School Choice Under Attack: Illinois' Dangerous Homeschool Law
Schoolchildren
The freedom to choose how our children are educated is under assault in Illinois. This frontal attack on home schooling should alarm every parent who values educational options beyond the failing government-run system.
Despite Illinois spending more per student than almost any other state, the educational outcomes are dismal. In Chicago, the majority of students cannot read at grade level. Yet instead of embracing innovation and choice, Illinois politicians are doubling down on protecting the failed status quo.
The tactics are revealing. In 2023, Governor J.B. Pritzker, following teachers union directives, refused to renew the modest Invest in Kids program that offered several thousand low-income children an escape route from underperforming schools. Now, the legislature is advancing the deceptively named "Homeschool Act" - legislation designed to suffocate home education through bureaucratic strangulation.
This law would force homeschool parents to submit annual "Homeschool Declaration Forms" that effectively enroll their children in the nearest public school - despite not attending. Parents would be required to provide children's names, birthdates, grade levels and home addresses. Failure to comply could result in 30 days imprisonment. Additionally, parents must submit an "education portfolio" with writing samples, workbooks and other materials to prove they're following the state's School Code, along with assessments of each child's progress.
The irony is staggering. The same bureaucracy presiding over Illinois' educational collapse now wants to "oversee" homeschooling, despite abundant research showing homeschooled students excel academically. Parents choose home education precisely to provide quality instruction in an environment aligned with their values - something increasingly absent in government schools.
What's happening in Illinois exemplifies modern socialism's playbook. Today's Marxists don't seize businesses outright; they control them through suffocating regulations. In education, where government already holds a near-monopoly, they fight vigorously against parental attempts to find alternatives that better serve their children's needs.
Meanwhile, American students continue falling behind their international peers in reading and math. This educational failure is precisely why school choice has gained impressive momentum nationwide.
The pandemic gave parents unprecedented visibility into classroom instruction - or lack thereof - and revealed how teachers unions prioritized their interests over students' education. As a result, 20 states have enacted programs giving parents control over educational funding, with more joining the movement.
Homeschooling has likewise surged, growing dramatically during the pandemic, receding slightly as schools reopened, but now expanding again as parents seek better alternatives.
Illinois stands as a warning of the battles ahead. The educational establishment will not surrender its power without a fight. For parents who value their right to direct their children's education, vigilance is essential. The freedom to choose may depend on it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Has Long Floated Using Force Against His Own People — Now He Has the Pretext to Do So
'You just [expletive] shot the reporter!' Australian journalist Lauren Tomasi was in the middle of a live cross, covering the protests against the Trump administration's mass deportation policy in Los Angeles, California. As Tomasi spoke to the camera, microphone in hand, an LAPD officer in the background appeared to target her directly, hitting her in the leg with a rubber bullet. Earlier, reports emerged that British photojournalist Nick Stern was undergoing emergency surgery after also being hit by the same 'non-lethal' ammunition. The situation in Los Angeles is extremely volatile. After nonviolent protests against raids and arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents began in the suburb of Paramount, President Donald Trump issued a memo describing them as 'a form of rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States'. He then deployed the National Guard. As much of the coverage has noted, this is not the first time the National Guard has been deployed to quell protests in the U.S. In 1970, members of the National Guard shot and killed four students protesting the war in Vietnam at Kent State University. In 1992, the National Guard was deployed during protests in Los Angeles following the acquittal of four police officers (three of whom were white) in the severe beating of a Black man, Rodney King. Trump has long speculated about violently deploying the National Guard and even the military against his own people. During his first administration, at the height of the Black Lives Matter protests, former Secretary of Defence Mark Esper alleged that Trump asked him, 'Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' Trump has also long sought to other those opposed to his radical agenda to reshape the United States and its role in the world. He's classified them as 'un-American' and, therefore, deserving of contempt and, when he deems it necessary, violent oppression. During last year's election campaign, he promised to 'root out the communists, Marxists, fascists and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country'. Even the Washington Post characterised this description of Trump's 'political enemies' as 'echoing Hitler, Mussolini'. In addition, Trump has long peddled baseless conspiracies about 'sanctuary cities', such as Los Angeles. He has characterised them as lawless havens for his political enemies and places that have been 'invaded' by immigrants. As anyone who has ever visited these places knows, that is not true. It is no surprise that in the same places Trump characterises as 'disgracing our country', there has been staunch opposition to his agenda and ideology. That opposition has coalesced in recent weeks around the activities of ICE agents, in particular. These agents, wearing masks to conceal their identities, have been arbitrarily detaining people, including US citizens and children, and disappearing people off the streets. They have also arrested caregivers, leaving children alone. As Adam Serwer wrote in The Atlantic during the first iteration of Trump in America, 'the cruelty is the point'. The Trump administration's mass deportation program is deliberately cruel and provocative. It was always only a matter of time before protests broke out. In a democracy, nonviolent protest by hundreds or perhaps a few thousand people in a city of ten million is not a crisis. But it has always suited Trump and the movement that supports him to manufacture crises. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, a key architect of the mass deportations program and a man described by a former adviser as 'Waffen SS', called the protests 'an insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States'. Trump himself also described protesters as 'violent, insurrectionist mobs'. Nowhere does the presidential memo deploying the National Guard name the specific location of the protests. This, and the extreme language coming out of the administration, suggests it is laying the groundwork for further escalation. The administration could be leaving space to deploy the National Guard in other places and invoke the Insurrection Act. Incidents involving the deployment of the National Guard are rare, though politically cataclysmic. It is rarer still for the National Guard to be deployed against the wishes of a democratically elected leader of a state, as Trump has done in California. This deployment comes at a time of crisis for U.S. democracy more broadly. Trump's longstanding attacks against independent media — what he describes as 'fake news' — are escalating. There is a reason that during the current protests, a law enforcement officer appeared so comfortable targeting a journalist, on camera. The Trump administration is also actively targeting independent institutions such as Harvard and Columbia universities. It is also targeting and undermining judges and reducing the power of independent courts to enforce the rule of law. Under Trump, the federal government and its state-based allies are targeting and undermining the rights of minority groups — policing the bodies of trans people, targeting reproductive rights, and beginning the process of undoing the Civil Rights Act. Trump is, for the moment, unconstrained. Asked overnight what the bar is for deploying the Marines against protesters, Trump responded: 'The bar is what I think it is'. As New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie recently observed: 'We should treat Trump and his openly authoritarian administration as a failure, not just of our party system or our legal system, but of our Constitution and its ability to meaningfully constrain a destructive and system-threatening force in our political life.' While the situation in Los Angeles is unpredictable, it must be understood in the broader context of the active, violent threat the Trump administration poses to the U.S. As we watch, American democracy teeters on the brink. This article was updated on June 9, 2025 to correct information about Rodney King. Emma Shortis, Adjunct Senior Fellow, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The post Trump Has Long Floated Using Force Against His Own People — Now He Has the Pretext to Do So appeared first on Katie Couric Media.
USA Today
3 days ago
- USA Today
Well done, Illinois! State gives women's sports teams access to public funding
Well done, Illinois! State gives women's sports teams access to public funding Show Caption Hide Caption In baseball, women will soon have a league of their own For women passionate about the sport, the launch of the Women's Pro Baseball League next year is great news. After decades of making do with leftovers and scraps, women's sports teams now officially have a seat at the table in Illinois. The Illinois Sports Facilities Authority Act was amended last weekend to ensure women's teams are included in any conversations about public funding. The bill now goes to Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who intends to sign it. 'That codification is everything,' Karen Leetzow, president of the NWSL's Chicago Stars, which led the push for the change, told USA TODAY Sports. 'When you look at history, so many examples (of inequities) exist and, absent legislation, nothing changes. To have it codified and to bring attention to past inequities and make sure that those don't happen in the future, is huge.' The Stars aren't asking for money. Not yet, anyway. Neither are the WNBA's Chicago Sky. That's not the point. OPINION: New York Liberty value soars. Time for WNBA owners to invest or get out of the way No women's team has ever gotten public funding for a facility in Illinois. Or most other states, for that matter. The idea they'd dare even ask is met with incredulousness — and, let's be honest, a healthy dose of condescending misogyny — while no one is surprised when a men's team puts its hand out. By making this change, the Illinois legislature is sending a strong message that, in this state at least, women's teams are of equal value and worth to men's teams. That if the state has resources, the Stars and the Sky have as much right to them as the Chicago Bears, Chicago White Sox and any other team. Now, before the Neanderthals start howling that women's teams don't make money or that men's teams should get preference because they do, let's remember that men's professional sports have at least a half-century head start on women's teams. And for much of that existence, they've been bolstered by public support. That means the public built or helped build the stadiums and arenas in which they play and the infrastructure that made them accessible to fans. The same stadiums and arenas that are a significant source of their wealth. Take the White Sox. While they technically are tenants at Rate Field, they own the stadium for all intents and purposes. They reportedly pay less than $2 million a year in rent for a ballpark built with public funds and, in return, get to keep the revenue from ticket sales, concessions, parking and merchandise. The team also gets the bulk of the profits from the naming rights deal. The White Sox signage is permanent. So, too, the spaces used by the players. Oh, the White Sox also get to set the calendar at Rate Field. If there's a concert or some other non-baseball event at the ballpark, it has to work with the White Sox's schedule and wishes. WOMEN'S PRO SOFTBALL IN ILLINOIS: Schedule, how to watch 2025 AUSL games The Stars, meanwhile, are basically house guests at SeatGeek Stadium in suburban Bridgeview — as they were not so subtly reminded last summer. After the season had begun, the Stars learned that village officials planned to stage Riot Fest, a three-day punk, rock and alternative music festival, on the stadium grounds the same weekend the Stars had a home game. Nothing says professional like the sweet, sweet sounds of St. Vincent and Beck drowning out the P.A.! Riot Fest wound up being moved, but that's immaterial. The Stars have no control over their facility, financially or otherwise, which makes it hard — not impossible, but really, really hard — to build valuation. OPINION: Homes of their own critical for continued growth of women's sports. Stadiums equal revenue Still not convinced? According to Forbes, the Kansas City Current's $36 million in revenue last season was the most in the NWSL, more than $10 million more than the third-place San Diego Wave and triple that of eight clubs. Why such a gap? Because the Current last year opened the first purpose-built stadium for a women's team and is now reaping the benefits. This year, in fact, Forbes estimates the Current will generate $45 million in revenue. 'As women's sports grow, we ought to have facilities of our own that we can monetize so hopefully we can grow,' Leetzow said. 'Without those resources, we are literally being starved. That is not going to help us move forward.' The Stars have already said they are planning to leave the geographically undesirable SeatGeek Stadium when their lease expires at the end of this season. The team prefers to train and play in the city, and is exploring its options. This doesn't mean the Stars will ask the state for money. But for the first time in their existence, it's an option. And that is another sign of progress, to have access to what men's teams have always had. Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: A new chance for school choice in Illinois
Illinois once boasted a program that allowed low-income students to obtain scholarships for private school. It was a lifeline for many families whose kids were flailing in large public schools, who were experiencing painful bullying and needed a new environment, or who just didn't find a good fit in their neighborhood school. Then, state lawmakers, at the urging of teachers unions, let the program expire at the end of 2023, leaving thousands of kids out of options. Without this program, called Invest in Kids, there was simply no money for their families to be able to cover tuition. This editorial board long supported the program, which was supported by private donations in exchange for a 75% income tax credit. Kids whose family incomes were below 300% of the federal poverty level were eligible. In the 2022-23 school year, more than one-quarter of scholarship recipients came from families earning less than the federal poverty level — $26,500 for a family of four. Nearly two-thirds had household incomes below 185% of the poverty line, or $49,025 for a family of four. More than half of the low-income students who received scholarships through Empower Illinois are Black or Hispanic. Now, these kids and their families have reason to hope. Republicans in Congress have introduced the Educational Choice for Children Act, a federal program that would provide tax-credit scholarships for K-12 students nationwide. Like Invest in Kids, this initiative would offer families a lifeline if their public school isn't meeting their child's needs. The ECCA continues to move forward after being included in the budget reconciliation bill approved by the U.S. House on May 22, but must still clear the Senate. This federal initiative proposes up to $5 billion annually in tax credits for donations to scholarship-granting organizations, aiming to restore educational opportunities for disadvantaged students in Illinois and nationwide. Opponents of school choice believe that education is a zero-sum game, and that private schools are a threat to the public system. We believe the opposite — that a thriving private and charter system and a strong traditional public system create an education ecosystem that can serve everyone's needs. There are things private schools can do that public ones can't, and the same is very much true in reverse. School choice remains popular in Illinois, with a clear majority of residents supporting the concept. More importantly, choice introduces accountability into a system that, for decades, has faced little real competition. When parents have options, schools must respond — whether by improving curriculum, addressing student behavior issues more effectively, or offering stronger support for struggling learners. Right now, parents with money can tap into alternatives. Poor ones mostly cannot. We view this as fundamentally unfair, and support a world where everyone has access to transformational education options. Illinois is fortunate to have many outstanding public schools, from suburban standouts like New Trier to top-tier magnets like Walter Payton College Prep. We also recognize the value of private schools that serve distinct communities — including faith-based, independent and neighborhood-based institutions. All play unique roles in our education ecosystem. Sadly, after Invest in Kids expired, a number of private schools also folded, including St. Odilo School in Berwyn, a pre-K to eighth grade Catholic school. Springfield has moved on from the thousands of low-income students it left behind a year and a half ago. Now, the ECCA is their best shot. We hope that the Senate passes a version of the reconciliation bill that includes this program. Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@
