&w=3840&q=100)
Op Sindoor effect? Defence stocks at new record, 50% spike since February low
India's listed defence companies have reached a record market capitalisation of Rs 11.23 lakh crore, driven by renewed investor appetite, geopolitical concerns, and sustained policy focus on domestic defence manufacturing read more
The value of Indian defence stocks has surged in recent weeks. AI-generated image via DALL-E
India's listed defence companies have reached a record market capitalisation of Rs 11.23 lakh crore, driven by renewed investor appetite, geopolitical concerns, and sustained policy focus on domestic defence manufacturing. The rally, captured in the continued strength of the Nifty India Defence Index, marks a sharp turnaround for the sector after a prolonged correction.
The index has climbed 9 per cent so far in May, extending gains of 11.5 per cent in April and 24.6% in March. This surge follows a 33 per cent slump between July 2024 and February 2025. Since bottoming out in February, the benchmark has staged a cumulative recovery of over 50 per cent. The current valuation is significantly higher than the previous peak of Rs 10.09 lakh crore seen in July last year and up nearly 62 per cent from the February low of Rs 6.95 lakh crore, Moneycontrol reported.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Despite the broad gains, only six of the 18 stocks within the index have surpassed their earlier record highs. The rest remain below previous peaks, pointing to a rally concentrated in select names.
Shares of firms such as DCX Systems, MTAR Technologies, Dynamatic Technologies, Cyient DLM, Unimech Aerospace and Manufacturing, Data Patterns, Mishra Dhatu Nigam, Astra Microwave Products, Hindustan Aeronautics, and BEML have surged between 55 per cent and 112 per cent from their 52-week lows hit in March and April.
Eight other defence stocks that touched their lows earlier in 2024 have also rebounded, delivering returns ranging from 58 per cent to 200 per cent. These include Cochin Shipyard, Bharat Dynamics, Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders, Zen Technologies, Bharat Electronics, Solar Industries India, Paras Defence and Space Technologies, and Garden Reach Shipbuilders.
The rally gained momentum after tensions flared between India and Pakistan in early spring, followed by a wave of investor optimism as the market corrected and rebounded.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's renewed focus on boosting indigenous defence production under the Make in India initiative has also strengthened sentiment. His call for advancing modern military capabilities and promoting local manufacturing has reinforced expectations that government support for the sector will continue.
Interest from more than a dozen countries in acquiring India's BrahMos missile system following its deployment during Operation Sindoor has added to investor confidence in the export potential of Indian defence technologies.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Institutional buying has picked up as well. Mutual funds increased their exposure to 11 of the 18 listed defence firms in April. Hindustan Aeronautics saw inflows of Rs 505 crore, raising mutual fund holdings to Rs 13,480 crore. Solar Industries India attracted Rs 119 crore, taking the total to Rs 15,510 crore. Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders received Rs 78 crore in fresh investments, bringing its mutual fund holdings to Rs 1,727 crore.
Other companies that drew institutional interest include Zen Technologies, BEML, Data Patterns, Garden Reach Shipbuilders, Mishra Dhatu Nigam, and Dynamatic Technologies, with inflows ranging from Rs 2 crore to Rs 60 crore. On the other hand, Bharat Electronics recorded the largest outflow, with mutual fund holdings dropping by Rs 893 crore to Rs 33,619 crore. Smaller reductions were also seen in Cochin Shipyard, Astra Microwave Products, Unimech Aerospace, and MTAR Technologies.
Sandeep Bagla of Trust Mutual Fund said rising regional tensions are likely to drive continued increases in defence budgets, making the sector an attractive long-term investment opportunity.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Anil Rego, chief executive at Right Horizons PMS, called defence both a structural and tactical play. He cited the government's consistent push for modernization, a growing export pipeline, and ongoing reforms under the Atmanirbhar Bharat program as key factors supporting the sector's long-term potential.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Maggi crisis was one of the greatest challenges of career'
NEW DELHI: The Maggi crisis, which unfolded in June 2015 and led to a nationwide ban of the popular instant noodles, was "one of the greatest challenges" of my career, said Suresh Narayanan , chairman and MD of Nestle India, said in his final letter to shareholders before his retirement on July 31. Narayanan, who took over as the company's CMD in 2015, is recognised for rejuvenating the company's flagship brand Maggi, after the FSSAI (Food Safety and Standards Authority of India) raised concerns about high levels of lead and monosodium glutamate in the product, leading to a temporary ban and significant backlash for the brand. Maggi noodles went from market leadership to near extinction and recovered 60% of its market share within months of its relaunch, he added. In his letter, Narayanan highlighted the decade's achievements, noting that Nestle India's capex increased from 1.8% of sales in 2015 to 10% in 24-25. "This not only demonstrates the focus on Indian consumers, but also our commitment to manufacture in India and 'Make in India' as a theme,'' he said. The company achieved a CAGR of over 10% in revenue and 21% in net profit over 2015-2025. Its revenue in FY24-25 stood at Rs 20,100 crore and net profit at Rs 3,300 crore. "In 2015, many considered us to be solely a Maggi noodles company. Since then we recalibrated and rejuvenated the portfolio launching over 150+ new products that have contributed to 7% of sales,'' Narayanan said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dixon, Florence see silver lining in Trump's tariffs
PARIS: They are a study in contrast: One is an electronics goods maker, the other a footwear manufacturer. One has its base in Chennai, the other up North. But, both are focusing on ramping up at breakneck speed, hoping to cash in on overseas players seeking to tap India, not just for its domestic market but also for exports, especially after Trump's tariffs. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The other similarity is scale. Electronics goods supplier Dixon Technologies, which has been busy with tie-ups to manufacture phones, laptops and consumer durables, is seeing a huge uptick in export orders from the US as countries seek to reduce reliance on China. "Indian market is around $40 billion, the US has imports of around $80 billion. In the next few years, we see a $100 billion export opportunity in the US and EU," said Dixon Technologies chairman Sunil Vachani. If it is smartphones that have seen a massive surge in production, it will be laptops in the next few years as companies look to first meet the domestic demand before venturing into exports, he said. "We missed the opportunity during Trump 1, when Indian companies were not ready. But now we have built scale, we are designing our own products. We have a foot in the door, and we will be like Vietnam in a few years once the component ecosystem is also developed," Vachani added. In Chennai, Florence Shoe Company chairman Aqueel Panaruna, whose family was in the leather footwear business, is manufacturing a million pair of sports shoes for one of the top global brands. His company is also a joint venture partner with Hong Fu, the world's second largest sports shoes maker for the likes of Nike and Adidas, to set up a $300 millon plant that can produce 10 million pairs of shoes. While the new quality control norms on footwear has driven global majors to eye more production in India, the shift began soon after Covid, with who's who of sports shoes, from Nike, Adidas, Puma and New Balance, tying up with local players to meet global and domestic demand. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now For Florence, the challenge in recent years has been the growing dependence on the US, which now accounts for around 80% of its exports, compared to 25% a decade ago. Trump's tariffs have added a 10% additional burden, with shoes now attracting up to 30% customs duty. But Panaruna is not worried. He is in fact banking on the trade deals with the US, UK and EU offering possibilities for more sourcing from India. "If the Hong Fu experience is good, we may see some of the factories shift from Vietnam to India," he said. "With displays and camera modules to be produced in India, value addition in mobiles could rise from 17-18% to around 40% in the next two-three years, nearing China's level of 50-55%," Vachani said.


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Flat delayed, builder told to pay buyer 11% interest in Gurgaon
Gurgaon: Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRera) has directed the builder of a highrise condominium — an affordable group housing project in Sector 109 — to pay the delay-possession interest and hand over the apartment to the complainant as per the terms of the buyer's agreement. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The unit number 908 of Tower 3 at Expressway Towers 109 was purchased for Rs 26.26 lakh nine years ago. The builder assured timely possession of the flat, with a carpet area of 644 sqft and a balcony area of 100 sqft, but failed to deliver within the stipulated four-year period from the date of allotment — May 19, 2017. HRera (Gurgaon) ordered the realtor to pay interest at 11.10% per annum on the amount paid by the complainant from May 30, 2022 until the valid offer of possession or two months post-occupation certificate — whichever is earlier. The builder has been given 90 days to clear all arrears of interest and must continue paying interest monthly until possession is offered. Additionally, the builder must provide an updated statement of account within 30 days, reflecting adjusted dues after interest. The complainant approached HRera alleging an inordinate delay in the delivery of the unit, which had been booked in 2016. An initial payment of Rs 1.28 lakh was made on Jan 17, 2016 and a total of Rs 13.65 lakh was paid by May 2018. Despite demands raised by the promoter in July 2021 for outstanding dues, the project remained incomplete. The complainant sought immediate possession after adjusting pending dues against delay compensation. After hearing the matter, HRera held the promoter in contravention of Section 11(4)(a) of the RERA Act and passed directions under Section 37. Upon receipt of the updated statement of account, the complainant must clear any outstanding dues within 60 days. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The builder has also been instructed to hand over the flat and execute the conveyance deed within three months of obtaining the occupation certificate, subject to stamp duty and registration charges. The authority clarified that the promoter cannot charge labour cess or work contract tax and must provide VAT calculation proofs if applicable. Maintenance charges may only be levied as per actual consumption, the order said. In Aug last year, HRera conducted a meeting on the stalled OSB Expressway Towers project in Sector 109 with homebuyers and the builder and issued a final warning, saying that if the project was not completed within six months, the regulator would invoke Section 8 of the Rera Act. This would transfer control to the buyers' association and potentially involve a third-party builder. The project, launched in 2017, faced significant delays, and despite repeated warnings, the builder failed to deliver possession of the flats. In response to HRera chairperson Arun Kumar's warning, the builder had assured completion of the project within the timeframe. However, he faces challenges arising out of licence suspension of three of his other projects due to default in payment and non-compliance with department of town and country planning orders.