Probe of crash of Mexican tall ship into Brooklyn Bridge centers on engine
Members of the Mexican Navy training vessel Cuauhtemoc are seen on board during investigations after it struck the Brooklyn Bridge over the weekend in New York City, U.S., May 19, 2025. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY
Members of the Mexican Navy training vessel Cuauhtemoc are seen on board during investigations after it struck the Brooklyn Bridge over the weekend in New York City, U.S., May 19, 2025. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz
Members of the Mexican Navy training vessel Cuauhtemoc are seen on board during investigations after it struck the Brooklyn Bridge over the weekend in New York City, U.S., May 19, 2025. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz
NEW YORK - The investigation into why a Mexican Navy training ship struck the Brooklyn Bridge on Saturday, shearing the top of its masts, will look into a possible engine failure and the role of a tug boat that assisted it in backing out of its pier, officials said on Monday.
The ship's engine was the key focus for the National Transportation Safety Board, said Brian Young, who is leading the agency's investigation.
"We will look at the status of the engine, we will look for any failures, we will look for engine inspections and we'll talk to the crew on what may have possibly happened with the engine," Young said at a preliminary NTSB briefing. He said investigators would also look for any electronic control data.
The accident occurred when the majestic white training vessel Cuauhtémoc was departing from lower Manhattan's Pier 17 on the East River shortly after sunset on Saturday.
The ship's planned route was southward, away from the Brooklyn Bridge and toward New York Harbor and her next destination in Iceland.
As it backed out of the pier, the ship was accompanied by a tug boat operated by McAllister Towing. As it cleared the dock, the ship pivoted but continued to move swiftly in reverse in the direction of the bridge.
Minutes later, its three 147-foot (44.8-meter) masts hit the underside of the iconic 142-year-old bridge, causing them to partially collapse.
The strike knocked dozens of white-uniformed naval cadets off the ship's crossbeams, where they were standing ceremoniously for her exit from the harbor. They could be seen dangling from their harnesses high above the ship's deck.
Two people aboard the ship - a cadet and a sailor - were killed, and around 20 were injured, two of them critically.
Salvatore R. Mercogliano, a maritime historian at Campbell University, said it appeared that an engine malfunction caused the accident.
"Without the engine failure, the ship would have maybe drifted into the bridge, but it wouldn't have hit it at speed," Mercogliano said. "The engine failure drove the ship into the bridge. And it's not exactly clear what role the tug could have done to prevent that from happening."
Videos posted online showed the tug first pushing the bow of the ship, then separating from it as the vessel moved closer to the bridge. It then appeared to rush toward the stern as if it intended to stop the ship from striking the bridge.
After the masts collapsed, the ship kept sailing under the bridge until it was stopped at an embankment on the Brooklyn side of the river, videos showed.
NTSB board member Michael Graham said the board had not yet conducted any interviews and intended to talk with the tug boat pilot, harbor pilot, ship captain and other crew members.
"We will be looking into three main areas... the crew and the operation of the crew, the vessel and the condition of the vessel, and finally, the environment, and that includes the weather, the wind, the current, the tide and the operating environment," Graham said.
Investigators are asking the public for additional video of the incident and have yet to determine if the Mexican naval vessel had a data recorder. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Indian cities keen to develop riverfronts but cleaning polluted rivers lags
While riverfront projects have given residents a public space, a key challenge cities face are the polluted rivers. PHOTO: REUTERS NEW DELHI – As Indian cities roll out plans to build attractive riverfront s , the improvements on land are outpacing attempts to clean up the waters of the polluted rivers below them . In the western state of Gujarat, a plan to extend the riverfront from the existing 11 .25 km in Ahmedabad city along the Sabarmati R iver to 38km includes the development of a 17.5km stretch by Singapore firm Surbana Jurong (SJ). The urban planning and design specialist is creating the masterplan for the last phases of the development, covering 591ha of land. The first phase was completed in 2012 but other earlier phases are in different stages of development by other companies. 'When completed, it will be the longest riverfront project in the world, with a total length of over 38km,' said Mr Abhishek Malhotra , SJ's regional director, South Asia. While the riverfront projects have given residents a much-needed public space, a key challenge for Ahmedabad and other cities with riverfront plans, however, are the extremely polluted rivers, which are clogged with sewage, toxic chemicals discharged by factories, and rubbish from rapidly growing cities. On the 371km-long Sabarmati R iver, which flows from the north-western state of Rajasthan into Gujarat, multiple cleaning operations have taken place but with limited success, said environmentalists. In the latest initiative to clean up the river, some 60,000 residents of Ahmedabad have since May 15 picked up 945 tonnes of waste from the riverbed after water was drained to repair the Vasn a B arrage, which controls the flow of water into the Sabarmati River near the riverfront. This is among other initiatives both short term and long term to clean the river – from using trash skimmers to collect floating rubbish to tackling the problem of untreated sewage. However, the pollutants coming into the river have continued to outpace clean-up efforts, noted environmentalists. 'The cleanliness drive is also to ensure wider awareness so that people don't throw waste into the river. We want river waters to be clean,' said Ahmedabad municipal commissioner Banchhanidhi Pani. A boy looks for recyclables as he walks on the banks of Yamuna river in New Delhi on April 11. PHOTO: AFP But it is not just the discarded rubbish that is the problem. A report released recently by Toxics Link, an Indian environmental research and advocacy organisation, said high levels of nonylphenol – a chemical with carcinogenic properties that can cause prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women – were detected on the surface water of four rivers including the Sabarmati, downstream of the riverfront project . The chemical, which also kills aquatic life , is used in the textile industry in particular. The report found the highest concentration of the chemical in Cooum River in Tamil Nadu. 'It is not enough to keep the riverfront water clean and not the rest of the stretch,' said Mr Mahesh Pandya, director of Paryavaran Mitra, a Gujarat-based non-governmental organisation dedicated to protecting the environme nt. In September 2024 , the Gujarat High Court rebuked the local authorities for failing to come up with a concrete plan for cleaning up the river. The court initiated a Public Interest Litigation on its own and has kept a close scrutiny of the clean-up efforts. 'All your claims are on paper,' the court noted, according to a report in Gujarat Samachar newspaper. Untreated sewage flowing into the river is a common problem in India' s polluted rivers. According to some estimates, 38,000 million litres of waste water enter Indian rivers due to the lack of functioning sewage treatment plants and poor waste disposal. Many riverfront projects in the pipeline Polluted rivers present a jarring challenge to local governments' plans to spruce up riverfronts and turn them into attractive urban community spaces. A report by the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA) said 61 riverfront projects have been initiated under the Smart Cities Mission, an urban renewal and retrofitting programme by the government to improve facilities and infrastructure in Indian cities. Many more are being developed outside the mission as well. Along the Sabarmati, the first 11.25km of the riverfront development, completed in 2012, has been held up as an exemplary instance of riverfront development in India. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was the chief minister of Gujarat from 2001 to 2014 , hosted world leaders like Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2014 and late Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe in 2017 on the riverfront. SJ, which has joined further development of the riverfront, aims to foster 'a vibrant and engaging urban-river interface', said Mr Malhotra. He said the masterplan 'embraces the natural slope of the riverbanks to create a convenient transition from the street level to the lower terrace, enhancing the connection between riverfront and the surrounding urban fabric'. The firm would be using a 'blend of design strategies – from landscaped stepped terraces to natural, soft edges', he added, allowing 'inclusive public access for people of all abilities'. In addition, the Gujarat government is proposing to build a Singapore-style Cloud Forest – a greenhouse-like structure featuring exotic trees and plants under a dome – covering an area of over 2,500 sq m, which is smaller than a football field. The trend to develop riverfronts in India is part of a larger push to boost urban infrastructure and make cities liveable. A study on waterfront development projects by the SPA, a public higher education institution, noted that waterfront development projects were significant as cities were 'grappling with multiple issues of pollution, biodiversity loss and extreme pressure on open spaces'. Thousands perform yoga together on the Sabarmati riverfront in Ahmedabad, India on World Yoga Day, on June 21. PHOTO: REUTERS It added that these developments lead to 'an increase in available and usable open spaces, re-establishing the lost connection between the people and the waterbody, an increase in livelihood options and property prices'. The SPA study noted that the development of the Ganga riverfront in the eastern city of Patna in Bihar state had led to significantly enhanced recreational facilities, improved public transport connectivity, and addressed waste management issues. It further noted that anecdotal evidence suggested potential increase in property values and economic activity. In 2022, the Central Pollution Control Board identified 311 polluted river stretches, calculated through levels of biochemical oxygen demand, an important indicator of water quality, on 279 rivers. Clean up rivers before developing riverfronts In some cities, residents are putting pressure on the authorities to pay as much attention to environmental concerns as developing the riverfront. Angry citizens of Pune, a city in the western state of Maharashtra, have staged protest marches, filed lawsuits, and planted trees to demand that the Mula R iver be cleaned up and that riverfront developments take environmental concerns into account. A concrete heavy riverside development would affect the natural aqueducts that charge the groundwater and the biodiversity along the river, said Pune-based environmentalist Mukund Mavalankar. 'We have pointed out that the river is dying because of untreated sewage going into the river. This needs to be tackled first,' said Mr Mavalankar. The capacity of sewage treatment plants along the Mula River is 500 million litres per day, when the required capacity is 1,000 million lit res, he added. While the protests and legal cases have not stalled plans as yet, they have brought focus on the issue of rejuvenating rivers and ensuring that wanton construction does not take place along their banks. A key problem has also been the lack of a holistic approach to clean rivers that flow through multiple states, water experts noted, arguing that piecemeal efforts are often unsuccessful despite the best intentions. Ms Jaya Dhindaw, the executive programme director of Sustainable Cities at WRI India, an independent research organisation, said important initiatives and institutional mechanisms have been set up by the government like the National Mission for Clean Ganga to clean the river Ganga and the surrounding areas. The Ganga is a 2,525km-long river that crosses multiple states in India before flowing into Bangladesh. But she noted: 'There still remains a lot to be done in terms of addressing issues such as checking and stopping source pollution, integrating ecosystem preservation and restoration, and ensuring financial and institutional wherewithal for maintenance of clean-ups.' 'A data-led approach which helps identify the sources of pollution, strong enforcement of pollution control, integrating nature-based solutions to manage water quality and enabling community ownership and stewardship of rivers are essential to the long-term success of clean-up efforts,' she added. Test case in Delhi A test case for whether river rejuvenation can happen with riverfront development is in the capital city. The Delhi government, which like Gujarat's is led by Mr Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party, has promised a Sabarmati type riverfront makeover along the Yamuna R iver. Plans include creating a central piazza, topiary park, shopping centre and river promenade along a 22km stretch of the river. The Yamuna flows through multiple states, with the stretch in Delhi among its most polluted. Between 2017 and 2022, the Delhi government spent more than 68 billion rupees (S$1 billion) to clean the Yamuna, but it still has high levels of pollutants from untreated sewage and industrial waste. The Delhi government recently announced a 30-point action plan to clean the river which includes building 40 sewage treatment plants. For residents, a riverfront to go to for a stroll or a cruise down the river is an attractive proposition. 'It would be great to have a riverfront,' said Ms Rit u Sharma, a Delhi resident, who added that she would love to take a walk along the riverfront. 'But I hope they can clean the pollution too.' Nirmala Ganapathy is India bureau chief at The Straits Times. She is based in New Delhi and writes about India's foreign policy and politics. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
12 hours ago
- Straits Times
TBR (To Be Read): What the late Ngugi wa Thiong'o, who rejected English, can teach Singapore
Kenyan author Ngugi wa Thiong'o wrote Devil On The Cross (1980), his first novel in his native Gikuyu language, in prison on toilet paper. PHOTO: REUTERS SINGAPORE – One Wednesday evening in 2017, when I was a literature undergraduate, Kenyan writer Ngugi wa Thiong'o – who famously stopped writing in English and switched defiantly to his native Gikuyu – made an appearance on campus and said something that has troubled me since. He was almost 80, subdued in manner, and often dropped the kind of pithy sentence that inspired not applause but reverential silence, then scribbling. To the Singapore audience, he had said: 'If you know all the languages of the world, but not your mother tongue, that is enslavement.' Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
US-backed Gaza aid group says all distribution sites closed after shootings
Palestinians gather to collect what remains of relief supplies from the distribution center of the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, June 5, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer Palestinians gather to collect what remains of relief supplies from the distribution center of the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, June 5, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer Palestinians gather to collect what remains of relief supplies from the distribution center of the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, June 5, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer DUBAI - A U.S.- and Israeli-backed group handing out aid in Gaza said on Friday all its distribution sites were closed until further notice, urging residents to stay away from these venues "for their safety" after a series of deadly shootings. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which last week started handing out meals to hungry Palestinians inside the war-shattered Gaza Strip, said that a reopening date would be announced later. The GHF opened two sites in southern Gaza on Thursday after closing all of its centres the previous day in the wake of shootings in the vicinity of its operations. It has so far operated four distribution centres. The organisation bypasses traditional relief agencies and has been criticised by humanitarian organisations, including the United Nations, for alleged lack of neutrality, which it denies. GHF halted distributions on Wednesday and said it was pressing Israeli forces to improve civilian safety beyond the perimeter of its operations after dozens of Palestinians were shot dead near the Rafah site over three consecutive days. The Israeli military said on Sunday and Monday that its soldiers had fired warning shots. On Tuesday, it said, forces also fired warning shots before firing towards Palestinians that it said were advancing towards troops. GHF has said that aid was safely handed out from its sites without any incident. Israel has re-intensified an offensive against Gaza's dominant Hamas militant group since breaking a two-month-old ceasefire in March in a war triggered by Hamas' cross-border attack on October 7, 2023. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
