In historic first, NAACP will not invite Trump to convention
Derrick Johnson, president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, accused the Republican president of working against the group's mission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NAACP National Convention 2025, Charlotte: Trump will be the first President in 116 years not invited to the event
The NAACP said President Donald Trump will NOT be invited to their national convention next month in Charlotte, North Carolina. This is the first time in 116 years a sitting U.S. president is not invited, as per the reports. Derrick Johnson, NAACP President, said this is not about politics. He said Trump goes against what the NAACP stands for, which is civil rights. Johnson, 'This has nothing to do with political party, the current president has made clear that his mission is to eliminate civil rights', as per the report by Associated Press. The White House has not replied to this decision yet. Recently, the NAACP has taken legal action against Trump and his administration. One lawsuit in April was to stop the Department of Education from cutting funds to schools with diversity programs. They said this move blocked fair chances for Black students, as stated by Associated Press. NAACP's history with U.S. Presidents The NAACP reminded people that presidents from both parties have always been welcome before. Even when the NAACP disagreed with a president, they still invited them in the past, as per reports. Another example, Ronald Reagan, also a Republican, came to the NAACP in 1981. He had been criticized earlier for using the term 'welfare queen' in his 1980 campaign, which many thought was racist. But when he spoke, he condemned white hate groups and promised to protect people's rights, as mentioned in the report by Associated Press. Live Events The NAACP's decision marks a major break from their usual tradition of engaging with every president, even those they strongly disagreed with. But this time, they believe Trump is actively working against civil rights, as per reports. FAQs Q1. Why did the NAACP not invite President Trump to their 2025 convention? The NAACP said Trump works against civil rights, which goes against their mission, so they chose not to invite him. Q2. Has the NAACP excluded any other sitting president before? No, this is the first time in 116 years that a sitting president was not invited to the NAACP convention.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
US won't kill Iran's supreme leader, 'at least not for now': Trump
President Donald Trump said Tuesday the US knows where Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is hiding during the Israel-Iran conflict but doesn't want him killed 'for now.' Trump urged, in a social media posting, Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER' as the five-day conflict continues to escalate. 'We know exactly where the so-called Supreme Leader' is hiding,' Trump added. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin.' Trump's increasingly muscular comments towards Tehran come after urging Tehran's 9.5 million residents to flee for their lives as he cut short his visit to an international summit to return to Washington for urgent talks with his national security team. Trump arrived at the White House early Tuesday at a moment of choosing in his presidency. Israel, with five days of missile strikes, has done considerable damage to Iran and believes it can now deal a permanent blow to Tehran's nuclear programme — particularly if it gets a little more help from the Republican president. But deepening American involvement, perhaps by providing the Israelis with bunker-busting bombs to penetrate Iranian nuclear sites built deep underground or offering other direct US military support, comes with enormous political risk for Trump. Trump, as he made his way back to Washington, expressed frustration with Iranian leaders for failing to reach an agreement. He said he was now looking for 'a real end' to the conflict and a 'complete give-up' of Tehran's nuclear programme. 'They should have done the deal. I told them, Do the deal,'' Trump told reporters on Air Force One. 'So I don't know. I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate.' Iran has insisted that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. Trump, who planned to meet with advisers in the Situation Room, appears to be gradually building the public case for a more direct American role in the conflict. His shift in tone comes as the US has repositioned warships and military aircraft in the region to respond if the conflict between Israel and Iran further escalates. Trump made an early departure from G7 The White House announced Monday, while Trump was at the Group of Seven summit in the Canadian Rockies, that he would cut his trip short. 'Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,' he wrote on social media. 'I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' Asked about his evacuation comment aboard Air Force One, Trump told reporters: 'I just want people to be safe.' 'We're looking at better than a ceasefire. We're not looking for a ceasefire,' Trump said. Trump said he wasn't ruling out a diplomatic option and he could send Vice President JD Vance and special envoy Steve Witkoff to meet with the Iranians. He also dismissed congressional testimony from National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, who told lawmakers in March that US spy agencies did not believe Iran was building a nuclear weapon. 'I don't care what she said,' Trump said. 'I think they were very close to having it.' Speculation grows that Trump may be tilting toward more direct involvement The Israelis say their offensive has eviscerated Iran's air defences and they can now strike targets across the country at will. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says the Israeli bombardment will continue until Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic missiles are destroyed. So far, Israel has targeted multiple Iranian nuclear programme sites but has not been able to destroy Iran's Fordo uranium enrichment facility. The site is buried deep underground — and to eliminate it, Israel may need the 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, which uses its weight and sheer kinetic force to reach deeply buried targets and then explode. But Israel does not have the munition or the bomber needed to deliver it — the penetrator is currently delivered by the B-2 stealth bomber. Israel's own defences remain largely intact in the face of Iran's retaliatory strikes, but some of Tehran's missiles are getting through and having deadly impact. The White House dispatched Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for a prime-time TV appearance as speculation grows about whether Trump could be tilting toward more direct US involvement. Hegseth told Fox News Channel that 'of course' Trump wanted to see a deal made to curb Iran's nuclear programme. 'His position has not changed,' Hegseth said. 'What you're watching in real time is peace through strength and America first. Our job is to be strong. We are postured defensively in the region to be strong in pursuit of a peace deal. And we certainly hope that's what happens here.' Trump continues to push Iran to negotiate on its nuclear programme Trump, meanwhile, during an exchange with reporters on the sidelines of the G7, declined to say what it would take for the US to get more directly involved. Instead, he continued to press Iran on negotiations over its nuclear programme. 'They should talk, and they should talk immediately,' Trump said during a bilateral meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. He added, 'I'd say Iran is not winning this war.' To be certain, Trump in the days-old conflict has sought to restrain Netanyahu. He rejected a plan presented by Israel to the US to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to a US official familiar with the matter, who was not authorised to comment on the sensitive matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity. The Israelis had informed the Trump administration in recent days that they had developed a credible plan to kill Khamenei. A widening schism over Iran among Trump's MAGA supporters Trump bristled when asked about some of his MAGA faithful, including conservative pundit Tucker Carlson, who have suggested that further US involvement would be a betrayal to supporters who were drawn to his promise to end US involvement in expensive and endless wars. 'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that,' IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!'' the president wrote on social media. Other prominent Trump supporters have also raised concerns about how far the president should go in backing Israel. Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk are among prominent Trump World allies who have noted that voters backed Trump because he promised not to entangle the nation in foreign clashes and to be wary of expanding US involvement in the Mideast conflict. He ran on a promise to quickly end the wars in Gaza and Ukraine but has struggled to find an endgame to either. But there are also Trump backers, including Sen Lindsey Graham, R-SC, who are making the case that this is Trump's moment to deliver a decisive blow to Iran. Graham is calling for Trump to 'go all-in' in backing Israel and destroying Iran's nuclear programme.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Wisconsin Supreme Court overturns GOP power grab, restores Attorney General's authority in major win
The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a law passed by Republicans in a 2018 lame-duck session that restricted the powers of Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul , as per a report. Court Rejects Law That Limited Attorney General's Power The court ruled unanimously, 7-0 that the law, which required Kaul to get approval from a Republican-controlled legislative committee before settling certain lawsuits, violated the state's separation of powers and was unconstitutional, according to an AP report. The law targeted Kaul's authority to settle lawsuits related to environmental and consumer protection cases , as well as those involving the governor's office and executive branch, AP reported. AP wrote, "The new law required the Legislature's budget committee, which is controlled by Republicans, to sign off on those settlements." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens Tips and Tricks Undo ALSO READ: U.S retail sales take a hit with biggest decline in 4 months — economists warn of consumer slowdown ahead How the Legal Battle Started According to AP, the legal battle started six years ago when the Republican-controlled Legislature held a session in December 2018 after Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul defeated Republican incumbents, and the laws signed by Republican Gov. Scott Walker, reduced the powers of both offices. Live Events What the Court Said About Separation of Powers Justice Brian Hagedorn, writing for the court, emphasized that the Legislature cannot 'assume for itself the power to execute a law it wrote,' quoted AP. Hagedorn also pointed out that there is no constitutional justification for requiring the Legislature's budget committee to sign off on court settlements at issue in the case, as quoted in the AP report. Attorney General Josh Kaul's Reaction to the Ruling Kaul celebrated the court's ruling, and said in a statement that the decision 'finally puts an end to the legislature's unconstitutional involvement in the resolution of key categories of cases,' as quoted in the report. FAQs What did the Wisconsin Supreme Court rule? The court struck down a law requiring the attorney general to get legislative approval before settling certain lawsuits, calling it unconstitutional, as per the AP report. When was the law passed? The law was passed in December 2018 during a lame-duck session after Democrats won key state offices, as per AP report.
