Sri Lankan Navy arrests 7 Indian fishermen from Rameswaram
Police said, 456 trawlers were issued tokens by the Fisheries Department for fishing on Saturday. One of the trawlers owned by V. Isaac Paul of Thangachimadam with seven fishermen on board, was held by the Sri Lankan Navy for crossing the IMBL.
The arrested were B. Ruther (40), P. Edison (48) and M. Jegadeesh (42) of Thangachimadam; A. Shanmugam (56) and F. Dalvin Raj (42) of Rameswaram, M. Sakthivel (43) of Keerathurai in Madurai and Anbalagan.
Police said that the arrested fishermen were taken to the Kankesanthurai port along with their trawler and were later lodged in Jaffna prison.
Boat damage
Another trawler, belonging to Maria Seeron, was damaged by the Sri Lankan Navy's patrol boat while fishing in the area between Katchatheevu and Neduntheevu. When the patrol boat approached the Indian trawler and the Navy personnel intended to question the fishermen, it dashed on the trawler, Fisheries Department sources said.
Despite the damage sustained to the trawler, the seven Indian fishermen who were on board — Stalin, Muneeswaran, Viyakulam, Columbus, Nagesh, Stephen and Sarathkumar — managed to return safely to Rameswaram jetty.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Stalin urges centre's intervention for release of 7 fishermen held by Sri Lanka
Madurai: Chief minister M K Stalin has urged the Union government to take urgent diplomatic steps to secure the release of seven Rameswaram fishermen apprehended by the Sri Lankan navy in the early hours of Sunday. In a letter to Union external affairs minister S Jaishankar, Stalin expressed concern over the recurring arrests of Tamil Nadu fishermen and called for immediate measures to end the continued harassment of those operating in the Palk Strait. "I urge the Union government to engage all available diplomatic channels to bring an end to these continued apprehensions. I further request that urgent and effective steps be taken to secure the release of all detained fishermen and their boats at the earliest," he said. Stalin also highlighted that 50 fishermen and 232 Tamil Nadu fishing vessels remain in Sri Lankan custody this year, compounding the economic and emotional hardship faced by their families. The latest incident occurred around 2 am on Sunday when a mechanised trawler (IND-TN-10-MM-746), owned by V Isaac Paul of Thangachimadam, was intercepted near Neduntheevu by the Sri Lankan navy. The boat, which had left Rameswaram with valid fishing tokens issued by the fisheries department, was reportedly operating close to the International Maritime Boundary Line (IMBL) when it was seized. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like What Is a Family Trust, and How Do You Set One Up? SmartAsset Learn More Undo The arrested fishermen were identified as B Ruther, 40, P Edison, 48, K Anbalagan, 45, M Jegadeesh, 42, all from Thangachimadam; A Shanmugam, 56, F Dalvin Raj, 42 from Rameswaram; and M Sakthivel, 43, from Keerathurai in Madurai. They were initially detained at Kankesanthurai port and later remanded to judicial custody in Jaffna prison. In a separate incident, the same morning, another mechanised boat (IND-TN-10-MM-1040), owned by Maria Seeron of Rameswaram, reportedly sustained significant damage after being hit by a Sri Lankan navy patrol vessel between Katchatheevu and Neduntheevu. However, the seven fishermen on board, Stalin, Muneeswaran, Viyakulam, Columbus, Nagesh, Stephen, and Sarath Kumar, escaped unhurt and returned safely to the Rameswaram jetty. In the past two weeks alone, aside from this latest arrest, 15 Indian fishermen have been remanded to judicial custody in two separate incidents, with their custody extended after initial hearings. J R Jesu Raja, leader of the Rameswaram Fishermen Association, condemned the arrests, stating, "The fishermen had no intention to violate international boundaries. The Sri Lankan navy is harassing them under the pretext of enforcement. One of the boats was even damaged while being chased." He appealed to both the Union and state governments to take a firm stand to ensure the safety of Indian fishermen. MSID:: 122420464 413 |
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Ulfa-I claims 3 cadres dead in drone strikes on Myanmar camps; Army denies
1 2 Guwahati: The banned insurgent group, United Liberation Front of Asom-Independent (Ulfa-I), claimed that three of its cadres were killed in a targeted drone attack in at least three waves on its mobile camps in Myanmar's Sagaing region near the India-Myanmar border by the Indian Army early Sunday morning. The Ulfa-I said between 2am and 4am, over 150 drones of Indian Army, manufactured in Israel and France, struck several mobile camps of Ulfa-I, and Revolutionary People's Front (RPF), the political wing of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) of Manipur along the India-Myanmar international border region between Longwa (Nagaland) and Pangsau Pass (Arunachal Pradesh). The group claimed that attack resulted in the death of senior Ulfa-I leader Nayan Asom and injuries to 19 other members. In a subsequent statement, it claimed that two more senior leaders — Ganesh Asom and Pradip Asom — were killed in a second wave of attack during Nayan Asom's funeral rites. The Indian Army has officially denied involvement in the alleged drone stricks. Defence ministry PRO Lt Col Mahendra Rawat told TOI in Guwahati, "There are no inputs with the Indian Army on such operation." In another statement later, Ulfa-I dismissed the Indian Army's denial, saying people in Arunachal Pradesh's border area are witness to the three waves of drone attacks. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Assam's chief minister and state police also denied any involvement or knowledge of operations, stating that further clarity is expected as more information surfaces. A security source confirmed that there were losses of life at the Ulfa-I camp in Myanmar, but it emphasised that, given the current crisis in Myanmar — where the military junta is embroiled in a widespread civil war with numerous ethnic armed groups and insurgents — the cause of the incident could be internal to Myanmar itself. "The ongoing civil war in Myanmar has led to frequent clashes, shifting alliances, and a general breakdown of state control in many areas, particularly near international borders. In this environment, attacks on insurgent camps — including those used by Ulfa-I — could plausibly originate from Myanmar's own ethnic armed organisations or even from the Myanmar military, rather than from Indian forces," the source said. Since the late 1980s and 1990s, Indian insurgent groups began establishing camps in Myanmar's border areas to escape Indian security operations. The porous border and ongoing conflict have made the region a hotspot for cross-border militant activity. Indian security agencies have expressed concern over the use of Myanmar's territory by insurgents for launching attacks in northeast India. There have been previous instances of Indian military action or alleged cross-border strikes, but official confirmation is rare and often denied by both Indian and Myanmar authorities. Ulfa's main camps are reportedly in the dense forests of Sagaing, with key bases at Waktham Basti, Hoyat Basti, and Hakiyot (opposite Longding district, Arunachal Pradesh). Some camps are said to be near the Pangmi Naga area and along the China-Myanmar border. Manipur-based groups, including PLA, KYKL, and PREPAK, also operate from these areas. The NSCN-K(YA) faction has set up its headquarters and camps in Naga-inhabited regions of Sagaing, often within a 6 to 10 km radius of other Indian groups camps. These camps have been used continuously, with their locations shifting in response to military pressure. The Sagaing region and Naga-inhabited areas of Myanmar remain the primary strongholds for these Indian insurgent groups, often with support or tolerance from local armed factions or, at times, the Myanmar military. The ongoing civil war in Myanmar has further complicated the security landscape, with insurgent groups sometimes shifting allegiances or moving camps to avoid detection or attacks.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Tracing the path to doom
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB)'s preliminary report has clearly identified the cause of the accident: Fuel control switches on Air India Flight 171 moved to 'cutoff' position one second apart during take-off, starving both engines and causing 260 deaths in what is the deadliest aviation incident in the country in decades. The question is: How? Was the error human, mechanical, or caused by software? The report's technical findings remain significant and demand rigorous follow-through regardless of implications (@CISFHQrs) The findings carry global significance because this represents the first fatal accident involving Boeing's 787 Dreamliner in 14 years of commercial service. While the report is silent on who, or what, caused the error, the exchange between pilots paraphrased in it — one asks the other why he moved the switches; the other responds that he did not — has been seen by many as a suggestion that the pilots were at fault. The Indian aviation community has reacted in anger over what it sees as an attempt to scapegoat the pilots. This is understandable. The report provides only a paraphrased account of the cockpit exchange, capturing confusion when engines began losing power. Exact words and other sounds from the voice recorder could provide crucial context that remains hidden. There's also a troubling precedent: Early theories speculated pilots hit the wrong levers during take-off — since ruled out by the report. More broadly, after the first Boeing 737 Max crash in 2018, the company insisted it had provided adequate guidance in manuals for pilots to handle the situation. Only after a second plane went down did the industry recognise the fundamental software flaw that made such guidance insufficient. But, perhaps most importantly, the anger is meant to be a reminder that dead pilots can't defend themselves against conclusions that could suit corporate or regulatory interests over truth. Yet the report's technical findings remain significant and demand rigorous follow-through regardless of implications. If evidence ultimately points to pilot error, that conclusion must be accepted, however inconvenient. Conversely, if mechanical or system failures emerge, manufacturers and regulators must face accountability. Truth-seeking serves everyone: Grieving families seeking closure, an industry requiring safety improvements, and pilots whose professional integrity depends on credible findings that consider all failure modes — human, mechanical, and systemic. The AAIB, having met its 30-day expectation, still faces a crucial test: It must demonstrate thoroughness and transparency. This requires releasing complete cockpit voice transcripts when appropriate, providing regular progress updates, and including qualified technical expertise — all while resisting pressure for premature conclusions. The aviation community must also exercise patience, recognising that credible findings demand time and methodical analysis. India's credibility ultimately depends on proving that evidence drives conclusions.
