Six West Yorkshire school bus routes facing the axe
WYCA, which subsidises numerous routes, will decide whether to move ahead with the changes on 24 July.The decision comes after more than 3,700 people took part in a consultation on the future of these subsidised services.The services facing the axe include: B50 Eldwick to Beckfoot SchoolB99 Bradford city centre to Appleton AcademyS64 Baildon to Titus Salt School or S66 Baildon Primary to Titus Salt SchoolC6 Crossley Heath GrammarS62 Cockburn SchoolSM25 Ilkley to St Mary's Menston
Referring to cuts to the Titus Salt School service, Warnes said: "Cuts are not an option."These transport links are essential to support local families and enable people to make sustainable travel choices."He said school buses were an important way of mitigating traffic congestion."The withdrawal of any of these services is simply not acceptable."Independent councillor for Bingley Marcus Deardon said he was worried the authority would cut other school bus services next year which had been passed to them by Bradford Council."These cuts will result in extra vehicles clogging up the highways and possibly making it impossible for some students to access these schools."
'Safe and secure'
According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, WYCA said it would work with councils and schools to ensure children with special educational needs and disabilities are provided with transport.It said it currently has arrangements in place for 328 buses carrying up to 20,000 pupils per day at a cost of £18.99m a year of which 45% as funded by the combined authority.The remaining costs are funded by income from fares, council's across West Yorkshire and schools.It said guidelines for value money criteria set a maximum subsidy of £2.35 per passenger trip from September 2025 and services that do not meet the criteria will be "considered for withdrawal".Chair of WYCA's transport committee and Bradford Council leader Susan Hinchcliffe said: "It is vital that we provide safe and secure routes for children to get to school, and we want to ensure the policy is equitably applied across West Yorkshire."We will continue to engage with stakeholders and the parents and carers of the small number of children affected to ensure that every child has a suitable option to get to school."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
NHS England spends £15k a week on train tickets for staff
Britain's biggest quango is spending almost £850k a year on taxpayer-funded train tickets for staff, figures show. Office workers for NHS England forked out more than £15,000 a week ferrying staff between its two offices in London and Leeds. In total, the train fares cost taxpayers £846,686 in the year to April 2024, NHS figures obtained through a Freedom of Information request revealed. This represents a 70pc rise compared to 2022-23 when the bill was £500,256. It showed that NHS England staff were regularly travelling by train for two hours and 30 minutes between the two cities for meetings and conferences, despite a rise in remote working and video conferencing. In one case, managers approved a return ticket worth £432.50, which was paid for by the taxpayer. John O'Connell, of the lobby group the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'It's staggering that an NHS quango is blowing more than £15,000 a week on train tickets while ordinary Britons are being told to tighten their belts. 'With remote working and video calls now the norm, there's no excuse for this level of face-to-face travel, especially at such eye-watering prices. 'Ministers must ensure these bloated expenses are brought firmly under control.' NHS England bought 5,337 single and return tickets between Leeds and London for staff last year, according to the data. This means there were more than 100 journeys every week, with the average ticket costing over £150. Earlier this year, the Government revealed it was abolishing NHS England to cut bureaucracy and divert money to frontline services. Announcing the decision, Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, said the budget for NHS England staff and admin alone had soared to £2bn, and that taxpayers were 'paying more, but getting less'. The process is expected to take over two years, and it is suspected that many of the staff will end up still being employed within the NHS. In total, the quango's train ticket expenses bill rose almost 70pc in the past year from £4.7m to £7.9m. Its travel bill, covering all forms of transport, increased to almost £10m, with £1.5m reimbursing staff for motoring expenses. An NHS England spokesman said: 'Given that our staff run a national health service, travel between sites is necessary to ensure effective co-ordination, but this should only be undertaken in line with our strict internal processes and government guidance. 'The number of flights taken by staff has almost halved in 2024-25 compared to 2023-24 following the introduction of the Flight Approval Panel, so that we continue to ensure every penny of taxpayers' money is spent wisely.'
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Online Safety Act having a ‘catastrophic' impact on free speech after users blocked from viewing videos of asylum seeker hotel protests, campaigners warn
The Online Safety Act is having a 'catastrophic' impact on free speech after people were blocked from viewing videos of asylum seeker hotel protests, campaigners have warned. Users of X – formerly Twitter – complained they were unable to view clips of police detaining activists in the UK, with messages on-screen saying it was 'due to local laws'. X even barred users from watching a powerful speech about grooming gangs which Conservative MP Katie Lam made to Parliament earlier this year. Since last Friday, websites have been required to check users are aged over 18 before letting them access potentially 'harmful' material such as pornography or face being fined up to £18million. But critics including US Vice-President JD Vance have said legislation introduced by the Tories in 2023 could be used to attack free speech. After a demonstration outside the Britannia Hotel in Leeds on Friday, X users said it blocked arrest footage. They were shown the message: 'Due to local laws, we are temporarily restricting access to this content until X estimates your age.' Following a row over Essex Police allegedly escorting counter-protesters to a demonstration in Epping, West Yorkshire Police stressed it was not involved in censoring posts. X has not commented but its AI chatbot Grok suggested the Leeds clip was restricted under the Online Safety Act due to violent conduct. As X does not have an age verification process, for many, access to posts defaulted to 'restricted' mode. Reform UK's Zia Yusuf last night branded the Online Safety Act 'the biggest ever assault on free speech in the UK'. 'This Tory monstrosity hands unelected bureaucrats sweeping powers to censor content they disapprove of,' he told the Mail. Madeleine Stone, senior advocacy officer at Big Brother Watch, warned of a 'catastrophic effect on free speech online' with 'intrusive new age checks to access a range of websites'. A government spokesman said: 'Free speech is fundamental to our democracy and we've taken robust action to protect it, including through the Online Safety Act.'
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Equality street! The suburban road where identical homes on one side are 'worth £100k more' than the other
Homeowners have called on Royal Mail to adopt the postcode of a neighbouring suburb where average house prices are significantly higher. A cluster of locals in Thornbury, a Bradford suburb straddling the city's eastern edge, have launched a bold bid to trade in their postcode to increase their house prices by £100k. They say they are being 'penalised' by having the city's undesired BD3 postcode despite technically falling in the council jurisdiction of neighbouring Leeds. Instead, they want to adopt the LS28 postcode of Pudsey, which carries a more desirable reputation. But neighbours on Gain Lane, the vast majority of whom are covered by Bradford council, have branded the move 'snobbish' and a thinly veiled attempt to 'pretend they don't live where they do.' One resident, firmly living in the BD3 postcode plagued by high crime rates, said: 'They're desperate to keep up appearances. 'Just because you buy a few hanging baskets and call your house 'The Willows' doesn't mean you live in Pudsey or Leeds. 'You're still in Bradford at the end of the day.' Bradford's BD3 postcode covers some of the city's most troubled and poverty-stricken communities. It ranks among the worst postcodes in the country related to car theft and dangerous driving offences. Whereas the neighbouring LS28 postcode covers the gentrified Leeds suburbs of Farsley, Calverley and Pudsey - represented in parliament by chancellor Rachel Reeves. House prices in the well-heeled commuter hubs are tens of thousands of pounds higher than in Bradford. Campaigners say they are being unfairly punished for having a BD3 suffix, despite technically falling under Leeds City Council's jurisdiction. They say that they are having to pay out for higher car and home insurance policies as a consequence, while also having to ensure deflated house prices. Lynda Berry, 59, admitted she wanted the LS28 postcode because it was 'posher'. She said: 'We're paying more in council tax and then getting hit again with higher car and home insurance. 'And we don't even get the benefits of being in Leeds, even though we technically are. 'It's frustrating. I understand there has to be a border somewhere, but we're getting penalised for being in BD3.' Russell Robinson, 69, who has lived in the area for over six decades, says the postcode saga has dragged on for years - despite multiple attempts to get it changed. He said: 'If you're in BD3, you're paying hundreds more for car insurance because it's one of the worst postcodes in the country for car crime and bad driving. 'When I used to go to an insurance broker, they'd look at my postcode and say, 'If you lived in LS28, it'd be £200 cheaper.' 'For my Freelander I have to pay £595, fully comprehensive. For my other Defender quite a few companies wouldn't insure it all. 'It's not like I'm going Trans-European or up mountains in it. It's just the Bradford postcode.' Mr Robinson, a retired council worker, revealed that when he sold his father's house - which also technically fell under Leeds but still carried a Bradford postcode - it sold for less than equivalent houses with an LS28 address. He said: 'We got £190,000 for it, something like that. It was a well-built stone house. 'They're paying £200,000 for much less in Pudsey - small gardens, one car on the drive. 'It's just the LS postcode.' According to Rightmove data, house prices in BD3 had an overall average of £120,323 over the last year. In leafier LS28, the average was £262,061 over the last year. Gurvinder Singh, 59, has lived in Gain Lane since 1989. He said he had pleaded with the council to swap his postcode to Leeds. He said: 'Our house prices are low. Our insurance is high. 'There a difference of around £100,000. If our house was in LS28 it would go for £260,000. Here there's a limit of about £160,000. 'Because of BD3, the prices are not high. We keep spending money on the house but we're not going to get the full benefit.' Asked if he tells people he is from Leeds or Bradford, Mr Singh, who works for Bradford-based baker Hovis, added: 'Leeds. Sorry to say, but Leeds. 'Bradford has a very bad reputation, especially BD3. 'I've caught drug dealers right outside the front of my house. I've had drugs thrown in my garden during a police chase. 'LS28 is like a different world. It's much better. The people are sensible, there are no idiot drivers on that side.' One resident further down Gain Lane, firmly within Bradford Council's boundaries, said the campaign was 'classist'. The woman, who would not be named for fear of riling neighbours, said: 'My house is in Bradford and I'm proud to be from Bradford. 'I think it's people trying to pretend they don't live where they do, to make them look and feel better. 'It's still Bradford, love.' Priyan Welikandu, 56, said his car insurance premiums had soared simply because of the BD3 postcode - despite paying all his bills to Leeds. He said: 'The car insurance is very high for no real reason. I've had this smaller car for 20 years, no claims, no accidents - and I'm still paying £700 a year. 'They told me it's because of the BD3 postcode. It should be around £300 or £400, but they said nothing counts for anything in BD3.' Mr Welikandu admitted he tells people he is from Pudsey, not Bradford. He added: 'If I say to my work colleagues, Bradford, they get the wrong idea - like it's dodgy. Pudsey is a bit more civilised.' The postcode lottery has also hit businesses landed with a BD3 postcode, despite administratively falling in Leeds. Mohammed Saqid, 20, who runs the Shandar takeawy on Gain Lane, said his business insurance premium had risen to £10,000. He said: 'If this was LS28 it would be £2,500. So having a Bradford postcode is four times more expensive for us. 'We pay our rates to Leeds council, we're right by the sign that says 'welcome to Pudsey'. It doesn't make any sense to us.' Conservative local councillors have backed the residents in their attempts to be reclassified by Royal Mail. Councillor Andrew Carter said: 'I am supporting local residents, and they are in contact with Royal Mail. Every possible obstacle has been put in the way of progress. Residents want to be in LS28 and they are right.' Cllr Craig Timmins said the postcode had also caused confusion for emergency services and council services. He added: 'These streets are an important part of our community and should be able to identify that way with their postcode, instead of constantly being frustrated by it.' Royal Mail said postcodes are designed to support deliveries, not to reflect geographies. A spokesperson said: 'Postcodes are designed to support the efficient sorting and delivery of mail, not to reflect geographic or administrative boundaries. Each one is based on the delivery route and the local delivery office, which means the postcode may not always match the actual geographic identity of the area. 'We have previously reviewed the arrangements and given the structure of the local network and the needs of the nearby delivery office, we do not believe a change is appropriate for our operations. 'It is important to note that postcodes typically cover groups of addresses delivered together.
