ASA 2024 Annual Report: Strengthening Consumer Protections With Effective Ad Self-Regulation
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) today released its 2024 Annual Report, detailing the extensive work undertaken to strengthen consumer protections and support industry awareness and compliance with the Advertising Codes.
Highlights from our report include:
We received 1628 complaints. Following triage, we considered 1312 formal complaints about 206 ads
100 ads were accepted for review by the Complaints Board, of these 62% were requested to be removed or amended
The industry compliance rate with decisions was 99%
Enhanced protection for children and vulnerable audiences with the launch of the new Children's Advertising Code, and Food and Beverage Advertising Code
Investment in industry education and training, with 20+ education and compliance resources published, and a suite of free webinars to support industry adoption of the new Codes
The five most complained about ads from 2024
ASA Chief Executive Hilary Souter said, 'Industry support is the foundation of the ASA self-regulatory process, with a collective purpose to uphold high standards of responsible advertising in New Zealand. Industry have risen to the challenge with the adoption of two new Codes in 2024, working with us as we rolled out new ad protections for children, and for all New Zealanders under the Food and Beverage Code. We thank the industry for their continued support of our process, as we work together on making every ad a responsible ad.
We are also grateful to the consumers and wider community who engage with our work – whether it be through our complaints process or our public consultations, consumer input is crucial to the effective operation of the ASA. We look forward to continuing our work together in 2025.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Port Of Auckland Fee Increases Cause Concern For Industry
Press Release – Ia Ara Aotearoa Transporting New Zealand National road freight association Transporting New Zealand is voicing strong concerns over the Port of Auckland's (POAL) announced increases to Vehicle Booking System (VBS) fees, warning these price hikes at the country's largest import port will have major repercussions for businesses and consumers. Trucks have been charged $130 per visit in access fees to the container terminal during peak hours since January 2025. This will increase to $180 in January 2026, $230 by July 2026 and $350 by January 2027. These fees are levied each time a truck accesses the terminal to deliver or collect a container. Billy Clemens, Head of Policy & Advocacy at Transporting New Zealand, is questioning the justification for these large increases, noting that POAL's productivity improvements have been minimal. 'Our road freight members and their customers haven't seen an associated increase in Port productivity,' he says. 'In fact, from financial year 2023 to 2024 POAL's average truck turnaround time improved by only 1.5 per cent, or 17 seconds. I don't know of any road freight companies who could hike their prices by 170 per cent over two years following that level of performance.' Clemens also challenges POAL's rationale that higher peak-time fees will incentivise off-peak deliveries. ' Traffic data confirms that our members already do their best to avoid peak traffic because it's a nightmare in Auckland as it is. If they could, they would.' 'A survey by one of our major North Island members revealed that only 12 per cent of their customers could accept night-time deliveries of containers.' Transporting New Zealand is warning that these increased costs will inevitably be passed on to consumers and exporters, making New Zealand goods less competitive on the international stage. All at a time when the Port is already comfortably surpassing its profit targets. Productive alternatives Clemens urges POAL and its owner, Auckland Council, to focus on enhancing productivity and performance rather than imposing higher fees on industry stakeholders. 'One practical option we've previously raised with POAL is to lower VBS charges for dual bookings, where a freighter both drops off and picks up containers on the same trip.' 'If POAL wants to improve productivity, it should also look to its 2024 Annual Report. POAL was comfortably meeting its peak vs off-peak truck target, but failing on crane rate, ship rate, and import dwell time, amongst others.' Cargo owners share concern at price increases Mike Knowles, chair of the New Zealand Cargo Owners Council, says the time-of-use approach is too simplistic to achieve significant behaviour change as the port is just one part of a complex supply chain. The Cargo Owners Council believes it is time for benchmarking of NZ port productivity against their charge structures. 'We think the time is long overdue for a closer look at arbitrary fee increases that do not result in measurable service or infrastructure improvement – as things stand the ultimate loser here is NZ Inc.' About Ia Ara Aotearoa Transporting New Zealand Ia Ara Aotearoa Transporting New Zealand is the peak national membership association representing the road freight transport industry. Our members operate urban, rural and inter- regional commercial freight transport services throughout the country. Road is the dominant freight mode in New Zealand, transporting 92.8% of the freight task on a tonnage basis, and 75.1% on a tonne-km basis. The road freight transport industry employs over 34,000 people across more than 4700 businesses, with an annual turnover of $6 billion.
Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
Port Of Auckland Fee Increases Cause Concern For Industry
National road freight association Transporting New Zealand is voicing strong concerns over the Port of Auckland's (POAL) announced increases to Vehicle Booking System (VBS) fees, warning these price hikes at the country's largest import port will have major repercussions for businesses and consumers. Trucks have been charged $130 per visit in access fees to the container terminal during peak hours since January 2025. This will increase to $180 in January 2026, $230 by July 2026 and $350 by January 2027. These fees are levied each time a truck accesses the terminal to deliver or collect a container. Billy Clemens, Head of Policy & Advocacy at Transporting New Zealand, is questioning the justification for these large increases, noting that POAL's productivity improvements have been minimal. "Our road freight members and their customers haven't seen an associated increase in Port productivity," he says. "In fact, from financial year 2023 to 2024 POAL's average truck turnaround time improved by only 1.5 per cent, or 17 seconds. I don't know of any road freight companies who could hike their prices by 170 per cent over two years following that level of performance." Clemens also challenges POAL's rationale that higher peak-time fees will incentivise off-peak deliveries. " Traffic data confirms that our members already do their best to avoid peak traffic because it's a nightmare in Auckland as it is. If they could, they would." "A survey by one of our major North Island members revealed that only 12 per cent of their customers could accept night-time deliveries of containers." Transporting New Zealand is warning that these increased costs will inevitably be passed on to consumers and exporters, making New Zealand goods less competitive on the international stage. All at a time when the Port is already comfortably surpassing its profit targets. Productive alternatives Clemens urges POAL and its owner, Auckland Council, to focus on enhancing productivity and performance rather than imposing higher fees on industry stakeholders. "One practical option we've previously raised with POAL is to lower VBS charges for dual bookings, where a freighter both drops off and picks up containers on the same trip." "If POAL wants to improve productivity, it should also look to its 2024 Annual Report. POAL was comfortably meeting its peak vs off-peak truck target, but failing on crane rate, ship rate, and import dwell time, amongst others." Cargo owners share concern at price increases Mike Knowles, chair of the New Zealand Cargo Owners Council, says the time-of-use approach is too simplistic to achieve significant behaviour change as the port is just one part of a complex supply chain. The Cargo Owners Council believes it is time for benchmarking of NZ port productivity against their charge structures. "We think the time is long overdue for a closer look at arbitrary fee increases that do not result in measurable service or infrastructure improvement - as things stand the ultimate loser here is NZ Inc." About Ia Ara Aotearoa Transporting New Zealand Ia Ara Aotearoa Transporting New Zealand is the peak national membership association representing the road freight transport industry. Our members operate urban, rural and inter- regional commercial freight transport services throughout the country. Road is the dominant freight mode in New Zealand, transporting 92.8% of the freight task on a tonnage basis, and 75.1% on a tonne-km basis. The road freight transport industry employs over 34,000 people across more than 4700 businesses, with an annual turnover of $6 billion.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Depreciation Uncertainty Focus Of Annual Plan Debate
Press Release – Hamilton City Council The value of waters assets, and how that could impact Hamilton City Councils books, has dominated todays (Thursday 29 May) Annual Plan discussions. Council is undergoing a revaluation of the citys drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater … The value of waters assets, and how that could impact Hamilton City Council's books, has dominated today's (Thursday 29 May) Annual Plan discussions. Council is undergoing a revaluation of the city's drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater pipes and pumpstations. The new value of the assets determines how much Council needs to budget for depreciation. As depreciation is an operating cost, the revaluation has potential flow-on effects on Council's financial measures, particularly the balancing the books outcome. The draft findings of the revaluation suggested a 120% increase in the cost to replace the assets compared to 2022, significantly above shifts in market-based indicators used by councils as a guide for asset values. Because of this discrepancy, staff recommended not including the draft findings as part of the Annual Plan, so these could be further interrogated before the drinking water and wastewater assets are transferred to the new joint waters company (also resolved today). 'There have been considerable industry changes to how revaluations are carried out since the last waters one in 2022,' said Chief Financial Officer Gary Connolly. 'The changes have produced complex results, with significant uncertainty about the validity for budgeting purposes. Extending the revaluation work would let us better understand the results.' The 2025/26 Annual Plan, which will be formally adopted in June, has a balancing the books deficit of $13 million in 2025/26 and a small surplus the following year. If the draft results had been factored into the Annual Plan, and no other subsequent changes made, the 2025/26 balancing the books deficit would be $37 million and reaching a surplus wouldn't be achieved until 2028/29. 'Reacting immediately to the draft results, given that many of these assets don't need to be replaced for another 50+ years, could have significantly perverse outcomes,' said Connolly. 'The staff recommendation isn't based on what would have happened with the balancing the books result. 'The revaluation issue has highlighted the risk of focusing too intently on balancing the books given the impact depreciation can have on that measure. 'We are developing a wider suite of measures to provide a more holistic picture of financial sustainability.' Deferring the revaluation means staff expect the 2024/25 Annual Report to receive a qualified opinion from Audit NZ. Given the lack of confidence in the draft findings, accepting these could also have this result. A qualified opinion is given when there are significant issue(s) in the Annual Report that prevent an unqualified opinion being given, but these issues are not considered pervasive. Staff do not anticipate any real-world negative consequences of a qualified audit opinion. The Annual Plan was eventually passed, subject to final adoption, eight votes to six. Those in favour: Mayor Southgate, Deputy Mayor O'Leary, Councillors Hutt, Casey-Cox, van Oosten, Tauariki, and Huaki. Those against: Councillors Wilson, Taylor, Macindoe, Pike, Bydder, and Naidoo-Rauf. Greater visibility of water costs coming to rates bills Hamiltonians will have more clarity of the costs to provide water services when their next rates invoice arrives. Elected Members have approved the introduction of targeted rates in 2025/26 to itemise what a property pays to receive drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater services. The targeted rates are not in addition to a property's rates for 2025/26. Property owners will see a corresponding reduction in the General Rate portion of their rates to accommodate the change to how rates are itemised. The General Rate funds most of the services provided by Council. For a median value home, the general rate currently makes up about 73% of the total rates bill. After the introduction of the targeted rates, the general rate portion will be about 45%. The targeted rates are required to meet central government's expectations for councils to separate water costs and revenue from the other services they provide, as part of the Local Water Done Well reforms. The drinking water and wastewater targeted rates will be in place for 12 months, before the newly formed joint waters company with Waikato District Council assumes responsibility for delivering and charging for those services. The targeted rates will be calculated in the same way as the general rate – by capital value. Council also approved, subject to final adoption in June, the proposed 15.5% rates increase for 2025/26. This is consistent with the rates increase projected in the 2024-34 Long-Term Plan, to address Council's rising costs due to inflation, higher interest rates, and depreciation.
