Museum boss ‘disappointed' at media leaks as union questions Titanic hires
The Age on Monday revealed that Museums Victoria had revised its hiring policies after anti-corruption agencies investigated whistleblower allegations it skirted public sector rules when it appointed staff who had personal connections with senior executives as part of a hiring surge during the Titanic exhibition.
In response, the Community and Public Sector Union wrote to Museums Victoria on Monday, demanding it explain its hiring processes, and whether staff were disadvantaged by it.
The union, which is negotiating a new pay deal, also demanded to see 'the criteria or processes used to identify, assess and appoint candidates' during the Titanic exhibition held at Melbourne Museum, and asked whether any of the positions filled at this time 'were later extended or converted to ongoing roles'.
The appointments were part of a recruitment drive during the blockbuster Titanic exhibition, which ran from December 2023 to April 2024 and was the museum's most popular touring show since 2016.
Loading
The success of the exhibition prompted senior management to extend exhibition hours and argue that existing staff were too stretched – necessitating the urgent hiring of extra visitor engagement officers and retail assistants.
The roles were not publicly advertised, and no formal interviews were conducted. One former employee said retail and visitor officer jobs at the museum were highly sought after and often attracted hundreds of applications.
The hiring round recruited nine people in all – eight of whom had personal connections to senior staff, including some with links to the family of chief operating officer Sean Royal, who already had two daughters working at the museum.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
2 days ago
- The Age
Desperately seeking cure for agent underquoting
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. REAL ESTATE As a parent of a child who has attended fruitless auction sales and paid for building inspections, my heart bled for the young couple who spent $500 for a building report on a place they 'could not afford' (″ This couple spent $500 trying to buy their dream home. They never stood a chance ″, 17/8. I am also concerned about the dishonesty of real estate representatives with underquoting. The 'cure' I see is relatively simple. Anyone placing their house up for auction should be required to provide three separate building reports similar to those provided by a vendor of a used car. Those three reports should be provided by building inspectors known to the agent and not the vendor. That would save the pain of potential buyers forking out and losing potential deposit money. The price guide has been a furphy for a long time. My wife and I attended an auction many years ago where we were told by the agent 'we would get it' at a price we found later was at least $40,000 lower than the reserve which that agent would have fully known. When a 'price guide' is given, it should also be mandatory that if someone offers the top reserve plus 5 per cent, that offer must be legally accepted. It may put an exaggerated price on a house but would give a buyer a fair guide and save the grief of auctions that many experience. Auctions do not contribute to economic productivity. At a federal level, any overseas 'investor' buying property – and not a resident – should be subject to a 100 per cent, or close to it, capital gains tax. If they have no intention of contributing to Australia economically on a full-time basis, why should they profit? Real estate is not productive investment. As for Australian investors and capital gains tax: For people who have been forced to relocate for work, two houses (one primary and one secondary residence) are fair enough. Otherwise, they should be subject to a far heavier capital gains tax than they do at present on a subsequent house. Trevor Gibbs, Ocean Grove Vendor should provide building report As The Age's 'Bidding Blind' investigation (17/8) shows, many house hunters are unnecessarily out of pocket in investigating a prospective property when the practice of underquoting renders that property out of reach. While revealing the reserve price prior to auction would go some way to resolving the situation, I consider there is another way similar to the private sale of a vehicle for which the seller must obtain a roadworthy certificate: Why not make the property's vendor responsible for providing an independent building inspection report? Not only would this redress the balance between vendors and potential buyers and reduce buyer futility, but it would also improve housing sector productivity by significantly reducing the number of unnecessary building inspection reports. Kevin Bailey, Croydon Lock in price expectations Significant disparity in the values between the real estate agent's ″quoted range″ and the vendor's ″locked in″ reserve figure for properties will continue until these two decisions have to be made concurrently and collaboratively. Andrea Middling, Canterbury Cooling on real estate agents Why is there no cooling-off period with real estate agents? There needs to be, as with most other contracts, particularly given the size of the asset. When selling, one agent was so rude the moment the contract was signed that I waited out the 90 days. I eventually sold very well with a responsible agent. Not everyone has the luxury of being able to hold off. This is a serious anomaly with contract law. Katharine Anderson, Windsor THE FORUM Not affordable Thank you, Daniella White for exposing the appalling failures of the Victorian government's fast-track planning regime ‴ Apartments for the rich': Developments fast-tracked with no affordable housing,″ (17/8). In metropolitan Melbourne, multi-storey apartment blocks are being fast-tracked under the guise of providing affordable housing while actually allowing expensive apartments affordable only by the well-off. In the Geelong suburb of Rippleside a similar story is unfolding. With 93 apartments and a marina built and a further four-storey apartment block approved, the site's developer consortium applied for an increase to seven storeys with a further 84 apartments. This was rejected last July by the Geelong Council. The developers have now gone to the DFP for fast-track approval of a seven-storey block of 83 apartments and a marina office on a waterfront site that already includes 96 apartments each valued at $2-$3 million and a marina. It is clear that affordable housing is, at best, the Cinderella of the planning story unfolding, while the developers get the golden slipper. The Allan government must stop this rort. Rosemary Kiss, Rippleside Bendigo festival Re ' Not quite a full stop for writers festival', (7/8). What good can come from placing restrictions on those engaged in literature? Writers' festivals should consider it an opportunity to discuss delicate topics in an intelligent and thoughtful manner. Craig Tucker, Newport
Sydney Morning Herald
5 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Victoria's new lesson plan rollout delayed almost a year due to IT issues
The cost of rolling out explicit teaching plans across Victorian schools has blown out by $1.6 million, with some plans delayed by almost 12 months. In June 2024, Victoria's Education Minister Ben Carroll announced high-quality lesson plans in English, maths, science, design and digital technologies that would place explicit teaching in every classroom. But the digital platform used to host and distribute the lesson plans – called ARC 4.0 – has been delayed by almost 12 months as suppliers redesigned content to align with the Victorian Teaching and Learning 2.0 model. Teaching plans for phonics, maths and English have been in use in classrooms for much of this year, and the science teaching plan was launched on Thursday, but the resources for design technology and digital technology have yet to be deployed. According to documents seen by The Age, the cost of the software program has blown out from a budgeted $1.11 million to $2.7 million as the government contract reveals at least $248,800 was granted to White Rose Education to review and rewrite existing mathematics lesson plans. The project, initially planned to be completed in 2024, is not due until December 31, 2025. Carroll said the resources would help to reduce teacher workload as well as support the delivery of high-quality teaching in every classroom.
The Age
5 days ago
- The Age
Victoria's new lesson plan rollout delayed almost a year due to IT issues
The cost of rolling out explicit teaching plans across Victorian schools has blown out by $1.6 million, with some plans delayed by almost 12 months. In June 2024, Victoria's Education Minister Ben Carroll announced high-quality lesson plans in English, maths, science, design and digital technologies that would place explicit teaching in every classroom. But the digital platform used to host and distribute the lesson plans – called ARC 4.0 – has been delayed by almost 12 months as suppliers redesigned content to align with the Victorian Teaching and Learning 2.0 model. Teaching plans for phonics, maths and English have been in use in classrooms for much of this year, and the science teaching plan was launched on Thursday, but the resources for design technology and digital technology have yet to be deployed. According to documents seen by The Age, the cost of the software program has blown out from a budgeted $1.11 million to $2.7 million as the government contract reveals at least $248,800 was granted to White Rose Education to review and rewrite existing mathematics lesson plans. The project, initially planned to be completed in 2024, is not due until December 31, 2025. Carroll said the resources would help to reduce teacher workload as well as support the delivery of high-quality teaching in every classroom.
