
Sterlite supporters want copper plant reopened
The proposal, prepared by former ICT Vice Chancellor Ganapati D Yadav and retired Anna University professor R Nagendran, recommends producing 70% copper from concentrate and 30% from recycled copper to reduce slag and emissions. It avoids production of phosphoric acid in the process, and sourcing water from desalination and Sewage Treatment Plant (STP).
Members from various associations, including the Thoothukudi Livelihood Protection Federation, Industrial Suppliers Association, and the local traders, fishermen, and villagers, supported a hybrid production model.
Supporter Ganesan said the hybrid model is sustainable and would boost Thoothukudi's economy. He urged the collector to consider and recommend the proposal to the state government.
They claimed this method would minimize pollution and restore lost jobs for contractors, lorry operators, and others in the industrial chain.
The Vedanta's Sterlite Copper plant was shut in 2018 following protests over environmental violations that led to the death of 15 civilians in police firing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
4 days ago
- News18
Sheikh Hasina's In Absentia Trial: Bangladesh Lawyers Decry ‘Unfair Process', Question Gaps
Last Updated: A Bangladesh court rejected lawyer ZI Khan Panna's request to represent Sheikh Hasina, on trial for alleged crimes against humanity. A special court in Bangladesh on Tuesday turned down a senior lawyer's request to represent deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina, who is on trial in absentia for alleged 'crimes against humanity," prompting renewed debate over whether she is receiving a fair defence. 'The state has appointed a defence lawyer for Sheikh Hasina. This (matter) is over," said M Golam Mortuza Mozumder, chairman of the three-judge International Crimes Tribunal of Bangladesh (ICT-BD). 'It is up to the tribunal who would be appointed as the defence lawyer," he added, questioning why ZI Khan Panna 'will come to defend her" at this stage of the proceedings. 'Now, when the train has left the station, he came and asked the station master to arrange his boarding." Panna's application, presented by lawyer Naznin Nahar, was also rejected in a secondary request to allow him to assist the state-appointed counsel. Hasina and former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal are being tried in absentia, with the tribunal earlier appointing little-known lawyer Amir Hossain to represent them both. A third accused, former police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun, has turned 'approver" to testify against the co-accused. Panna, a 1971 war veteran in his late 70s and chairman of the legal aid committee of the Bangladesh Bar Council, has been openly critical of the former Awami League regime but expressed his willingness to defend the 76-year-old Hasina. He is also known for criticising the current Muhammad Yunus administration for 'patronising forces" opposed to Bangladesh's 1971 independence. British journalist and rights activist David Bergman, who has been following the ICT-BD proceedings, raised concerns last week over the defence arrangements. He noted that one lawyer was appointed for two accused with 'very different interests," creating 'significant potential conflict of interest problems preventing them each from having a proper defence." Bergman also questioned the short preparation time, pointing out that Hossain only received the prosecution's evidence on June 25, which was five weeks before the trial began and has had no contact with either client. 'It is impossible for any lawyer to… devise a proper defence for both clients, particularly when the lawyer has no contact with the client(s)," he said. The ICT-BD, formed in 2010 to try wartime collaborators of Pakistan, is now hearing charges against Hasina and her aides. In a reversal, Tajul Islam, who was once a key defence lawyer for Jamaat-e-Islami leaders, is serving as the tribunal's chief prosecutor. Bergman called the development 'irony," adding, 'There may well be a much stronger word to describe this!" Last month, the tribunal charged Hasina with crimes against humanity for allegedly ordering a deadly crackdown during the 'July Uprising" led by the Students Against Discrimination (SAD) movement. The protests forced her resignation on August 5, 2024, after which she left Bangladesh aboard a military aircraft and has since been in India. Prosecutors say Hasina acted as 'mastermind, conductor and superior commander" in the violence, which the UN rights office estimates killed around 1,400 people between July 15 and August 15 last year. tags : Sheikh Hasina view comments Location : Dhaka, Bangladesh First Published: August 12, 2025, 21:45 IST News world Sheikh Hasina's In Absentia Trial: Bangladesh Lawyers Decry 'Unfair Process', Question Gaps Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Hans India
4 days ago
- Hans India
Bangladesh ICT rejects lawyer's plea to represent Sheikh Hasina
Dhaka: The International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) of Bangladesh on Tuesday rejected the application of senior Supreme Court lawyer Z.I. Khan Panna to represent former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina for the case of crimes against humanity linked to last year's July demonstrations. Analysts reckon the decision constitutes a travesty of justice, denying Hasina the right to be represented in the case. The application was filed by lawyer Nazneen Nahar on behalf of Panna at the tribunal seeking to defend Hasina in the case, local media reported. The tribunal questioned the purpose of the application during the testimony stage, stating that it could not be accepted. "The train has already left the station; there is no way to board it by informing the station master. At this stage of the case, there is no opportunity to appoint a new lawyer," leading Bangladeshi daily The Business Standard quoted the ICT as saying in response to the petition. The tribunal noted that the state has already appointed Supreme Court lawyer Amir Hossain to conduct hearings on behalf of Hasina. Earlier, on August 3, the prosecution at the ICT began its proceedings in a case against Hasina and two others over alleged crimes against humanity. The co-accused include former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal and former Inspector General of Police (IGP) Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun. Following the proceedings, the Awami League denounced the charges brought against its leadership, calling them a "politically motivated" move orchestrated by the Muhammad Yunus-led "illegitimate" interim government. Awami League leader Mohammad A. Arafat stated that neither former Prime Minister Hasina nor him have received any formal notice of the trial proceedings against the party members, which he said, highlights the "absurdity" of the "unelected" government. "This is part of a broader campaign by an unelected usurper heading an illegitimate government, intent on erasing democratic legitimacy, silencing opposition, and clinging to power. Such a regime has no legal or moral authority to prosecute a government elected by the people's mandate. An illegitimate regime cannot amend legislation passed by Parliament. Only Parliament has that authority," Arafat said in a statement. He said that no democratically elected leader should be "prosecuted for upholding constitutional duties in the face of violent insurrection."

The Hindu
08-08-2025
- The Hindu
Ensure freedom of expression does not hurt religious feelings, Madras HC tells State government
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has set aside the closure of a case registered by the Thoothukudi police over a social media post disrespecting Lord Krishna. Justice K. Murali Shankar observed, 'Depicting Hindu Gods in a disrespectful manner, intentionally hurting the sentiments of millions, cannot be justified. Such actions have the potential to spark enmity, religious outrage, social disorder, and undermine communal harmony'. The court said: 'Given the deep-rooted respect for religious symbols and deities, disrespect can lead to social unrest and hurt a large section of society. Therefore, it is crucial to approach such depictions with sensitivity. The government must ensure freedom of expression does not translate into hurting religious feelings.' The court was hearing a criminal revision petition filed by P. Paramasivan. The petitioner had lodged a complaint alleging that one Sathish Kumar posted a photo of Lord Krishna along with disrespectful comments on social media. He stated that he was deeply hurt by the misrepresented photo, which caused him significant mental anguish. He alleged that Sathish Kumar had posted the photo and comments with an intention of defaming Hindu Gods, damaging the image of Hindu women, and potentially creating a law and order problem by promoting enmity between different groups on religious grounds. On the basis of the complaint, an FIR was registered. Subsequently, the police filed a final report before Judicial Magistrate IV, Thoothukudi, as 'undetected'. Accepting the final report, the case was closed with liberty to file a private complaint. Challenging the same, the criminal revision petition was filed. Justice Murali Shankar observed that the police's final report and the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate accepting it and closing the FIR could not be sustained legally. While the investigating officer identified the post's potential to create law and order issues and disturb communal harmony, the investigation was not pursued diligently, and the final report appeared to have been filed mechanically, the court observed. Despite the seriousness of the allegations, the police handled the case casually. 'Given these circumstances, the court finds it necessary to direct the police to continue and complete the investigation within a stipulated period,' the judge observed, and directed the police to complete the investigation and file a final report in three months.