
After North Dakota falls in national report, teacher's union says falling pay ranking is dire for teacher retention
May 1—GRAND FORKS — The union representing North Dakota's teachers is raising the alarm about a new report showing continued declines in North Dakota's teacher pay relative to other states.
North Dakota
ranked 40th among U.S. states and Washington, D.C.
for average teacher salaries last school year, according to a report released this week by the National Education Association, a national labor union representing K-12 educators and college faculty and staff.
That's the lowest ranking for the state in at least four years, based on prior NEA reports.
"North Dakota is going backwards," said Nick Archuleta, president of statewide teachers union North Dakota United. "If we're serious about recruiting and retaining the very best teachers, we're going to have to invest in their salaries too."
Last year, North Dakota teachers made an average of $58,581 while the average starting salary came out to $43,734.
Average teacher pay has climbed in North Dakota by nearly 7% since 2020-21, when the state ranked 34th in the nation, but that hasn't kept pace with nationwide growth of around 10% over the same period.
Last year, average salaries in North Dakota grew by 3.2%, compared to 3.8% nationwide.
Starting teacher salaries in North Dakota have dropped from 26th nationwide in 2021-22 to 34th last year.
The state is suffering from a particularly acute case of the teacher shortage that's being felt nationwide.
The state Educational Standards and Practices Board in February declared a "critical shortage" of teachers in all content areas ahead of the 2025-26 school year, the sixth year running that it found deficits in all teaching areas.
North Dakota has been looking to fill open teaching positions with its Department of Labor-funded teacher apprenticeship program, ESPB Director Becky Pitkin said.
So far, "we haven't had as many calls of desperation as we have in the past," she said, but noted the board won't have a complete picture of teacher demand until the Department of Public Instruction compiles its Teacher Shortage Report from school districts in the fall.
Archuleta says legislators have to get serious about increasing teacher pay if they want to keep teachers in North Dakota, pointing to states like Idaho, which boosted its teacher salaries by 9.1% to $61,516 last year — passing North Dakota in average pay.
House and Senate lawmakers appear poised to approve a 2.5% year-over-year increase in the student per-pupil payment for the next biennium, a figure Archuleta points out struggles to keep pace with current inflation.
The Consumer Price Index climbed 2.4% over the last 12 months; Midwestern states saw slightly higher inflationary increases to consumer goods, up to 2.7%.
"We understand that we're probably not going to pay an average salary of $101,000 or whatever it is in California," Archuleta said. (It's $101,084, the highest in the nation.) "We get that. But we can certainly do better than No. 40."
The NEA notes that even with record-level increases in some states, average teacher pay has still fallen short of inflation over the last decade. Teachers are making on average 5% less in real wages than 10 years ago, per the NEA's report.
Adam Tescher, DPI's school finance director, says addressing the teacher shortage is about more than just salaries, pointing to the quality of schools and supportive administrators as other important factors to consider.
He did say, however, that the 2.5% per-pupil increase fell short of DPI's own hopes of a minimum 3% increase.
"School districts will have to make difficult decisions on where those increases will happen, or where they may have to potentially make reductions for other increases in spending," Tescher said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hunting for big game: Trump tariff inflation
My safari hat has been on for a month in search of big-game inflation. I blame Walmart (WMT) CFO John David Rainey for making me get into this wardrobe. "And so we'll work hard to try to keep prices low. But it's unavoidable that you're going to see some prices go up on certain items," Rainey told me in mid-May after Walmart reported first quarter earnings. Rainey — responding to my question on the impact of new Trump tariffs — said increases would be noticeable in a few short weeks. "Well, if you've got a 30% tariff on something, you're likely going to see double digits [in price increases]," Rainey warned. I've been on high alert ever since for signs of eye-popping inflation that brings back the discussion of a potential Fed rate hike this year (which has gone dormant). Or, at the bare minimum, renewed market volatility due to a more uncertain outlook. By and large, my hunting expeditions have come up short. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for April rose by a seasonally adjusted 0.2%. The tame jump put the 12-month inflation rate at 2.3%, its lowest since February 2021. This report hit the wires on May 13, before an inflation-indicator company like Walmart warned about the looming effects of tariffs. Still, a data point is a data point. Also surprisingly docile was the inflation expectations reading in the University of Michigan's May sentiment report. Year-ahead inflation expectations were little changed at 6.6% versus April's 6.5%. The uptick marked the smallest increase since the election and ended a four-month streak of "extremely large" jumps in near-term inflation expectations. Long-term inflation expectations dropped to 4.2% in May from 4.4% in April. This was the first decline since December 2024. Again, a data point is a data point. While I hate to be the bearer of bad news, I have started to scope inflation charging out on the prairie. What I'm seeing seems to validate what Rainey told me and could set the stage for negative surprises for the bulls on inflation report days. New research from Morgan Stanley analyst Alex Straton shows that major retailers still reliant on China and other markets for production have begun to jack up prices a good bit. The average footwear year-over-year price increase tallied 13% in May, according to Straton's research. The prior six-month average was 1%. Under Armour (UA) and ON Holdings (ONON) were cited as being aggressive on recent price hikes. Some apparel pricing looked even worse, per Straton. Gap (GAP), for instance, hiked its average apparel pricing by 20% in May. Macy's (M) clocked in with a 12% apparel price increase, Levi's (LEVI) with 9%, and Nike (NKE) by 10%. Meanwhile, those aforementioned price increases at Walmart appear to be happening as Rainey promised. Customers are posting pics on the Walmart subreddit of large price increases on toys and apparel. "We also put in place some selective price actions," HP (HPQ) CEO Enrique Lores explained to me about how he is offsetting tariffs on parts that make up PCs and printers. "We think that the industry-wide price increases that we see, and especially the increased economic uncertainty, will have an impact on demand," he said, "and therefore we continue to expect that the market will grow, but we feel it will grow at a lower pace than we were expecting." Bottom line: If you've been complacent on tracking inflation, don't be. It's beginning to rear its ugly head and could devour your portfolio this summer if not careful. The Yahoo Finance team is heads down on our annual fall Invest conference. It's shaping up to be our most impactful one yet! At this invitation-only event, our guests will delve into the most critical issues powering global markets with our newsroom. Key themes include artificial intelligence, cryptocurrencies, and prosperity. Engage in Q&As following thought-provoking conversations with renowned investors, policymakers, economists, and other leading experts. For the first time, we will host two investor education rooms: one led by yours truly and one by the dynamic duo of data master Jared Blikre and veteran trader Kenny Polcari. I strongly encourage you to register now here before we are out of tickets. I will continue to remind you about Invest each Sunday in this newsletter. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

3 hours ago
New disputes emerge ahead of US-China trade talks in London
BEIJING -- U.S.-China trade talks in London this week are expected to take up a series of fresh disputes that have buffeted relations, threatening a fragile truce over tariffs. Both sides agreed in Geneva last month to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. The latest frictions began just a day after the May 12 announcement of the Geneva agreement to 'pause' tariffs for 90 days. The U.S. Commerce Department issued guidance saying the use of Ascend AI chips from Huawei, a leading Chinese tech company, could violate U.S. export controls. That's because the chips were likely developed with American technology despite restrictions on its export to China, the guidance said. The Chinese government wasn't pleased. One of its biggest beefs in recent years has been over U.S. moves to limit the access of Chinese companies to technology, and in particular to equipment and processes needed to produce the most advanced semiconductors. "The Chinese side urges the U.S. side to immediately correct its erroneous practices,' a Commerce Ministry spokesperson said. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wasn't in Geneva but will join the talks in London. Analysts say that suggests at least a willingness on the U.S. side to hear out China's concerns on export controls. One area where China holds the upper hand is in the mining and processing of rare earths. They are crucial for not only autos but also a range of other products from robots to military equipment. The Chinese government started requiring producers to obtain a license to export seven rare earth elements in April. Resulting shortages sent automakers worldwide into a tizzy. As stockpiles ran down, some worried they would have to halt production. Trump, without mentioning rare earths specifically, took to social media to attack China. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted on May 30. The Chinese government indicated Saturday that it is addressing the concerns, which have come from European companies as well. A Commerce Ministry statement said it had granted some approvals and 'will continue to strengthen the approval of applications that comply with regulations.' The scramble to resolve the rare earth issue shows that China has a strong card to play if it wants to strike back against tariffs or other measures. Student visas don't normally figure in trade talks, but a U.S. announcement that it would begin revoking the visas of some Chinese students has emerged as another thorn in the relationship. China's Commerce Ministry raised the issue when asked last week about the accusation that it had violated the consensus reached in Geneva. It replied that the U.S. had undermined the agreement by issuing export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software to China and saying it would revoke Chinese student visas. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions,' the ministry said in a statement posted on its website. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a May 28 statement that the United States would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.'


The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
New disputes emerge ahead of US-China trade talks in London
BEIJING (AP) — U.S.-China trade talks in London this week are expected to take up a series of fresh disputes that have buffeted relations, threatening a fragile truce over tariffs. Both sides agreed in Geneva last month to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. The latest frictions began just a day after the May 12 announcement of the Geneva agreement to 'pause' tariffs for 90 days. The U.S. Commerce Department issued guidance saying the use of Ascend AI chips from Huawei, a leading Chinese tech company, could violate U.S. export controls. That's because the chips were likely developed with American technology despite restrictions on its export to China, the guidance said. The Chinese government wasn't pleased. One of its biggest beefs in recent years has been over U.S. moves to limit the access of Chinese companies to technology, and in particular to equipment and processes needed to produce the most advanced semiconductors. 'The Chinese side urges the U.S. side to immediately correct its erroneous practices,' a Commerce Ministry spokesperson said. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wasn't in Geneva but will join the talks in London. Analysts say that suggests at least a willingness on the U.S. side to hear out China's concerns on export controls. One area where China holds the upper hand is in the mining and processing of rare earths. They are crucial for not only autos but also a range of other products from robots to military equipment. The Chinese government started requiring producers to obtain a license to export seven rare earth elements in April. Resulting shortages sent automakers worldwide into a tizzy. As stockpiles ran down, some worried they would have to halt production. Trump, without mentioning rare earths specifically, took to social media to attack China. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted on May 30. The Chinese government indicated Saturday that it is addressing the concerns, which have come from European companies as well. A Commerce Ministry statement said it had granted some approvals and 'will continue to strengthen the approval of applications that comply with regulations.' The scramble to resolve the rare earth issue shows that China has a strong card to play if it wants to strike back against tariffs or other measures. Student visas don't normally figure in trade talks, but a U.S. announcement that it would begin revoking the visas of some Chinese students has emerged as another thorn in the relationship. China's Commerce Ministry raised the issue when asked last week about the accusation that it had violated the consensus reached in Geneva. It replied that the U.S. had undermined the agreement by issuing export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software to China and saying it would revoke Chinese student visas. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions,' the ministry said in a statement posted on its website. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a May 28 statement that the United States would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' More than 270,000 Chinese students studied in the U.S. in the 2023-24 academic year.