logo
2 owners of luxury homes in Hong Kong fined HK$110,000 over illegal structures

2 owners of luxury homes in Hong Kong fined HK$110,000 over illegal structures

Two owners of luxury homes at Redhill Peninsula have been fined more than HK$110,000 (US$14,015) in total after admitting to carrying out unauthorised building works, the first convictions among 30 prosecutions taken against the landlords of the estate on Hong Kong Island where rampant illegal structures were found.
Advertisement
A spokesman for the Buildings Department said on Friday evening the two owners pleaded guilty at Eastern Court to carrying out unauthorised building works on Thursday. They were convicted, with one fined HK$30,000 and the other HK$82,980
The maximum penalty for commencing or carrying out building works without first obtaining approval and consent from the department is a fine of HK$400,000 and two years' imprisonment, plus a further fine of HK$20,000 for each day that the illegal structure continues standing.
The department revealed the two cases were the first convictions out of 30 prosecutions of owners at the estate in Tai Tam.
The spokesman said the owners of the two detached houses concerned were found to have conducted building works without prior approval or consent from the department during a large-scale inspection in September 2023.
Landslides triggered by a record-breaking downpour earlier that year had drawn attention to extensive illegal additions at the seaside community, ranging from swimming pools to basement on public slopes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pouring over the facts: what is behind Hong Kong's water procurement scandal?
Pouring over the facts: what is behind Hong Kong's water procurement scandal?

South China Morning Post

time6 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Pouring over the facts: what is behind Hong Kong's water procurement scandal?

Hong Kong police have arrested a married couple suspected of being at the centre of a rapidly unfolding controversy surrounding a HK$52.9 million (US$6.8 million) contract to supply drinking water to some government offices. The pair allegedly defrauded the government and are suspected of breaching the Trade Descriptions Ordinance by providing false information about the product manufacturer. The unprecedented fiasco over the contract, which was among the first of its kind awarded to a mainland Chinese company in June, has raised questions about the government's tendering process and how due diligence is conducted. With a criminal investigation and official probe under way, the Post breaks down the nature of the scandal and the questions that remain unanswered. What is the company behind the winning bid? The company at the centre of the controversy is Xin Ding Xin Trade Co Ltd. Founded in 2007 in Hong Kong, Xin Ding Xin is led by director Lui Tsz-chung, who lives in Sai Wan Ho, with shareholder Chan Pik-lam sharing the same residential address. A search in the Companies Registry shows the firm was originally incorporated as Wellco Investment (Group) Limited before adopting its current name in 2009.

Hong Kong's Jimmy Lai was set on using US links for anti-China actions, court hears
Hong Kong's Jimmy Lai was set on using US links for anti-China actions, court hears

South China Morning Post

time7 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Hong Kong's Jimmy Lai was set on using US links for anti-China actions, court hears

Hong Kong prosecutors have hit out at former media owner Jimmy Lai Chee-ying for likening his appeals for foreign intervention to a transnational partnership among law enforcement authorities, while arguing his 'persistent' collaborations with US political figures showed his determination to instigate anti-China measures. The prosecution on Monday began wrapping up its evidence against the Apple Daily founder at the closing stage of his marathon national security trial at West Kowloon Court after two enforced adjournments. Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions Anthony Chau Tin-hang dismissed the defence's contention that Lai was merely exercising his fundamental rights protected by the city's constitutional documents, including the Basic Law. He referred to a passage of the prosecution's court filing that said it was 'surprising to see that [Lai] raised freedoms of thought and association as his shield'. Chau also highlighted a point made in the defence's written submission that sought to compare what Lai did at the material time with the cooperation between the Department of Justice and the International Association of Prosecutors. 'We submit it is inconceivable they sought to draw this analogy. It is totally incomprehensible and we find it absurd to make this example,' Chau said.

Hong Kong police arrest couple for fraud in HK$52.9 million water procurement scandal
Hong Kong police arrest couple for fraud in HK$52.9 million water procurement scandal

South China Morning Post

time10 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Hong Kong police arrest couple for fraud in HK$52.9 million water procurement scandal

Hong Kong police have arrested a married couple suspected of defrauding the government in connection with a HK$52.9 million (US$6.8 million) contract to supply drinking water to civil service offices. Advertisement Kung Hing-fun, the senior superintendent of the Commercial Crime Bureau of Police, said on Monday that the man, 61, and woman, 57, were arrested the previous day. Kung added that the married couple were the owners of a company that had secured a 36-month water deal, and that a mainland Chinese man was still at large. The Post has learned the company in question is called Xin Ding Xin Co. Ltd. She also said that the deal stipulated supplying bottled water to certain government offices, but the product was sourced from a third-party supplier in Dongguan rather than a Guangzhou-based company as specified in the contract. The company mentioned in the contract was named Robust, the Post learned. Wong Chun-yue, the bureau's chief superintendent, said the Guangzhou firm learned from the news that it was selected as the contract supplier, adding that the company which won the contract only asked once about water quality and had no further communication. Advertisement 'We believe the suspects used the Guangzhou company's water quality documents to meet tender requirements,' Wong said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store