MK Party: Ramaphosa made legal missteps when appointing interim police minister
The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party also slammed President Cyril Ramaphosa's choice of Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga to lead a commission of inquiry into police corruption as premature and a conflict of interest.
ALSO READ:
- MK Party heading to ConCourt to challenge appointment of interim police minister
- KZN MK Party threatens chaos should Mkhwanazi be persecuted
- MK Party sends Ramaphosa ultimatum over decision to appoint interim police minister
The party said there's enough evidence to fire Mchunu and a commission of inquiry to probe explosive allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi is unnecessary.
As it prepares a legal challenge to be lodged in the Constitutional Court, the MK Party said Ramaphosa has put two arms of state on a collision course by choosing a serving Constitutional Court judge to lead the inquiry before he's officially retired.
MK Party parliamentary leader John Hlophe explained: 'It's a judicial commission of inquiry, it's going to be headed by a judge, yet there are fundamental and serious allegations of corruption in the judiciary. In other words, the judiciary is called upon to investigate itself.'
Hlophe said appointing Wits law professor Firoz Cachalia as the interim police minister before his tenure as an academic officially ends is not only premature, but is another unconstitutional move because the country can't have two ministers serving in the same portfolio.
The MK Party said the Constitution also does not allow one of the president's two outside appointments to be in a temporary capacity.
Meanwhile, Parliament's police and justice committees will hold a joint meeting on Wednesday to chart a path for an inquiry into the police and the allegations involving Mchunu.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Madlanga commission to cost taxpayers R147.9m over six months
'The estimated budget for the commission over six months is R147.9m.' On Monday the commission chairperson, acting deputy chief justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, said work had started and they were treating the matter with urgency. The commission is set to begin in August, with the first interim report to be submitted to President Cyril Ramaphosa within the first three months. Madlanga said the inquiry would sit in Gauteng at a soon-to-be-announced venue, as the commission was still procuring premises. The commission comes after serious allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi that police minister Senzo Mchunu and deputy police commissioner for crime detection Lt-Gen Shadrack Sibiya worked in cahoots with criminals. Mchunu and Sibiya have since been placed on 'leave of absence'. Mkhwanazi alleged Mchunu and Sibiya were connected to criminals who run a drug syndicate from Gauteng and they were influenced by criminals to disband the political killings task team which was doing a good job. The commission will also probe: the Tshwane, Johannesburg and Ekurhuleni metropolitan police departments; the National Prosecuting Authority; the SAPS; and the judiciary.
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
How to ruin a good battle
If the military uniforms they wear in parliament were not for show and Colleen Makhubele was a commander of the MK Party forces in a real battle, she would have led them straight to an embarrassing defeat at the hands of the enemy. The occasion was the parliamentary vote on the Appropriations Bill — a significant step towards the passing of the troubled government of national unity's budget. The battle lines had long been drawn, GNU forces — though initially divided — stood in favour, and those outside the GNU would oppose it...
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
When xenophobia rears its ugly head it is time to ask the right questions
Have you noticed how, without fail, the ugly head of xenophobia always seems to re-emerge in the run-up to local elections? It's no accident. It's a strategy, and one we've seen play out time and again. When political failures pile up and service delivery grinds to a halt, scapegoating foreign nationals becomes a convenient distraction. Instead of holding local government accountable for broken promises, potholes, power cuts and clinics without doctors, we're told the problem is 'illegal foreigners'. It's a dangerous misdirection and it's costing lives. Instead of directing our rightful anger towards dysfunctional municipalities and inept leadership, we're encouraged sometimes by officials themselves to lash out at those even more vulnerable than us. It's easier to point fingers at desperate migrants in clinic queues than to question how our cities became places of neglect. Nowhere is this more evident than in the deeply troubling scenes unfolding outside public healthcare facilities across South Africa. Foreign nationals or those merely suspected of being foreign are being chased away, blocked from entering clinics and denied their constitutional rights. These acts aren't just inhumane; they are illegal. Let's be clear, section 27 of the South African Constitution guarantees everyone – yes, everyone – the right to access healthcare services. This includes migrants, asylum seekers and undocumented persons. It is not a matter of opinion. It is the law. And here's the part too many people overlook: having all people healthy within our borders is a public good. Allowing anyone, regardless of nationality, to suffer from untreated TB, measles or HIV does not just threaten their health, it endangers ours. Public health doesn't discriminate, and neither should we. What makes this even more dangerous is the recent targeting of human rights organisations like the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (Seri), Helen Suzman Foundation and the South African Human Rights Commission by xenophobic movements like Operation Dudula. These organisations grounded in constitutionalism and justice have dared to remind us that we are a country governed by laws, not mob sentiment. In the face of these attacks, Abahlali baseMjondolo showed us what real solidarity looks like. Their decision to form a human chain outside Seri's offices, physically defending the space and its staff, was an act of profound courage. It reminded us that human rights are not abstract principles, they must be defended in action, in public and with conviction. This is not just about foreign nationals. This is about the soul of our democracy. If we allow attacks on human rights defenders and on organisations like Seri to go unanswered, we set the stage for broader repression. Today it's them. Tomorrow it's all of us. We must stand up, speak out and defend what is right. Human rights are not a suggestion. They are the foundation of our Constitution. They are the promise of 1994. And they are under threat. Operation Dudula together with March and March are attacking our democratic values, our hard-won freedoms and the rule of law. If groups like Seri, Helen Suzman Foundation and the South African Human Rights Commission are silenced, who will speak up when your rights are next in line? We must not allow anger to be weaponised against the wrong people. It is time to ask better questions. Why are our clinics underresourced in the first place? Why are there not enough trained healthcare workers? Why is the housing backlog growing year after year? And why are we not holding local councillors and officials to account for this? Foreign nationals didn't fail to maintain your community's water infrastructure. They didn't loot public funds meant for housing and healthcare. They didn't shut down your clinic or redirect its budget. That was your government. South Africa is at a crossroads and we can continue being played, turning on each other in frustration. We must start organising, demanding better services, transparent leadership and a government that serves everyone who lives here.
