US Army will not conduct Typhon live-fire at exercises in Philippines
The U.S. Army will not conduct a live-fire operation of its Mid-Range Capability missile system, known as Typhon, during exercises in the Philippines this spring, according to the service commander in charge of U.S. Army Pacific operations.
'We are not planning to conduct live-fire in the Philippines right now,' Maj. Gen. Jeffrey VanAntwerp, deputy chief of staff of operations, plans and training at U.S. Army Pacific, told reporters in a media briefing Thursday.
The news comes almost a year after the Army's 1st Multi-Domain Task Force transported a Typhon launcher to Luzon, Philippines, as part of that year's Salaknib exercise — marking the first time the new capability, deemed vital to the U.S. Army's strategy in the Indo-Pacific, had been deployed. The missile system traveled more than 8,000 miles from Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, aboard a C-17 Globemaster cargo aircraft on a 15-hour flight.
Typhon has since remained in the country, angering China, which has criticized the move and warned it could destabilize the region. Officials have yet to fire the missile system in the Philippines.
It is unclear how long Typhon will remain in the Philippines or if it will go elsewhere in the Pacific theater.
In response to a question on where the system might be headed next, VanAntwerp said, 'We're making plans, but I have to defer to [the Office of the Secretary of Defense].'
The Lockheed Martin-built system, consisting of a vertical launch system that uses the Navy's Raytheon-built Standard Missile-6 and Tomahawk missiles, can strike targets in the 500- to 2,000-kilometer range. The complete system has a battery operations center, four launchers, prime movers and modified trailers.
The missile system is capable of sinking ships, hitting land targets at long ranges and is 'mobile and survivable,' VanAntwerp said.
As part of this year's Salaknib and Balikatan military drills between the U.S. and the Philippines, the Philippine Navy plans to fire C-Star, Spike Non-Line-of-Sight and Mistral missiles. The country's military will not fire its Brahmos medium-range ramjet supersonic cruise missile, which has a higher price point per shot.
Typhon's presence in the Philippines has prompted other countries in the Pacific region to inquire about the possibility of hosting the weapon system, a U.S. defense official recently told Defense News.
The Army knew Typhon would have a strong deterrent effect, but didn't expect it to have an effect as great as has been observed over the past year, the official said, particularly in rattling China.
The biggest challenge now is transporting the capability around the Pacific — if the desire is to rotate it in and out of countries — due to the high costs of moving equipment, the official said.
Meanwhile, the Army's 3rd MDTF, headquartered in Hawaii, is slated to soon receive its Typhon battery, which the service has certified at JBLM.
'We're constantly looking for opportunities to exercise capability like that forward in theater,' Col. Michael Rose, the 3rd MDTF commander, said recently. 'We learn enormous lessons by bringing capability into the theater.'
Rose said the Army anticipates the Typhon supporting Operation Pathways, a series of year-round exercises designed to strengthen cooperation with regional allies and deter China.
Noah Robertson and Leilani Chavez contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Military parades are as American as apple strudel
When President Donald Trump announced there would be a major military parade in Washington, D.C. on June 14, my first reaction was: What? On Flag Day? He explained it was to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. That made more sense, especially when it was further pointed out that it coincided with his own 79th birthday. Trump had long admired the pomp and spectacle of large military parades like France's Bastille Day rollout. In his first term he proposed such a full-scale military parade for July 4, 2018. That proposal was abandoned when the D.C. government and the Army pushed back over the estimated high cost and potential damage tanks would do to the streets. This time, those objections were overcome when the Army promised to lay heavy metal plates on the streets and pay for any damage incurred. Still, the Defense Department estimates the parade could cost up to $45 million. Some 6,700 troops are being flown in from around the country to participate in the parade. The procession of over 150 vehicles will include 28 Abrams tanks weighing 140,000 pounds each. Fifty aircraft will be flying overhead along with a parachute jump by the Army's Golden Knights team. Wars and military parades are as old as civilization itself, and America is no different in wanting to celebrate and show off its military might. I call such parades, 'as American as apple strudel,' because our first army was trained in musket drills at Valley Forge by a Prussian military officer, Baron von Steuben. He trained 100 of the elite officers, who in turn trained another 100, until our entire army was trained. Precision military drills are the basis of military parades. They instill in troops the important values of discipline, cooperation and precision that forge unit cohesion on the battlefield. There is a certain ambivalence in America about flaunting our military might through ostentatious displays of our power in parades. That is not to say we have been reluctant to celebrate our military victories in parades honoring and thanking our troops for their successes and sacrifices. In the early days of the republic, it was quite common for the president to review the troops in parades every Fourth of July. That practice ended with President James Polk in 1845. However, in 1865 perhaps the most impressive military parade in U.S. history was held. Called the Grand Review of the Armies, it was held on May 23 and 24 after President Andrew Johnson declared an end to the Civil War on May 10. The returning Union soldiers marched 12 abreast, stretching back seven miles. In 1942 and 1946 there were two huge military parades in New York City marking U.S. entry and victory in World War II. Beginning with President Dwight D. Eisenhower's first and second inaugurals in 1953 and 1957, impressive military parades were staged, at least implicitly honoring 'Ike's' heroic military leadership in World War II. In 1963, President John F. Kennedy's inauguration was matched by another military parade that again implicitly recognized his heroic deeds in World War II, but also served as a muscle-flexing display at the peak of the Cold War. The 1991 military parade marking victory in the Persian Gulf War was the last of its kind. There had been nothing comparable after the Korean, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan wars. The Army's 250th celebration will be coupled with next year's 250th commemoration of the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4. Lest there be any concern about the Navy and Marines' 250th birthday commemorations this fall, elaborate arrangements are being made for each in Philadelphia. I was raised in small towns in the Midwest, where there were no military parades — only annual celebrations on Labor Day of the towns themselves. In one town it was called 'Homecoming Day,' in another, 'Old Settlers' Day,' but the parades were the same, led by a military color guard followed by dozens of gaily decorated floats and interspersed with high school bands from the area. A street carnival and evening stage performances rounded-out the holiday. I can identify most with what Erma Bombeck is supposed to have said about July 4 celebrations: 'You have to love a nation that celebrates its independence every July 4, not with a parade of guns, tanks, and soldiers who file by the White House in a show of strength and muscle, but with family picnics where kids throw Frisbees, the potato salad gets iffy, and the flies die from happiness. You may think you have overeaten, but it is patriotism.' Don Wolfensberger is a 28-year staff veteran of Congress, culminating as chief-of-staff of the House Rules Committee in 1995. He is author of, 'Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial' (2000), and, 'Changing Cultures in Congress: From Fair Play to Power Plays' (2018).
American Military News
4 hours ago
- American Military News
Army meets recruiting goal 4 months early under Trump admin
The U.S. Army announced on Tuesday that it has reached its Fiscal Year 2025 recruiting goals for active-duty soldiers by recruiting over 61,000 new soldiers four months early under President Donald Trump's administration. In a Tuesday press release, the U.S. Army Public Affairs said the military service had successfully met its recruiting goals for this year by signing contracts with 'more than 61,000 future Soldiers' four months before the end of Fiscal Year 2025. Officials explained that meeting the Army's recruitment goals early demonstrates a 'significant turning point for the Army' and points toward a 'renewed sense of patriotism and purpose among America's youth.' 'I'm incredibly proud of our U.S. Army recruiters and drill sergeants,' Army Secretary Dan Driscoll said. 'Their colossal efforts and dedication to duty helped the U.S. Army accomplish our FY25 annual recruiting goal a full four months ahead of schedule.' The U.S. Army explained that its recruitment goal for Fiscal Year 2025 was 10% higher than Fiscal Year 2024's goal of 55,000 new Army recruits. Officials noted in Tuesday's press release that the Army's ability to meet a higher recruitment goal this year signifies a 'surge in interest and enthusiasm for Army service.' The Army added that the average number of contracts signed per day this year has surpassed last year's numbers by 'as much as 56%' in the same period. READ MORE: Over $6 billion spent on US military recruitment, retention in 3 years: Report 'I want to thank the commander in chief, President Trump, and Secretary of Defense Hegseth for their decisive leadership and support in equipping, training and supporting these future Soldiers as they face a world of global uncertainty and complex threats,' Driscoll stated. 'Putting Soldiers first is having a tangible impact and shows that young people across our country want to be part of the most lethal land fighting force the world has ever seen.' According to Army Times, the Army exceeded its recruitment goal by roughly 11,000 recruits last year after failing to reach its recruitment goals for two years. The outlet noted that the Army only succeeded in securing 44,901 recruits in 2022 with a goal of 60,000 recruits and only 54,000 recruits in 2023 with a goal of 65,000 recruits. Highlighting the future service of the 61,000 new recruits for Fiscal Year 2025, the Army said, 'These 61,000 men and women, who are choosing to serve their nation, represent the best of America. As the Army approaches its 250th birthday on June 14, 2025, these future Soldiers will carry forward a legacy of honor, courage and service spanning two and a half centuries.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Netherlands still backs Israeli F-35 ‘supply chain of death': Report
The Netherlands is still supporting the supply chain of Israel's version of the F-35 fighter jet, more than a year after a court banned direct Dutch exports of F-35 parts to Israel, a report claims. Research by the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM) shared with Al Jazeera shows that the port of Rotterdam is frequented by ships carrying F-35 parts for maintenance and assembly. The ships belong to the Danish shipping giant Maersk. By examining import data and shipping receipts of Maersk and Lockheed Martin – the United States weapons manufacturer that designed the F-35 – the group found that more than a dozen shipments from Israel travelled through the port of Rotterdam on their way to the US from April 2023 until early 2025. The F-35 fighter jet has been used by Israel to bomb Gaza from the air with devastating effect. Much of the Strip, where more than 50,000 people have been killed since October 2023, is in ruins. 'Maersk now operates a recurring shipping cycle between Lockheed Martin's Fort Worth facility in Texas and Israel Aerospace Industries in Israel, routed through Rotterdam,' the report stated. 'In this cycle, Maersk transports pairs of empty F-35 wing containers from Houston to Ashdod, Israel, where they are loaded with completed F-35 wings. The filled containers are then shipped back to the US for final assembly or repair.' The researchers noted that Rotterdam is a 'key stopover point in this process, and shipments for this cycle have occurred beyond February of 2024'. Then, a judge at a Dutch appeals court ordered the Netherlands to stop exporting and transiting F-35 parts to Israel, saying there was a 'clear risk' they were being used in 'serious violations of international humanitarian law'. The Dutch state immediately lodged an appeal at the Supreme Court, but until a decision is made, it is still bound by the lower court's ruling. 'The findings in the report show that the port of Rotterdam plays an important role in sustaining the operational capacities of Israel's F-35 fighter jets. This way, the port of Rotterdam is complicit to international law violations in Gaza,' Gerard Jonkman, director of a Dutch NGO, The Rights Forum, told Al Jazeera. The Dutch Foreign Ministry told Al Jazeera that the court had subsequently confirmed that the judgement in February 2024 applied only to the export or transit of F-35 parts from the Netherlands to Israel and that the Dutch state had implemented the judgement accordingly. A spokesperson for the port of Rotterdam told Al Jazeera that the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs was responsible for issuing permits for the transhipment of military goods. Port officials check vessel compliance with environmental and safety regulations for shipping on behalf of the government and municipality of Rotterdam, they said. 'The harbour master receives only limited information regarding vessel cargo. The information received mainly pertains to whether the vessel is carrying hazardous substances. Other aspects of vessel cargo are monitored by various other public authorities, such as customs.' They said they were 'aware' of the February 2024 court ruling. 'All activities in the port must comply with international laws and regulations and the permits issued by the government. If we see any indication that this is not the case, the Port of Rotterdam Authority alerts the competent authority.' The Rights Forum was one of three parties, together with the Dutch affiliate of Oxfam and PAX for Peace, the largest peace organisation in the Netherlands, that sued the Dutch state over its export of F-35 parts to Israel. 'In this case, there is no direct export from the Netherlands to Israel, but the Netherlands is still part of the supply chain for the Israeli F-35 programme,' Gerard Jonkman, head of the Rights Forum, said of the Palestinian Youth Movement's findings. 'This way the Netherlands facilitates the Israeli F-35 programme and might breach its obligations under international law.' PAX for Peace project leader Frank Slijper told Al Jazeera: 'This indeed shows that the Netherlands is part of the F-35 supply chain.' A grassroots organisation, the Palestinian Youth Movement believes that targeting Maersk directly disrupts the flow of weapons in the 'supply chain of death used to genocide Palestinians'. According to the group, Maersk has shipped the wings for every Israeli F-35 since March 2022. In November 2024, following a decision by Spain to deny docking permission to two ships carrying weapons bound for Israel, Maersk adjusted its routes. The company's fleet now avoids Spain in favour of Rotterdam and the port of Tangier in Morocco 'Maersk has, for years, knowingly supplied the Israeli military with key weapons components used to carry out genocide in Gaza,' Aisha Nizar of the Palestinian Youth Movement told Al Jazeera. 'The company has done so without hesitation, potentially violating multiple arms embargo policies across Europe.' The F-35 is considered a top-of-the-line fighter jet. The aircraft designed by Lockheed Martin costs at least $80m in its most basic configuration. Currently, 12 countries operate the jet. F-35 parts are made in the United States and several participating partner countries, giving the project the moniker Joint Strike Fighter. 'It is very sad to see that Maersk is not distancing itself from Israel's crimes against humanity in Gaza and more broadly continues lending itself to the crucial replenishment of Israel's armed forces,' Slijper said. 'Shipping military supplies for the benefit of Israel's arms industry and the [Israeli army] risks Maersk being complicit in Israel's crimes.' The use of the jet by Israel, the only country with its unique version of the F-35, has been scrutinised since the start of the onslaught in Gaza. Recently, campaign groups took the United Kingdom government to court in a bid to halt the exports of British-made F-35 parts to a statement to Al Jazeera, Lockheed Martin said: 'Foreign military sales are government-to-government transactions, and we closely adhere to US government policy with regard to conducting business with international partners.' Regarding F-35 shipments, Maersk told Al Jazeera that it upholds a strict policy of not shipping weapons or ammunition to active conflict zones and that it conducted due diligence, particularly in regions affected by active conflicts, including Israel and Gaza, and adapts this due diligence to the changing context. It confirmed, however, that its US subsidiary Maersk Line Limited was one of 'many companies supporting the global F-35 supply chain' with transport services. The F-35 programme includes several coalition countries, including Israel. 'As part of the coalition-building of the F-35, Maersk Line Limited regularly transports parts between participating countries, including Israel, where F-35 wings are manufactured,' it said.
