Trump re-election puts U.S. anger center stage. Let's find a better way to cope.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Healthcare insurance is broken. How do we fix it?
The brazen murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in broad daylight in midtown Manhattan last year has open the floodgates to an outpouring of anger and frustration with the health insurance industry.
In 2003, just a few years after the Columbine shooting. My then-boyfriend and I were wearing tactical black and combat boots, our daily 'angry kid' uniform. A checkout lady at the Fernandina Beach Publix made a dismissive comment about it.
Standing under the swaying live oaks, I watched the red rage splotches creep up his neck. I realized that he chose tactical black every day to provoke someone. That day, it worked; here he was, fuming.
He was legitimately angry for years of bullying by our classmates, teachers and school administrators. But choosing anger limited him, too. He could hate and he could fight, but then he could never build anything new there.
Donald Trump resumed the presidency a few weeks ago. Whether I look at his supporters or detractors, I am reminded of watching someone I loved being consumed by weaponizing anger.
Polarization — visceral dislike of the other party — is a lot like a tactical black uniform. We can hate the other side and we can fight them, but we have a hard time building anything new with our neighbors.
Many Americans are legitimately angry that liberal politicians abandoned the working class for an elitist globalization strategy that gutted American manufacturing. Most Americans think their kids will be poorer than they are. Economic despair drives an opioid crisis that is swallowing whole towns.
Many folks affected by those crises voted for Donald Trump in 2016 and 2024. I attended the 2017 inauguration. There were a lot of men in tactical black.
I've worked with liberal organizers fighting for basic fairness and a lot of them are consumed by legitimate anger, too. They may be heirs to the traumas of slavery or Indigenous boarding schools, or hold personal pain of discrimination. Even those wearing rainbow flags and unicorn pins come equipped for battle.
I was also bullied in Fernandina, for being openly atheist in a Bible Belt town. However, as it dawned on me that my boyfriend was choosing anger, I realized I was, too. I could choose something different.
Since then, I've spent my adult life working with religious communities to make sure people of all faiths (and no faith) support one another's rights to thrive. No one should be bullied, attacked or harmed for their religious beliefs — not even my neighbors who once hurt me.
I'm proud of our American ideals of equality and freedom. Our democracy is battered, though, and I am downright angry about a lot of what's happening in the country now. I'd like to build something new with my neighbors and with others.
The most effective way to do that is not by deepening political trenches; it's collaborating with all kinds of neighbors on issues that matter to us. Rachel Kleinfeld of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace advises that one strategy to rebuild a battered democracy is to 'Build a broad-based, multi-stranded, prodemocracy movement around a positive vision concretized in locally rooted action.'
What does that look like? A great first step is to meet people different from yourself — Interfaith America has online programs, while Braver Angels and +More Perfect Union work directly in Jacksonville. Try attending (or organizing) a 'citizens assembly,' where people participate in policy development.
Letters: Is a prominent vaccine denier the best pick to lead Health & Human Services?
Better Together America sponsors nonpartisan 'civic hubs' that help communities collaborate to solve big problems and hold elected officials accountable.
Research shows that diverse input makes better policy. Policy must account for human differences of all types if it is going to be both good and long-lasting. When we participate more directly in governance at any level, we build trust in the democratic system. When we work together toward common goals with people different from ourselves, we hate each other less.
As Trump begins his second term, Americans' anger at each other is front and center. Let's put that legitimate anger to better use.
Allison K. Ralph, Ph.D., is an expert in U.S. religious and ideological pluralism. A native of Fernandina Beach, she graduated from Douglas Anderson School of the Arts.
This guest column is the opinion of the author and does not necessarily represent the views of the Times-Union. We welcome a diversity of opinions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US, China to launch new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting
By David Lawder STOCKHOLM (Reuters) -Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials will resume talks in Stockholm on Monday to try to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies, aiming to extend a truce by three months and keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from U.S. duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. The Stockholm talks come hot on the heels of Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15% tariff on most EU goods exports to the U.S., including autos. The bloc will also buy $750 billion worth of American energy and make $600 billion worth of U.S. investments in coming years. No similar breakthrough is expected in the U.S.-China talks but trade analysts said that another 90-day extension of a tariff and export control truce struck in mid-May was likely. An extension of that length would prevent further escalation and facilitate planning for a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October or early November. A U.S. Treasury spokesperson declined comment on a South China Morning Post report quoting unnamed sources as saying the two sides would refrain from introducing new tariffs or other steps that could escalate the trade war for another 90 days. Trump's administration is poised to impose new sectoral tariffs that will impact China within weeks, including on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, ship-to-shore cranes and other products. "We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes," Trump told reporters on Sunday before European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen struck their tariff deal. DEEPER ISSUES Previous U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia's H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include U.S. complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that U.S. national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. "Geneva and London were really just about trying to get the relationship back on track so that they could, at some point, actually negotiate about the issues which animate the disagreement between the countries in the first place," said Scott Kennedy, a China economics expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "I'd be surprised if there is an early harvest on some of these things but an extension of the ceasefire for another 90 days seems to be the most likely outcome," Kennedy said. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has already flagged a deadline extension and has said he wants China to rebalance its economy away from exports to more domestic consumption -- a decades-long goal for U.S. policymakers. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex than those with other Asian countries and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on U.S. industries. TRUMP-XI MEETING? In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October. Trump has said he will decide soon on a landmark trip to China, and a new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail planning. Sun Chenghao, a fellow at Tsinghua University's Center for International Security and Strategy in Beijing, said that a Trump-Xi summit would be an opportunity for the U.S. to lower the 20% tariffs on Chinese goods related to fentanyl. In exchange, he said the Chinese side could make good on its 2020 pledge to increase purchases of U.S. farm products and other goods. "The future prospect of the heads of state summit is very beneficial to the negotiations because everyone wants to reach an agreement or pave the way in advance," Sun said. Still, China will likely request a reduction of multi-layered U.S. tariffs totaling 55% on most goods and further easing of U.S. high-tech export controls, analysts said. Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the U.S. trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024.


San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Hong Kong's CK Hutchison seeks Chinese investor to join Panama Ports deal
HONG KONG (AP) — A Hong Kong conglomerate that's selling ports at the Panama Canal said Monday it may seek a Chinese investor to join a consortium of buyers, a move that could please Beijing but bring more U.S. scrutiny to the geopolitically fraught deal. CK Hutchison Holdings' initial plan to sell port assets in dozens of countries to a group that includes U.S. investment firm BlackRock Inc. pleased President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the critical shipping lane's operations in Panama. However, they apparently angered Beijing and drew a review from Chinese anti-monopoly authorities. A Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997. After months of uncertainty brought by tensions between Washington and Beijing, Hutchison said in a statement that the exclusive negotiations period with the consortium has expired. However, it added 'the Group remains in discussions with members of the consortium with a view to inviting major strategic investor from the PRC to join as a significant member of the consortium,' referring to the People's Republic of China. It said they needed to change the membership of the consortium and the structure of the transaction for the deal to be able to pass reviews by 'all relevant authorities." The awkward position Hutchison found itself in for months highlights the challenges Hong Kong business elites face in navigating Beijing's expectations of national loyalty, especially when relations between China and the United States are strained. Hong Kong has overhauled its electoral system to ensure the city is run by 'patriots.' CK Hutchison is owned by the family of Hong Kong's richest man, Li Ka-shing. It announced March 4 that it would sell all its shares in Hutchison Port Holdings and in Hutchison Port Group Holdings to the consortium that also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, a subsidiary of the Mediterranean Shipping Company. In May, Hutchinson co-managing director, Dominic Lai told shareholders that Terminal Investment was the main investor. Its parent company is led by Italian shipping scion Diego Aponte, whose family reportedly has a longstanding relationship with Li's. The initial deal, valued at nearly $23 billion including $5 billion in debt, would have given the consortium control over 43 ports in 23 countries, including the ports of Balboa and Cristobal, located at either end of the canal. That agreement also required approval from Panama's government.


Fox News
12 minutes ago
- Fox News
'We are bullish about the future because America is back,' says Mike Johnson
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., touts the successes of the Trump administration so far this term on 'One Nation.'