Alaskans: Peace is a big deal for us – Russia's only 4km away
This was not only literally true, serving as a refuelling stop for both leaders as they crisscrossed the globe - the Pope was on his way to South Korea and the Pacific Islands, Reagan returning from China - but it also reflected a turning point in history as they plotted to liberate Poland and the other Warsaw Pact countries from Soviet control.
A few years earlier President Nixon had his own historic meeting in Alaska, meeting in Anchorage with Emperor Hirohito, himself on a stopover to a state visit to Britain.
Now Alaska finds itself again at a crossroads both geographically and politically, this time for two leaders in President Trump and President Putin who are poised to make momentous decisions on war and peace.
It is a fitting venue for a US-Russia summit given the rich shared history of the two nations reflected here but it also underlines that, while the agenda is the future of Ukraine and western European security, this is a discussion between neighbours.
'Peace between Russia and Ukraine is a big deal for Alaska because we're so close to Russia here - the longer this war goes, the more chance there is of more global war and we're on the front lines,' said Father Matthew Howell, pastor of an Antiochian Orthodox Church in Wasilla, an hour's drive north of Anchorage.
For the locals, Alaska does not feel remote at times like these. This is especially true for some of its more recent arrivals.
'I have Ukrainian parishioners in my church,' Father Howell, 41, said. 'They absolutely want peace. They are refugees who want this war to end. As an Alaskan - I've been here for over 20 years, my wife was born and raised here - we absolutely feel like we are on the front lines of any war that starts and so this summit is critical.'
Mainland Russia is 88km away across the Bering Strait, a waterway named after the Danish explorer sent by Peter the Great to chart new territory east of Russia in the 18th century. Russian trappers quickly followed in pursuit of its sea otter pelts and established coastal communities that observed the Orthodox faith, spread by missionaries to native Alaskans. It still has thousands of adherents here, albeit no longer under Russian Orthodox jurisdiction.
Despite the distance to the mainland, Sarah Palin, the former governor, was right when she said during the 2008 presidential campaign that Russia could be seen from Alaska. She was ridiculed for something she didn't actually say - 'I can see Russia from my house!', which was voiced by Tina Fey in a parody of her in a Saturday Night Live sketch.
In fact, Ms Palin told ABC News that 'they're our next-door neighbours, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska'.
Big Diomede, a Russian island in the Bering Strait, is only 4km from Little Diomede, owned by the US. They are visible from each other on a clear day.
Some Russians believe the government of Tsar Alexander II, which was bankrupt after the Crimean War and looking to counter British expansion in the frozen north, blundered in selling the 1,723,337 sqkm territory to the US for $US7.2m in 1867. At the time, though, many Americans nicknamed the purchase 'Seward's Folly' after the secretary of state who completed it.
The Klondike gold rush in western Canada several decades later changed minds about the territory, fuelling a population and building boom that laid the foundations for eventual US statehood in 1959 after its strategic importance was recognised in World War II.
The reminders of Russian influence are all around Anchorage, not least on the huge military base where Mr Trump and Mr Putin will meet. Named in part after Captain Hugh Elmendorf, a brilliant pilot killed while flying a prototype fighter plane in 1933, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson is home to the graves of nine Soviet pilots, two military personnel and two civilians who died between 1942 and 1945 while ferrying aircraft from the US to the Soviet Union.
Nearly 8000 aircraft were donated to the Soviet Union under the Lend-Lease Act, a US policy to provide its allies with military aid, including weapons, supplies and food. Some 300 Russian pilots flew the planes over the Bering Strait and on to the eastern front.
'Thus, the meeting will unfold near a site of profound historical importance - one that underscores the wartime brotherhood-in-arms between our nations,' said Yuri Ushakov, former Russian ambassador to the US, who will be part of the five-man Russian delegation. 'This symbolism is particularly resonant in this year, the year of the 80th anniversary of victory over Nazi Germany and militarist Japan.'
There is an irony in Mr Putin and his team being hosted at a US base that has grown to a civilian and military population of 32,000 because of its importance on the front line against the threat primarily from Russia.
But the Russian leader is unlikely to want to venture into downtown Anchorage to try the elk or yak burgers at the 49th State Brewing Company, where he would be more likely to encounter protesters - and perhaps one of the moose that occasional wander the city streets - than on a secure military installation.
'The choice of Alaska is quite significant - first, it's equidistant, almost, in the flight time for each of the presidents to that venue, which symbolically says we're treating Russia as an equal here,' said George Beebe, the former director of Russia analysis at the CIA and director of grand strategy at the Quincy Institute.
'Second, it is not in Europe, which of course was the traditional meeting place during the Cold War. It puts a focus on the bilateral US-Russian relationship, which is I think where President Trump wants it to be. It also says to Putin: 'We are going to engage with Russia.''
The Times Read related topics: Vladimir Putin The Times
Historical analogies for Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin's meeting in Alaska are overblown: it's unlikely there'll be any grand bargains. The Times
In a speech to mark 80 years since the end of the Second World War, Charles will echo his grandfather George VI's emphasis on the global devastation of conflict.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Canada moves to halt strike as hundreds of flights grounded
The Canadian government intervened Saturday to end a strike by Air Canada cabin crew members that saw hundreds of flights cancelled and triggered summer travel chaos for the carrier's 130,000 daily passengers. Canada's largest airline, which flies directly to 180 cities worldwide, had stopped all operations after some 10,000 flight attendants began industrial action fueled by a wage dispute just after midnight on Saturday. Hours later, Canada's labor policy minister, Patty Hajdu, moved to invoke a legal provision that would halt the strike and force both sides into binding arbitration. "This is not a decision that I have taken lightly. The potential for immediate negative impact on Canadians and our economy is simply too great," Hajdu told journalists. However, she said it could still take five to 10 days for Air Canada to resume regular services after the disruption. The airline had earlier urged customers not to go to the airport if they have a ticket for Air Canada or its lower-cost subsidiary Air Canada Rouge. It said flights by Air Canada Express, which are operated by a third party, would not be impacted by the walkout. The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), which is representing the workers, said its members would remain on strike until the government formally issues an order that they return to work. "Please remember there is only a referral, we are still in a legal position to strike and will continue to do so, we must show the company we are in control of this," the union's Air Canada branch wrote on Facebook. In a separate statement, CUPE slammed the Canadian government's intervention as "rewarding Air Canada's refusal to negotiate fairly by giving them exactly what they wanted." "This sets a terrible precedent," it added. "This will only ensure that the unresolved issues will continue to worsen by kicking them down the road." - Unpaid ground work - In addition to wage increases, the union says it wants to address uncompensated ground work, including during the boarding process. Rafael Gomez, who heads the University of Toronto's Center for Industrial Relations, told AFP it is "common practice, even around the world" to compensate flight attendants based on time spent in the air. He said the union had built an effective communication campaign around the issue, creating a public perception of unfairness. An average passenger, not familiar with common industry practice, could think, "'I'm waiting to board the plane and there's a flight attendant helping me, but they're technically not being paid for that work,'" he said, speaking before the strike began. "That's a very good issue to highlight," Gomez said, adding that gains made by Air Canada employees could impact other carriers. Air Canada detailed its latest offer in a Thursday statement, specifying that under the terms, a senior flight attendant would on average make CAN$87,000 ($65,000) by 2027. CUPE has described Air Canada's offers as "below inflation (and) below market value." The union has also rejected requests from the federal government and Air Canada to resolve outstanding issues through independent arbitration. Canada's economy, though showing resilience, has begun feeling the effects of US President Donald Trump's trade war, with his tariffs hitting crucial sectors like auto, aluminum and steel. In a statement issued before the strike began, the Business Council of Canada warned an Air Canada work stoppage could add further pain. "At a time when Canada is dealing with unprecedented pressures on our critical economic supply chains, the disruption of national air passenger travel and cargo transport services would cause immediate and extensive harm to all Canadians," it said.

The Australian
6 hours ago
- The Australian
In high-stakes summit, Trump, not Putin, budges
Donald Trump wanted to go bold -- a high-pomp, high-stakes summit with Vladimir Putin to test whether the Russian leader would compromise on the Ukraine war. In the end, it looks like it was Trump, not Putin, who budged. Putin, visibly delighted as he stepped foot in the West for the first time since ordering the 2022 invasion, made no apparent concession at the talks at an Alaska air base. In a brief joint media appearance with Trump, who unusually took no questions, Putin again spoke of addressing the "root causes" of the Ukraine war and warned Kyiv and Europeans against disrupting "emerging progress" with the United States, the top defender of Ukraine under Trump's predecessor Joe Biden. Trump, who bills himself as a master negotiator, acknowledged there was "no deal" but said there were "very few" areas of disagreement, although he was vague on what they were. But posting hours later on his Truth Social account, Trump said he wanted Russia and Ukraine to "go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war" and not a ceasefire. Trump's own administration had been pushing a ceasefire for months, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky signing on after intense pressure from Trump. Putin had repeatedly rejected truce offers and kept up attacks on Ukraine, seeking to maximize battlefield advantage. - Putin again woos Trump - Trump had vowed to be firm with Putin after wide criticism of the US president's cowed appearance before him at a 2018 summit in Helsinki. But Putin again found ways to flatter and trigger Trump, who in his second term constantly speaks unprompted about his many grievances. Putin told Trump before the cameras that there would have been no war -- which Putin himself launched -- if Trump were president in 2022 rather than Biden, a frequent Trump talking point. Trump bemoaned the effect on ties with Putin of what he again called the "hoax" of the findings by US intelligence that Russia meddled in the 2016 election to help him. In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity after the summit, Trump said that "one of the most interesting things" Putin told him was about... the US voting system. Trump said approvingly that Putin -- who has held power in Russia since 2000 and was declared the winner of elections last year with 88 percent of the vote -- told him of the risks of mail-in ballots and said of Trump's 2020 loss to Biden, "You won that election by so much." US election authorities and experts have found no evidence of wide-scale fraud from mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, which Trump, uniquely in US history, refused to concede. - 'Shameful' or wait and see? - Trump's Democratic rivals voiced outrage that the summit secured no breakthrough and said it only served to normalize Putin, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. "By quite literally rolling out the red carpet, Trump has legitimized Russia's aggression and whitewashed Putin's war crimes. It's shameful," said Representative Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Experts said it was too early to write off the summit completely, as much is not known about what was discussed behind closed doors. Trump will meet Zelensky on Monday at the White House. Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, which backs US restraint, said that Trump's critics have been proven wrong in saying he would "give Ukraine to Putin or force Kyiv to accept surrender." "His focus has been and remains getting Putin to the negotiating table. Mr. Trump deserves credit rather than condemnation for his efforts so far," she said. But Kristine Berzina, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund, said an initial read was that "Putin scored a victory by showing up, and Trump's limited words and tense demeanor left Putin to control the narrative." "For a man so attached to showmanship, Trump unusually allowed Putin to be the star of what should have been the Trump show," she said. sct/md


SBS Australia
9 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Trump to meet with Zelenskyy after no deal reached at Alaska summit
Listen to Australian and world news, and follow trending topics with SBS News Podcasts . Ahead of the high stakes meeting with Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump said he would know within two minutes of meeting the Russian leader whether it would be a success. It took almost three hours before the leaders emerged from the meeting behind closed doors. It was the first face-to-face meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Putin since 2019, with the Russian leader ostracised by Western leaders since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. After their meeting, Mr Trump and Mr Putin emerged to speak before reporters in Anchorage, but they took no questions. "I believe that we had a very productive meeting. There were many, many points that we agreed on - most of them. I would say. A couple of big ones that we haven't quite got there. But we have made some head way. There is no deal until there is a deal. I will call up NATO in a little while. I will of course call up President Zelenskyy." Mr Trump later told Fox News that he rated the meeting a 10 out of 10 - even though he revealed no details of the points of agreement and disagreement. "There is not that much. There is one or two significant items (of disagreement). But I think they can be reached. Not it is really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done. And I would also say the European nations. They have to get involved a little bit. But it is up to President Zelenskyy. And if they like, I will be at the next meeting. They are going to set up a meeting between President Zelenskyy, President Putin and myself, I guess. Not that I want to be there, but I want to make sure that it gets done. We have a pretty good chance of getting it done." It is a change in the tone Mr Trump had a few weeks ago when he issued a August 8 deadline for Mr Putin to show a genuine commitment to a ceasefire - or face stronger sanctions. At the post-meeting press conference, Mr Putin was keen to cast the meeting as a success for him - in receiving the invitation, but also on the prospect of a Russian-US economic reset. "I expect that today's agreement will be the starting point - not only for the solution of the Ukrainian issue. But will also help us bring back business and pragmatic relations between Russia and the US." He says he has not shifted in his position on the full-scale invasion in Ukraine. "We're convinced that in order to make the settlement lasting long-term, we need to eliminate the primary roots, the primary causes of the conflict. And we have said it multiple times, to consider all legitimate concerns of Russia and to reinstate a just balance of security in Europe - and in the world on a whole." And at the end of the press conference, Mr Putin was eager to secure another meeting with the US President. Donald Trump: "Thank you very much Vladimir." Vladimir Putin: "Next time in Moscow." Donald Trump: "Oh, that's an interesting one! I will get a little heat on that one but I could see it possibly happening. Thank you very much Vladimir. Thank you all! Thank you!" Vladimir Putin: Thank you so much." Matthew Sussex is a fellow at the Australian National University's Strategic and Defence Studies Centre. He says there was a lot of theatre and optics involved in the high stakes visit - and Mr Putin got what he wanted. "Yes, it's certainly a win for Vladimir Putin. The optics of it were that, you know, he came to American territory, but American territory in Alaska, which of course previously was part of the Russian Federation and there was a lot of media talk in Russia and billboards going up saying, you know, Alaska is Russian and we will take that back. So he got a photo opportunity with Donald Trump. So it makes him look, look respected and valued and making the American president travel all the way to Anchorage to meet him. And at the same time, he basically dodges those sanctions that Trump had threatened." Mark Cancian is a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC. He says despite the convivial language between Mr Trump and Mr Putin, the Alaska summit was planned haphazardly from start to finish. "The press conference was startling - even bizarre - in the sense that the meeting was expected to last maybe six hours and broke up after about three. Then the press conference was called very abruptly. The journalists race into the room. The parties come on stage and speak their piece. Putin starts off and Trump responds, and then they trip off after a couple of minutes, they take no questions and Putin gets on his airplane, flies away. And I don't think anyone quite expected a result like that. On the other hand, the words spoken were very friendly. Both Putin and Trump were encouraging about the future, but vague. And this is clearly the first step on, you know, what could be a long journey." He says negotiations to end wars can take a long time to finalise, but there is a positive for Ukraine in that the worst outcome was avoided. "Another encouraging thing was Trump saying that the Europeans and Ukraine, President Zelenskyy, had to be part of this agreement, and that had not come through quite clearly again about a week ago. The concern is that the pressure will go on to Zelenskyy to give up territory, to make an end to the conflict and get it over with as Trump would say. The Ukrainians are very reluctant to give up territory." Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy says he has been briefed on the Alaska meeting in a phone call with Mr Trump. The call also ended with an invitation for him to come to Washington DC on Monday (18 August local time). He says he has accepted the invitation and looks forward to discussing "all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war".