heightened discussions around aspects of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and how that is given effect to in our current world in particular in government processes, Waitangi itself continues to be the place for that kind of dialogue to occur and the place for all New Zealanders and in particular the parties to the treaty to come together and talk."
The trust has enjoyed a good working relationship with government over the years, with the government continuing to support Waitangi through projects and development funding, she said.
The trust is much more focused on maintaining Waitangi as a special, tapu place where the treaty was signed and were the spirit of partnership was agreed, she said.
"We look after that place and space and the wairua of that place in order that the parties can come together and experience it and reflect and talk about what it means to us today."
Simpson said ultimately the dialogue between Māori and government is a good thing and Waitangi is an appropriate place for it to happen.
"It is an interesting time, an interesting juncture in the development of our nationhood in that we are having conversations nationally around the place of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, around what the treaty promised, about what it means and how we will reflect that within our national systems and structures."
Orginisations like the Waitangi National Trust and the Waitangi Tribunal which are close to the treaty and its history have a role to play in working through those discussions and getting to a good conclusion, she said.
Lisa Tumahai, the former chair of Ngāi Tahu and representative on the board of the people, Pākeha and Māori, living in the South Island, will step into the roll of deputy chair.
The chief executive of Waitangi Ltd Ben Dalton said Simpson's appointment is not only a landmark for the trust but a testament to her unwavering dedication to the kaupapa of the treaty.
"Her leadership will help deepen the understanding and relevance of Waitangi for generations to come," he said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
The House: The other MPs at Youth Parliament
Photo: VNP/Louis Collins Despite being a non-sitting week, last week Parliament was brimming with political intrigue and drama due to Youth Parliament, which occurs once each Parliamentary term, and involves each and every real MP selecting a young person from their electorate to represent them at the event in which participants recreate Parliament. Minister for Youth James Meager described the event as an opportunity for youth to "learn about effective advocacy and how they can play a role in the decision-making process in the country". Some may dismiss Youth Parliament as a tokenistic charade for swotty debating students. After being a fly-on-the-wall for the two days, it is clear that the event's impact runs far deeper. You can listen to The House's audio story from Youth Parliament at the link above. Youth MPs experience a number of Parliamentary procedures. Among them, the General Debate probably makes for the best watching. This isn't your typical secondary school speech competition about uniforms in schools or whether pineapple belongs on pizza. Instead, these speeches are often well-researched, compelling, and have a raw, unfiltered passion. Tanvi Upreti, Youth MP for National's Tom Rutherford, decried the lack of civics education in New Zealand schools, which she said led to young people making uninformed decisions at the polling booth. Photo: VNP/Louis Collins "Voting without understanding is not empowerment. It is a cause of silence. It is a manipulation. It is an illusion of our choice," Upreti said. Photo: VNP/Louis Collins Although strictly speaking, Youth MPs are non-partisan, representing their community rather than a party, it was clear some of them shared similar concerns as their older counterparts. One such example was Youth MP for Labour's Ginny Anderson, Tautalaleleia Sa'u. If you closed your eyes, you could have easily been listening in during a strong General Debate speech from any given sitting week. Photo: VNP/Louis Collins "Tax cuts for landlords, tax cuts for tobacco companies. But who's paying for it? People like my parents. People living in garages, cars, and overcrowded homes. We are paying for it with our dignity. Cost of living? No, it's the cost of breath, cost of seeing tomorrow, cost of the future, cost of who's going to eat and who isn't. Mr Speaker, at what cost will rangatahi have to pay to live a simple life?" Photo: VNP/Louis Collins At every Youth Parliament, there seems to be some sort of controversy. You may recall a hullabaloo about mask wearing during the 2022 event, and action for lowering the voting age. This time, the contention was over what some participants perceived to be censorship of speeches by the government (through the Ministry for Youth Development). Photo: VNP/Louis Collins A recent fixture of Youth Parliament is the Youth Press Gallery, a separate group of 16-24 year olds who get soundbites on the tiles and cover proceedings from the gallery. "I definitely have enjoyed just seeing the behind-the-scenes, it's kind of humanised a lot of the MPs," Youth Press Gallery member Jonathan McCabe said. Photo: VNP/Louis Collins It seemed it wasn't just the Youth MPs who had concerns around censorship. Youth journalists Reuben Smith and Aleksandra Bogdanova said, "[it's] felt like every story… that we have to publish, we have to send over to the ministry to have a look over. And though it's intended to help us, it does come with some consequences." Photo: VNP/Louis Collins Smith and Bogdanava are students of the NZ Broadcasting School at the Ara Institute of Canterbury. Both said their brief taste of press gallery life had reinforced their interest in being a part of the fourth estate. "It's a reminder of the democratic importance of free… journalism. Not something that is funded and sieved through the government." Photo: VNP/Louis Collins When asked about the accusations of censorship, Minister for Youth James Meager called it a bit of a misunderstanding, adding that "all of the Youth MPs and the Youth Press Gallery were entitled to say what they felt like they needed to say. Part of our role and part of the Ministry's role in running this programme is to make sure that all the participants are safe in what they do and say. And look, they don't have the protections in the same way that politicians do in terms of privilege and in terms of protection from legal action. So just trying to support them and guide them and provide recommendations about what they might want to do, to amend their speeches here and there, but ultimately it's up to them as to what they say." Photo: VNP/Louis Collins Youth MPs also had a go at scrutinising the government through a mock Question Time session, which Meager was involved in. Youth MPs weren't afraid to express dissatisfaction if they thought an answer wasn't up to scratch. Photo: VNP/Louis Collins While there was probably just as much back and forth shouting in the chamber as there is in Parliament proper, several of the MPs I talked to noted the collegiality of their colleagues, telling me that arguments were almost always made in good spirit. Youth MP for Catherine Wedd, Chris Proctor, said "the biggest thing I learnt is that politics isn't always like what you see in the media. I feel like sitting in the house. We felt a lot more unified than what it could look like from the outside. I think everyone's in there for the right reasons, representing their community." *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Enjoy our articles or podcast at RNZ.
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Supermarket loyalty card cyberattack prompts password warning
New World says some customer accounts may have been accessed in the cyberattack. Photo: Google Maps A cybersecurity attack has prompted a warning for supermarket customers to change their passwords and some accounts may have been accessed by outsiders. Members of supermarket loyalty and online shopping programme New World Clubcard received an email on Friday night, telling them scammers had attempted to gain access to accounts by trying commonly used passwords. A "recent" cybersecurity incident had affected "a number of New World Clubcard accounts", the email said. "Our technology team has identified suspicious external activity where scammers have attempted to gain access to accounts by trying commonly used passwords across many usernames," the supermarket said. "Based on our investigation, it appears that some New World Clubcard accounts with weaker or reused passwords may have been accessed, without the cardholder's authorisation." Photo: Supplied Most customers were told their account had not been affected, but the supermarket advised them to change their passwords to be safe. In the email, New World said its own systems had not been breached and its technology team was monitoring for "any further malicious activity". The supermarket retailer, which is owned by parent company Foodstuffs, said it was working with cybersecurity experts to ensure customers' data remained secure. "We sincerely apologise for any inconvenience. Your privacy and security are extremely important to us, we have taken these actions to protect you, and strongly recommend you [establish] a refreshed and strong password." Foodstuffs did not respond to RNZ's requests for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
16 hours ago
- RNZ News
Home build dream shattered after Waikato business hacked and woman launders couple's $150k
By Belinda Feek, Open Justice reporter of Sophie Winchester-Krishan outside the Hamilton District Court after being sentenced on three charges of money laundering. Photo: NZME / Open Justice / Belinda Feek A woman's bank account went from a balance of 5c to almost $150,000 overnight - but it was not her money. Instead, it was the money of a couple who were in the process of building their dream home and had fallen prey to hackers. Sophie Mareta Moerangi Winchester-Krishan was the middleman in the scam, where her bank account was used to deposit the funds and she then transferred them to offshore accounts. The 66-year-old, who was charged with three counts of money-laundering as a result, was paid $5000 for her role in the scam. She was recently sentenced in Hamilton District Court, where the couple spoke of their building dream being shattered and how they had been left with "a lifetime of loss and heartache". It wasn't made clear in court exactly how Winchester-Krishan and the scammers first connected. Her defence lawyer argued Winchester-Krishan had been so keen to get back into work that she ignored what might have been red flags. Those red flags included queries by Kiwibank about the suspicious transactions and her account being briefly frozen. Despite this, she assured the bank that the transactions were legitimate. Now, the case has earned caution from Netsafe, which warned it was difficult to recover money in these events and urged people to be sceptical when being told a company's invoice details had changed. The court heard that in August 2021, the email account of a Waikato-based building firm was hacked. The hackers were able to access the company's client database and then created an email with a similar domain name. They then sent the couple an email stating the company was having difficulty with its regular bank and asked them to direct their next payment into a Kiwibank account. The victims later discovered the account belonged to Winchester-Krishan and, before the transfer, it had a balance of 5c. The money was transferred over two days. One payment was $100,000 - the ASB Bank's daily transfer limit - followed by a second transfer of $54,263.01. By the morning of 16 August 2021, the full amount had made its way into Winchester-Krishan's account. She then sent some of the funds to an account in Australia, after receiving payment instructions from an "almost certainly fictitious overseas doctor", the court heard. Kiwibank then contacted her to alert her to a "suspicious transaction" and froze her bank account. Winchester-Krishan later told Kiwibank the transaction was genuine and the money was released. She then transferred almost $30,000 to an account in the US. Kiwibank contacted her about the suspicious account and, again, Winchester-Krishan confirmed it was genuine. Later that same day, she transferred $66,280.77 to a different US bank account. Over two days, Winchester-Krishan transferred just under $150,000 of the couple's money into offshore bank accounts. She kept $5000 as payment. In a statement to the court, the woman said she and her husband bought a piece of land to build their dream home in September 2020. Filled with excitement, they visited the section with their newborn baby in July 2021, after the concrete had been poured. A month later, she received the fake email from the "building company", asking for the $154,263.01 instalment. She duly paid it into what she was told was the company's Kiwibank account. Shortly afterwards, she was informed that the company's computer system had been hacked and their money was gone. "In a matter of seconds, our whole world changed," she told the court. She said their plan to build their dream home had been shattered. Their excitement turned to stress and worry, which was compounded by the fact that she had worked in IT for 17 years. She was left asking herself, "How could I let this happen to us?" The woman said she was so stressed that she was no longer able to produce milk to breastfeed her daughter. "The opportunity to bond [with her] was taken away from me," she said. The woman then developed a chronic illness that she would never fully recover from. She and her husband ended up having to walk away from the building project. "It's hard to believe all this happened for the offender to gain $5000, and it has left us with a lifetime of loss and heartache." Crown solicitor James Lewis characterised Winchester-Krishan's offending as "a sequence of reckless acts carried out by the defendant for financial gain". "The devastating impacts on the victim and their family include life-altering consequences," Lewis said. "The defendant should have heard and seen the alarm bells. "She was being asked to transfer large sums of money to offshore accounts by people she hardly knew. "She was being questioned by the bank about their concerns... but nevertheless, it still happened." He urged the judge not to issue any discount for Winchester-Krishan's previous good character, given her previous dishonesty convictions, and pushed for a jail term or at least home detention. Defence counsel Martin Dillon said his client's remorse was genuine. While she had defended the charge at trial, he said she had only wanted to challenge whether she was reckless in transferring the money overseas. Sophie Winchester-Krishan transferred the couple's money to a number of offshore accounts in August 2021. Photo: NZME / Open Justice / Belinda Feek "She accepts that she was essentially blinded by the opportunity of an online job being given to her," Dillon said. "She did close her mind or eyes to what might have been red flags... she was not motivated by financial gain... but instead of getting back into the workforce and working again, albeit remotely from home." He suggested Winchester-Krishan moved the money within 24 hours, but Judge Arthur Tompkins disagreed. "That's not quite right," the judge said. "The money arrived and then there were about three days' worth of interactions with the bank. "This is not money-laundering where money arrives and it's flicked on immediately. "Winchester-Krishan had to visit the bank in person and then field inquiries from the bank as to the suspicious transaction, which she confirmed was a genuine payment." The judge said the transaction was clearly suspicious, as it was for a "fictitious orphanage in Turkey" with a different "tale" about where the money was going. Dillon also submitted that Winchester-Krishan had co-operated with police in their investigation and was assessed as a low risk of re-offending. He suggested that an end sentence of community detention and supervision was appropriate. Judge Tompkins said, while Winchester-Krishan's offending was not premeditated, she made "minimal" inquiries about where the money had come from, when it landed in her account. "Particularly, when the bank alerted her to suspicious transactions, she took some trouble to satisfy the bank that the transactions she sought to make were not suspicious." After considering all of the submissions, Judge Tompkins found that home detention was the most appropriate sentence and imposed a term of 10 months. Winchester-Krishan has spent some of the $5000 she was paid, but police were about to claw back $1400 of it. However, the full amount the couple lost was not being sought through the court. NZME understood the victims were trying to recover it through other avenues. Netsafe chief online safety officer Sean Lyons said business email compromise (BEC) scams were "a quiet kind of attack". "That's part of what makes it effective. "The email might come from a familiar name. The invoice might match work that's genuinely been done - it lands in the inbox at just the right time. "All of that lowers the chances anyone will pause and question it." However, BEC scams can hit from both sides, he said. A business might unknowingly send a doctored invoice from a compromised account or a customer might receive what looks like a routine bill from a supplier they trust. "Either way, the money ends up in the hands of criminals and it's often very difficult to recover." Lyons said, for businesses, email security was key, while for customers it paid to be "sceptical". "If payment details suddenly change or something feels slightly off, don't reply to the email. "Instead, contact the business directly, using a phone number or address you already know." * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald.
