How hedge funds performed in turbulent July
Hedge fund stockpickers returned almost 1.5% in July and are up roughly 7.8% for the year so far, said Goldman Sachs in a note to clients on Monday seen by Reuters.
Systematic hedge funds trading stocks were on track to deliver their worst monthly performance on record before rebounding after July 25 to claw back half of their losses, finishing with a negative 2% return, said Goldman.
These funds were up 10% for the year so far, however, added the bank. While stockpickers benefited by piling into already crowded trades, hedge funds using algorithms to create systematic trading strategies were hurt by busy trades, said Goldman.
The S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab hit record highs during July, but only returned 1.38%.
The biggest multi-strategy funds posted muted returns, including Schonfeld Strategic Advisors' flagship fund Strategic Partners, which was down 0.3% in July and is now up 5.8% for 2025, according to a source familiar with the matter.
Schonfeld's Fundamental Equity fund gained 1.4% last month and was up 7.1% in the year, the source added.
The $76.9 billion British hedge fund Marshall Wace returned a negative 0.2% in its Market Neutral TOPS fund, bringing its half-year performance to roughly 11%. Its Eureka fund returned 1.6% in July and is up 6.1% for 2025 so far, said another source familiar with the fund's results.
*result as of Aug 4
**class B shares, as of July 25
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Weigh in on Sydney Sweeney or run the world? Trump, for better or worse, attempts it all
Aug 9 (Reuters) - From firing people to promoting jeans, calling for peace deals or the renaming of a sports team, President Donald Trump keeps a lot on his proverbial to-do list. Much of it is unrelated to running the country. More than six months into his second term as U.S. commander-in-chief, Trump, a former New York businessman and reality television host, has applied a hands-on management style and producer-like attitude toward governing, relying largely on his own instincts for decisions large and small. Using the tools of social media and a propensity for bullying, Trump personally wades into issues inside and outside the federal government to get his way. He harangues company executives to invest in America and uses trade deals as leverage over foreign leaders to end conflicts. Last week he fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics over unproven allegations she falsified figures that he didn't like. This week he called for the head of Intel to step down over ties with China, and the company's stock fell. In recent months he has pressed the Washington Commanders football team to change its name back to the Redskins, forced universities to pay huge amounts to the federal government, boosted retailer American Eagle Outfitters' shares with a compliment about a controversial jeans commercial featuring actor Sydney Sweeney and attempted to shore up Republican power by pushing for political redistricting in Texas. Trump's style, which can confound both his friends and his foes, is dramatically different from his more traditional predecessors. It has earned him condemnation for being caustic and praise for being effective at getting what he wants. "While he delves into topics that are certainly distractions relative to the big business of leading the world's greatest nation, it can also be said that past presidents have excessively deferred to the bureaucracy and failed to deliver the change their voters expected," said Carlos Curbelo, a Republican former congressman from Florida. "Trump views himself more as the CEO of the U.S.A. than as president," Curbelo added. "It's good for decision making and challenging for the constitutional order which made our country the world's greatest economic and military force." Trump has taken on academia, the legal world, media companies, athletics, the federal bureaucracy and more, all while retooling the world economy with tariffs, cracking down on immigration flows, upending relations with allies and putting his stamp on American culture. Though he has a team of advisers, the president frequently follows his own counsel, making policy decisions and then announcing them himself, ramifications aside. "I think what a lot of people miss about Trump is he's the marketer-in-chief," said Ford O'Connell, a Republican strategist with ties to the White House. "Not only is he his own best press secretary, he's also his own best chief-of-staff." Critics question why Trump gets bogged down in issues that are secondary to his goals of strengthening the U.S. economy, for example, or achieving a peace deal between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. "He's commenting one moment on ... Putin and tariffs and all that's happening in the world and the next moment he's talking about, oh, Sydney Sweeney, and all these other issues that are completely unrelated to being president of the United States," said Charlie Dent, a Republican former congressman from Pennsylvania. "He simply can't focus." The White House said Trump is using his skills to deliver on policy priorities. 'President Trump's leadership style can be summed up plainly as decisive and commanding," said White House spokesman Harrison Fields. Trump also employs a talent to distract when facing difficulty. Though that super power has largely eluded him with the controversy over sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein and the Department of Justice's refusal to release files related to the disgraced financier's case, Trump's broad ability to change the subject and dominate the news cycle has stupefied his opponents for years. "His leadership style is much closer to that of an executive producer, and the executive producer who has a really big picture understanding of the audience," said Republican strategist Kevin Madden, a senior adviser to former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney's 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns. "I think he trusts his instincts about the audience over anybody else, and that's why you see him oftentimes, you know, managing his own policy portfolio." Trump, though not a stickler for detail on all things policy-related, does get into the weeds on things he cares about, both cultural and political, including redecorating the Oval Office with gold, paving over the Rose Garden and building a new ballroom on the White House grounds. On Tuesday, reporters bantered with the president while he walked on the roof of the White House press room, surveying the grounds for what he said were more ways to spend his money. The White House said Trump and other donors plan to pay for the $200 million ballroom project, which is slated to be finished before his second term concludes. "I think narcissists do get bogged down in details because they think that everything is a reflection of them," said Republican strategist Rina Shah. "When he decides to focus on the minutia, he's forgetting about the bigger picture. And that's kind of a disservice to the office." Where critics see such disservice, the White House sees results. On the eve of presiding over a U.S.-brokered peace framework between Azerbaijan and Armenia this week, Trump took to social media to tout his involvement: 'Many Leaders have tried to end the War, with no success, until now, thanks to 'TRUMP.'"
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Yellowstone, Top Gun, Chalamet: what will the Paramount-Skydance merger mean for film and TV?
The merger between Paramount and Skydance has finally been completed, with various roadblocks (including Stephen Colbert, apparently, as well as the related 60 Minutes settlement/bribery) cleared from the path of a new entity called Paramount, A Skydance Corporation. It's an appropriately franchise-y moniker for a merger between a major Hollywood studio and a company that made its bones as a constant financer of some of its biggest movie series. This ends (for now) years of speculation over what might be done with Paramount, a global conglomerate that was nonetheless considered on less sure footing than its fellow remaining big five studios, Disney, Sony, Universal and Warner Bros. (Well, maybe not the recently embattled Warner Bros, though they seem to have gotten a major reprieve with their killer 2025 slate) Skydance honcho David Ellison is the new Paramount CEO. The new co-chairs of Paramount Pictures will be Skydance executive Dana Goldberg and former Sony executive Josh Greenstein. But with Ellison at the top boasting years of Skydance experience, he'll ultimately be determining Paramount's fortunes as a movie and TV company. The son of billionaire Larry Ellison, David for years seemed like he got into the movies primarily to work in closer proximity to airplanes. His first film as a producer was the 2005 flop Flyboys, a world war one fighter-pilot drama that was an early strike against the burgeoning movie career of star James Franco. Undeterred, the next year he founded Skydance Media, the kind of thing a 23-year-old budding pilot can do if they happen also to be a billionaire's son. Over the years, the company co-financed a number of big Paramount productions. They didn't all or even mostly involve fighter planes, but they did include big Paramount brands (Mission: Impossible, Star Trek), would-be franchise-starters and restarters (Jack Reacher, Jack Ryan, a couple of Terminators) and, in what Ellison must have considered his crowning achievement, Top Gun: Maverick, for which he received a best picture nomination as one of the film's producers. So does this indicate that Paramount will move towards making Top Gun even more of a signature title, the platonic ideal of billion-dollar nostalgia franchise with ample access to expensive fighter planes? Maybe. In some ways, the Skydance merger isn't as grim as other corporate acquisitions in this field. Ellison is just 42, which sets him apart from someone like Bob Iger (who recently unretired in his 70s and still hasn't set a proper successor). The deal also doesn't consolidate Paramount under another studio's umbrella, the way that 20th Century Fox went from storied, century-old cinema legacy to Disney shingle that mostly revives franchises from its catalog and produces lower-budget offerings directly for streaming. (This was a possibility for Paramount; Sony was apparently looking at acquiring them.) Nor does the merger put another movie studio under the control of a tech company. Though it's not exactly known for an art-forward sensibility – like, say, Annapurna, the more prestigious movie company that David's sister, Megan, founded in 2011 – Skydance is still mainly an entertainment firm. What, then, might be expected from Paramount in the Skydance era? The relative narrowness of previous Skydance operations suggests an ongoing ignorance about how to run other aspects of the business, such as the news division of CBS. Ellison has talked a bit about keeping CBS trustworthy and independent, but a leading 60 Minutes producer already quit, pre-merger, over pre-merger interference from Paramount. Ellison also made comments about most people identifying as 'center-right' or 'center-left', a thinking that suggests he's looking at journalism in terms of pleasing his audience, rather than doing reporting that might prompt baseless charges of bias. Less of an ethical challenge but central to the Paramount business is the ongoing dip in value of the company's signature cable brands – they own MTV, Comedy Central, Nickelodeon and Showtime, among others – which other companies have dealt with by spinning off into separate entities. But these channels are arguably more tied into Paramount's identity; Nickelodeon, for example, has provided a steady stream of movie hits in addition to TV franchises. They will probably stay put for now (though that won't protect them from layoffs). Between those brands and the company's seeming political triangulating, it seems likely that the importance of Taylor Sheridan, whose universe of centrist-appeal western shows does so well in traditional TV terms, will only increase. Despite that cable legacy, streaming and 'non-linear' TV are said to be a priority for the company, with Ellison mentioning a dedication to premium streaming-only movies and shows in his day-one open letter. Though Skydance had some success working on big-picture theatrical franchises for Paramount, their branched-out efforts to provide content for various streaming services has been more typical of that arena – that is, often expensive but somehow still low-rent. Ghosted, Heart of Stone, 6 Underground … several of the interchangeable streaming caper/spy movies that feel more like mockbusters than events have Skydance's name on them. They often feel, in fact, like knockoffs of the movies Paramount might have made for theaters in the 2000s and 2010s. Skydance also attempted to start their own animation studio by employing the disgraced former Pixar head John Lasseter, which so far has resulted in the twin embarrassments of Luck (on Apple TV+) and Spellbound (on Netflix). The company does have an animated project from the Incredibles creator Brad Bird in the works, as well as a cartoon called, uh, Pookoo. They're also shooting a live-action project called Matchbox. This is not a code name. It is based on the toy cars. Those movies won't be on the Paramount slate, but they could be indicative of where the corporate heads are at when it comes time to rebuild the movie studio. Ellison may not be a tech CEO, but his billionaire dad is; Larry Ellison co-founded Oracle. That mix of established money and a vaguely tech-forward outlook could turn out to be recent-big-business as usual. The real question mark regarding Skydance is how (or if) they might handle the stuff that doesn't involve blatant imitating or trend-chasing that every big studio does. (Has any movie studio undergoing a shift in the past decade declared an intention not to leverage a bunch of supposedly valuable old IP?) Recent past periods of creativity flourishing at Paramount seemed almost accidental. In the mid-to-late 2010s, for example, the studio had a few years where they made or distributed Denis Villeneuve's Arrival, Richard Linklater's Everybody Wants Some!!, Alexander Payne's Downsizing, Darren Aronofsky's Mother!, Martin Scorsese's Silence, and Denzel Washington's Fences, among others, boldly supporting movies made by and for thinking adults. (They also made some pretty decent franchise movies with Skydance, such as Star Trek Beyond and several Mission: Impossible entries.) It doesn't seem like Skydance's first priority it would be replicating any of those grownup movies, even a hit like Arrival. Yet it is hopeful that the first announced Paramount Pictures deal brokered by Goldberg and Greenstein is a James Mangold-directed, Timothée Chalamet-starring original film called High Side – in other words, an old-fashioned, A-list-director-and-star combination. Maybe Ellison and his lieutenants are able to reach back to more Paramount-specific projects – their thrillers of the 70s, the star-driven comedies of the 80s and 90s, the surprise inventiveness of their affiliation with MTV films – and do a little more than play with Matchbox cars and fighter jets.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
People in the US: have you been affected by interest resuming on student loan debt under the Save plan?
Under the Biden administration, about 8 million people enrolled in a 2023 income-driven repayment plan for student debt – the Saving on a Valuable Education (Save) plan. But as of 1 August, the Trump administration has resumed charging loan interest under the Save plan to borrowers, who have been in forbearance since last year. The Department of Education has recommended people switch to another repayment plan for their federal student loans. Borrowers can still forgo payments, but will see interest accruing on their loans and won't make any progress toward student loan forgiveness. We want to hear from you. Are you a US borrower who enrolled in the Save plan? What do you plan to do now that interest is again being charged? Will you be forced to make changes to your spending habits in order to make new payments? How will this affect you? You can tell us how you've been affected by filling in the form below. Please include as much detail as possible. Please include as much detail as possible. Please include as much detail as possible. Please note, the maximum file size is 5.7 MB. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. If you include other people's names please ask them first. Contact us on WhatsApp or Signal at +447766780300. For more information, please see our guidance on contacting us via WhatsApp, For true anonymity please use our SecureDrop service instead. If you're having trouble using the form click here. Read terms of service here and privacy policy here.
