Plans for almost 100 new cost rental homes approved in Cork suburb of Blackrock
Plans for almost 100 new homes in the Cork suburb of Blackrock which will be made available on a cost rental basis have been given the green light.
An Bord Pleanála upheld last year's decision of Cork City Council to grant planning permission to development firm, Lyonshall, for the construction of 90 residential units on a 0.63-hectare site on Skehard Road.
Advertisement
The board rejected appeals against the council's ruling by two local families who claimed the proposed development was out of proportion and would visually dominate other homes in its immediate vicinity.
They complained that the density and height of the apartment blocks were excessive.
The site – which is adjacent to the SuperValu supermarket in Blackrock – is currently occupied by Villa Maria, a vacant two-storey house, which will be demolished as part of the plans.
The project is being developed in conjunction with voluntary approved housing association, Tuath Housing, as a cost rental scheme subject to funding approval from the Department of Housing.
Advertisement
It will comprise 74 apartments in three blocks up to five storeys in height as well as 12 townhouses and four duplex units.
Under the cost rental scheme, the rent charged will be a maximum of 35 per cent of a tenant's income.
Lyonshall successfully appealed a condition imposed by council planners which directed it to omit one level from the apartment blocks with the loss of 18 units.
A planning inspector with An Bord Pleanála had also recommended the omission of one storey with the observation that the acceptability of five-storeys was 'very finely balanced' and would represent 'an abrupt transition in scale.'
Advertisement
However, the company said the condition was unnecessary and claimed that the reduced number of units would threaten the viability of the development.
In response to the appeals, Lyonshall pointed out that the Cork City Development Plan sets height targets for areas across the city.
It noted that the development was within the target range for Blackrock and Ballintemple of between three and five storeys.
Subject to compliance with a number of planning conditions, the board said the development was acceptable in terms of design, density, unit mix, residential amenity for future residents as well as pedestrian and traffic safety.
Advertisement
The board also observed that it would promote 'the efficient development of housing on an accessible and sustainable site.'
Planning documents submitted by Lyonshall show that Blackrock was the second most preferred location after the city centre among almost 13,500 applicants for social housing in Cork.
The company said there was 'a demonstrable need for social and affordable housing at this location' as well as noting that there was an 'overwhelming and urgent demand' for small residential units.
Cork City Council has previously rejected plans for a mixed-used development including an Aldi supermarket on the same site by the same developer in 2021 because of its 'visually obtrusive' impact and overshadowing of neighbouring properties.
Local Fianna Fáil councillor, Terry Shannon, said he had no objection to the development in principle but claimed its height was 'excessive' and its scale was 'quite overpowering.'
Independent councillor, Kieran McCarthy, said he believed the proposal 'packs too much housing into such a small space,' while his Labour colleague, Peter Horgan called for the plans to be reviewed in order to replace the apartment blocks with more duplex-style housing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Lottery players could still win record EuroMillions jackpot next week
The EuroMillions draw on Friday night offered a record jackpot of £210m, but no winning tickets were purchased. The winning numbers were 20, 21, 29, 30, 35, with Lucky Stars 2 and 12. Seven players won the second-tier prize, entitling them to winnings of more than £2m each. The jackpot is capped at £210m, and additional money has gone to boosting prizes in the second tier. Tuesday's draw will offer an estimated jackpot of £208 million, meaning the record prize amount is still up for grabs.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Britons are great savers – that's the problem
The British aren't bad savers. But – as a nation – we hold much less of our wealth in investments than our American and European counterparts – limiting potential for long-term returns. The Government recognises this issue and is considering savings limits to cash ISAs, which could encourage investment in shares and other assets, but what about the root causes preventing appetite for investing? Robinhood, alongside Global Counsel, examined the barriers to investing for under-represented groups in the UK. Inclusion is foundational to Robinhood's mission: of our 25 million customers, around half are first-time investors. We're working to match that level of access in the UK – and that starts with listening. Research showed that people approach investing differently, with distinct barriers to investing for women and ethnic minorities. Women are significantly less likely to invest than men, and ethnic minorities invest considerably less than the majority population. When they do, motivations vary, and lack of confidence undermines actual capability. Ethnic minority investors are nearly four times more likely to invest to support elder family members, which may explain why they tend to be more focused on medium-term gains over longer-term, personal retirement goals. They are also twice as likely to hold exchange traded funds (ETFs). Confidence in social media is low for all respondents, yet 44pc of ethnic minority respondents are likely to rely on it for investment advice, versus 14pc for non-ethnic minority population. There is also widespread misunderstanding of the minimum amount of capital required to invest. For relatively accessible investments, like stocks and shares Isas, respondents believed they needed, on average, £2,383 to invest – more than 23 times the £100 minimum required by many providers. Policymakers and industry can address the barriers. The Financial Conduct Authority is clear that the consumer duty welcomes innovation, provided that it leads to better consumer outcomes. Historical, well-intentioned regulation has created a market where financial advice is out of reach for many. However, Advice Guidance Boundary review, and more specifically Targeted Support, can now address this by allowing firms to provide advice on the basis of 'people like you', opening financial advice to a wider range of investors. With this in mind, firms should be allowed to re-visit the way investment risk is represented – to help, rather than alienate, investors. Cash products are not required to carry warnings about lower long-term returns or the risk of wealth erosion due to inflation, while investing products must carry multiple downside warnings. Both should carry equally robust and proportionate information – so consumers understand the risks of investing and the risks of holding cash. Additionally, marketing materials should dispel myths about up-front capital requirements for investing. The move to a new Consumer Composite Investments regime should broaden the range of products retail consumers can invest in, including specifying US-domiciled ETFs in the overseas fund regime. The data is clear. UK consumers want to invest more, and in a wider range of assets. This requires coordinated action. But the opportunity to create a nation of long-term investors is too important to miss.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE One in four senior bank staff say closing branches 'isn't a concern'
More than a quarter of senior banking professionals say the closure of bank branches isn't a major concern for their business, figures seen by This is Money reveal. While as many as 27 per cent of senior bank staff said branch closures weren't a challenge to their business, the same cannot be said for the public. There is growing concern over access to bank branches, as more find themselves living in bank and cash machine deserts. Some 60 per cent of bank customers said closures have made it more difficult to speak to a member of staff, according to the data from credit information provider CRIF. A majority also said banks are now less focused on serving and looking after their customers than they were five years ago. A third said the increasing numbers of bank closures have made it more confusing to get what they need form their bank because they are now unable to speak to bank staff directly and instead often have to find information on their website. As many as 13million banking customers still rely on physical branches, recent figures from the Financial Conduct Authority reveal. Sara Costantini, regional director for the UK and Ireland at CRIF, said: 'Financial services have changed rapidly over the last decade, as people continue to embrace digital banking and manage multiple aspects of their finances online. 'The knock-on impact of this has been the reduction in physical, in-person banking services. 'While many working in the sector don't see this as a major challenge to their business, bank branch reductions are continuing to fuel concerns over the quality of customer services and what further closures may mean for the future.' How many bank branches are closing? According to data from Which?, some 379 bank closures have been earmarked for 2025, with a further 22 already planned for 2026. This is despite rules brought in last year that banks must prove to regulators that local communities will still have free cash access if they close their branch. Since 2015, there have been as many as 6,377 branch closures across the UK, meaning two thirds of all the branches open in 2015 have now closed. Bank closures are increasingly giving rise to the creation of banking deserts. Data from Nomis shows that in 2024 there are as many as 15 'grey zones' in the UK. North East Derbyshire, a district with more than 100,000 residents, has no bank branches whatsoever. In the CRIF survey, a fifth of consumers said they are concerned about the closure of more bank branches over the coming five years. Costantini said: 'The findings highlight the difficult tightrope that banks now need to walk, balancing the need to ensure their digital services remain cutting edge and up to scratch, which has become a competitive area for so many, without losing the personal touch that more traditional services offer.' Meanwhile, its not just bank branches that are shutting their doors. Between October 2019 and January 2024, there was 30 per cent reduction in the size of the UK's ATM network, likewise creating ATM dead zones and stifling Britons' access to cash. Some 23,000 ATM's are expected to be closed, leaving just 15,000 across the country, according to the UK's ATM network, Link.
