Death threats over Texas flooding cartoon force museum journalism event to be postponed
An online fury erupted this week over an editorial cartoon in The Buffalo News by Pulitzer Prize-winner Adam Zyglis showing a man in a MAGA cap being swept away by the Texas floodwaters. Nose deep in the water, the man is holding up a sign that reads 'Help' and a speech bubble floating downstream says: 'Gov't is the problem not the solution.'
At least 120 people were killed in the Texas flooding and more than 170 were missing.
The Buffalo Newspaper Guild said a happy hour event Thursday at the Buffalo History Museum called 'Drawing Support for Local Journalism' was postponed amid the backlash. The free, public event was planned to highlight the need for local journalism at a museum exhibit of Zyglis' work.
But the guild said plans to protest and confront Zyglis at the event led to death threats against the cartoonist 'and a deluge of other direct threats to hurt him and his family.'
'We wholly condemn the individuals who have chosen to twist a positive, public event into an attempt to terrorize and silence Zyglis, spread fear among journalists and their supporters, and distort the mission of a free press,' the guild said in an online post.
Zyglis posted the guild announcement on Instagram and commented: 'Threats to me and my family are never an acceptable response to disagreeing with an editorial cartoon.'
The guild said the event will be rescheduled.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Jorge Ramos, On His Digital Reinvention: ‘I'm Not Ready To Retire'
Jorge Ramos, in the studio where he films "Así Veo Las Cosas" — his news series that blends ... More journalism with the intimacy of social media. To Jorge Ramos, neutrality is a four-letter word. After nearly four decades as a Univision anchor — a high-profile perch that eventually turned him into, according to The Guardian, the best-known journalist in the Spanish-speaking world — the 67-year-old Ramos left behind the television news industry that defined much of his career to launch an independent, internet-based news program. His new show, which debuted in June and can be found across YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and X, is called Asi Veo las Cosas — Spanish for 'That's how I see things.' In other words, it's not the kind of show that clings to the familiar 'voice from nowhere' objectivity that characterizes much of legacy journalism. Instead, Asi Veo las Cosas is largely an extension of Ramos' world view — which he described in a phone interview with me as, basically, 'pro-immigrant, pro-democracy, and pro-freedom.' Why Jorge Ramos believes journalism should take a stand 'I personally have no problem with objectivity,' said Ramos, who was born in Mexico and moved to the U.S. in the 1980s to escape press censorship. 'If something is red, we say it's red. If 16 people died, we say 16. And if you make a mistake, you correct it and move on. But sometimes, and I understand this might be controversial in certain places, sometimes as a journalist you have to take a stand. 'I don't think neutrality is a journalistic value.' Of course, no one who's followed his career up to this point needs him to spell that out. After all, he's built a career out of amplifying the voices of marginalized communities and confronting politicians — from calling President Obama 'deporter-in-chief' during a Univision interview in 2014 to his tense exchange with Venezuelan dictator Nicholas Maduro in 2019 at the presidential palace in Caracas, during which he called the strongman 'illegitimate.' And now, he's running a digital platform with a clear point of view, one that's both a reinvention and a return to form — bringing him closer to the audiences he's always fought for. He spends time during his broadcasts, for example, responding directly to viewers. One recent episode found him speaking directly to the camera about a woman named Yocari Villagómez who'd lived in the U.S. for 12 years, with no criminal record. Despite being married to an American citizen, she was told she had to leave — and so made the difficult decision to self-deport to Mexico, with her husband by her side. In recent days, he also traveled to Brooklyn to surprise a young student named Camila who wants to follow in Ramos' professional footsteps. 'I knew that after television I needed to reinvent myself,' Ramos said. 'At 67, I'm not ready to retire. I see the numbers — millions of people viewing what I'm doing online — and the immediate communication I have with the audience that I didn't have before.' Still, he admits the shift comes with challenges. 'I'm still figuring out how to monetize a news operation like the one I'm in,' he added. But for Ramos, the motivation is about more than business. 'I believe that journalists never retire. And I still have a battle to fight.' At the center of that battle is the animating force — contrapoder, a Spanish word that literally means to be against power — that's characterized his work for pretty much the entirety of his career. 'I think that as journalists, we have two main responsibilities: The first one is to report reality as it is, not as we wish it would be. And the second one, which is the most important social responsibility that we have, is to question and to challenge those who are in power. I think if we applied this to every situation – Democrats or Republicans, tyrants or not — and if you as a journalist always try to position yourself as contrapoder, in other words on the other side of power, you will be fine.' This philosophy also places Ramos squarely inside a broader debate about objectivity. For much of the 20th century, American journalism upheld what the Columbia Journalism Review recently described as a belief that 'detached fact-finding' is the highest standard worth pursuing. But critics like NYU's Jay Rosen argue that this approach has granted journalists 'unearned authority' and discouraged them from owning perspectives for which there is no alternative viewpoint. Ramos agrees. For him, neutrality in the face of things like racism, human rights violations, or corruption is actually closer to complicity. In fact, it was watching American journalists freely criticize President Ronald Reagan that convinced him to stay in his adopted country. 'I love this country,' Ramos said of the U.S.. 'This country gave me opportunities my country of origin couldn't. But I've never seen so much fear out there as I see now. However, I think this too shall pass. The essence of the United States — freedom, diversity, opportunity — will prevail. But we have to fight for it. Like never before.'
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Texas Lawmaker Files Recreational Cannabis Legalization Bill
A Texas lawmaker has introduced a bill to legalize marijuana as the legislature reconvenes for a ... More special legislative session called by Gov. Greg Abbott. A Texas lawmaker last week introduced legislation to legalize recreational cannabis for adults. The measure, HB 195, was filed in the Texas House of Representatives by Democratic Rep. Jessica González on July 24. González filed the new bill as the Texas legislature met in a special session called by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. The governor called for the special session last month to renew deliberations on several issues from this year's regular legislative session, including the regulation of hemp products marketed for human consumption. HB 195 Legalizes Weed For Adults If passed by the legislature and signed into law, HB 195 would legalize recreational marijuana in Texas for adults aged 21 and older, online cannabis news source Marijuana Moment reported on Thursday. The measure would allow adults to possess up to 2.5 ounces of cannabis, including up to 15 grams of marijuana concentrates. Adults would also be permitted to share the same quantities of cannabis, provided such exchanges are not advertised, promoted or paid for. Adults would be permitted to keep up to 10 ounces of cannabis at home, although amounts over 2.5 ounces would have to be kept in a locked or secured area. The measure does not legalize home cannabis cultivation, however. Legislation Authorizes Regulated Sales Of Recreational Marijuana The legislation also legalizes commercial production and sales of recreational cannabis, which would be regulated by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (DLR). The agency would be tasked with issuing licenses for cannabis growers, transporters, testing facilities, processors and retailers, beginning no later than November 1, 2026. The Texas Commission of Licensing and Regulation, which oversees the DLR, would be responsible for drafting regulations to govern the cannabis industry. The bill mandates the adoption of regulations covering several issues, including requirements for child-resistant packaging. Marijuana product packaging would also be required to be labeled as cannabis and would be barred from resembling the packaging of commercial candy products. The commission would also be required to develop regulations for a track-and-trace system to monitor cannabis products as they travel through the supply chain. The legislation also mandates rules covering the security of cannabis facilities, restricting dangerous pesticides, and the advertising and display of cannabis products. HB 195 also mandates the distribution of taxes and fees collected from the legal cannabis industry. The DLR would receive 10% of revenue to oversee and administer the state's legal cannabis program. Another 10% would go to the Texas Department of Safety to oversee cannabis laboratory testing, while 20% would go to municipalities and counties with at least one licensed cannabis business. The remainder of revenue collected would be earmarked for the Texas Education Agency's Foundation School Program. The Texas State Capitol in Austin. Bill Gives Local Governments Some Control Over Cannabis Businesses Cannabis businesses would only be permitted in jurisdictions where the local government has authorized commercial cannabis activity. Local governments would also be allowed to set rules governing the number, operating hours and location of cannabis businesses in their jurisdiction. The legislation allows property owners to ban cannabis smoking on the premises. However, bans on other forms of cannabis consumption, cannabis possession or marijuana paraphernalia are not permitted. The bill does not legalize consuming cannabis in a motor vehicle, watercraft or aircraft. Consuming cannabis in a public place would also remain illegal except in areas authorized by local governments. Texas Cannabis Activists Laud New Legalization Bill Heather Fazio, director of the Texas Cannabis Policy Center, applauded the introduction of HB 195. 'As we continue the conversation about hemp regulation, we appreciate Rep. Gonzalez's bill to simply legalize and regulate cannabis across the board,' Fazio told Marijuana Moment. 'Her bill cuts to the chase: cannabis should be legal for adult use. Not more arrests. No more criminal records. And no more confusing policies. Just safe, legal cannabis in Texas.' HB 195 is awaiting assignment to a legislative committee in the Texas House of Representatives. If the measure is passed and signed into law, Texas will join the 24 states that have legalized recreational marijuana. Last month, lawmakers significantly expanded the state's medical cannabis program, making the Lone Star State the 40th state to adopt comprehensive medical marijuana legalization.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment
President Donald Trump over the weekend called for the prosecution of music superstar Beyoncé – based on something that did not actually happen. Trump claimed in a social media post that Beyoncé broke the law by supposedly getting paid $11 million for her endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris during an October 2024 event in Houston. But there is simply no basis for Trump's claim that Beyoncé received an $11 million payment related to the Harris campaign, let alone for the endorsement in particular. Federal campaign spending records show a $165,000 payment from the Harris campaign to Beyoncé's production company, which the campaign listed as a 'campaign event production' expense. A Harris campaign spokesperson told Deadline last year that they didn't pay celebrity endorsers, but were required by law to cover the costs connected to their appearances. Regardless of the merits of this particular $165,000 expenditure, it's far from an $11 million one. Nobody has ever produced any evidence for the claim of an eight-figure endorsement payment to Beyoncé since the claim that it was '$10 million' began spreading last year among Trump supporters on social media. Fact-check websites and PolitiFact looked into the '$10 million' claim during the campaign and did not find any basis for it. The White House did not immediately respond to a CNN request late Saturday for any evidence of Trump's $11 million figure. When Trump previously invoked the baseless figure, during an interview in February, he described his source in the vaguest of terms: 'Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million.' A Harris spokesperson referred CNN on Saturday to a November social media post by Beyoncé's mother Tina Knowles, who called the claim of a $10 million payment a 'lie' and noted it was taken down by Instagram as 'False Information.' 'When In Fact: Beyonce did not receive a penny for speaking at a Presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harrris's (sic) Rally in Houston,' Knowles wrote. A spokesperson for Beyoncé told PolitiFact in November that the claim about a $10 million payment is 'beyond ridiculous.' What Trump wrote Sunday Trump revived the false claim in a social media post published after midnight early Sunday morning in Scotland, where he is visiting. He wrote that he is looking at 'the fact' that Democrats 'admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT.' Democratic officials actually reject the claim of an $11 million payment. The White House did not immediately respond to CNN's request for any evidence of a Democratic admission of such a payment. Trump went on to criticize other payments from the Harris campaign to organizations connected to prominent endorsers. He asserted without evidence that these payments were inaccurately described in spending records. And he wrongly asserted that it is 'TOTALLY ILLEGAL' to pay for political endorsements, though no federal law forbids endorsement payments. Trump concluded: 'Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Trump has repeatedly called for the prosecution of political opponents. His Saturday post about Harris and celebrity endorsements was an escalation from a post in May, when he said he would call for a 'major investigation' on the subject but did not explicitly mention prosecutions.
