
US foreign aid cuts threaten decades of progress on driving down malaria
Cuts to US-funded malaria programs are adding to a host of issues confronting Congolese mother Mwayuma Idi Feza, whose city, Goma, is at the center of the country's intensifying conflict and run by a vicious militia.
'I have a child who is sick. He has had malaria for a week and a few days now,' Feza, 36, told CNN of her 1-year-old son, whose fever she suspects is caused by the mosquito-borne illness.
She is also experiencing symptoms of the disease, she said. 'I'm feeling cold. I feel bitterness in my mouth.' The single mother is out of work and said she can barely afford food, much less malaria treatment for her and her baby.
Malaria is a preventable and curable disease, but it still claims hundreds of thousands of lives around the world each year. Infants, children under five and pregnant women are most likely to die from a malaria infection.
It's a leading cause of death in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which bears the world's second-highest malaria burden after Nigeria, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). In 2022, some 24,000 people were estimated to have died of the disease in the central African nation. More than half those deaths were of children under 5.
Since the Trump administration started slashing foreign aid early this year, an estimated 36% of US Agency for International Development (USAID) funding for malaria programs has been cut, according to the Center for Global Development, a DC-based think tank. But the true level of aid cuts remains uncertain.
In the DRC, that money funded the supply of antimalarials to 'many health zones' across the country, 'including intermittent preventive treatment for pregnant women,' according to Michel Itabu, a former spokesperson for the country's National Malaria Control Program (PNLP), referring to a WHO-recommended program in areas where malaria is endemic.
'The PNLP is already feeling the effects' of the funding cuts, Itabu told CNN. Such preventive programs might have protected Idi Feza and her baby son – instead, if infected, they are both at risk of serious illness or even death.
The US government has long been the largest donor to global efforts to combat malaria. For decades, USAID spearheaded a program called the President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) to drive down mortality and eliminate malaria in 30 of the hardest-hit nations, most of which are in Africa. Launched by George W. Bush in 2005, the program helped reduce malaria deaths by more than 60% – saving millions of lives.
CNN spoke to several people who previously worked on the initiative but were recently laid off amid Trump's dismantling of USAID. Most PMI staff have been let go or had their work halted by stop-work orders, and the Trump administration's proposed budget called for a 47% cut to the program.
'One of the reasons that we don't have malaria in the US is because we fund and track malaria worldwide, for global health security.'
Former USAID contractor, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisals
Every aid worker who spoke to CNN emphasized that people would die in the short term as a result of the disruption to malaria prevention and treatment efforts.
Longer term, they said the funding cuts would destroy years of American progress in driving down the prevalence and severity of the disease.
US-backed surveillance systems that were once the backbone of efforts to monitor malaria and other disease outbreaks around the world have also been cut, former US government workers told CNN, underscoring long-term concerns.
'One of the reasons that we don't have malaria in the US is because we fund and track malaria worldwide, for global health security,' one former USAID contractor told CNN in February, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisals. She warned that locally acquired malaria cases, like Florida experienced in 2023, could become more common 'if we're not funding driving down the parasite elsewhere.'
Aid workers and nonprofits have repeatedly made the case that malaria programs and US disease monitoring make America 'safer, stronger and more prosperous,' which was Secretary of State Marco Rubio's stated framework for assessing US foreign assistance.
For example, USAID and the US military have long invested in malaria vaccine research to both reduce the global disease burden and protect US soldiers serving abroad.
Spencer Knoll, US policy and advocacy director at the nonprofit Malaria No More, said in testimony to the US House Appropriations Subcommittee in April that 'the world's most dangerous infectious diseases – including Ebola, Marburg, and pandemic influenza – often present first as fevers, and malaria detection programs can stop outbreaks in their tracks.'
The nonprofit also argued that US assistance prevents other countries like China and Iran from making further inroads in Africa in terms of soft power.
'Everything that comes from USAID… was very intentionally branded, with this logo that says 'from the American people.' People know where it was coming from,' said former PMI contractor Annē Linn, who lost her job in January. 'When all of a sudden everything stops, that just tears down trust – not just from our government to other governments, but within countries' own health systems.'
Between 2010 and 2023, the US contributed more than one-third of the world's malaria financing, according to WHO.
As of last year, the US was also the largest contributor to the Global Fund, which works to fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. It's unclear what the future level of US funding for the independent, public-private program will be, following the Trump administration's proposal to halve US matching contributions.
The Trump administration's funding cuts 'could reverse decades of progress earned, in part, through longstanding investments from the United States of America and other global partners,' WHO warned in a statement earlier this year. 'Although funding for some USA-supported malaria programs have been reinstated, the disruptions have left critical gaps.'
The US State Department did not respond to questions from CNN about the stop-work orders and where specifically budget cuts to the PMI would be felt.
Former aid workers emphasized concerns about lack of investment to tackle several global threats related to malaria, including drug resistance, increasingly insecticide-resistant mosquitoes and new, invasive types of mosquitoes that are moving into urban areas with high populations.
'The timing for all of this couldn't be worse. Malaria is seasonal, and so having interruptions during times of seasonality sets us back significantly,' said Nathaniel Moller, formerly a senior innovation adviser at the PMI, whose job was cut in January. He warned that with less funding for measures like bed nets and preventative medicine, the baseline of cases will rise this year, enabling further spread of the disease down the road.
'You missed that window, and you can't just go back to that initial baseline… it's going to go up,' Moller said, noting that the rainy season is already underway in parts of east, central and southern Africa. 'We risk losing years of investments and seeing the caseload increase significantly.'
That bad timing is particularly evident in Malawi, where recent flooding and cyclones have driven up malaria infections, the country's National Malaria Control Manager Lumbani Munthali told CNN. He added that cuts to USAID funding for malaria interventions have put the country in 'a difficult situation' because 'it's not easy to close the gaps that have been created.'
More than 2,000 people died of malaria in Malawi last year. Some 9 million were infected.
'Malawi has made significant progress in reducing malaria deaths because of the technical and financial support from the US government,' Munthali said. That funding went towards procuring millions of malaria tests kits annually and providing insecticide-treated bed nets and antimalarial medication for pregnant women and nursing mothers.
'We are trying to close those gaps but may not close them completely,' Munthali said, as Malawi adjusts to the sharp drop-off in US foreign aid. About 64% of Malawi's USAID funding has been cut across all programs, according to the Center for Global Development's analysis.
In 2023, the most recent year for which PMI figures are available, Malawi received $24 million for its fight against malaria. It's not yet clear exactly how much it will lose this year, Munthali said.
Cuts to other areas of US foreign aid, like malnutrition programs, will have overlapping effects in Africa, aid workers also warned.
'Kids that are acutely malnourished will be more vulnerable to other diseases,' like measles, cholera and malaria, according to Nicolas Mouly, an emergency coordinator for Doctors Without Borders, or Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), who works in northwest Nigeria. He said funding gaps for malnutrition programs that were already present in 2024 have deepened significantly this year.
Malaria infection can also lead to malnutrition, fueling what MSF has called 'a vicious cycle.'
Nigeria's health minister, Muhammad Ali Pate, told CNN that the government has mobilized domestic funding for its health sector, including $200 million recently approved by parliament to lessen the effects of losing USAID funding.
'When the change in US government occurred and the policy was made, we considered it as another opportunity for reset and for us to increase our domestic funding so that we can meet the responsibility of the health of our population,' he said. 'At the end of the day, the responsibility of the health of Nigerians is on the Nigerian government. It is never a primary responsibility of the US government.'
MSF doesn't rely on US government funding, but the organization said its programs have been burdened with additional patients following US cuts to other humanitarian actors in the region. 'We won't have the capacity to treat all of them,' Mouly said.
Aid organizations prepare for the annual peak of malnutrition – when fall harvests have yet to arrive and rainy seasons have increased malaria cases – by stockpiling ready-to-use therapeutic food sachets. But for this year's lean season, Mouly said there is 'uncertainty' about their availability.
'We can expect a very critical situation,' Mouly said, emphasizing that children will die as a result. 'We've not seen anything like this in terms of disruption of global aid. It's very difficult.'
Lauren Kent reported and wrote from London. Nimi Princewill reported from Abuja, Nigeria.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
2 hours ago
- News24
SA is not facing a deadly Covid XBB wave or egg-related Salmonella outbreak, despite posts
South Africans are once again the target of misleading health hoaxes, with two unrelated but widely shared false claims circulating on Facebook and WhatsApp. One warns of a 'deadly' new Covid-19 variant, called Omicron XBB, while the other suggests a Salmonella outbreak linked to local eggs. Both are false, and neither poses a current threat to the public in South Africa, according to authorities. Covid-19: viral XBB warning is old and false A Facebook post urging people to wear masks because of a so-called 'Covid-Omicron XBB' wave claims the variant is 'five times more virulent' than Delta, lacks typical symptoms like fever or cough, and is often undetectable with nasal swabs. The post goes on to recommend two-layered masks, warns of pneumonia as an early sign, and urges people to stay away from crowds and share the message widely. However, none of these claims are supported by current medical evidence - and local authorities flagged the post as fake on the official South African government Facebook page. Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi this week confirmed South Africa is monitoring a new Covid-19 variant but has not seen a resurgence in cases. Research reveals that this message is an old copy-paste hoax that first circulated globally in late 2022. It has since gone viral in other countries and made an appearance in South Africa last year as well. Independent fact-checkers at the time debunked the claims, noting that: The XBB variant was first identified in August 2022 and is a recombination of Omicron sublineages BA.2.10.1 and BA.2.75. There is no credible evidence that XBB is more deadly or virulent than Delta. The World Health Organisation (WHO) and national health authorities have stated that there are no significant differences in severity between XBB and previous Omicron strains. Claims that nasal swabs cannot detect it or that it attacks the lungs 'without symptoms' are not supported by science. Egg-related Salmonella concern is also misplaced At the same time, another viral claim suggests that a Salmonella outbreak is linked to eggs in South Africa. However, the South African Poultry Association has dismissed this as misinformation imported from abroad. In a statement, the association clarified that the Salmonella outbreak referenced in the posts occurred in California, US, and there is no link to South African eggs. A statement from the organisation says: We confirm that there are no current Salmonella cases in South Africa that have caused people to be hospitalised. We further confirm that there are currently no confirmed cases of highly pathogenic avian influenza (bird flu) in poultry in South Africa. Social media posts provide further clarification: Both hoaxes show how easily global health concerns can be recycled, repackaging old misinformation as urgent local alerts In the case of the Covid-19 post, this includes exploiting outdated fears of new variants to push health advice designed to stoke anxiety - and responses below these posts on some platforms reveal the extent to which it is accepted as fact. For the Salmonella claims, it may be a simple case of regional confusion, with an overseas outbreak wrongly presented as domestic - but the impact is similar, with the potential to undermine the local poultry industry. In both instances, credible sources debunk the claims, which are more reliable than viral posts with no verifiable origin.


WebMD
2 hours ago
- WebMD
More Thoughts on the Myth of the Perfect Patient
In my last post, I talked about the extreme efforts I took to be the healthiest, most perfect MS patient. I realized I had more to say on the subject. If the average person looked at my diet today, they'd still think I was pretty strict. I still cut out most inflammatory foods: gluten, dairy, excessive sugar, corn, oats, veggie oils, and highly processed foods. But some "bad" habits have definitely snuck back into my life. I drink coffee every day, have Diet Coke a few times a week, indulge in (gluten-free and vegan) sugary desserts, eat out often, sacrifice sleep for fun, no longer read food labels with a magnifying glass, blast music through my headphones, and occasionally grab fast food after a night out. And with these choices comes guilt. Constant, nagging guilt that I indulge so much despite having an inflammatory condition. You would think I'd have more self-restraint, given the implications, and yet I've entered a chapter in my life where that's just … not a priority. People are often surprised by my lifestyle. Those who knew me throughout my MS journey saw me transform from a lifestyle that was average, to extremely strict and healthy, to average again, and now possibly even slightly unhealthy. They're shocked that I've "regressed" so much, and I get questioned about it constantly. I'm always uncomfortable answering. What do I say? "Yes, I still have multiple sclerosis and it's a really scary disease, but I'm just kind of taking a break from being healthy"? Or when people who newly meet me realize I have MS, they often question how it's possible when we seemingly live the same lives. They applaud me for having so much energy and "handling it so well." But they don't see me take three-hour naps just to get through my day. They don't see the migraines, numbness, and spasms that creep up on me. They don't see the constant doctor appointments, blood tests, and MRIs. Why are they so shocked by my diagnosis? Why are people shocked that I stopped eating such a strict diet? Why do they make comments about it? Why do their comments make me feel even more guilty? Why are they allowed to drink a can of soda, but not me? Nothing is worse than when someone points out I'm doing something unhealthy and asks how it affects my MS. Even when they don't mention my MS directly, the implications of my chronic illness hang heavy in the air. Because the reality is they're projecting an image of a perfect patient onto me, and that simply does not exist. Even when I was at my healthiest, I wasn't perfect. Eating that healthy gave me extreme anxiety, and any misstep sent me into a spiral. But truly, you cannot win with a chronic illness. When you try to eat super healthy, you put immense pressure and stress on yourself. When you decide not to prioritize it, the guilt and shame eat at you. Not to mention that your body changes throughout each transformation, making the transition even more obvious and difficult. When people come to me for advice about managing MS through lifestyle changes, I feel like an imposter. Yes, for almost two years I was eating strictly healthy and following all the health trends. But now, I don't really think about them. I feel inauthentic talking to people about what they should do to be healthier because I don't currently follow those practices. Sometimes, I wish I could recapture that energy, passion, discipline, and motivation I had to be so healthy. But I'm not perfect, and I am certainly not the perfect patient. For now, I will enjoy my indulgences. I will remind myself that nothing in life is permanent and that life has many chapters. I will never be the perfect patient, because there is no perfect patient. It is not my fault I have MS, and there is no need to punish myself more for it. I'm sure my healthy habits will come back to me one day. For now, I will enjoy myself in ways I never even thought possible a few years ago. And I'll try to let go of the guilt that comes from not living up to an impossible standard. Maybe the healthiest thing I can do is accept myself exactly as I am today, and try my best to live in the present.


Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Republicans May Find They Need to Get Behind the ACA
House Republicans' reconciliation bill seeks to pay for $5 trillion of tax cuts by slashing health-care spending, potentially leaving millions of Americans uninsured. The job of averting this self-inflicted disaster now falls to the Senate. The legislation seeks to cut $793 billion from Medicaid, the health program for the poor. Half this sum will come from requiring beneficiaries under 65 to work, look for employment or volunteer, with some exemptions. The new rules are slated to start in late 2026 — moved up from 2029 — after some lawmakers objected that savings wouldn't materialize soon enough.