logo
US judge whose son was murdered voices dismay as threats to jurists rise

US judge whose son was murdered voices dismay as threats to jurists rise

The Guardiana day ago
A judge whose son was murdered by a disgruntled lawyer posing as a pizza deliveryman voiced anguish that the crime has spawned a spate of copycat threats against other jurists.
Esther Salas, a US district judge for New Jersey, fought back tears on Thursday after being asked to respond to a trend of judges receiving home pizza deliveries with the name of her late son attached as a means of intimidation.
Salas's son, Daniel, then aged 20, was shot dead on his doorstep on 19 July 2020 by a man who had ostensibly been delivering a pizza to his family's home. Her husband, Mark, survived critical injuries after being shot multiple times in the attack.
The suspect, Den Hollander, an attorney who was subsequently found dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, had earlier appeared in Salas's court in a case which he lost.
'I'm probably a little more emotional today than ever, because we're in July,' she told a webinar, titled Speak Up for Justice, discussing the rising tide of violent threats against judges. 'July is a hard month because Daniel would have been 25 on July 13, and we celebrated his murder – not celebrated, had to endure the anniversary of his murder, his fifth anniversary, on July 19.'
'Then to hear that my beautiful son's name, everything that Danny stands for is love and light – and to hear people using it as a weapon, weaponizing his name to inflict fear,' she added.
Thursday's forum was held to address an intensifying atmosphere of menace and intimidation that judges describe facing since Donald Trump returned to the White House in January. It included judges who had been threatened directly after ruling against some of Trump's most contentious policies and executive orders. Several participants called the current hostile environment 'unprecedented'.
Salas was speaking after two fellow judges, John McConnell, a US district judge from Rhode Island, and Robert Lasnik, who sits on the western district of Washington, said they had both received pizzas in Daniel's name.
McConnell described receiving a threatening voice message calling for his assassination after arousing anger among Donald Trump's supporters with a ruling that blocked the president's attempt to freeze funding to states. The expletive-laden recording was played to the webinar.
McConnell's ruling led to articles being lodged in Congress calling for his impeachment. A wanted poster with his face and name on it was placed inside the US Capitol, apparently by a member of Congress.
McConnell said his court had received about 400 or 500 'vile phone' calls following the ruling – which triggered a formal complaint by America First Legal, an advocacy group founded by Trump's deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller as well as six credible death threats.
He was initially puzzled by the unexplained pizza deliveries until the US marshalls, which protect members of the federal judiciary, explained it, prompting him to call Salas.
'They wanted to let us know that they knew where we lived,' McConnell said. 'The most devastating, the most heartbreaking call I've ever had to make was when the marshals called me and told me that a pizza had been delivered in … Daniel's name. I didn't want to make that call. But I called my friend Esther because I thought she needed to know what was going on and we had a good cry over it.'
He added: 'Someone was on the dark web, searching for my home address, because - this a quote, 'He wanted Smith and Wesson to pay me a visit at my home.''
Lasnik said pizzas had been delivered to his home in Seattle while two of his adult children, who lives in different cities, had also received deliveries – all in Salas's son's name – after he went on national media to criticize the climate of intimidation aimed at judges.
'What's the message to Judge Lasnik? We know where you live. We know where your children live and they could end up dead just like Judge Salas's son. That's a pretty cruel thing to do.'
Pizzas had been sent to 'upwards of 50' judges, he told the forum.
Referring to the threats against judges generally, he said: 'They would make a ruling, they would be bombarded with hate mail and hate emails and threats. And it's so discouraging to a young judge to suddenly not only worry about, how do I do this job, right, but how do I keep my family safe?'
John Coughenour, also a judge from Washington and who issued a preliminary injunction against Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship, described how local sheriff's officers arrived at his home with weapons drawn following a 'swatting' call falsely stating he had murdered his wife.
John Roberts, the chief justice of the US supreme court has twice spoken out against threats against judges in recent months, warning that it is undermining the rule of law. He warned against the trend in his end of year report in 2024, and reiterated it at a forum in North Carolina last month, voicing fears that it could lead to violence.
While there have been past criticisms of Democratic rhetoric against rulings – notably against Chuck Schumer, the party's leader in the Senate – Trump and his supporters have raised the ante since his inauguration in January. Judges have been repeatedly assailed as 'radical', 'Marxists', or faced calls for their impeachment over rulings that stymied administration policies.
Salas said the current climate went beyond previous threat levels.
'We've seen it come from both sides, but now it's at a level that I have to honestly say … is different,' she said. 'We're seeing things coming out from the top down, from White House spokespeople calling us crazy leftist, unconstitutional judges. That's the difference. We are nonpartisan, but we have to speak the facts.
'And the facts are that we have political leaders with large social platforms, with power calling us deranged and idiots. It's wrong whoever does it, whatever side you sit on.'
Additional reporting by Sam Levine
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk's latest venture blasted as 'vanity project for the wealthy'
Musk's latest venture blasted as 'vanity project for the wealthy'

Daily Mail​

time2 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Musk's latest venture blasted as 'vanity project for the wealthy'

By Nashville is getting a makeover all thanks to business mogul Elon Musk. Musk's Boring Company, has plans to build a massive underground tunnel in Tennessee and it seems he has the support of many major Tennessee lawmakers on a federal level, but not so much from local leaders. What one representative called a 'vanity project for the wealthy' has been dubbed the 'Music City Loop'. It will span 10 miles from city center to the airport on Nashville's south east corridor, its entrance just steps from the airport. The privately funded project will supposedly shuttle Tennesseans between downtown and the airport in only eight minutes. The company plans to use electric vehicles to connect city hotspots, similar to an already operating Boring system in Las Vegas . Musk and Boring Company seemed to have the full support of Republican lawmakers, who demonstrated their support at a press conference about the project on July 28. Republican Tennessee Governor Bill Lee attended, and expressed his excitement for the endeavor. 'They could have taken their next underground loop anywhere, but they saw something unique about Tennessee,' he said. 'The best part of all of it is it's 100 percent privately funded. There will be no cost to Tennessee taxpayers.' But, John Ray Clemens, chair of the Tennessee House Democratic Caucus, called the privately funded endeavor 'fiscally irresponsible and legally suspect'. 'No responsible executive would give away unrestricted and unlimited underground property rights to an unhinged billionaire, who Donald Trump doesn't even trust anymore, and grant him and his company exclusive access rights beneath our city and a monopoly to profit in perpetuity.' The project has yet to receive approval from the Metro Nashville Council or the mayor's office, and Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell was notably absent from the event. In a brief statement about the project, he said: 'We are aware of the state's conversations with The Boring Company, and we have a number of operational questions to understand the potential impacts on Metro and Nashvillians.' Yet, United States Senator Marsha Blackburn seemed to think the impact would be overwhelmingly positive. She posted on X that the company 'couldn't have picked a better new home for their state-of-the-art tunneling technology than Nashville'. She wrote: 'I look forward to seeing the tremendous impact of this investment in our city!' State Representative Aftyn Behn called the tunnel a 'privatization of public infrastructure,' noting that it was designed to benefit a select few 'not the people who actually live and work here'. In his press release about the 'Music City Loop' Behn wrote, 'It's a vanity project for the wealthy, and once again, the Lee administration is rolling out the red carpet for billionaires while working families are stuck in traffic.' 'We rank at the bottom in livability, and yet instead of investing in roads, schools and transit that benefit everyday Tennesseans, they're floating billion-dollar boondoggles for the ultra-rich,' stated state Senator Heidi Campbell The decision seems to be just as divisive among citizens as it is among local lawmakers. Many took to social media following the press conference to chime in with their opinions. Reacting to coverage of the press conference on Reddit , one user posted: 'And the grift continues. This isn't a much needed or desirable project. 'This is a grift meant to line the pockets of the world's richest person. The goal was never providing a decent or even acceptable transit service.' Another commented: 'Could've had a great light rail system and instead get this utter nonsense.'

Chargers LB Denzel Perryman facing weapons charges
Chargers LB Denzel Perryman facing weapons charges

Reuters

time2 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Chargers LB Denzel Perryman facing weapons charges

August 2 - Chargers linebacker Denzel Perryman is facing felony weapons charges after a traffic stop in Los Angeles on Friday night. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department confirmed to The Athletic that Perryman remained in jail Saturday morning. Perryman, 32, is entering the second season of his second stint (also 2015-20) with the Chargers. The Chargers issued a statement that they are "aware of a matter involving Denzel and are gathering information." Perryman's agent, Ron Butler, also released a statement. "We are aware of the recent reports regarding Denzel Perryman's arrest in Los Angeles," the statement read. "At this time, we are still gathering facts and will fully cooperate with the process. Denzel is a respected veteran in the NFL and a dedicated father, teammate, and professional. While we do not take this situation lightly, we remain confident that the matter will be resolved fairly and in accordance with the law. Out of respect for the process and all parties involved, we will have no further comment at this time." Perryman registered 55 tackles and one sack in 11 starts for the Chargers in 2024, missing six games with a groin injury. A second-round draft pick by the then-San Diego Chargers in 2015, Perryman has posted 717 tackles, 7.5 sacks, five interceptions and three fumble recoveries in 119 games (99 starts) with the Chargers, Las Vegas Raiders (2021-22) and Houston Texans (2023). He made the Pro Bowl in 2021 with a career-high 154 tackles for the Raiders. Perryman signed a one-year, $2.655 million contract with the Chargers for the 2025 season and was projected to be a starter. According to public records, Perryman was arrested at 9:41 p.m. local time Friday night and booked at 10:06 p.m. He is due to appear at Inglewood Municipal Court on Tuesday, ESPN reported. --Field Level Media

Jack Smith under investigation by the Office of Special Counsel over Trump prosecutions
Jack Smith under investigation by the Office of Special Counsel over Trump prosecutions

The Independent

time4 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Jack Smith under investigation by the Office of Special Counsel over Trump prosecutions

Former special counsel Jack Smith, the federal prosecutor who led two federal investigations into President Donald Trump, is being investigated by the Office of Special Counsel. Smith, who has long been targeted by Trump and allies for what they believe is weaponization of the justice system, is being investigated by the office for allegedly violating the Hatch Act, a law that prohibits federal employees from engaging in political activity. The Office of Special Counsel confirmed the inquiry into Smith to The Independent. That comes after Senator Tom Cotton of Alabama, the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, requested that an investigation be opened into Smith on allegations that he intended to interfere with the 2024 presidential election by trying to speed up proceedings in Trump's election interference case. 'Jack Smith is a partisan Democrat who weaponized the law against President Trump to help Dems win,' Cotton wrote on X. 'I've asked the Office of Special Counsel to investigate his actions that likely violated the law to influence the election.' Smith is a registered independent voter. The Office of Special Counsel is an independent federal agency that safeguards the government's merit system by investigating allegations of wrongdoing and protects employees while whistleblowing. It is separate from the Justice Department office where Smith's special counsel status came from. The investigation into Smith is the latest move in the president's campaign of retribution against those whom he believes unfairly targeted him for political reasons. Trump has used his power as president to open investigations into people, revoke security clearances, and target businesses and institutions. In August 2023, Smith brought a four-count criminal indictment against Trump for his actions to overturn the 2020 election results in his favor. Smith had pushed for the trial to begin soon after the indictment was filed because the presidential election was coming up and Trump was running. Cotton claims that Smith's urgency is a sign that he was acting at the behest of Democrats to influence the election. No evidence has yet been brought forward to confirm Cotton's theory. Smith had investigated Trump for less than a year before bringing the indictment. He accused the president of pushing false claims of widespread voter fraud to try and convince the public that the election had been rigged in former president Joe Biden's favor, despite no evidence of mass voter fraud. Those claims incited Trump supporters who, at the direction of Trump, marched to the Capitol on January 6, 2021, to protest Congress's certification of election results. The mob turned angry and violent and physically stormed the Capitol that day, resulting in multiple deaths. The indictment claimed Trump and his allies engaged in a scheme to try and appoint fake electors in states with close races to certify the election in Trump's favor, even though he lost. Trump had denied all wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty to the charges, constantly railing against the indictments and Smith as corrupt and motivated by politics. Smith's case against Trump began seeing cracks after the Supreme Court ruled in the president's favor, awarding him vast immunity from criminal prosecutions in July 2024. Once Trump won the 2024 election in November, Smith moved to dismiss the case, saying there was a precedent not to prosecute a sitting president. shortly before Trump took office. The president had threatened to fire Smith as soon as he assumed power.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store