3 Recent Political Wins for the Crypto Sector and What They Mean for This Leading Cryptocurrency
XRP is already up more than 300% since the 2024 election, and new political catalysts could send it higher still.
A more crypto-friendly SEC makes it much more likely that a spot XRP ETF will be approved in 2025.
New crypto legislation set to be signed this summer could pave the way for new XRP growth opportunities related to stablecoins.
10 stocks we like better than XRP ›
Arguably, the biggest beneficiary of the Trump administration's pro-crypto policies has been the cryptocurrency XRP (CRYPTO: XRP). On Election Day, XRP was trading for just $0.50. Today, it trades for about $2.20, for an eye-popping 345% return on investment in just six months.
While much of the early pro-crypto euphoria surrounding the Trump administration has already been priced into XRP, new catalysts continue to emerge. In fact, there are three big ones with the potential to send XRP higher over the next 12 months.
President Donald Trump campaigned on a pro-business, pro-crypto platform. And that's exactly what he has delivered. One of the first moves was the replacement of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) head Gary Gensler, who was known for his heavy-handed approach to crypto regulation, with Paul Atkins, who is known for his support of the crypto industry.
This shakeup at the SEC is important for several reasons. For example, it led to the SEC dropping a long-running lawsuit against Ripple, the company behind the XRP crypto token. For more than four years, the SEC claimed that XRP was a security and not a commodity. That long, bruising legal battle now appears to be over.
That should free up Ripple (and XRP) to go back to expanding its business of facilitating financial transactions. Moreover, it should make it easier for Ripple to gain institutional adoption for its blockchain-based payment network, which is primarily used to send cross-border payments. As long as there was a dark legal cloud hovering over Ripple, financial institutions had to think twice about getting fully onboard with Ripple's payment technology.
In March, the White House announced the creation of both the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and the U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile. The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve only holds Bitcoin, so it doesn't affect XRP. But the Digital Asset Stockpile would to hold all the other cryptocurrencies owned by the U.S. government, including XRP.
In the days before the announcement of the U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile, Trump specifically noted that XRP was one of the four cryptocurrencies that were going to be prioritized. The high-profile inclusion of XRP came after Ripple Chief Executive Officer Brad Garlinghouse directly reached out to the White House, encouraging a broader crypto diversification away from Bitcoin.
What remains to be seen, of course, is whether the U.S. government will ever decide to buy more XRP for the stockpile. Right now, the only XRP in that would be held in the stockpile is crypto that was seized or confiscated by the government. So, from the perspective of crypto investors, it's important for the government to buy XRP. If that happens, the price of XRP could skyrocket.
New stablecoin legislation should be signed by the end of the summer. At first glance, this political win shouldn't have a big impact on XRP. After all, XRP is an altcoin, and not a stablecoin, right?
However, there is an indirect impact. That's because Ripple recently introduced a new dollar-pegged stablecoin, known as Ripple USD (CRYPTO: RLUSD), to encourage more activity on the XRP blockchain. Even though Ripple USD only launched in December, it already has a market cap of $300 million, which suggests that institutional investors are eyeing new uses for XRP.
Admittedly, there's quite a bit of debate in the crypto world about how much this new stablecoin will actually help XRP. On one hand, it should drive new transaction activity, create new use cases for XRP, and lead to greater demand for the XRP token. On the other hand, the new stablecoin might cannibalize XRP transaction activity, and lead to lower demand for the XRP token.
As noted above, much of the pro-crypto euphoria that existed immediately after the 2024 election has already been priced into XRP. There's no other rational way to explain how a cryptocurrency that had seemingly flatlined at the $0.50 level suddenly skyrocketed to a 52-week high of $3.39 in mere weeks.
But there's still a lot of promising upside potential from these three new political catalysts. For example, a crypto-friendly SEC makes it much more likely that a new spot XRP exchange-traded fund will be approved by the end of 2025. And, any initiative by the Trump White House to free up non-taxpayer funds for the Digital Asset Stockpile could send XRP parabolic.
Although there's a lot to be excited about, just remember: In its entire history, XRP has never once traded higher than $4. So, while it's nice to fantasize about XRP skyrocketing in value, the most likely outcome is for XRP to double in price, to regain an all-time high of $3.84 from seven years ago.
Before you buy stock in XRP, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and XRP wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
Dominic Basulto has positions in XRP. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
3 Recent Political Wins for the Crypto Sector and What They Mean for This Leading Cryptocurrency was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
32 minutes ago
- CBS News
Pennsylvania food banks worry about SNAP cuts in federal government's proposed budget bill
Food banks fear that if the budget bill heading to the U.S. Senate gets passed, thousands of people in Pennsylvania will go hungry. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program helps nearly 2 million Pennsylvanians put food on the table. "For every meal the food bank provides, SNAP provides nine meals," said Jennifer Miller, CEO of the Westmoreland Food Bank. Leaders from the Westmoreland Food Bank and Feed Pennsylvania came together with the secretaries of the Pennsylvania Departments of Human Services and Agriculture to discuss how proposed federal changes would impact the most vulnerable in the state. They said the House-passed reconciliation bill would cut nearly $300 billion from the SNAP program through 2034. "We have existing work requirements in SNAP, but this bill would make them more strict. And as a result, we believe at least 140,000 Pennsylvanians could lose access to food assistance that helps people be healthy enough to go to work in the first place," Pennsylvania Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Val Arkoosh said. Food banks fear they will see substantially more people lining up for food. "We are not equipped to absorb the massive demand that would result from reduced access to federal nutrition programs. Food banks cannot replace the scale, the reach and the stability of the SNAP program," Miller said. "If enacted, these cuts would eliminate more meals per year distributed by the entire charitable food network in this country," said Julie Bancroft, CEO of Feeding Pennsylvania. State Agriculture Secretary Russell Redding said losing SNAP dollars would also hit farm families. "Roughly 25 cents of every grocery dollar spent goes straight back to the farm, 25 cents for every dollar for food purchased at the grocery store," Redding said. Arkoosh said the proposed cuts would cost the state over $1 billion more annually. "The result would be devastating for Pennsylvania families and for our economy," Arkoosh said. Many believe the fight is not over, though. "You all have a role in contacting your senators, your congressperson, letting them know how this impacts our commnity, our neighbors, our friends," Westmoreland County Commissioner Ted Kopas said.
CNN
35 minutes ago
- CNN
Three attacks in two months: Why American Jews are on edge
CNN's Bianna Golodryga breaks down the three high-profile recent attacks on Jewish elected officials, diplomats and community events that are putting American Jews and government officials on edge.
New York Times
42 minutes ago
- New York Times
Acting FEMA Chief Told Staff He Didn't Know About U.S. Hurricane Season
The acting head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency told employees on Monday that he did not know the United States has a hurricane season, according to two people who heard the remarks and said it was unclear if he was serious. The official, David Richardson, has served in the Marines and worked in the Department of Homeland Security's Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office. After he joined FEMA in May, some FEMA workers expressed concern about his lack of experience in emergency management. The remark, coming a day after the start of the Atlantic hurricane season, could deepen those concerns. The two people who described the comment asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA, said in a statement that Mr. Richardson was joking. The agency statement said FEMA would be focused on disaster response this hurricane season and said the Trump administration is in the process of reforming an agency it believes is bloated. Even if the comment was a joke, the timing would be questionable. The hurricane season, which began on Sunday and lasts through Nov. 30, is considered the agency's most challenging period, during which the country is the most vulnerable to large-scale devastating disasters that can overwhelm state and local disaster managers. In addition, FEMA has just gone through a major reduction in staffing. During the same meeting, according to the two people, Mr. Richardson told agency employees that FEMA should plan to respond to this year's hurricane season the same way the agency responded to last year's hurricane season. But employees have expressed concern with that approach because of the agency's reduced staff. Since the start of the Trump administration, FEMA has lost about a quarter of its full-time staff, including one-fifth of the coordinating officers who manage responses to large-scale disasters, according to a former senior official. The departures came after pressure from the Department of Government Efficiency, previously led by Elon Musk, for a massive culling of federal workers. Mr. Richardson's predecessor at FEMA was Cameron Hamilton, who was pushed out in early May, a day after telling members of Congress that FEMA was vital to communities 'in their greatest times of need' and should not be eliminated. The comment appeared to be in conflict with President Trump, who has suggested the agency be eliminated. On his first full day as acting administrator, Mr. Richardson told the agency's employees that if any of them tried to obstruct his agenda, 'I will run right over you.'
