Plans for almost 100 new cost rental homes approved in Cork suburb of Blackrock
An Bord Pleanála upheld last year's decision of Cork City Council to grant planning permission to development firm, Lyonshall, for the construction of 90 residential units on a 0.63-hectare site on Skehard Road.
Advertisement
The board rejected appeals against the council's ruling by two local families who claimed the proposed development was out of proportion and would visually dominate other homes in its immediate vicinity.
They complained that the density and height of the apartment blocks were excessive.
The site – which is adjacent to the SuperValu supermarket in Blackrock – is currently occupied by Villa Maria, a vacant two-storey house, which will be demolished as part of the plans.
The project is being developed in conjunction with voluntary approved housing association, Tuath Housing, as a cost rental scheme subject to funding approval from the Department of Housing.
Advertisement
It will comprise 74 apartments in three blocks up to five storeys in height as well as 12 townhouses and four duplex units.
Under the cost rental scheme, the rent charged will be a maximum of 35 per cent of a tenant's income.
Lyonshall successfully appealed a condition imposed by council planners which directed it to omit one level from the apartment blocks with the loss of 18 units.
A planning inspector with An Bord Pleanála had also recommended the omission of one storey with the observation that the acceptability of five-storeys was 'very finely balanced' and would represent 'an abrupt transition in scale.'
Advertisement
However, the company said the condition was unnecessary and claimed that the reduced number of units would threaten the viability of the development.
In response to the appeals, Lyonshall pointed out that the Cork City Development Plan sets height targets for areas across the city.
It noted that the development was within the target range for Blackrock and Ballintemple of between three and five storeys.
Subject to compliance with a number of planning conditions, the board said the development was acceptable in terms of design, density, unit mix, residential amenity for future residents as well as pedestrian and traffic safety.
Advertisement
The board also observed that it would promote 'the efficient development of housing on an accessible and sustainable site.'
Planning documents submitted by Lyonshall show that Blackrock was the second most preferred location after the city centre among almost 13,500 applicants for social housing in Cork.
The company said there was 'a demonstrable need for social and affordable housing at this location' as well as noting that there was an 'overwhelming and urgent demand' for small residential units.
Cork City Council has previously rejected plans for a mixed-used development including an Aldi supermarket on the same site by the same developer in 2021 because of its 'visually obtrusive' impact and overshadowing of neighbouring properties.
Local Fianna Fáil councillor, Terry Shannon, said he had no objection to the development in principle but claimed its height was 'excessive' and its scale was 'quite overpowering.'
Independent councillor, Kieran McCarthy, said he believed the proposal 'packs too much housing into such a small space,' while his Labour colleague, Peter Horgan called for the plans to be reviewed in order to replace the apartment blocks with more duplex-style housing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
26 minutes ago
- Times
‘We are Nicolas': inside France's middle-class revolt worrying Macron
Nicolas, a thirtysomething professional, sits in his tiny Paris flat with his head in his hands. Despite a degree and a job with a big brand company, he and his wife Julie are barely managing after the state takes its huge cut from their pay. More than 500,000 people have tweeted sympathy with the young manager since his plight went public. Ministers and MPs have offered support and he is worrying President Macron's staff. All of which is remarkable given that Nicolas does not exist. He is the fictional embodiment, a viral meme, of the frustration of a generation of white urban middle-class millennials who feel they are being milked to pay for the French benefits system and for boomers living it up on state pensions. His name is one that peaked in popularity with middle-class parents in 1980. The slogan 'C'est Nicolas qui paie' (Nicolas foots the bill), which emerged in 2020, has taken off this year, channelling anger in a section of the electorate that was the heart of initial support for Macron's centrist En Marche party, now called Renaissance. Targets for Nicolas's ire include Bernard and Chantal, generational names for 70-year-olds who are depicted sailing the oceans on cruises, thanks to pensions that this year gave retired recipients higher incomes than average full-time workers. Also in his sights is Karim, the Muslim-African immigrant whose life is supposedly financed by Nicolas. Tax rises promised by François Bayrou, prime minister of France's minority government, have boosted the Nicolas phenomenon, drawing in conservative politicians. Bruno Retailleau, leader of the centre-right Republicans and the interior minister, warned that if Bayrou fails to change the budget: 'It's Nicolas who'll pay'. Jonas Haddad, 37, the vice-president of the Normandy region and spokesman for the Republicans, praised what he called 'the rallying call for a generation that is being fleeced'. He said: 'I'm hearing a lot of young French people wondering if it is worth staying in France.' Aides of Macron, who opposes Bayrou's planned tax rises, say they are keeping a close eye on the movement. The Élysée Palace agrees with the claim that the middle class is being taxed too much, a staff member said. The government is more worried about a brewing revolt, also born on social media, of a potentially more violent type. Under the slogan 'Bloquons tout' (Let's block everything), a movement echoing the 2018 gilets jaunes (yellow vests) uprising is calling for the country to be brought to its knees on September 10. Drawing from the radical left and hard right, it is calling for civil disobedience and mass protest. It is being closely watched by the police intelligence service. The Nicolas trend has been propelled by an X account, NicolasQuiPaie, which has relayed humorous memes around the long-suffering millennial. The anonymous creator of the account, which has more than 70,000 followers, has insisted that he is not political. However, he has voiced admiration for Javier Milei, the libertarian Argentine president. He has distanced Nicolas from the gilets jaunes. He told Le Figaro: 'We must make the country understand that the country cannot stay afloat without the people who are at work. The political leaders have to have the courage to teach the other social classes that they need us.' Nicolas is being depicted on the left as a vehicle for populist and hard-right politics. Gaspard Gantzer, a former advisor to François Hollande, the former Socialist president, said: 'This Nicolas character, who comes over so simple and typical, is in reality a Trojan horse. He is circulating reactionary identity politics, which claim that only productive people have the right to have an opinion.' Analysts see the Nicolas phenomenon and the angrier 'block everything' movement as a symptom of the breakdown of the political system, witnessed by the collapse of the old established parties and the emergence of two big blocs on the hard left and populist right that jointly enjoy support from well over half the public. Jérôme Fourquet, director of opinion for Ifop polling, said: 'Each in its way translates the deep anger which is burning in whole swathes of society.' • In the new age of French chaos, hard right and left call the shots Nicolas comes mainly from right-wing frustration over taxes and excessive benefits, while the 'block everything' is a replay of the yellow vests, he told Le Point magazine. 'They are two slogans that have no party or trade union but which are fed by the same exasperation.' The Nicolas phrase is a new take on an old expression, recently used by Macron: 'C'est bibi qui paie'. Bibi refers to oneself so it means: 'I'm the one who pays'.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Aldi joins hot air brush craze with rock-bottom £12.99 option – and similar gadgets cost over £100 more
WITH summer in full swing, we're all looking for those perfect holiday looks - from beach waves to a flawless blow-dry that lasts all night. But getting that salon-perfect hair doesn't have to mean spending a fortune. 2 While the high-end brands have dominated the market, leaving us with serious gadget envy, Aldi has launched a new product that proves you can get the hair of your dreams without breaking the bank. The supermarket has joined the hot air brush craze with a rock-bottom £12.99 option, and it's a total game-changer. While popular stylers from the likes of Dyson and ghd can cost over £100 more, Aldi's budget-friendly buy promises to deliver smooth, voluminous hair with minimal effort. The hot air brush is part of their Specialbuy range and can be used on both wet and dry hair. It's no surprise that the tool is making waves, with the hashtag #hotairbrush racking up over 42 million views on TikTok as everyone tries to achieve that professional blow-dry look at home. And if you need a new hairdryer to go with it, Aldi is also bringing back its bestselling Ionic Hairdryer for the same low price of £12.99. It comes with three heat settings, two speed options, a cool shot function, and overheat protection. Both the Hot Air Brush and the Ionic Hairdryer will be available in stores nationwide starting August 21st. But as with all Specialbuys, they're only available while stocks last, so you'll have to be quick to get your hands on them. Aldi has also launched a new skincare and beauty dupe that will have shoppers racing to stores. All upcoming 'Aldi Finds' in the middle aisle next week – including portable chargers, power toothbrushes & dryer balls The budget supermarket's new £3.99 Tanning Facial Drops promise to give a summer glow without the sun, rivalling the much more expensive Tan Luxe Illuminating Face Drops and saving you £32. Perfect for packing in your holiday bag, the 30ml drops come in two shades - 'Light to Medium' and 'Medium to Dark' - and are formulated with skin-loving ingredients like Vitamin E, Aloe Vera, and Raspberry Fruit Extract. But the dupe fun doesn't stop there. Aldi has also released a £1.99 Lacura Prism fragrance, which shoppers are claiming is "nearly identical" to the iconic Prada Paradoxe, which can cost upwards of £72 for a 30ml bottle. This travel-friendly scent is another budget-friendly way to get a luxury feel for less. 2 The supermarket has also launched a new £1.99 product that promises to instantly refresh your home and save you a fortune on repainting. The supermarket's new Touch Up Markers are the perfect solution for covering up scratches, dents, and stains on surfaces like furniture, cabinets, and wood. Landing in stores as part of Aldi's Specialbuys, these bargain pens come in a variety of colours, including pine, black/brown, white, and both grey and white grout. The quick-drying formula means you can easily touch up marked areas without worrying about smudges, making them ideal for a quick and effortless home makeover. What are the best Aldi beauty dupes? ALDI has become well-known for its affordable beauty dupes that often rival high-end brands in terms of quality and effectiveness. Here are some of the best Aldi beauty dupes that have garnered rave reviews: Lacura Healthy Glow Exfoliating Tonic Dupe for: Pixi Glow Tonic Price: £3.99 (compared to Pixi's £18) Description: This exfoliating tonic contains glycolic acid and works to gently exfoliate and brighten the skin. It's a fantastic, budget-friendly alternative to the popular Pixi Glow Tonic. Lacura Q10 Renew Anti-Wrinkle Day Cream Dupe for: Nivea Q10 Plus Anti-Wrinkle Day Cream Price: £1.45 (compared to Nivea's £10) Lacura Caviar Illumination Day Cream Dupe for: La Prairie Skin Caviar Luxe Cream Price: £6.99 (compared to La Prairie's £292) Lacura Hot Cloth Cleanser Dupe for: Liz Earle Cleanse & Polish Hot Cloth Cleanser Price: £3.99 (compared to Liz Earle's £17.50) Lacura Snapshot Ready Foundation Primer Dupe for: Smashbox Photo Finish Foundation Primer Price: £5.99 (compared to Smashbox's £26) Lacura Miracle Cream Dupe for: Elizabeth Arden Eight Hour Cream Price: £3.99 (compared to Elizabeth Arden's £28) Lacura Ebony Rose Face Mask Dupe for: Fresh Rose Face Mask Price: £6.99 (compared to Fresh's £52) Lacura Charcoal Clearing Mudmask Dupe for: GlamGlow Supermud Clearing Treatment Price: £5.99 (compared to GlamGlow's £42) Lacura Velvet Touch Foundation Dupe for: Estée Lauder Double Wear Foundation Price: £5.99 (compared to Estée Lauder's £34) Lacura Tinted Lip Oils Dupe for: Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Tinted Oil
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Rachel Reeves risk repeating a mistake if she changes inheritance tax
Whenever a government is desperate to raise funds, there is a good chance it will revisit mad and bad ideas before trying something that is proven to work. As Rachel Reeves stares at the prospect of a black hole in the public finances — ranging from £20 billion to £70 billion, according to various estimates — it is clear that the chancellor cannot dig down the back of the sofa to plug the gap at the next budget. If these estimates are to be believed, dramatic spending cuts or big tax rises will be required to keep within her fiscal rules. Some Labour figures have duly called for a wealth tax, to squeeze the pips out of the country's richest who are already fleeing in rising numbers. Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, is said to have privately urged Ms Reeves to clamp down on the rich; Lord Kinnock, the former party leader, has done so publicly. Thankfully this unwise idea has been dismissed as 'daft' by Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, which hopefully means it has been discarded. Yet another such bad idea has floated into the public domain: reworking inheritance tax. Reports suggest that Treasury officials have been tasked with examining how assets are being given away before death to reduce liabilities. Under current rules, gifts made seven years or more before someone's death are not captured by inheritance tax. Any gifts handed over after that are taxed at varying rates. The Treasury is said to be examining whether a lifetime cap should be introduced and whether the so-called 'taper rates' on gifts given up to seven years beforehand need to be reworked. It is unclear whether these ideas have yet to reach the chancellor's desk. • Angela Rayner gives Labour a 12-month mission to save itself Were Ms Reeves to pursue changes to inheritance tax, it would represent the apotheosis of the Starmer government's all-pain, no-gain approach to governing. First, changing the rules on inheritance tax would not raise the projected £40 billion required to plug the gap in the public finances. Families would simply find workarounds to avoid strenuous new levies, just as they have done under the present regime. There is a risk that the government would go to great effort to craft new inheritance tax rules, only to find that it fails to deliver what was hoped for and it is back to square one. Second, it is political suicide. There are few issues more likely to incite fury among the electorate than a stricter inheritance tax regime. Swathes of middle England who have carefully accrued capital will punish any party that seeks to take it away. Gordon Brown realised this when mulling over calling an election in 2007, taking fright from the Conservative's plans to raise the inheritance tax threshold to £1 million. And finally, it is morally wrong. Inheritance tax is a levy on those who have worked hard throughout their lives to earn something to pass onto the next generation. The chancellor must draw a line under this speculation, which will prove damaging to her personally the longer it continues. There are better options available, such as tackling the ballooning welfare bill, with spending on disability benefits set to reach £100 billion by the end of the decade. There is also the dire state of productivity in the public sector, which is costing the economy £80 billion a year, as this newspaper reported yesterday. After £40 billion of tax rises in her first budget suffocated economic growth, Ms Reeves would be wise to learn and not repeat the same error.
