B.C.'s Official Opposition introduces bill to prevent future time changes
Still sleepy from this week's time change?
B.C's Official Opposition hopes to make political hay in the sunshine and has introduced a bill that calls for the immediate end to any future time changes in the province. The catch is getting the government to support it.
"Let's get this implemented," said John Rustad as he rose in the legislature Thursday to introduce his bill: Interpretation (Uniform Pacific Time Zone) Amendment Act.
"Let's end these time changes in British Columbian for people's health."
Rustad told the house people in the province are done with twice-yearly time changes, citing consequences such as sleep deprivation, health issues, and car accidents.
To drive home the urgency for a change, Rustad's party went further in its argument, saying the change could be part of the "elbows up," Canada-first approach in its trade war with the U.S.
"This premier wants to wait for the U.S. before we make a decision about B.C. for B.C.," said Ward Stamer, MLA for Kamloops-North Thompson, during question period.
"So, Mr. Speaker, how can the premier claim he is elbows up against becoming the 51st state while allowing the U.S. to dictate how we set our clocks?"
WATCH: CBC News explains how 'elbows up' became a Canadian rallying cry:
Why Canadians are saying 'Elbows Up'
2 days ago
Duration 1:18
It's become a rallying cry against U.S. tariffs. But in hockey-loving Canada, the phrase also evokes memories of one of the game's greatest players: Saskatchewan-born Gordie Howe. Known to many as Mr. Hockey, he also earned the nickname Mr. Elbows.
In 2019, more than 223,000 British Columbians voted on whether or not to stop switching clocks, with 93 per cent of participants voting in favour of a move to permanent daylight time. Switching to permanent standard time was not a voting option.
The NDP government passed legislation to make the change, but with no firm timeline.
Premier David Eby has said the change wouldn't be enacted until B.C.'s American neighbours — including Washington state, Oregon and California — did the same.
In response to an inquiry before the time change on March 9, which questioned waiting on the U.S. due to the ongoing trade war, Eby said he would "ponder" expediting it.
Rustad's motion doesn't appear to have sparked any urgency from the premier, though.
"Trust me, I am as sympathetic as the next guy to kids that have trouble adjusting to time changes or pets or just waking up feeling like you're an hour behind. But in this moment, that is not government's No. 1 priority," he said Thursday.
WATCH: CBC News explains the effects of twice-yearly clock changes:
How the time change in B.C. affects your health
6 days ago
Duration 1:55
While many people are resisting the change to daylight time, CBC reporter Tara Carman found regional differences to staying with one time zone, while SFU psychology professor Myriam Juda says the time change has a big impact on our health.
Rustad said if the government supported his bill, it could be passed "in a day" and then quickly enacted.
The first reading of the Interpretation (Uniform Pacific Time Zone) Amendment Act was passed in the legislature on Thursday and will now go to second reading.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
14 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
B.C. court gives parliament 10-month deadline to make Indian Act comply with Charter
VANCOUVER - The B.C. Supreme Court has given the Canadian government until April 2026 to change the Indian Act to bring it into compliance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms after a successful legal challenge by descendants of people who renounced their status under the law. The court ruled that provisions of the act that denied status to people with a 'family history of enfranchisement,' where their parents or grandparents gave up their status and the benefits it entails, infringed upon the plaintiffs' Charter rights.
Vancouver Sun
14 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
West Kelowna denies permit for MAGA singer Sean Feucht on safety grounds
The City of West Kelowna has cited public safety reasons to deny a permit for a concert by American Christian singer Sean Feucht, who is outspoken in the Make America Great Again movement. The city said in an emailed statement on Wednesday that the permit for a concert in Memorial Park on Saturday had been sought by the Burn 24/7 Canada Worship Ministries Society. 'The city, with assistance from the RCMP and West Kelowna Fire Rescue, reassessed the safety and security plans submitted by the organizer and determined the potential public safety risks have not been appropriately mitigated,' it said. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. West Kelowna in the B.C. Interior was the latest Canadian community to reject a concert by Feucht, who ran unsuccessfully as a Republican candidate for Congress in 2020 and has been criticized for remarks on the LGBTQ+ community and abortion. The City of Abbotsford last month denied a permit for a show at Mill Lake Park, which would have taken place this Sunday. That was after six of his concerts in Central and Eastern Canada were cancelled. Feucht said in a social media post on Wednesday afternoon that he was in Canada, posting a photo from inside Winnipeg Richardson International Airport. 'Your fav American worship leader is back. They let me in again,' said Feucht. He alluded to the controversies surrounding his Canadian tour dates in a post earlier Wednesday. 'It's wild watching 'Christian' mayors across Canada cancel outdoor worship services 'for safety reasons' while allowing mass protests and pride events in their cities,' he wrote. Feucht could not immediately be reached for comment. He was scheduled to play in Winnipeg on Wednesday, Saskatoon on Thursday, and Edmonton on Friday. His show in Abbotsford on Sunday will now take place at a private venue. Advocacy Canada, a not-for-profit group representing the LGBTQ community, celebrated West Kelowna's decision. It said on Facebook that it was thankful to everyone who raised their voices 'in opposition to the hateful rhetoric that has no place in our valley.' The group said it initially planned to hold a peaceful rally at the concert, but this had been cancelled. The Canadian Constitution Foundation said last month that Feucht's Charter rights had been violated by the string of cancellations. James Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University, has said it raised 'red flags' to see public bodies revoking Feucht's permits. Feucht posted on social media in August 2023 that 'the LGBTQ+ mafia is a cult bent on perverting and destroying the innocence of every child they can.' He said in June last year, in an apparent reference to pride celebrations, that 'June is the month you discover which people, businesses, influencers, corporations & ministries have sold their soul to a demonic agenda seeking to destroy our culture and pervert our children.'
Winnipeg Free Press
14 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
B.C. court gives parliament 10-month deadline to make Indian Act comply with Charter
VANCOUVER – The B.C. Supreme Court has given the Canadian government until April 2026 to change the Indian Act to bring it into compliance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms after a successful legal challenge by descendants of people who renounced their status under the law. The court ruled that provisions of the act that denied status to people with a 'family history of enfranchisement,' where their parents or grandparents gave up their status and the benefits it entails, infringed upon the plaintiffs' Charter rights. The ruling says the Canadian government agreed with the plaintiffs that the registration provisions of the act perpetuated 'disadvantage, stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination' tied to enfranchisement by denying people the benefits of Indian status due to their family history. Lawyer Ryan Beaton says the ruling comes eight years after he first met one of the plaintiffs, Sharon Nicholas, whose grandfather gave up his status in 1944 to spare his children from going to residential schools. Beaton says when people like Nicholas' grandfather became enfranchised, their children also lost their status, and she had been working for decades on the issue before challenging it in court. Beaton says a related class-action lawsuit filed this month in Federal Court is seeking damages from the Canadian government over lost benefits related to the denial of status under the law, and the class is estimated to include between 5,000 and 10,000 people. He says the ruling has been 'incredibly gratifying' for Nicholas. 'So for her it's been, you know, a 40-year journey to get to this point. She's an incredible person,' Beaton said. 'She came in with a whole lot of research. She taught me a lot about not just her family's history but the way the Indian Act registration provisions have affected her family.' He says the case was somewhat unusual because the Canadian government admitted that the law as written wasn't in line with the Charter, sparing the plaintiffs a trial after they originally filed their lawsuit in 2021. Beaton says there were many reasons people gave up their status, but the law meant their descendants lost out on benefits such as treaty settlement funds doled out to First Nations members. 'In those days, if you were Indian, you could not vote, you could not own certain forms of property, your kids had to go to residential school,' he said. 'So to get out from those disadvantages, some people chose to renounce their Indian status.' He says Parliament had attempted to fix the law in the past, but it didn't succeed. The plaintiffs have 'to get the change through the courts if it's not coming through Parliament,' he said. The court gave Parliament until April 2026 to bring the act into compliance with the Charter, which could be a 'legislative solution' that will apply across the country rather than just within B.C., Beaton said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 20, 2025.
