
Supreme Court grants interim relief to cartoonist, but says offensive posts a matter of concern
NEW DELHI:
Supreme Court
on Tuesday granted interim protection from arrest to Indore-based cartoonist Hemant Malviya, who has been booked over a cartoon shared on social media containing derogatory references to
Prime Minister Narendra Modi
and the RSS and said that it would be a test case for the court on how to deal with the offensive posts.
The court listed the matter after August 15 for further hearing.
A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Aravind Kumar granted interim protection after he tendered unconditional apology, despite strong opposition from Madhya Pradesh govt which placed some of his other offensive posts on social media. The court directed him to file the apology in Hindi in the form of an affidavit and directed the parties to complete the pleading till the next date.
At the outset, advocate Vrinda Grover, appearing for Malviya, informed the bench that the petitioner was offering an apology. Additional solicitor general K M Nataraj, appearing for the state, placed before the bench screenshots of other objectionable social media posts allegedly made by Malviya.
The bench said that one of the posts was 'very very offensive' and could attract various provisions of Indian Penal Code. 'What is happening today, all kinds of statements are being made on social media... the language they use. There are some among the lawyer community also doing this...We will have to do something. Lets this case be a test case,' the bench said, posting the case for after August 15.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
34 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HT Archives: Key accord inked to bring peace and stability to Punjab
Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and Akali Dal president Sant Harchand Singh Longowal on Thursday finalised a comprehensive accord on a slew of issues concerning Punjab, marking a welcome end to the prolonged crisis in the border state that has bedevilled the nation. Then PM Rajiv Gandhi with Sant Harchand Singh Longowal in 1985. (HT Archives) The 11-point Memorandum of Settlement signed at 5.30pm in Parliament House provides for the transfer of Chandigarh to Punjab, two high-power commissions to decide on territorial disputes between Punjab and Haryana, a tribunal on the Ravi-Beas water systems, reference of the controversial Anandpur Sahib resolution to the Sarkaria Commission, widening of the scope of the inquiry into the November 1984 riots, rehabilitation of those discharged from the Army, and compensation to the families of all the innocent people killed in agitation and riots since August 1982. The memorandum was tabled in the Lok Sabha within 20 minutes of its signing by a beaming Prime Minister, who expressed the hope that this 'will bring to an end a very difficult period through which the nation has passed.' The five-page memorandum, signed by the two leaders, itself ends thus: 'This settlement brings to an end a period of confrontation and ushers in an era of amity, goodwill and co-operation, which will promote and strengthen the unity and integrity of India.' Members of Parliament on both sides of the aisle welcomed the Prime Minister's announcement by thumping their desks. Two senior Opposition leaders in the Lok Sabha, Prof Madhu Dandavate (Janata) and C Madhava Reddy (Telugu Desam) welcomed it immediately. The transfer of Chandigarh to Punjab, as also of Hindi-speaking areas now in Punjab to Haryana is to take place simultaneously on the next Republic Day, 1986. The commission will submit its findings by December 31, 1985, which will be binding on both sides. LK Advani, leader of the BJP parliamentary party, called the pact 'a great relief', even as he underscored reservations about specific provisions of the memorandum. He also said that had the Akalis and the government shown this kind of sagacity during the tripartite conference in January 1983 'the country and Punjab might have been spared a lot of agony and bloodshed.' Talks held at the time, which included opposition parties, collapsed on January 26, with Sikh leaders resigning from the state legislatures and Parliament. It was noteworthy, he said, that at the time of the tripartite conference all Opposition parties had opposed any formal reference by the government to the Anandpur Sahib resolution, a list of demands the Akali Dal made in 1983. 'It is strange', said Mr Advani, 'that the ruling party whose principal election plank was that the Opposition parties were favouring the Anandpur Sahib resolution and it alone was resisting it, has now in an official communique signed by the Prime Minister himself formally recognised it'. The agreement provides for the rehabilitation of all those discharged from the army, through gainful employment. The jurisdiction of the Justice Ranganath Misra Commission inquiring into the November 1984 riots that followed the assassination of former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi will be extended to cover the disturbances in Bokaro (Bihar) and Kanpur. The government agreed to consider the formulation of an All-India Gurdwara Bill. 'The legislation will be brought forward for this purpose in consultation with the Akali Dal and others concerned and after fulfilling all relevant constitutional requirements.' Under the accord, the government agreed to withdraw the notification applying the Armed Forces Special Powers Act to Punjab. The existing special courts will now try only cases relating to the offences of 'waging war' and hijacking.' All other cases will be transferred to ordinary courts and enabling legislation, if needed, will be brought forward in the current session of Parliament. The river water dispute is to be adjudicated by a tribunal headed by a Supreme Court judge. The accord provides that the report of the tribunal will be submitted within six months and will be binding on both Punjab and Haryana. Gandhi said that on the Anandpur Sahib resolution, Sant Longowal made it very clear that it was meant to be an exercise for greater autonomy within the Indian Union. Those aspects of the resolution passed by the Akali Dal first in 1973 and again in 1978, which pertain to Centre-State relations now stand transferred to the Commission on Centre-State relations headed by Mr Justice R. S. Sarkaria. The accord specifically provides for the promotion of Punjabi language. The Prime Minister will write to the chief ministers on the question of according adequate representation to the minorities in employment and other avenues. On Chandigarh, the accord provides for the city going to Punjab. The present Union Territory has some adjoining areas included both from Punjab and Haryana. The Hindi speaking areas will now be transferred to Haryana and the Punjabi-speaking areas to Punjab.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
National Sports Governance Bill: Will govt clean up federations including BCCI — or isthere a danger of overreach?
nearly a decade ago, when the Supreme Court was hearing the recommendations made by a panel led by Justice R M Lodha, set up by the Court to suggest reforms to the Board of Control for Cricket in India, then Chief Justice T S Thakur asked the BCCI a rhetorical question: 'Are you refusing to be reformed?' In the coming days, the cricket board could, again, face a similar question. For years, the BCCI has acted on its own on governance issues. Through the National Sports Governance Bill, which Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya introduced in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday, the government has shown a will to bell the cat. So far, the BCCI has resisted all attempts to bring it under government regulation. Its main argument has been that since it does not seek funding from the sports ministry, it isn't answerable to it. Unlike other sports, the cricket board, an autonomous body, isn't covered under the Right to Information Act, 2005. However, with cricket returning to the Olympics in 2028, it could be forced to align with other national federations and follow the standard good governance practices. The government aims to achieve this by bringing the BCCI under the National Sports Board (NSB), as the Bill envisages. The NSB will have sweeping powers to lay down rules and oversee the functioning of all federations — from unconventional games like atya patya to mainstream sports like cricket. Indeed, sports governance issues go beyond cricket. The Bill seeks to bring in legislation to improve 'the governance of the sports bodies and achieve better results in sports and reduce the disputes and litigation, inter alia, involving sports federations'. It relies on two main pillars — the NSB will be a SEBI-like body that will govern all sports, and the creation of a National Sports Tribunal, which will take the burden away from the lower courts and high courts. With the NSB, there are fears of government overreach and the question of appointing the right people, free of conflicts of interest or bias, to head the organisation. At the same time, there are concerns that the formation of the Tribunal, which will have the powers of a civil court and decide on disputes ranging from selection to election, could disenfranchise athletes and administrators of their right to approach the courts. Whether or not the government, through this Bill, succeeds in cleaning up the messy Indian sports administration depends on whether or not it manages to enforce its provisions in letter and spirit.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
'Pakistan has no objection to America listing TRF as terror group': Foreign minister Ishaq Dar
Pakistan's foreign minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar defended Islamabad's stance on the proscribed terror group The Resistance Front, shortly after the United States listed the outfit as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO). The Resistance Front – which India and the United States believe is an offshoot of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba – claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22. US secretary of state Marco Rubio (R) and Pakistani foreign minister Ishaq Dar walk together prior to a meeting at the department of state on July 25, 2025 in Washington, DC.(AFP) 'It is obviously a sovereign decision of the United States to designate the TRF. We have no issue. And we welcome, if they have any evidence, that they are involved,' said Dar at an event in Washington DC. Dar met US secretary of state Marco Rubio earlier on Friday. 'Linking the TRF to the Lashkar-e-Taiba is wrong. That outfit was dismantled years ago by Pakistan. The actors were prosecuted, arrested and jailed, and the entire outfit was destroyed,' said Dar, repeating a claim often made by Pakistan's government. Earlier, Dar told Pakistan's Parliament that Islamabad had blocked mention of the TRF in a UN Security Council Resolution which condemned the Pahalgam attacks. 'We opposed the mention of TRF in the UNSC statement. I got calls from global capitals, but Pakistan will not accept. TRF was deleted, and Pakistan prevailed," said Dar in April. Dar added at the time that Pakistan would require further proof about the TRF's activities. Dar defended that stance in response to a query from HT at a public event on Friday. Pakistan's foreign minister said no evidence was available at the time against the TRF to justify its inclusion in a UNSC statement. India declared TRF a terrorist organisation under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in January 2023. The South Asia Terrorism Portal indicates that TRF emerged in 2019 via social media announcements, and since then, it has taken responsibility for several attacks across Jammu and Kashmir, including a grenade attack in Srinagar, injuring seven civilians and targeted killings in 2021. India has persistently pushed for the TRF to be designated as a terrorist entity internationally, submitting evidence and representations to the UN's 1267 Sanctions Committee monitoring team in May and November 2024, having raised this issue previously throughout 2023.