
More than a third of retail investors in S'pore face problems exercising their rights: Survey
More than a third of retail investors in S'pore face problems exercising their rights: Survey
Source: Straits Times
Article Date: 26 Jun 2025
Author: Sue-Ann Tan
About a quarter of the respondents said they met challenges in accessing company financial reports and disclosures.
More than a third of retail investors, or 37 per cent, experienced difficulties in exercising their rights, according to a new survey out on June 25.
The survey, which was commissioned in 2024 by the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or Sias, included the responses of 197 people in a bid to track the progress of investors' rights in Singapore and see what more needs to be done.
Sias is the main investor-led organisation dedicated to investor education and the advocacy of retail investors' rights. It engages companies and regulators to improve corporate governance and transparency.
The survey was also conducted with support from the Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) and the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS).
Of the respondents who said they faced difficulties in exercising their rights, 41 per cent felt their voices were not heard enough when companies made decisions.
Another 24 per cent said they met challenges in accessing company financial reports and disclosures.
About 22 per cent also reported encountering difficulties when voting at shareholder meetings because of unclear procedures and a lack of information.
Lastly, 13 per cent said they experienced delays in receiving dividends and other things that shareholders are entitled to.
SIT associate professor of accounting Kevin Ow Yong said: 'From an accounting and finance perspective, it is imperative that there are adequate safeguards to protect investors so as to improve and maintain investor confidence towards Singapore Exchange-listed companies.'
The report observed that there is room for further reforms to plug gaps in investor protection under the existing framework.
The opportunity for reform has also cropped up, with the ongoing review by the Equities Market Review Group, which was set up in 2024 to boost Singapore's equities market.
'While it is important for regulation to be right-sized in order to improve and increase the quality of listings in Singapore, this should not be at the expense of investor protection, which is important to support both retail and institutional investment in Singapore's equities market,' the report said.
Among the things investors wanted are having better mechanisms for investor redress and dispute resolution, and ensuring fair and equal access to information.
Investors also said they wanted more transparency in corporate governance practices and to strengthen safeguards against insider trading and market manipulation.
Strengthening shareholders' voting rights was also important to investors.
The largest proportion of investors felt that more can be done to make information more accessible.
The report noted: 'These respondents elaborated that they felt their rights were compromised due to a lack of communication about significant changes in business strategy and insufficient disclosure on company investments.'
For instance, one company did not inform investors about a major strategy shift, particularly after being inactive in one of its primary businesses for several years.
Shareholders then raised these concerns at annual general meetings, demanding clearer communication about the company's intentions.
'In this instance, the feedback led to improved communication, with the company directly addressing their concerns, leading to enhanced transparency and investor confidence,' the report said.
It noted that the fact that some respondents want greater transparency in corporate governance practices also indicates a growing demand for greater openness, accountability and clarity in how companies are managed and directed.
SUSS School of Law lecturer Lance Ang said: 'The recommendations in the study are particularly pertinent in the light of the shift towards the 'disclosure-based regime' announced by the Equities Market Review Group in its ongoing review of the regulatory framework to attract listings.'
He added that a disclosure-based approach that forms the basis of informed investor decision-making must be supported by private and public enforcement of disclosure breaches.
These can enable investors to get compensation for losses, as well as ensure shareholders have access to information and investor education, Mr Ang said.
SUSS School of Business senior lecturer Tan Eng Joo noted that the findings suggest that enforcement alone is not enough to empower investors, but that it is also encouraging that 'no single area stands out as particularly deficient'.
'This reflects a balanced approach within existing investor protection mechanisms, supporting efforts to build a resilient and inclusive capital market where all investors feel heard, engaged and safe,' Dr Tan said.
Sias president David Gerald said that over the past decade, the organisation has seen a shift in Singapore where more investors are more proactive in asserting their rights.
'Through our persistent advocacy, constructive dialogue with regulators and listed companies, and empowering investors with knowledge, Sias has helped shape a more engaging investing community,' he said.
'This journey reflects our unwavering belief that protecting investor rights is fundamental to building trust and resilience in our capital markets.'
Sue-Ann Tan is a business correspondent at The Straits Times covering capital markets and sustainable finance.
Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction.
Print

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Singapore Law Watch
5 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
More than a third of retail investors in S'pore face problems exercising their rights: Survey
More than a third of retail investors in S'pore face problems exercising their rights: Survey Source: Straits Times Article Date: 26 Jun 2025 Author: Sue-Ann Tan About a quarter of the respondents said they met challenges in accessing company financial reports and disclosures. More than a third of retail investors, or 37 per cent, experienced difficulties in exercising their rights, according to a new survey out on June 25. The survey, which was commissioned in 2024 by the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or Sias, included the responses of 197 people in a bid to track the progress of investors' rights in Singapore and see what more needs to be done. Sias is the main investor-led organisation dedicated to investor education and the advocacy of retail investors' rights. It engages companies and regulators to improve corporate governance and transparency. The survey was also conducted with support from the Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) and the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS). Of the respondents who said they faced difficulties in exercising their rights, 41 per cent felt their voices were not heard enough when companies made decisions. Another 24 per cent said they met challenges in accessing company financial reports and disclosures. About 22 per cent also reported encountering difficulties when voting at shareholder meetings because of unclear procedures and a lack of information. Lastly, 13 per cent said they experienced delays in receiving dividends and other things that shareholders are entitled to. SIT associate professor of accounting Kevin Ow Yong said: 'From an accounting and finance perspective, it is imperative that there are adequate safeguards to protect investors so as to improve and maintain investor confidence towards Singapore Exchange-listed companies.' The report observed that there is room for further reforms to plug gaps in investor protection under the existing framework. The opportunity for reform has also cropped up, with the ongoing review by the Equities Market Review Group, which was set up in 2024 to boost Singapore's equities market. 'While it is important for regulation to be right-sized in order to improve and increase the quality of listings in Singapore, this should not be at the expense of investor protection, which is important to support both retail and institutional investment in Singapore's equities market,' the report said. Among the things investors wanted are having better mechanisms for investor redress and dispute resolution, and ensuring fair and equal access to information. Investors also said they wanted more transparency in corporate governance practices and to strengthen safeguards against insider trading and market manipulation. Strengthening shareholders' voting rights was also important to investors. The largest proportion of investors felt that more can be done to make information more accessible. The report noted: 'These respondents elaborated that they felt their rights were compromised due to a lack of communication about significant changes in business strategy and insufficient disclosure on company investments.' For instance, one company did not inform investors about a major strategy shift, particularly after being inactive in one of its primary businesses for several years. Shareholders then raised these concerns at annual general meetings, demanding clearer communication about the company's intentions. 'In this instance, the feedback led to improved communication, with the company directly addressing their concerns, leading to enhanced transparency and investor confidence,' the report said. It noted that the fact that some respondents want greater transparency in corporate governance practices also indicates a growing demand for greater openness, accountability and clarity in how companies are managed and directed. SUSS School of Law lecturer Lance Ang said: 'The recommendations in the study are particularly pertinent in the light of the shift towards the 'disclosure-based regime' announced by the Equities Market Review Group in its ongoing review of the regulatory framework to attract listings.' He added that a disclosure-based approach that forms the basis of informed investor decision-making must be supported by private and public enforcement of disclosure breaches. These can enable investors to get compensation for losses, as well as ensure shareholders have access to information and investor education, Mr Ang said. SUSS School of Business senior lecturer Tan Eng Joo noted that the findings suggest that enforcement alone is not enough to empower investors, but that it is also encouraging that 'no single area stands out as particularly deficient'. 'This reflects a balanced approach within existing investor protection mechanisms, supporting efforts to build a resilient and inclusive capital market where all investors feel heard, engaged and safe,' Dr Tan said. Sias president David Gerald said that over the past decade, the organisation has seen a shift in Singapore where more investors are more proactive in asserting their rights. 'Through our persistent advocacy, constructive dialogue with regulators and listed companies, and empowering investors with knowledge, Sias has helped shape a more engaging investing community,' he said. 'This journey reflects our unwavering belief that protecting investor rights is fundamental to building trust and resilience in our capital markets.' Sue-Ann Tan is a business correspondent at The Straits Times covering capital markets and sustainable finance. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
Business Times
11 hours ago
- Business Times
SBF proposes 1-2 year extension of compliance deadline for SGX-listcos' climate-related disclosures
[SINGAPORE] The Singapore Business Federation (SBF) has proposed extending the deadline for Singapore Exchange (SGX)-listed companies' compliance with the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB)-based climate-related disclosures by possibly one to two years. This is one of the four recommendations released by the SBF on Thursday (Jun 26), in relation to the disclosure. Under the SGX Regulation (SGX RegCo)'s prevailing sustainability reporting regime, all listed companies have to make climate-related disclosures for financial years (FY) commencing on or after Jan 1 this year, using the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) standards. Data was collected by SBF and SGX RegCo in April and May from 40 SGX-listed companies on the mainboard and Catalist boards through a roundtable discussion and a survey, which showed that only 4 per cent were confident about meeting this timeline, even though all the engaged listed companies were already preparing for ISSB disclosures. More than 90 per cent of them also said extending the timeline for mandatory ISSB disclosures, for example by one or two years, would be useful for them to prepare higher-quality ISSB reports. They also added that a time extension would not detract them from the work that they had already begun. The four recommendations from SBF are: A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up Grant small- and mid-cap listed companies more time to comply, for example, by one to two years; Make disclosure requirements proportionate for small- and mid-cap listed companies; Provide Singapore-relevant cross-sector and sector-specific guidance; and Designate a central platform for digital reporting of climate-related disclosures. These recommendations apply to the small- and mid-sized listcos which make up 84 per cent of SGX-listings, since not all listings (including secondary-listed issuers) are subject to sustainability-reporting requirements. Kok Ping Soon, chief executive of SBF, said: 'Our key recommendation is to extend their compliance deadline, after engaging close to 40 small- and mid-cap listed companies. This does not represent a step back from Singapore's climate-reporting ambitions, but is a practical measure to provide smaller listed companies more time to strengthen internal capabilities and incorporate best practices after larger listed companies make their ISSB disclosures for FY2025.' While preparations for ISSB climate reporting are underway, a deadline extension would enable small- and mid-cap companies to, for example, prepare subsidiaries which may be based overseas. It would also strengthen data collection systems and enable these smaller businesses to take guidance from the FY2025 ISSB reports by larger listed companies. Extending the deadline would also enable small- and mid-cap listed companies to be eligible for the Sustainability Reporting Grant (SRG) by the Economic Development Board and Enterprise Singapore, given that the SRG is awarded only to reports filed before compliance for mandatory climate-related disclosures kicks in. He also stressed SBF's recommendation of increasing awareness and application of proportionality mechanisms, with more guidance within and across sectors relevant to the city-state. 'These will help smaller listed companies in Singapore take full advantage of any compliance deadline extension to more effectively transition their business,' Kok said.
Business Times
12 hours ago
- Business Times
SBF proposes 1-2 year compliance deadline extension for SGX-listcos on climate-related disclosures
[SINGAPORE] The Singapore Business Federation (SBF) has proposed extending the deadline of Singapore Exchange (SGX)-listed companies' compliance to the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB)-based climate-related disclosure by possibly one to two years. This is one of the four recommendations released by the SBF on Thursday (Jun 26) in relation to the said disclosure. At present, under the SGX Regulation (SGX RegCo)'s prevailing sustainability reporting regime, all listed companies are required to make climate-related disclosures for financial years (FY) commencing on or after Jan 1 this year, using the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) standards. Data was collected by SBF and SGX RegCo in April and May from 40 SGX-listed companies on the Mainboard and Catalist boards through a roundtable and survey, which showed that only 4 per cent are confident in meeting this timeline, even though all the engaged listed companies are in progress of preparing for ISSB disclosures. More than 90 per cent of them also said extending the timeline for mandatory ISSB disclosures, for example by one or two years, would be useful for them to prepare higher quality ISSB reports. They also added that a time extension will not detract them from the work that they had already begun. With this in mind, the four recommendations from SBF are: A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up Grant small- and mid-cap listed companies more time to comply, for example, by one to two years; Make disclosure requirements proportionate for small- and mid-cap listed companies; Provide Singapore-relevant cross-sector and sector-specific guidance; and Designate a central platform for digital reporting of climate-related disclosures. These recommendations account for 83 per cent of SGX-listings, since not all listings are subject to sustainability reporting requirements such as secondary-listed issuers, as at Monday. Kok Ping Soon, chief executive of SBF, said: 'Our key recommendation is to extend their compliance deadline, after engaging close to 40 small- and mid-cap listed companies. This does not represent a step back from Singapore's climate reporting ambitions, but is a practical measure to provide smaller listed companies more time to strengthen internal capabilities and incorporate best practices after larger listed companies make their ISSB disclosures for FY2025.' While preparations for ISSB climate reporting is underway, a deadline extension would enable small- and mid-cap companies could, for example, prepare subsidiaries which may be based overseas; strengthen data collection systems; and take guidance from FY2025 ISSB reports by larger listed companies to produce higher quality research. Extending the deadline would also enable small- and mid-cap listed companies to be eligible for the Sustainability Reporting Grant (SRG) by the Economic Development Board and Enterprise Singapore, as SRG is only applicable for reports before compliance for mandatory climate-related disclosures sets in. He also stressed SBF's recommendation of increasing awareness and application of proportionality mechanisms, with more guidance within and across sectors relevant to the city-state. 'These will help smaller listed companies in Singapore take full advantage of any compliance deadline extension to more effectively transition their business,' Kok said.