&w=3840&q=100)
NZ Prime Minister Luxon discusses trade with Chinese Prez Xi jinping
Christopher Luxon, on his first visit to China since becoming prime minister in late 2023, flew to Beijing after two days of meetings with officials and business leaders in Shanghai
AP Beijing
The prime minister of New Zealand stressed the importance of his country's trade ties with China in a meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Friday.
Christopher Luxon, on his first visit to China since becoming prime minister in late 2023, flew to Beijing after two days of meetings with officials and business leaders in Shanghai, China's commercial centre.
He wants to maintain healthy trade relations with China, an important market for New Zealand products, despite differences over regional and global security issues and China's growing divide with the United States.
Our trade and economic links are complementary and contribute to prosperity in both countries, he was quoted as saying in a news release following his meeting with Xi.
Luxon said he raised the necessity of reducing tensions in the Indo-Pacific region and the importance of what he called the key role that China can play in helping to resolve global challenges such as the war in Ukraine.
In a complex world, open dialogue is more important than ever, Luxon said in a post about the meeting on X.
His exchange with Xi came one day after revelations that New Zealand had suspended millions of dollars in aid to the Cook Islands over concerns about the latter's deepening ties with China.
China accounts for more than 20%of New Zealand's exports of goods and services.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Myanmar's junta battles guerillas for control of key jade mining hub
YANGON: Myanmar's junta and anti-coup guerillas battled over the country's jade mining hub Friday, a combatant and a local said, displacing desperate civilians as they vied for supplies of the precious stone. Myanmar has been consumed by a many-sided civil war since a 2021 coup toppled the democratic government, with the myriad of fighting factions plundering the nation's vast natural resources to fill their coffers. Jade is considered auspicious in Chinese culture and high-quality stones can fetch astronomical sums in the neighbouring country. Fighting has raged during a Myanmar military offensive around villages and mining sites in Hpakant township of northern Kachin state, according to Naw Bu, spokesman of the Kachin Independence Army battling the junta in the area. "They came to the jade mining areas of some companies and they burned down trucks and destroyed other things," he added. "They intended to stop our income from jade mining." AFP was not able to verify the claim and a spokesman for Myanmar's junta could not be reached for comment. Battles in the area began around three weeks ago but continued in the early hours of Friday, Naw Bu said. A local resident who asked to remain anonymous said around 15 civilians had been killed since May 28 and "some residents didn't dare to stay in the combat zone and have been displaced." As Myanmar's civil war enters its fifth year, more than 3.5 million people in the Southeast Asian country of around 50 million are currently displaced, according to United Nations figures. Kachin state hosts the largest jade deposits in the world according to geologists. Myanmar also has a huge and loosely-regulated mining sector for gold, rubies and rare earth minerals which has flourished in the war. China is also a key market for rare earth minerals, where they are used in electric vehicles the country is producing at prodigious rates.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Jeep maker Stellantis weighs sale among options for Maserati, sources say
Stellantis is considering a possible sale of its struggling luxury Maserati unit, among other options, two sources with knowledge of the matter said, as the automaker seeks to overhaul its sprawling portfolio of 14 brands. Discussions over Maserati's future started before new CEO Antonio Filosa, who starts on Monday, was appointed last month, while Stellantis was steered by Chair John Elkann. The viability of the French-Italian company's 14 brands - which include Chrysler, Peugeot, Jeep and Alfa Romeo - was a priority for Elkann as he interviewed candidates to fill the CEO job. Like other European carmakers, the world's fourth biggest automaker is facing hefty U.S. import tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump and struggling with stiff competition from Chinese rivals. Stellantis hired consultant McKinsey early in April to advise it on the effects of the U.S. tariffs on Maserati and Alfa Romeo as the two brands prepare future plans. Stellantis affirmed then that it was fully committed to both brands. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Drink this before bedtime and watch your belly shrink by morning Lulutox Undo However, a possible divestment of Maserati, its only luxury brand, is among the options McKinsey is exploring for Stellantis, the two sources told Reuters, adding the adviser's assessment was still in the early stages. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to discuss the matter publicly. Asked for comment, a Stellantis spokesperson said: "Respectfully, Maserati is not for sale". Live Events McKinsey declined to comment. Filosa's predecessor Carlos Tavares, who resigned in December after a poor performance in the U.S. market, had refused to consider getting rid of any of the carmaker's brands. But some investors and analysts say a streamlined portfolio would boost Stellantis' profit margins. Stellantis shares have lost two-thirds of their value since March last year. FALLING SALES Maserati's sales fell by more than half in 2024 to just 11,300 units and the unit posted an adjusted operating loss of 260 million euros ($298 million) last year. The brand currently has no new model launches scheduled as it waits for a new business plan, after its previous one was put on hold by Stellantis last year. Brand head Santo Ficili said earlier this month the plan would be presented soon after Filosa starts the job. One of the sources said Stellantis has been coming to terms with the fact that it has too many brands, making it difficult for it to properly invest in all of them. The carmaker needs to "set priorities", the source said. Stellantis has not specifically mandated McKinsey to find a buyer for Maserati, but the mandate is to consider all options, including a potential sale, the second source said. All options are on the table, the source said. Stellantis' board has been divided over plans for Maserati, one source said. Some board members think Stellantis is not in a position to sustainably re-launch Maserati and suggest selling it is the best option. Others think Maserati still has value and that selling its only luxury brand would be a huge reputational setback for Stellantis. Chinese automakers, such as Chery, might be among those interested in buying European auto brands, to support their expansion in the region, where they still lack brand recognition among consumers. This would be a similar move to SAIC's 2007 purchase of Britain's MG Motor or Geely's acquisition of Sweden's Volvo Cars in 2010.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Israel hammers Iran: Trump mulls bunker busters-will Xi rescue Ayatollah?
AI image for representation only. As Israel rains missiles on Iranian military and nuclear targets and President Donald Trump weighs direct US intervention with bunker-busting bombs, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei finds himself increasingly isolated. But the one power many hoped - or feared - might come to Tehran's aid, China, has stayed conspicuously cautious. Not that China has totally abandoned Iran, it has drawn a red line: But only on paper. Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi called the Israeli strikes on Iran 'unacceptable.' President Xi Jinping issued a condemnation through the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. China even offered rhetorical support for Iran's 'sovereignty and security.' But beyond the statements, one thing was conspicuously absent: Action. Chinese President Xi Jinping has condemned Israel's assault, emphasized dialogue, and backed Iran's sovereignty. Yet he has shown no signs of rushing to deliver weapons, military intelligence, or any other support that might change the battlefield calculus in Iran's favor. 'China may be offering economic relief and rhetorical support to Iran, but actual military intervention is not anywhere near the table yet,' Wen-Ti Sung, nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council's Global China Hub, told Bloomberg. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Why it matters Iran is facing its most serious external threat since the 1979 revolution. Israel has killed over 600 Iranians, including top generals and nuclear scientists. Trump has demanded Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and is weighing military options. And yet, China - a supposed strategic partner - has stuck to statements and sidestepped commitments. The lack of meaningful action from Beijing signals two crucial realities: 1. China's support for Iran is driven more by economic self-interest and strategic restraint than ideological alignment. 2. Beijing's Middle East strategy is transactional and risk-averse, prioritizing energy security and economic ties over alliances. Between the lines: Rhetoric without risk Beijing's pattern is clear. As in Ukraine, it prefers moral positioning to material involvement. 'China may be offering economic relief and rhetorical support to Iran, but actual military intervention is not anywhere near the table yet,' Wen-Ti Sung, a nonresident fellow with the Atlantic Council's Global China Hub, told Bloomberg. The calculus is both ideological and pragmatic. Xi's doctrine of non-interference-rooted in Deng-era realism-has become a trademark of China's global posture. That principle allows Beijing to project neutrality in foreign conflicts, appeal to the Global South, and avoid the pitfalls of overextension that have ensnared the US for decades. In this case, the risks are exceptionally high. Iran is being directly targeted not just by Israel but potentially by an emboldened United States. President Donald Trump has floated the possibility of using 'bunker buster' bombs to strike Iran's deeply buried nuclear sites. Open conflict with a US-backed adversary in the Middle East is a trap China has no interest in walking into. 'China does not want to risk getting entrapped by Iran's war with an Israel that has the Trump administration behind it,' Sung explained. Zoom in Oil calculus: Over 90% of Iran's oil exports go to China, mostly via sanction-evading methods using yuan and shadow fleets. Yet Iran accounts for less than 1% of China's total trade. It's significant for Tehran, not Beijing. 'If Iranian oil disappears, China has other options,' noted Fitch Ratings. 'OPEC+ spare capacity could fill the gap.' Beijing's diversified energy strategy is designed precisely for this scenario-an unstable supplier becomes expendable. Energy risk: If the conflict disrupts the Strait of Hormuz, the fallout for China could be massive. Nearly half of its crude oil passes through the narrow waterway. Weapon supply: Iran needs advanced air defense and fighter jets to match Israel. But China has not signed a new arms deal with Iran since 2005. US sanctions have disincentivized such transactions. Public mood: Some Chinese nationalist voices want Beijing to back Iran militarily. But most state messaging focuses on stability, and social media commentary is mixed. 'If Islamic countries such as Pakistan intervene, it will indirectly drag China in, because the weapons they use are from China,' Pan Guang of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences told the South China Morning Post. The big picture China and Iran have deepened ties in recent years. Xi oversaw Iran's entry into BRICS and the SCO. They signed a 25-year strategic deal in 2021, reportedly worth $400 billion in investments. But implementation has been slow, and sanctions have chilled enthusiasm among Chinese firms. Iran is a 'strategic partner' for Beijing only insofar as it fits broader geopolitical aims - challenging US dominance, securing oil, and building influence. Iran is not central to China's Middle East blueprint. Meanwhile, China has kept relations warm with Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. When Beijing brokered a diplomatic thaw between Tehran and Riyadh in 2023, it celebrated the moment but quickly stepped back as new conflicts erupted. 'China's strategy in the Middle East is to stay on good terms with everyone to maximize its economic gains and geopolitical influence,' Neil Thomas of the Asia Society Policy Institute told the Bloomberg. And if conflict between the US and Iran escalates, Beijing may even benefit. Greater US involvement in the Middle East would 'distract Washington from strategic competition with China,' Bloomberg analysts noted. What they're saying 'Xi has expressed willingness to help. But what can he or China do?' asked Zhiqun Zhu, professor at Bucknell University. 'Mediating is a tall order that's hard to reach without cooperation of other key players, especially the United States.' 'Further escalation of tensions in the Middle East is not in the interests of any party,' said China's foreign ministry, urging countries with 'special influence on Israel' - a nod to the US - to play a constructive role. 'If Trump takes some action on the Israel-Iran issue, he can divert attention from other troublesome issues,' said Pan Guang, implying that China sees US threats as partly political theater. What's next If the conflict deepens and Trump orders US strikes, China will likely double down on diplomacy, perhaps via the UN Security Council, where it can flex soft power without real costs. But don't expect Beijing to: Deploy military assets Sell weapons to Tehran Mediate alone between Israel and Iran That's not how Xi operates. China has neither the appetite nor the leverage to act as a wartime ally. And with global oil prices, Chinese economic recovery, and domestic woes in play - including youth unemployment and a real estate slump - the risks of deeper entanglement far outweigh the potential gains. The bottom line Xi Jinping is not coming to the Ayatollah's rescue. China may speak out against Israeli strikes and back Iran in the abstract. But when it comes to real power - arms, troops, strategic shielding - Tehran is on its own. Xi's priority remains crystal clear: avoid chaos, avoid sanctions, and avoid war.
