logo
‘Bonnie and Clyde' couple who planned brutal rape of young children jailed

‘Bonnie and Clyde' couple who planned brutal rape of young children jailed

Independent2 days ago
A couple who dubbed themselves Bonnie and Clyde have been jailed for planning and fantasising about the 'brutal' rape and sexual assault of young children under the age of 12.
Stuart Compton, 46, and his partner, Tracy Turner, 52, sent each other thousands of messages planning the depraved abuse of two girls and a boy over a two-year period.
Merthyr Crown Court heard their sick plan failed after an online dating app informed police of concerns about Compton, and the pair were arrested.
Sentencing the couple on Monday, Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke, the Recorder of Cardiff, handed Compton a life sentence, while Turner was given 12 years in jail, with a further two years on extended licence.
Compton must serve a minimum term of seven years in prison before he can apply to the parole board for release.
Addressing Compton, she said: 'Unless and until the parole board considers it safe to release you, you will remain in prison.'
At an earlier hearing, the couple, who referred to each other as Bonnie and Clyde in messages, both pleaded guilty to six counts of arranging sex attacks on children.
Compton also pleaded guilty to six counts of making indecent images, and Turner, who is a hospital operating assistant, admitted two counts of the same offence.
Bonnie and Clyde were outlaws who gained notoriety in the 1930s for a series of bank robberies in America.
The judge said messages showed they had discussed 'over and over again' their desires to rape children and their conversations 'made clear that this was not fantasy'.
The couple had planned to carry out the acts, with Ms Lloyd-Clarke saying they had 'carefully identified' a location for one of the rapes to take place.
'You were both sexually aroused by the idea of raping a child,' she said.
She added: 'You both deny your sexual interest in children, you both minimise your offending.'
The couple must also inform the police of any names or addresses they use and are barred from working with children and vulnerable groups.
Compton, from Cathays, and Turner, from Roath, both Cardiff, had denied a string of other offences, including conspiracy to murder, conspiracy to rape and conspiracy to kidnap, which were ordered to lie on the file.
Matthew Cobbe, prosecuting, told the court their conversations demonstrated a 'clear intent to arrange and commit sexual acts' with young children, although no child was ever abused.
'The first threads of messages suggested fantasy, they expressly talked about fantasy, but this developed into an obsession,' Mr Cobbe said.
'Their obsession drove them to discuss over and over the sexual acts that they intended to perform and the ways that they believed that they could achieve that goal.'
The prosecutor said they had been arranging the 'brutal rape' of one of the children and had planned to drug the child to aid the abuse.
'They recognised the abuse for what it was, they recognised that it was rape,' he said.
'It was not a realisation that it would amount to rape, instead they were clearly stimulated by the fact that it was rape.
'Compton would press her whether she wanted to be present, she would confirm that she did and go on to confirm that she wanted to be involved.
'Compton claimed that he would accept all responsibility for the acts.
'The exchanges lasted months, they began as a fantasy but they became an obsession and an intended goal.'
The court heard that messages recovered by the police took weeks to go through because there was so many, and showed Compton was interested in children 'aged one to six'.
Examination of Compton's device showed that he discussed his fantasies with others, and would develop his own character in these conversations, 'creating depraved sexual stories involving children'.
Referring to Turner, Mr Cobbe said: 'They exchange messages where they discuss the possibility of going to a festival or camping, so that they can be 'around' families with young children.
'Turner suggests a family festival, not too expensive.
'Compton thinks that is a 'great idea', commenting he'd like to go to a 'hippy one, where lots of drugs consumed leaving unattended girls, great f****** idea that's genius babe'.'
Some of the messages the couple sent each other were read out in court, with each of them describing what they wanted to do to the young children and each other.
In one message, Compton asked if she was serious about getting involved, and Turner responded: 'I'm not f****** about, babe.'
The mother of one of the young girls described in a victim impact statement how they had stopped trusting people after learning of Compton and Turner's crimes.
'The decisions we make as parents are now different and lead to paranoia,' she said.
'Some days it is very real and other days it is like a dream. We do not want this to define our family. We cannot undo this.'
The father of another girl described the defendants' crimes as 'incomprehensible'.
'I hope what they have done to me and my family stays with them for the rest of their lives,' he said.
His partner added: 'Finding out about their crimes turned our world upside down.
'I have always had an open and honest relationship with my daughter.
'I am furious that I have had to lie to my child to protect her from these offences.'
Kevin Seal, representing Compton, insisted his client had expressed remorse for his actions in a pre-sentence report.
Mr Seal said: 'It was clear to the author of the report that these were genuine comments from the defendant himself – 'I have let everybody down'.
'He wished to apologise to anyone who has been let down by his actions.'
A doctor diagnosed Compton with a compulsive sexualised behaviour disorder, which involves intense preoccupation with sexual fantasies and behaviours.
'It is not to be confused with sex addiction,' he said.
He said the disorder did not provide 'any form of defence' but wished the judge to understand what Compton suffered from.
He said the Compton had used a mixture of proscribed medication for his back and illegal drugs, including cocaine and cannabis, as well as alcohol.
Mr Seal said the defendant had recognised he had a problem and reached out for support for the drugs and there had been a 'marked de-escalation' of messages regarding children.
Nicola Powell, representing Turner, told the court she had ended the relationship with Compton as soon as she was arrested and had no contact with him since.
'She was a lady who, until these allegations were made and pleas entered, was without previous convictions,' she said.
'She had worked as a senior theatre assistant in the NHS for over 30 years without a blemish on her character.'
Miss Powell said Turner had a long-standing issue with depression and anxiety, which led her in later years to abuse alcohol and cocaine.
'She accepts that she had an extremely unhealthy relationship with him, she abused alcohol and he introduced her to cocaine,' she said.
'This was not the support she needed and quite simply, it led her to spiral downwards and out of emotional control.
'By the time of her arrest, she was taking cocaine every day. She thought she loved Mr Compton and he loved her.'
Miss Powell said that Turner told the author of a pre-sentence report: 'I am very sorry and ashamed. I'll never forgive myself for the rest of my life.'
The barrister added: 'I would ask you to accept that her remorse in this case is genuine.'
A spokeswoman for the Cardiff and Vale University Health Board said it would be inappropriate for them to comment on the case but confirmed that Turner was dismissed from her position in March 2025.
She insisted that the safety and wellbeing of patients is the Board's highest priority.
She added: 'We would like to take this opportunity to reassure patients that the criminal case is entirely unconnected with the individual's employment within Cardiff and Vale University Health Board.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Colorado dentist convicted of murder in the poisoning death of his wife
Colorado dentist convicted of murder in the poisoning death of his wife

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Colorado dentist convicted of murder in the poisoning death of his wife

A jury convicted a Colorado dentist of first-degree murder on Wednesday in the poisoning death of his wife. Prosecutors at trial had accused James Craig of repeatedly poisoning his wife Angela Craig, including by lacing her smoothies, over 10 days in March 2023. When those attempts failed, prosecutors said the dentist gave his wife a final dose of cyanide as she was hospitalized in suburban Denver with symptoms that puzzled doctors. She was declared brain dead soon after. James Craig didn't testify during the two-week trial, and his attorneys didn't present other witnesses. The defense suggested Angela Craig may have taken her own life and faulted police for focusing solely on James Craig as a suspect. Craig claimed that his wife sought his help in ending her life but prosecutors said he offered other conflicting explanations for her death to other people. Toxicology tests determined Angela Craig died of poisoning from cyanide and tetrahydrozoline, an ingredient found in over-the-counter eye drops, according to the coroner. ____ Slevin reported from Denver.

Man has conviction for Wilden murder quashed for second time
Man has conviction for Wilden murder quashed for second time

BBC News

time31 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Man has conviction for Wilden murder quashed for second time

A man who was twice found guilty of a woman's murder has had his conviction quashed for a second time at the Court of Plummer was jailed in 1998 after a jury found he had fatally attacked Janice Cartwright-Gilbert at the building site of her future home near Wilden, Bedfordshire, the previous Cartwright-Gilbert, 38, was stabbed with a knife and scissors before her body was set alight in a caravan next to the building Plummer, who was 24 at the time of her death, had his first murder conviction quashed in 2021, but was convicted again following a retrial at Aylesbury Crown Court in 2023 and sentenced to life with a minimum term of 16 years. Mr Plummer's barristers challenged his second conviction at the Court of Appeal earlier this month, claiming the trial judge was wrong to allow hearsay evidence to be presented to the jury from a police informant, Christopher had shared a cell with Mr Plummer before his first conviction and claimed he had confessed to the murder, but the "cell confession" was not used in the first trial, and Dunne died in a ruling on Wednesday, three senior judges quashed Mr Plummer's second conviction, stating that Dunne's claims "should have been withdrawn from the jury". Lord Justice Edis, sitting with Mrs Justice McGowan and Judge Nigel Lickley KC, said: "Dunne was a criminal and paid police informant who was in the habit of passing information to the police about other criminals for his own benefit."He continued: "The circumstances of the suggested confession to murder and the reliability of the informant are such as to raise concerns about it."He added: "He gave no detail of the murder which could support its reliability." Mr Plummer had his first murder conviction quashed after it was referred to the Court of Appeal by the Criminal Cases Review Commission due to concerns over expert Plummer had admitted to burglary, but denied murder and that he had ever given a confession. Account discrepancies At a hearing on 15 July, Katy Thorne KC, for Mr Plummer, said that Dunne's evidence "should never have been admitted" and that the trial judge "failed to properly consider" the evidence had "inherent potential unreliability".She also said records showed a payment had been made to Dunne at the time he provided evidence to the police, but "there has never been any explanation given by anyone" for what it was did not ask to speak to police about the alleged confession until August 1997, and gave a differing account that Justice Edis said there were "discrepancies and matters that cannot in fact be correct" in Dunne's accounts, which also did not provide "any account of the killing".He continued the retrial "should have been stopped" after the jury had heard the evidence, and the judge's "failure to do that clearly therefore renders the conviction unsafe".The Crown Prosecution Service, which opposed the appeal, said: "Having carefully considered the judgement, it is not possible for the prosecution to seek a further retrial as the remaining evidence, without the cell confession, would not provide a realistic prospect of conviction." Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Hot sex with my bad girl ex-girlfriend is irresistible – even though she tried to ruin my life
Hot sex with my bad girl ex-girlfriend is irresistible – even though she tried to ruin my life

The Sun

time31 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Hot sex with my bad girl ex-girlfriend is irresistible – even though she tried to ruin my life

DEAR DEIDRE: MY 'bad girl' ex is serious trouble yet I can't keep away, even though she tried to ruin my life. She's so incredible in bed that when she says 'jump' I can't help but come running. We found each other on a dating site and I was instantly attracted to her. She was gorgeous and very naughty in her messages. She was also potty-mouthed and her relationship track record was patchy, but that didn't put me off. I'm 42 and she's 30. When I met her, I was going through a difficult divorce and struggling to get access to my eight-year-old son. Living alone for the first time in my adult life, I was lonely. We met in a bar one night and went back to my flat after just one drink. The sex was out of this world. I can't tell you what she did to me, but no other woman has ever made me feel that way. We started seeing each other regularly, and it soon became clear that she was insanely jealous. When she found out I was innocently messaging an ex — a woman I went out with at school and now have a platonic friendship with — she lost it. She then sent a long message to my ex-wife, including telling her what we did in bed. And then she went to the police and accused me of emotional abuse. Thankfully, they saw through her crazy stories. They told me to stay away from her — especially as I was trying to get legal rights to see my son. Understanding the impact of ghosting I've tried a few times, but can't. She tells me how sorry she is and keeps luring me back into bed. I know she's bad news and that I should block her, but I'm not sure if I can keep away for long. DEIDRE SAYS: This woman is clearly not stable. She may be incredible in bed, but she's also incredibly bad news. She's tried to ruin your life once. Next time she might succeed. If you can't keep away from her for your own sake, then do it for your son. Listen to the brain in your head, not the one in your trousers, and tell yourself that no sexual experience is worth a police record and estrangement from your child. Only you can find the willpower to end this relationship. So you need to dig deep and stay away from her. If she then won't leave you alone, you can contact (0808 802 0300). MY FRIEND IS INCAPABLE OF SPEAKING FOR HERSELF DEAR DEIDRE: MY friend treats me like I'm a ventriloquist and she is the dummy – and it really gets on my nerves. She always expects me to do all the talking for her when we're out in public, and I'm sick of it. I'm 27 and she is 25. We have been friends for two years. She is a good mate, but her reliance on me to speak for her, as if she is not capable herself, irritates me so much. If we are in a restaurant and the waiter comes over, I always have to order for her. If a stranger starts up a conversation, she doesn't answer, but looks over to me to speak instead, even if the person spoke directly to her. Sometimes, I wonder how she copes when she goes somewhere, and I'm not with her. I know I need to say something but I don't know how to go about it without hurting her feelings. DEIDRE SAYS: Your friend sounds painfully shy and lacking in confidence. But I can see why this annoys you. You do need to say something, before this ruins your friendship entirely. Next time you see her, gently explain how you feel. Rather than telling her off, or accusing her, which will make her defensive, say you feel uncomfortable talking for her and would love to see her speak for herself. If she is just shy, perhaps ask if you can help her practise talking to people. My support pack, Standing Up For Yourself, should help you. DEAR DEIDRE: A DECADE ago, personal circumstances led me to ghost a man who I have now realised was perfect for me. Lately, the thought that I threw away my one chance of true love is stopping me from sleeping. I'm a 48-year-old single woman. Ten years ago, I met a man online, who is a year younger than me. We got on like a house on fire, had lots in common and he made me laugh. He was also kind, caring and genuinely wanted a relationship. But after a few weeks of talking, I lost my job and then my father died. I was in no state to date, so I deleted my profile – along with our potential relationship. When I went back online a few months later, his profile had disappeared. I had no way to get in touch. I haven't met anyone as lovely as him since and I can't help thinking what might have been. Should I try to track him down and tell him how I feel? DEIDRE SAYS: He's 'the one that got away'. In your head, he is perfect, but you never really got to know him. Ten years is a long time. If you track him down, there is a good chance he won't still single. After being ghosted, he might find it odd that you have contacted him now. Perhaps it is better to try to find someone new. My support pack, Finding The Right Partner For You, may help. HELP ME LEAVE RACIST HUSBAND DEAR DEIDRE: AFTER 30 years of marriage to a racist who won't even let our mixed-race grandchildren visit, I have had enough. I have realised he has ruined my whole life. I want to leave him but I'm scared of being alone, and don't know how to tell him. I'm 54 and have three children with this man, who is 60. He has always made racist remarks. He complains about immigrants and mutters under his breath when black people pass him in the street. Although I hate his attitudes, I have put up with them because he was a decent husband. But when my son fell in love with a black woman, my husband said he was dead to him. He hasn't spoken to him since. He won't let our son, daughter-in-law or grandchildren visit. If I want to see them, I have to go to their place. Our other children, who have white partners, are welcome to come whenever they like. But I love my children equally. I have begged and pleaded with him to change his mind, but he won't. He says he can't forgive our son. Any love I had for him has gone. Now I hate him for breaking up our family. How can I leave him? DEIDRE SAYS: As you have finally accepted, your husband is not going to change his obnoxious racist views, even if it hurts you and means missing out on his relationship with his son and grandchildren. Perhaps if you make it clear to him you will end your marriage unless he accepts his whole family, he will reconsider. But if he won't, then walking away is the best thing you can do. It won't be easy, but you will be happier in the long run. My support packs, Thinking Of Divorce and Ending A Relationship have lots of information and links that will help you to do this. Lean on your children and friends for support.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store