Family seeks body camera footage from fatal police shooting of a Black teen in Alabama
Jabari Peoples, 18, was shot June 23 by a police officer in the parking lot of a soccer field in Homewood, an affluent suburb near the central city of Birmingham.
The Homewood Police Department said the officer fired his weapon after Peoples grabbed a gun from a car door during a scuffle as the officer was trying to arrest him for marijuana possession.
The family is disputing the police version of events. Leroy Maxwell, Jr., an attorney representing the family, said Peoples was shot in the back and, according to a witness, did not have a weapon when approached by the officer.
Hundreds of people attended a vigil for Peoples at the soccer complex where he was shot. The family released doves and white balloons and brought in a large photo of Peoples with angel wings. Candles spelled out 'Jabari' at the spot where he was killed.
Bron Peoples said his younger brother had a plan for his life and would write down his dreams for the future in a notebook. He said their parents had drilled into them how to behave when interacting with police. He said the family is 'calling for justice.'
'The truth needs to come out. The truth has to come out. We need the truth,' he said. 'We've got to continue to stand together so it won't happen to anyone else's brother, son, nephew, cousin. We got to stand together to make a change.'
The police department said the details surrounding the incident are 'clearly captured' on the officer's body camera. The department statement added that the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency, which is reviewing the use of force, has possession of the video and will coordinate its release to the family.
Maxwell called on the agency to immediately release the footage.
'They deserve to see with their own eyes what happened in Jabari's final moments. The public deserves transparency. Jabari's family deserves justice. And justice begins with the truth,' Maxwell said.
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency did not immediately return an email seeking comment.
The shooting unfolded at about 9:30 p.m. when a police officer approached a car at the Homewood Soccer Complex where Peoples and a female friend were parked.
The Homewood Police Department posted a statement on social media that the officer smelled marijuana and noticed a handgun in the pocket of the driver's side door. The officer attempted to put Peoples in handcuffs to arrest him for marijuana possession and a struggle ensued, according to the statement.
'Peoples broke away from the officer and retrieved the handgun from the open driver's side door pocket, creating an immediate deadly threat to the officer. The officer, fearing for his safety, fired one round from his service weapon to defend himself,' the police statement said.
Peoples is a 2024 graduate of Aliceville High School in the city of the same name, about 100 miles (160 kilometers) west of Homewood.
Aliceville Mayor Terrence E. Windham sent a letter to Homewood's mayor urging him to work to release 'all available footage related to this case.'
Star Robb, a community activist in Birmingham, questioned how marijuana possession escalated into a fatal police shooting. She said the community 'won't stand for lies.'
'He was minding his own business. Even if they did smell weed, when has weed become a death sentence? It's legal in most states around the country so when did it become a death sentence.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial live updates: Jury set to resume deliberations after reaching verdict on 4 of 5 counts
The jury in the trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs is set to resume deliberations Wednesday after saying it has reached a verdict on four of the five counts against the hip-hop mogul. The 12-member panel sent a note on Tuesday afternoon informing Judge Arun Subramanian that it had come to an agreement on counts two, three, four and five — which include sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and transportation to engage in prostitution — but was unable to reach a verdict on count one: racketeering conspiracy. 'We have reached a verdict on counts 2, 3, 4 and 5," the note read. "We are unable to reach a verdict on count 1 as we have jurors with unpersuadable opinions on both sides.' Subramanian told the jury to 'keep an open mind' as it continues deliberating the case. Federal prosecutors say that for decades, Combs abused, threatened and coerced women to participate in drug-fueled marathon sexual encounters called 'freak offs' and used his business empire, along with guns, kidnapping and arson, to control his victims. 'The defendant used power, violence and fear to get what he wanted,' Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik said during last week's closing arguments. 'It's time to hold him accountable. It's time for justice. And it's time to find him guilty.' Marc Agnifilo, Combs's lead defense attorney, argued that Combs is a 'swinger' and a drug abuser guilty of past domestic violence, but not the 'leader of a criminal enterprise' as prosecutors have portrayed him. 'He did not do the things he's charged with,' Agnifilo told jurors. 'He did what he did. But he's going to fight to the death to defend himself from what he didn't do.' Follow the live blog below for the latest updates culled from various reporters and news organizations in the courtroom, including ABC News, the Associated Press, CNN, NBC News, the New York Times and USA Today. Before exiting the courtroom, Combs spoke to his mother, Janice Combs, and several of his adult children who were seated behind him in the gallery. "I'll be all right," he told his mother, tapping his chest. "Love you." Combs has been held without bail at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn since his arrest last September. The jury sent a note to Judge Arun Subramanian saying that it will finish deliberations for today and will continue tomorrow morning at 9 a.m. ET. The group said it had reached a verdict on four of the five counts against Combs but will continue to deliberate the racketeering conspiracy charge. After Judge Arun Subramanian, the prosecution and the defense team discussed the jury's last note about not reaching a verdict on the first count against Combs, Subramanian said he was going to tell the jury to keep deliberating. Subramanian also said he is going to tell the group that if they're done deliberating for the day and want to pick up tomorrow instead, they can send another note to him. When the jury entered the courtroom, Subramanin said, 'I received your note that you have reached verdicts on count 2-5 but not on count 1. I ask at this time that you keep deliberating." The jury says it has reached a verdict on four of the five counts against Combs. 'We have reached a verdict on counts 2, 3, 4 and 5," its note to the judge reads. "We are unable to reach a verdict on count 1 as we have jurors with unpersuadable opinions on both sides.' Here is a review of all the criminal counts the hip-hop mogul is facing, and the possible sentences for each: Count 1: Racketeering conspiracy If convicted, Combs faces a maximum sentence of life in prison. Count 2: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion regarding Victim 1, who is Cassie Ventura If convicted, Combs faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years and a maximum sentence of life in prison. Count 3: Transportation to engage in prostitution regarding Victim 1 and commercial sex workers If convicted, Combs faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. Count 4: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion regarding Victim 2, who is "Jane" If convicted, Combs faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years and a maximum sentence of life in prison. Count 5: Transportation to engage in prostitution regarding Victim 2 and commercial sex workers If convicted, Combs faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. The jury has informed Judge Arun Subramanian that it has reached a verdict on four of the five counts against Combs. 'We have reached a verdict on counts 2, 3, 4 and 5," the note reads. "We are unable to reach a verdict on count 1 as we have jurors with unpersuadable opinions on both sides.' Count 1 is the racketeering conspiracy charge. Counts 2-5 are sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion and transportation to engage in prostitution. Lawyers for both the prosecution and defense told Subramanian that they want him to tell the jury to continue deliberations. The jury has sent another note to Judge Arun Subramanian. The panel has now sent the judge six notes since deliberations began on Monday. Combs and attorneys from both sides have gathered inside the courtroom. As deliberations began Monday in the federal sex trafficking trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, he was accused in a new civil lawsuit of drugging and raping a man, USA Today reports: In 2021, the man, then in his 20s, alleges in the suit that he met a security guard for one of Combs's parties while stopped at a gas station in Los Angeles. The guard invited him to a party that evening, where he says he drank a glass of champagne on arrival that he later suspected had been drugged. [...]In the suit, lawyers for the man also claim that during the party, while he searched for a place to lie down, he passed out and was awoken by someone unbuttoning his pants. When he asked what was going on, a voice, which the lawsuit claims belonged to Combs, responded, "You're about to get that Diddy love."When the man protested, saying he had a wife and children, Combs allegedly told him he was going to receive a great massage, before he felt himself being undressed, covered in some form of liquid and penetrated anally, per the suit. It's one of dozens of lawsuits that have been filed against Combs since Cassie Ventura's explosive 2023 suit accusing him of sexual assault. In a statement to the paper, Combs's legal team said, "No matter how many lawsuits are filed, it won't change the fact that Mr. Combs has never sexually assaulted or sex trafficked anyone — man or woman, adult or minor." "We live in a world where anyone can file a lawsuit for any reason," Combs's legal team continued. "Fortunately, a fair and impartial judicial process exists to find the truth, and Mr. Combs is confident he will prevail in court." Read more from USA Today: As Diddy jury deliberates, new civil suit against music mogul alleges drugging and rape There is once again a large media presence outside the courthouse as the jury continues its deliberations. Combs's family members, including his mother and several children, were seen coming and going, as well as a supporter who displayed a T-shirt that reads "A freako is not a R.I.C.O," a reference to the racketeering charges the hip-hop mogul is facing. The jury requested to review Cassie Ventura's testimony about three incidents, including the 2016 assault at a Los Angeles hotel, and the events during and after her 2013 trip to the Cannes Film Festival. Hotel assault: Ventura told the court that Combs erupted when she tried to leave a "freak off" at the InterContinental Hotel in L.A. on March 5, 2016, a violent assault that was caught on surveillance video and left her with bruises and a black eye. Combs later paid a hotel security guard $100,000 in cash for the surveillance footage. After it leaked, Combs publicly apologized for the assault. The defense did not deny it occurred, arguing that it was evidence of domestic violence and not the criminal behavior alleged by federal prosecutors. Cannes incident: Ventura told the court that during a 2013 trip to the Cannes Film Festival in France, Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off their yacht. Then, on a commercial flight back to the U.S., she said he pulled up explicit videos of her having sex and threatened to release them unless she agreed to another "freak off." Ventura said she felt trapped and arranged one for him upon their landing. The jury also asked to review testimony from Ventura and Daniel Phillip, a male escort who testified that he was paid to have sex with Ventura numerous times and witnessed Combs physically abuse her at a New York City hotel years before the InterContinental assault. Judge Arun Subramanian ordered that transcripts of testimony from Combs's ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and Daniel Phillip, a male escort, be sent to the jury. After a lengthy discussion with lawyers from both sides, Subramanian also said the jury will get the transcripts for Ventura's testimony about the days before and after the March 5, 2016, assault at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles, as well as a transcript of Ventura's testimony regarding her 2024 Instagram post in response to the release of the surveillance video. (In the post, she described the assault as "domestic violence.") Prosecutors objected to the inclusion of her testimony about the Instagram post, but Subramanian sided with the defense, which wanted it sent to the jury. In its latest note to the judge, the jury is asking for transcripts of testimony from Combs's ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and Daniel Phillip, a male escort. Specifically, the jury wants to review Ventura's testimony about the 2016 assault at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles, which was caught on surveillance video; her flight back from the Cannes Film Festival with Combs, during which she said he played "freak off" videos and threatened to release them; and what she told the court, if anything, about the "freak offs" she took part in with Phillip. The panel also wants to review Phillip's testimony about a "freak off" he and Ventura had at the Essex Hotel in New York. (Phillip told the court that he witnessed Ventura "slumped over.") Lawyers for both sides are now reviewing the transcripts to identify the corresponding excerpts so Judge Arun Subramanian can provide them to the jury. The jury has sent another note to the judge, asking for transcripts of testimony from two witnesses: Cassie Ventura, Comb's ex-girlfriend, and Daniel Phillip, a male escort who testified he was paid to have sex with Ventura. It is the fifth note sent to the judge by the jury since deliberations began Monday. Such a request for transcripts is not unusual. The prosecution called 34 witnesses to testify over the course of six weeks. Janice Combs, Sean "Diddy" Combs's mother, has been a constant presence at her son's trial. She arrived at the courthouse early Tuesday for the second day of deliberations. Inside the courtroom, the defendant spoke briefly to his mom, who was seated in the gallery, before returning to his holding cell. 'Just relax, it's gonna be all right,' he said, according to a CNN report, adding that he loved her outfit. Judge Arun Subramanian discussed with the prosecution and defense attorneys how to answer the jury's question about whether giving drugs to someone who asked for them qualifies as distributing controlled substances. Subramanian sent a note to the jury saying, "In response to the jury's question, the Court refers the jury to page 37, lines 1 through 3 of its jury charge," or jury instructions. Subramanian quoted the lines he's referencing in the jury charge in his response letter: 'The word 'distribution' means actual, constructive or attempted transfer. To distribute simply means to deliver, to pass over or to hand over something to another person, or to cause it to be delivered, passed on or handed over to another. Distribution does not require a sale.' Judge Arun Subramanian is now on the bench. One of the notes the jury sent to Subramanian yesterday included a question about what qualifies as the distribution of controlled substances. Subramanian said he would answer the jury's question this morning. The jury is expected to return at 9 a.m. ET to resume its deliberations. Late Monday, the 12-member panel sent a note asking Judge Arun Subramanian to clarify what constitutes the distribution of controlled substances. Subramanian asked prosecutors and defense attorneys to meet and confer about how to respond to the jury's question. The judge told the jury he would respond this morning. There is no timetable for a decision. Subramanian told jurors that they can choose how long to deliberate each day. Yesterday, the jury stayed until 5 p.m. ET. Jury deliberations began late Monday morning after Judge Arun Subramanian gave the 12-member panel instructions on how to apply the law in deciding its verdict. Just an hour into its deliberations, the jury sent a note to Subramanian saying it was concerned that one juror can't follow his instructions. Subramanian sent a note back reminding jurors of "their duty to deliberate and their obligation to follow my instruction on the law." The jury sent another note asking the judge to clarify what constitutes the distribution of controlled substances. Subramanian said he would address the issue this morning. It concluded deliberations after more than five hours without coming to a verdict. The jury will resume deliberations on Tuesday at 9 a.m. ET. The 12-person group began deliberations around 11:30 a.m. ET this morning, and concluded for the day after just over five hours. The jury sent two more notes to Judge Arun Subramanian while deliberating Monday afternoon. Subramanian, who returned to the bench to read the notes, said that the first was a question, which he said he would answer tomorrow. The second was a note informing the court that the jury plans to end deliberations today at 5 p.m. ET. Earlier this afternoon, the jury sent the judge a note expressing concern that one of the jurors wasn't able to follow the judge's instructions on deliberations. After receiving a note from the jury saying it is concerned that one member of the panel can't follow his instructions, Judge Arun Subramanian sent the following reply: 'I received your note. I remind every juror of their duty to deliberate and their obligation to follow my instruction on the law. With that instruction in mind, please continue deliberating.' Subramanian also instructed jurors not to reveal any specifics about their deliberations in any future notes they send to the court.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Denver police shoot suspect after officers say he pulled a gun on them
Police in Denver shot a suspect in the Montbello neighborhood Tuesday night. Officers said the shooting happened about 9 p.m. in the 4300 block of Del Rio. Denver police shot a suspect in the 4300 block of Del Rio on Tuesday night. CBS According to Denver police, two officers were on patrol when they heard illegal fireworks going off. That's when they said they headed toward the sound and found a group of people shooting off fireworks in the street. The officers confronted the group and that's when police said one of them challenged officers and pulled a gun. "He then began to reach for his waistband... at which point he drew the firearm from his waistband while facing the officer. One officer did fire," said Denver Police Chief Ron Thomas. Denver police shot a suspect in Montbello after officers said he pulled a gun on them. CBS Thomas said the officer fired two rounds, striking the suspect. Police said he was taken to the hospital in serious condition. No officers were injured.
Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Trump admin fast-tracks death penalty case for transgender cult suspect in Border Patrol killing: attorneys
Attorneys for Teresa Youngblut, the woman accused in the Jan. 20 shooting that killed U.S. Border Patrol Agent David Maland, are accusing the Justice Department of orchestrating a fast-tracked path to capital punishment that violates her constitutional rights. In a June 30 motion filed in federal court, Youngblut's defense team called the government's timeline for deciding whether to pursue the death penalty "unprecedentedly tight" and warned it could render the pretrial process "a near-pointless formality." "This Court should step in to ensure Ms. Youngblut receives a meaningful opportunity to persuade the government not to pursue the death penalty," the motion says. Youngblut, 21, has been linked by investigators to "Ziz," a fringe, self-described vegan, anti-government, transgender-rights collective that federal authorities say may be connected to multiple homicides throughout the U.S. According to a federal affidavit, Youngblut was driving a Prius with German national Felix Bauckholt, who is also an alleged member of Ziz, when they were stopped by Border Patrol agents in Coventry, Vermont, on Jan. 20. Prosecutors allege Youngblut drew a .40-caliber Glock and fired without warning, starting a shootout that left both Bauckholt and Maland dead. READ THE MOTION – APP USERS, CLICK HERE In their motion, Youngblut's defense attorneys, Steven Barth and Julie Stelzig, argued that the Department of Justice is pushing forward with a July 28 deadline to present mitigating evidence to its Capital Case Review Committee, despite not having filed a death-eligible indictment. The typical federal timeline, they argued, allows for more than a year. "The timeline being imposed in this case is vastly out of step with the historical practice of the Department of Justice," they wrote, citing data showing a nearly 15-month average between indictment and mitigation presentation in comparable cases. The defense asked the court to extend the deadline to Jan. 30, 2026, arguing that the current pace denies Youngblut due process. READ ATTORNEY GENERAL PAM BONDI'S FEB. 5 MEMORANDUM – APP USERS, CLICK HERE The defense argued that Youngblut's case has been fast-tracked due to a Feb. 5 memorandum issued by Attorney General Pam Bondi. In the memorandum, Bondi specifically named the Maland case as an example where "absent significant mitigating circumstances," the death penalty should be sought for the murder of a federal law enforcement officer. Bondi's directive lifted the federal moratorium on executions set in place by the Biden administration. Fox News Digital has reached out to the Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney's Office in Vermont for comment. Youngblut's team argued in the motion that the defense had limited time to prepare for the case, noting that Youngblut's "learned counsel," an attorney with experience in capital cases, was only appointed on June 12 after a previous lawyer withdrew. The motion also noted that only recently has the team retained a mitigation specialist, and they are still working through thousands of pages of discovery as well as facing limited access to Youngblut, who is detained over two hours away from counsel. The DOJ's deadline, the defense said, "virtually ensures that [Youngblut's] mitigation presentation has no realistic chance of serving its purpose." In a Jan. 27 motion for pretrial detention, the government alleged that Youngblut had no stable residence, had an extensive travel history and associations with individuals under investigation in a double homicide in Pennsylvania and another killing in Vallejo, California. The government also pointed to Youngblut's journal, which allegedly referenced LSD usage and "high vibration" trips that led prosecutors to argue that she was a flight risk. The June 30 motion also included supporting letters from defense counsel and a declaration from Matthew Rubenstein, the director of the Capital Resource Counsel Project, who attested that the DOJ's current timeline falls outside established norms in federal death penalty proceedings. If the court declines to intervene, Youngblut's attorneys warned that the current course could trigger costly delays and the misuse of capital punishment. "An artificial rush in the authorization process may end up backfiring," the defense cautioned, "resulting in avoidable delay, wasted resources, and the arbitrary imposition of the most serious punishment our legal system allows." Fox News Digital has reached out to the Federal Public Defender – District of Vermont for comment.
