Doctors, former patients warn of LASIK eye surgery dangers: ‘Biggest scam ever put on the American public'
LASIK providers say the procedure is 95% to 99% safe, but one LASIK survivor said she had suicidal ideations for two years after her 'disastrous' surgery in 2000.
She also claimed to know of at least 40 people to have taken their own lives because they couldn't take constant pain and vision problems, developed after the procedure.
Advertisement
8 Ryan Kingerski, 26, died by suicide after undergoing LASIK surgery in 2024.
Family Handout
8 Tim and Stefanie Kingerski said Ryan suffered headaches, double vision, seeing dark spots and floaters — tiny spots that appear as streaks or cobweb-like shapes across a person's field of vision — after LASIK surgery.
CBS Pittsburgh
'I really didn't want to stick around at times, but I decided I would to get the word out about how dangerous this surgery can be,' Paula Cofer, 66, of Tampa, Fla., told The Post Wednesday.
Advertisement
'The LASIK lobby and the surgeons will tell you only one percent of patients have issues afterward. That's not true. There are multiple studies that indicate otherwise.
'The percentage of those with poor outcomes are in the double digits, not one percent. And they know it,' she claimed.
Since LASIK was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1999 over 10 million people in the US have undergone Laser Vision Correction, according to the medical journal Clinical Ophthalmology, which states between 700,000 and 800,000 people sign up for it each year.
Cofer runs the Lasik Complications Support Group on Facebook, one of numerous organizations on social media which have sprung up in response to LASIK procedures gone wrong.
Advertisement
8 Laser vision correction being carried out by a doctor.
Vadim – stock.adobe.com
'If you understand Lasik and what it does to the eyes and cornea, you realize you can't do it on a healthy eye and not expect complications,' Cofer said.
The procedure — Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis — reshapes the cornea of the eye.
'Not everyone has severe complications but a lot more people are suffering than you know. I got floaters, severe dry eyes, induced astigmatism and severe night vision problems,' said Cofer.
Advertisement
Ryan Kingerski, 26 — the cop who died by suicide after taking time off from the Penn Hills Police Department in Allegheny County, Penn. last August to undergo LASIK — had similar symptoms.
His grieving parents, Tim and Stefanie Kingerski, told CBS News this week about the hell their son went through after the procedure.
The Kingerskis said Ryan began suffering from headaches, double vision, seeing dark spots and floaters — tiny spots that appear as streaks or cobweb-like shapes across a person's field of vision, they said.
8 Paula Cofer, 66, started the Lasik Complications Support Group on Facebook to help others after suffering complications from her own procedure.
Courtesy of Paula Cofer
8 Fox 2 Detroit meteorologist Jessica Starr took her own life and left a note and videos explaining it was because of the complications she suffered after undergoing LASIK surgery.
Ryan's parents told a story similar to that of Detroit TV meteorologist Jessica Starr's widower, Dan Rose, who said she took her own life after struggling with intense eye pain and vision problems following laser eye surgery.
The 35-year-old mother hanged herself on Dec. 12, 2018, just two months after undergoing LASIK to correct her vision.
'Prior to the procedure, Jessica was completely normal, very healthy,' Rose told WJBK in 2019. 'There was no depression … no underlying issue.'
Advertisement
Rose said his wife left behind a 30-page suicide note and videos, which made it clear the decision to end her life was because of the elective surgery.
Morris Waxler, now 89, was an FDA advisor who headed the branch responsible for reviewing data on LASIK between 1996 and 2000, which covers the period it was approved.
8 A patient undergoing eye surgery
mehmet – stock.adobe.com
8 Morris Waxler says he regrets approving the use of LASIK when he worked for the FDA and has been speaking out publicly about its dangers since 2010.
Vadim – stock.adobe.com
Advertisement
It's a decision he told The Post he regrets — and has been speaking out publicly about LASIK's dangers since 2010.
'It didn't matter what questions and concerns I had, because the surgeons were very powerful and still are,' he claimed.
Waxler has previously told CBS in 2019 his own analysis of industry data showed complication rates between 10% and 30% and in 2011, he petitioned the FDA to issue a voluntary recall of LASIK.
'People come in with healthy eyes and all they need is eyeglasses. But when surgeons cut the cornea they are removing nerves and leaving the corneas with odd shapes and some patients will have intractable pain,' he added.
Advertisement
The FDA warns on its website there are risks to undergoing LASIK including losing vision, glare, halos, and/or double vision and other 'debilitating visual symptoms'.
However, The American Refractive Surgery Council says on its website: 'LASIK is safe and is one of the most studied elective surgical procedures available today … the rate of sight-threatening complications from LASIK eye surgery is estimated to be well below one percent.'
8 Dr. Edward Boshnick's practice is dedicated to restoring vision and comfort to people affected by eye conditions. He calls LASIK a 'BS procedure'.
EyeFreedom.com
For Abraham Rutner, 43, a Brooklyn electrician, there was hope after his failed LASIK surgery five years ago.
Advertisement
'It's like you have a layer of oil on top of your eye — it was so hazy and terrible,' Rutner told The Post. 'I couldn't work. I couldn't drive. I felt like I was still a young man and I lost my life.'
Then he heard about 84-year-old Edward Boshnick, a Miami eye doctor whose optometric practice is dedicated to restoring vision and comfort lost due to a variety of eye conditions and surgeries, including LASIK, keratoconus and corneal trauma.
Dr. Boshnick, whose website is called Eyefreedom, fitted Rutner with something called a scleral lens which fits over corneas damaged by LASIK. Paula Cofer also said she got fitted with the lens, which has helped her too.
Boshnick told The Post 'Everyone has different problems when it comes to LASIK, and called it a 'BS procedure.'
'It's the biggest scam ever put on the American public,' he said. 'And it's a multi-billion dollar business.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Sick cruise ship passenger furious after getting hit with shocking bill: ‘What is this nightmare?'
They got more than they asked for. There's nothing worse than getting sick on vacation — especially if your getaway is out at sea. A frustrated traveler took to Reddit to share not only how bad their recent experience was getting ill on a Norwegian cruise ship — but also how expensive it was. Advertisement In the r/mildlyinfuriating subreddit, the disgruntled cruise ship passenger warned, 'Don't get sick on a cruise ship' above a picture of a lengthy, itemized medical bill. This traveler left his vacation poorer and sicker. The original poster came off that cruise with a tan and a $9,750.86 bill. Advertisement If you look closely, it seems that 21 different tests were performed on the OP, which totaled around $8,761 — and then an additional $618.59 on medications and $380.27 on supplies. Yikes. It's unknown what exactly this cruise-goer came down with — but it obviously was bad. Many empathetic Reddit users took to the comment section of the post to share similar sickly experiences. Advertisement 'My neighbor had to be airlifted off a cruise ship the other year. Fortunately she is a 'veteran cruiser' and carries enough insurance to mitigate the diabolical costs. Sorry you have to absorb this, OP.' 'Over $100 to slap a fingertip pulse ox sensor on you?? What is this nightmare?' There was nothing relaxing about this cruise ship vacation. 'I love the new patient charge, where every patient is a new patient.' Advertisement To avoid getting slapped with a wildly expensive bill like this poor soul — there are a few precautions you can take to avoid getting sick before boarding your next cruise vacation. Use hand sanitizer and wash your hands thoroughly. 'Infectious diseases spread quickly on cruise ships because a lot of people share the same space day and night for an extended amount of time in relatively close contact,' Dr. Shalom Sokolow, an emergency medicine physician at Northwell's Phelps Hospital, told The Post. 'Always wash your hands after you have been in contact with other people and before you eat,' Sokolow said. While it's tempting to pig out on the buffet — Dr. Eric Ascher, a family medicine physician at Northwell's Lenox Hill Hospital, explained how it's 'also an easy way for the norovirus to spread because of all the shared utensils.' Sokolow agreed, adding, 'Plentiful and fun food is among the main appeals of a cruise and there is no reason to miss out.' 'However, there are a few basic steps to protect yourself from getting sick.'
Epoch Times
11 hours ago
- Epoch Times
High Noon Recalls Vodka Seltzer Drinks Mislabeled as Celsius Energy Drinks
Alcoholic beverage brand High Noon announced it has voluntarily recalled some of its canned vodka seltzer drinks after some cans were mislabeled as Celsius energy drinks, according to a notice posted on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website. The Modesto, California-based company said in a bulletin, released Wednesday by the FDA, that some lots of its High Noon Beach Variety packs were 'mislabeled as Celsius Astro Vibe Energy Drink, Sparkling Blue Razz Edition with a silver top' but were 'filled with High Noon vodka seltzer alcohol' instead. 'Consumption of the liquid in these cans will result in unintentional alcohol ingestion,' said the recall notice from High Noon, which is owned by the winemaking giant E & J Gallo Winery.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
How FDA panelists casting doubt on antidepressant use during pregnancy could lead to devastating outcomes for mothers
At a meeting held by the Food and Drug Administration on July 21, 2025, a panel convened by the agency cast doubt on the safety of antidepressant medications called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs, in pregnancy. Panel members discussed adding a so-called black box warning to the drugs – which the agency uses to indicate severe or life-threatening side effects – about the risk they pose to developing fetuses. Some of the panelists who attended had a history of expressing deep skepticism on antidepressants. SSRIs include drugs like Prozac and Zoloft and are the most commonly used medicines for treating clinical depression. They are considered the first-line medications for treating depression in pregnancy, with approximately 5% to 6% of North American women taking an SSRI during pregnancy. We are a psychologist certified in perinatal mental health and a reproductive psychiatrist and neuroscientist who studies female hormones and drug treatments for depression. We are concerned that many claims made at the meeting about the dangers of those drugs contradict decades of research evidence showing that antidepressant use during pregnancy is low risk when compared with the dangers of mental illness. As clinicians, we have front-row seats to the maternal mental health crisis in the U.S. Mental illness, including suicide and overdose, is the leading cause of maternal deaths. Like all drugs, SSRIs carry both risks and benefits. But research shows that the benefits to pregnant patients outweigh the risks of the SSRIs, as well as the risks of untreated depression. The panel did not address the safety of SSRIs following delivery, but numerous studies show that taking SSRI antidepressants while breastfeeding is low risk, usually producing low to undetectable drug levels in infants. The biology of maternal brain health Pregnancy and the months following childbirth are characterized by so many emotional, psychological and physical changes that the transition to motherhood has a specific name: matrescence. During matrescence, the brain changes rapidly as it prepares to efficiently take care of a baby. The capacity for change within the brain is known as 'plasticity.' Enhanced plasticity during pregnancy and the postpartum period is what allows the maternal brain to become better at attuning to and carrying out the tasks of motherhood. For example, research indicates that during this period, the brain is primed to respond to baby-related stimuli and improve a mother's ability to regulate her emotions. These brain shifts also act as a mental buffer against aging and stress in the long term. On the flip side, these rapid brain changes, fueled by hormonal shifts, can make people especially vulnerable to the risk of mental illness during and after pregnancy. For women who have a prior history of depression, the risk is even greater. Clinical depression interferes with brain plasticity, such that the brain becomes 'stuck' in patterns of negative thoughts, emotions and behaviors. This leads to impairment in brain functions that are essential to motherhood. New mothers with depression have decreased brain activity in regions responsible for motivation, regulation of emotion and problem-solving. They are often withdrawn or overprotective of their infants, and they struggle with the relentless effort needed for tasks that arise with child-rearing like soothing, feeding, stimulating, planning and anticipating the child's needs. Research shows that SSRIs work by promoting brain plasticity. This in turn allows individuals to perceive the world more positively, increases the experience of gratification as a mother and facilitates cognitive flexibility for problem-solving. Assessing the risks of SSRIs in pregnancy Prescription drugs like SSRIs are just one aspect of treating pregnant women struggling with mental illness. Evidence-based psychotherapy, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, can also induce adaptive brain changes. But women with severe symptoms often require medication before they can reap the benefits of psychotherapy, and finding properly trained, accessible and affordable psychotherapists can be challenging. So sometimes, SSRIs may be the most appropriate treatment option available. Multiple studies have examined the effects of SSRIs on the developing fetus. Some data does show a link between these drugs and preterm birth, as well as low birth weight. However, depression during pregnancy is also linked to these effects, making it difficult to disentangle what's due to the drug and what's due to the illness. SSRIs are linked to a condition called neonatal adaption syndrome, in which infants are born jittery, irritable and with abnormal muscle tone. About one-third of infants born to mothers taking SSRIs experience it. However, research shows that it usually resolves within two weeks and does not have long-term health implications. The FDA-convened panel heavily focused on potential risks of SSRI usage, with several individuals incorrectly asserting that these drugs cause autism in exposed youth, as well as birth defects. At least one panelist discussed clinical depression as a 'normal' part of the 'emotional' experience during pregnancy and following birth. This perpetuates a long history of of women being dismissed, ignored and not believed in medical care. It also discounts the rigorous assessment and criteria that medical professionals use to diagnose reproductive mental health disorders. A summary of the pivotal studies on SSRIs in pregnancy by the Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Women's Health discusses how research has shown SSRIs to not be associated with miscarriage, birth defects or developmental conditions in children, including autism spectrum disorder. The risks of untreated mental illness Untreated clinical depression in pregnancy has several known risks. As noted above, babies born to mothers with clinical depression have a higher risk of preterm birth and low birth weight. They are also more likely to require neonatal intensive care and are at greater risk of behavioral problems and impaired cognition in childhood. Women who are clinically depressed have an increased risk of developing preeclampsia – a condition involving high blood pressure that, if not identified and treated quickly, can be fatal to both mother and fetus. Just as concerning is the heightened risk of suicide in depression. Suicide accounts for about 8% of deaths in pregnancy and shortly after birth. Compared with these very serious risks, the risks of using SSRIs in pregnancy turn out to be minimal. While women used to be encouraged to stop taking SSRIs during pregnancy to avoid some of these risks, this is no longer recommended, as it exposes women to a high chance of depression relapse. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that all perinatal mental health treatments, including SSRIs, continue to be available. Many women are already reluctant to take antidepressants during pregnancy, and given the choice, they tend to avoid it. From a psychological standpoint, exposing their fetus to the side effects of antidepressant medications is one of many common reasons for women in the U.S. to feel maternal guilt or shame. However, the available data suggests such guilt is not warranted. Taken together, the best thing one can do for pregnant women and their babies is not to avoid prescribing these drugs when needed, but to take every measure possible to promote health: optimal prenatal care, and the combination of medications with psychotherapy, as well as other evidence-based treatments such as bright light therapy, exercise and adequate nutrition. The panel failed to address the latest neuroscience behind depression, how antidepressants work in the brain and the biological rationale for why doctors use them in the first place. Patients deserve education on what's happening in their brain, and how a drug like an SSRI might work to help. Depression during pregnancy and in the months following birth is a serious barrier to brain health for mothers. SSRIs are one way of promoting healthy brain changes so that mothers can thrive both short- and long-term. Should the FDA, as a result of this recent panel, decide to place a black-box warning on antidepressants in pregnancy, researchers like us already know from history what will happen. In 2004, the FDA placed a warning on antidepressants describing potential suicidal ideation and behavior in young people. In the following years, antidepressant-prescribing decreased, while the consequences of mental illness increased. And it's easy to imagine a similar pattern in pregnant women. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Nicole Amoyal Pensak, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Andrew Novick, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Read more: Risk of death related to pregnancy and childbirth more than doubled between 1999 and 2019 in the US, new study finds US preterm birth and maternal mortality rates are alarmingly high, outpacing those in all other high-income countries Study shows an abortion ban may lead to a 21% increase in pregnancy-related deaths I receive royalties for the sales of my book RATTLED, How to Calm New Mom Anxiety with the Power of the Postpartum Brain. Dr Novick has a career development award from the National Institute of Child Health and Development (K23HD110435) to study the neurobiology of hormonal contraception. This funding was not used to support the preparation or publication of this article. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not represent those of the National Institutes of Health or the University of Colorado School of Medicine. Solve the daily Crossword
