logo
New Zealand woman and six-year-old son detained for three weeks by Ice in US enduring ‘terrifying' ordeal

New Zealand woman and six-year-old son detained for three weeks by Ice in US enduring ‘terrifying' ordeal

The Guardian3 days ago
A New Zealand woman who is being held at a US immigration centre with her six-year-old son after they were detained crossing the Canada-US border, is being wrongly 'treated like a criminal', according to her friend and advocate.
Sarah Shaw, 33, a New Zealander who has lived in Washington state for just over three years, dropped her two eldest children to Vancouver airport on 24 July, so they could take a direct flight back to New Zealand for a holiday with their grandparents.
When Shaw attempted to re-enter the US, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) detained her and her youngest son, in what was a 'terrifying' ordeal, said Victoria Besancon, Shaw's friend who is helping to raise money for her legal fight.
'Sarah thought she was being kidnapped,' she said. 'They didn't really explain anything to her at first, they just kind of quietly took her and her son and immediately put them in like an unmarked white van.'
Ice confiscated Shaw's phone and transported the mother and son to the Dilley immigration processing center in south Texas, many states away from her home, Besancon said. Foreign nationals caught up in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown have similarly been transported to centres far from their homes, support networks and legal representation.
'It has been absolutely horrible,' Besancon said, adding that aside from the staff, Shaw and her son are the only English speakers, are locked in their shared bedroom from 8pm to 8am and are not allowed to wear their own clothes.
'It really is kind of like being in jail ... it has been absolutely devastating and it's kind of barbaric.'
Shaw is on what is known as a 'combo card' visa – an employment visa, which she obtained through her employment at a maximum security juvenile facility, and an I-360 visa, which can grant immigration status to domestic violence survivors.
Shaw had recently received a letter confirming her visa renewal, not realising that the I-360 element of her visa was still pending approval.
'It wasn't until she tried to come back across the border that she realised only half of the combination card – because it's only one physical card – had been fully approved,' said Besancon.
Border officials did not need to detain Shaw and could have filed for humanitarian parole, Besancon said. Meanwhile, all three of Shaw's children have had their I-360 visas approved, and Besancon alleged her youngest son was therefore being detained 'illegally'.
Besancon, a retired US Navy officer, said her country's treatment of Shaw and other immigrants was appalling.
'It's so heartbreaking now to see people who, like Sarah, are not only legal, but who are contributing to American society,' she said, adding that the situation is taking a huge financial and emotional toll on Shaw and her son.
'She gives therapy and counselling to some of our most at risk youth … and to be treated like a criminal herself has just been absolutely devastating.'
Shaw's case is the latest in a growing list of foreigners facing interrogation, detainment and deportations at the US border, including a British tourist, three Germans Lucas Sielaff, Fabian Schmidt and Jessica Brösche, and a Canadian and an Australian who were each held and then deported, despite having valid work visas.
The union representing Shaw, the Washington Federation of State Employees (WFSE), has called for her release.
'The trauma this has already caused for her and her son may never be healed,' said Mike Yestramski, the union's president and a psychiatric social worker at Western State hospital.
The union 'vehemently opposes Ice practices' and the broader immigration policies that enable them as they contradict American values and human rights, Yestramski said.
New Zealand's foreign affairs ministry said it is in contact with Shaw, but cannot comment further on the case due to privacy issues.
The Guardian has contacted Ice and the US embassy in New Zealand for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody
Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody

A federal judge ruled Friday to deny the Trump administration's request to end a policy in place for nearly three decades that is meant to protect immigrant children in federal custody. U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles issued her ruling a week after holding a hearing with the federal government and legal advocates representing immigrant children in custody. Gee called last week's hearing 'déjà vu' after reminding the court of the federal government's attempt to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement in 2019 under the first Trump administration. She repeated the sentiment in Friday's order. 'There is nothing new under the sun regarding the facts or the law. The Court therefore could deny Defendants' motion on that basis alone," Gee wrote, referring to the government's appeal to a law they believed kept the court from enforcing the agreement. In the most recent attempt, the government argued they made substantial changes since the agreement was formalized in 1997, creating standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement. Gee acknowledged that the government made some improved conditions of confinement, but wrote, 'These improvements are direct evidence that the FSA is serving its intended purpose, but to suggest that the agreement should be abandoned because some progress has been made is nonsensical.' Attorneys representing the federal government told the court the agreement gets in the way of their efforts to expand detention space for families, even though Trump's tax and spending bill provided billions to build new immigration facilities. Tiberius Davis, one of the government attorneys, said the bill gives the government authority to hold families in detention indefinitely. 'But currently under the Flores Settlement Agreement, that's essentially void,' he said last week. The Flores agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, was the result of over a decade of litigation between attorneys representing the rights of migrant children and the U.S. government over widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s. The agreement set standards for how licensed shelters must provide food, water, adult supervision, emergency medical services, toilets, sinks, temperature control and ventilation. It also limited how long U.S. Customs and Border Protection could detain child immigrants to 72 hours. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services then takes custody of the children. The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when HHS takes custody, but she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs. In arguing against the Trump administration's effort to completely end the agreement, advocates said the government was holding children beyond the time limits. In May, CBP held 46 children for over a week, including six children held for over two weeks and four children held 19 days, according to data revealed in a court filing. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours. That included 14 children, including toddlers, who were held for over 20 days in April. The federal government is looking to expand its immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz,' where a lawsuit alleges detainees' constitutional rights are being violated. Gee still has not ruled on the request by legal advocates for the immigrant children to expand independent monitoring of the treatment of children held in U.S. Customs and Border Protection facilities. Currently, the agreement allows for third-party inspections at facilities in the El Paso and Rio Grande Valley regions, but plaintiffs submitted evidence showing long detention times at border facilities that violate the agreement's terms.

Global News Podcast  Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal
Global News Podcast  Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Global News Podcast Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal

After ending their much-heralded summit in Alaska, the US and Russian leaders have said their meeting was "productive" and "positive", despite failing to come to a firm agreement on ending the war in Ukraine. Also, the United Nations says more than 1,700 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid in Gaza since late May; African leaders want world maps to better reflect their continent's true size; and at more than 3 million years old, the fossilised remains of Lucy - a human ancestor are going on tour. The Global News Podcast brings you the breaking news you need to hear, as it happens. Listen for the latest headlines and current affairs from around the world. Politics, economics, climate, business, technology, health – we cover it all with expert analysis and insight. Get the news that matters, delivered twice a day on weekdays and daily at weekends, plus special bonus episodes reacting to urgent breaking stories. Follow or subscribe now and never miss a moment. Get in touch: globalpodcast@

What we expected from the Trump-Putin summit - and what actually happened
What we expected from the Trump-Putin summit - and what actually happened

Sky News

time3 hours ago

  • Sky News

What we expected from the Trump-Putin summit - and what actually happened

A warm handshake, big smiles, and a red carpet - this was the welcome for Vladimir Putin as he touched down on US soil for critical negotiations on the war in Ukraine. There had been much build-up to the summit in Anchorage, Alaska,not least from Donald Trump himself - with the US president having threatened "severe" consequences for Russia should it not go well. But more than two-and-a-half hours of talks resulted in just a brief news conference with little detail given away - and ultimately, no talk of a ceasefire and no deal on Ukraine reached yet. Here is what was expected from the meeting - based on information from the White House, Mr Trump and the Kremlin beforehand - and what happened on the night. One-on-one turned into three-on-three It was thought this would be a one-on-one meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Putin. Instead, the US president was joined by US secretary of state Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, while the Russian leader was supported by his foreign affairs advisor Yuri Ushakov and Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov. The change seemed to indicate the White House was perhaps taking a more guarded approach than during a 2018 meeting in Helsinki, where Mr Trump and Mr Putin met privately with interpreters. The US leader then shocked the world by siding with the Russian leader over US intelligence officials on whether Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential campaign. Mr Putin was given the kind of reception typically reserved for close US allies, belying the bloodshed and the suffering in the war he started. The two men greeted each other with a handshake and a smiling Mr Trump even applauded the Russian president as he approached him on the red carpet. Our international affairs editor Dominic Waghorn, in Kyiv, gauged the Ukrainian reaction to the arrival - and said people were furious at the welcome extended by the Trump team. Images of US soldiers on their knees, unfurling the red carpet at the steps of the Russian leader's plane, went viral, he said, with social media "lit up with fury, anger, and disgust". He added: "There are different ways of welcoming a world leader to this type of event, and Trump has gone all out to give a huge welcome to Putin, which is sticking in the craw of Ukrainians." Any questions? Plenty. But no one was really given a chance to ask. Ahead of the talks, cameras were allowed inside for just a minute - and while this was enough time for a few journalists to shout some questions, these were ignored by the two leaders. "President Putin, will you stop killing civilians?" one shouted. In response, Mr Putin put his hand up to his ear as if he could not hear. In their brief media conference after the talks, Mr Putin spoke for almost nine minutes, while Trump took just three-and-a-half to say what he wanted to say. The two men then did not stay to answer questions from reporters. Before the event, the Kremlin said it could last between six and seven hours, but the whole visit lasted about four-and-a-half hours. 'Severe consequences' Ever since his inauguration in January, Mr Trump had been threatening serious consequences for Russia should a deal on Ukraine not be reached soon. Just two days after the ceremony, he took to social media to declare there could be "high levels of taxes, tariffs and sanctions" and called for an end to the "ridiculous" war. In February, he held what he described as a "productive" call with the Russian leader, and about two weeks later he infamously berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a visit to the Oval Office - this one taking place in front of the world's media. In July, he started to set deadlines for an end to the war - first giving Mr Putin 50 days and later reducing this to "10 or 12 days", before announcing the summit last week. Yesterday, Mr Trump insisted his Russian counterpart was "not going to mess around with me". However, while both men insisted the talks were "productive", it is not clear what agreements have been reached, and whether Ukraine is any closer to finding peace. The word ceasefire was not mentioned by either leader. Instead, they praised each other, with Mr Trump describing Mr Putin's remarks as "very profound" - and there was no mention of sanctions. A meeting with Mr Zelenskyy? It was expected that after the talks, Mr Trump could set the table for the next meeting with the Ukrainian president. While he said he would call Mr Zelenskyy, he made no public commitment to a meeting during the media conference. In an interview with Fox News after the summit, he said Russia and Ukraine would set a date to discuss next steps and a potential ceasefire deal, but did not provide further details on specifics or timings. "They're going to set up a meeting now, between President Zelenskyy and President Putin and myself, I guess," Mr Trump said. He also said that European nations "have to get involved a little bit" but it is "really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done". Putin brought his own limo - but travelled in The Beast instead After shaking hands on the red carpet, the two leaders made their way towards their waiting vehicles. But despite Mr Putin arriving with his "Aurus" limousine, and it being spotted on the tarmac near the planes, he got into the American presidential limousine, known as "the Beast", to travel to the meeting location. The Russian president was seen with a wide smile on his face, while Mr Trump appeared to be waving to the crowds.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store