logo
Restored property tax cut bill passes Wyoming Senate, heads to House

Restored property tax cut bill passes Wyoming Senate, heads to House

Yahoo05-02-2025

CHEYENNE — A bill to offer all homeowners in Wyoming a two-year, 50% reduction in property taxes has passed the state Senate.
Senate File 69, 'Homeowner property tax exemption,' passed in a 23-8 vote on third reading Tuesday. Last week, the Senate voted to decrease the percentage of property tax relief to 25% of assessed property value up to $1 million. This week, the Senate restored the bill to its original form, approving an amendment brought forward by Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne, in a 19-12 vote.
That amendment brought tax relief back to 50% for all homeowners, with no state backfill and a two-year sunset date.
Senate President Bo Biteman, R-Ranchester, said on the floor that the version passed Tuesday was the bill Wyomingites deserve.
Sen. Bo Biteman, R-Ranchester (2025)
Sen. Bo Biteman, R-Ranchester
'The people of Wyoming are tired of excuses. They want action, and they want us to deliver for them, finally,' Biteman said, adding that the Senate has been debating property tax relief for years.
'I have said repeatedly, the most difficult thing to do in the Wyoming Legislature is to cut taxes,' he said. 'Hundreds of millions of dollars flies out of here every time we do the budget.'
Senate Vice President Tim Salazar, R-Riverton, said this was the Senate fulfilling its promise to provide much-needed relief to its constituents.
'We just passed historic property tax relief. We didn't do it with trumpets. We didn't do it with fanfare, but we passed it,' Salazar said.
Sen. Tim Salazar, SD26
Sen. Tim Salazar, SD26
Other senators worried that the tax cut could affect smaller, more rural communities — many of which have not experienced soaring property tax increases — in ways that it may not affect counties where property values have increased by double digits in recent years.
Sen. Stacy Jones, R-Rock Springs, proposed an unsuccessful amendment to use state savings to backfill, or pay back, local governments for 12.5% of the lost revenue under the cut. In Rock Springs, property taxes have only increased 19.5% from 2019 to 2023. Jones said a 50% cut there would devastate the local civic center, rec center, senior center and services like snow removal.
'What you do today affects all of the communities across Wyoming,' Jones said.
However, Sen. Chris Rothfuss, D-Laramie, who voted against the bill, also voted against Jones' amendment. Rothfuss said the Legislative Stabilization Reserve Account, or the state's savings, was not designed to pay back tax cuts for citizens.
Others said that they did not support a backfill, but for another reason: To show citizens that the taxes they pay do indeed go toward local services, and when they are cut, so are those services.
Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, said he could not vote for SF 69 because it created a 'one size fits all' solution for all of Wyoming.
Instead, he said the Senate could have chosen to reduce only the assessed state mill levies, without cutting into those assessed by specific counties.
'We could have gone in … to the property taxes that this legislative body is responsible for, and stayed in our lane,' Hicks said. 'But we couldn't stay in our lane. We said, 'We are going to usurp all those local governments. We are going to have a paternalistic point of view, and we are going to provide property tax relief. Damn with the local governments'.'
Sen. Eric Barlow, R-Gillette, brought forward an amendment that would allow taxpayers to pay the full amount of property taxes due, without the exemption, if they choose to do so.
'I hear from folks who say, I need the services in my community. I want to have a way to pay if there is an exemption, a reduction,' Barlow said. 'This says that if you get the tax bill, and say it is a 50% exemption, that I can pay the full amount without the exemption.'
That amendment passed in a voice vote.
No state 'backfill'
Senate leaders told the media shortly after the vote they did not remove the state backfill 'to make a point.' On the floor, some senators pointed out that removing this backfill would hurt city budgets and reduce local services.
'Our purpose wasn't to inflict pain or to make a point. We don't make a point in tax policy,' Biteman said. 'It affects people's lives, it affects the pocketbook. Good tax policy stands on its own. … If you're going to cut taxes, cut taxes. You don't take money out of one pocket, put it in the other, and call it a tax cut. And that's the bottom line with the backfill.'
Nethercott added that it's 'not sustainable from a state fiscal perspective' to backfill lost revenue from the state. Local governments need to be self-sustainable on their own revenues, through their own financial planning, she said.
Biteman said there are still some House members who are 'hung up' on including a state backfill. However, the Senate president said those members are 'coming off of that.'
'I don't want to speak for them, but it sounds like things are moving,' Biteman said.
Nethercott said on the floor that a vote for the bill would not be a cut in education funding. One of the funding sources for the School Foundation Program is mill levies, which are paid for through property taxes.
Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne
Rothfuss agreed the loss in property tax revenue doesn't cut education funding, but it would force the state to dip into its savings. Currently, the incoming revenue from property taxes matches the expenditure of education funds, he said.
'That's a good situation to be in, when your revenue and your expenses are about the same,' Rothfuss said. 'If we pass this legislation, then we are no longer receiving enough revenue to pay the full cost of the School Foundation Program.'
This would force the state to pull out of its savings account, Rothfuss said, instead of relying on existing revenue.
'That's unsustainable,' Rothfuss said.
Before becoming law, SF 69 must pass the House and obtain Gov. Mark Gordon's signature. If SF 69 passes those hurdles, the exemption would first apply to the tax year that began Jan. 1.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bill enacting nation's strictest limits on corporate health care influence signed by Gov. Kotek
Bill enacting nation's strictest limits on corporate health care influence signed by Gov. Kotek

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bill enacting nation's strictest limits on corporate health care influence signed by Gov. Kotek

A doctor works at a pharmacy. Corporate investors eyeing local health care facilities in Oregon could soon face one of the hardest markets nationwide. () Corporate investors hoping to take over local health care facilities in Oregon could soon face one of the hardest markets nationwide. Senate Bill 951, which was quietly signed into law by Gov. Tina Kotek on Monday, sets the strongest regulations on private and corporate control of medical practices in the nation, according to industry lawyers. A similar effort failed in the Legislature last year amid pushback from Republicans that prevented the bill from meeting key legislative deadlines. The governor told reporters at a news conference Monday that the bill should be a model for other states and for Congress. 'We need to make sure that our health care providers and our delivery system stays local and is controlled locally,' she said. 'That's what that bill is trying to do.' The legislation was opposed by companies such as Amazon and the statewide nonprofit Oregon Ambulatory Surgery Center Association, an industry group, where executives see private investment as vital to their business strategy. 'We universally agree that the way to protect clinics from closure and maintain the broadest patient access to outpatient care is to keep the existing, and multi-ownership models alive and well,' wrote Ryan Grimm on behalf of the association and the Portland Clinic, a private multispecialty medical group, in a March letter to lawmakers. 'In some communities, there is no hospital to swoop in to the rescue, or no hospital in a financial position to save a clinic,' he wrote. The bill does not go into effect immediately and it contains a three-year adjustment period for clinics to comply with the restrictions. Institutions such as hospitals, tribal health facilities, behavioral health programs and crisis lines are exempted. 'We're at an inflection point in this country when it comes to the corporatization of healthcare,' wrote House Majority Leader Ben Bowman, D-Tigard, in a statement May 28 following the bill's passage in the Oregon House. 'With the passage of this bill, every Oregonian will know that decisions in exam rooms are being made by doctors, not corporate executives.' The signature from Kotek deals a major victory to local providers and doctors, who sought to wrest back control over their practices in key decisions such as spending, staffing levels, physician ownership stake, and the price of services. The legislation would close what supporters say is a loophole in state law, which mandates that doctors hold at least a 51% stake in most medical practices, but which companies have taken advantage of by employing their own doctors — sometimes from out of state — and putting them down on paper as clinic owners. Then the company itself, or a hired management service, is brought in to handle payroll, accounting and other services, shifting away control and revenues from the clinic to the company, and from what was once a locally operated business. The bill limits the control such companies can have in a clinic's operations and would ban noncompete agreements used by companies to prohibit doctors from taking a job at a different practice. Support for the bill coalesced around the takeover of the Eugene-based Oregon Medical Group by the health care giant Optum, one of the nation's largest employers of physicians. The surrounding area lost dozens of doctors, leaving over 10,000 people without care, according to a Frequently Asked Question's document from Sen. Deb Patterson, D-Salem, after Optum required its doctors to sign non-compete contracts. Optum reversed course after pressure from lawmakers in May 2024. 'This bill is about preventing the kind of takeover that happened at the Oregon Medical Group in Eugene,' wrote state Rep. Lisa Fragala, D-Eugene, in a May statement. 'When we see consolidation in the healthcare market, we see three things happen: higher prices, negative effects on the quality of care and decreased access to care.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Dozens of environmental groups sign letter opposing return of Utah public lands sale
Dozens of environmental groups sign letter opposing return of Utah public lands sale

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dozens of environmental groups sign letter opposing return of Utah public lands sale

People rally in opposition of Utah's lawsuit attempting to take control of federal lands at the Capitol in Salt Lake City on Saturday, Jan. 11, 2025. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch) Organizations from around the country signed a letter on Monday urging U.S. senators not to include a controversial proposal to sell thousands of acres of federal land in Congress' budget bill. The letter comes in the wake of reports that Utah Sen. Mike Lee is considering reviving an amendment to the bill originally proposed by Rep. Celeste Maloy that would dispose of nearly 11,500 acres of Bureau of Land Management land in southwestern Utah, and about 450,000 acres in Nevada. Lee, when asked by a Politico reporter last week if he intended to reintroduce the disposal, responded, 'I gotta go vote, but yes.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Lee's office did not respond to a request for comment on Monday, and it's unclear whether Utah's senior GOP senator is considering bringing back an exact copy of Maloy's amendment, or something different. But more than 100 organizations and nonprofits around the country are sounding the alarm, telling Senate leaders to 'heed how dramatically unpopular this idea is and reject any misguided attempt to get public lands sales back in this bill.' 'Decisions about the future of public lands should remain in public hands. Leaders in the House and Senate, extractive industry, and private developers are using the reconciliation process to sell off federal lands to pay for billionaire tax cuts. But such moves are deeply unpopular. Polling has repeatedly shown that the public — especially westerners — strongly believes in keeping public lands in public hands and, across partisan lines, rejects any efforts that would lead to the sale of these shared and cherished lands,' reads the letter, signed by Utah groups like the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Conserve Southwest Utah, Save Our Canyons, Great Basin Water Network and Back Country Horsemen of Utah. Public lands sale may return to 'big, beautiful' bill with Mike Lee amendment The letter is addressed to Lee, who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, New Mexico Democrat Martin Heinrich, the committee's ranking member, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat. Maloy's amendment was dropped from the budget bill after it received pushback from all sides of the aisle. That includes Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke, who previously said selling public lands is a line he would not cross and rallied support from a bipartisan group of lawmakers to strip the proposal from the bill. 'The public had no opportunity to participate in the process of identifying these parcels, let alone time to understand the long-term effect of selling off these public lands,' the letter reads. Maloy's proposal identified parcels owned by the Bureau of Land Management to sell to Washington and Beaver counties, the Washington County Water Conservancy District and the city of St. George. The land would have been used for water infrastructure (like reservoirs and wells), an airport expansion in St. George, new and widened roads, recreation and housing. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

The impact of Medicaid, SNAP cuts in Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
The impact of Medicaid, SNAP cuts in Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The impact of Medicaid, SNAP cuts in Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

ST. LOUIS – Last week, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued its analysis of President Donald Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill.' The CBO predicted the legislation would increase the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade and leave nearly 11 million people without health insurance. 'They're asking the poorest Americans to tighten their belts, so that the richest Americans can loosen their belts, and that's what makes it so extra unfair,' Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, said. Kogan says the president's tax bill could feature the largest Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) cuts in history. 'By putting up so much red tape, tons of people who're doing everything right fall through the cracks,' Kogan said. 'These are incredibly meager benefits and all of the sudden, lots of people are going to lose them.' Police crackdown on reckless, disabling dozens of cars Kogan says the bill freezes Medicaid provider taxes, which many states use to help pay for large portions of their Medicaid programs. 'Already, a lot of hospitals are struggling, and this would definitely make the situation much worse,' he said. Senator Josh Hawley warned this could force rural hospitals to close. 'You've got some senators who now want to change this bill to cut Medicaid benefits. That's ridiculous. That's insane. 1.3 million people in Missouri are on Medicaid, including hundreds of thousands of kids. These are working people who cannot afford health insurance otherwise,' Hawley said in a June 5 interview. Last week, Hawley posted on his X social media account, 'Just had a great talk with President Trump about the big, beautiful bill. He said again, no Medicaid benefit cuts.' 'Failure is not an option. And we intend to deliver, along with the president, for the American people,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said. With Senate Republicans planning to get the bill to the president's desk by July 4, Kogan fears the fallout. 'There's a lot at stake here and a lot of people's livelihoods could be upended, so I hope the senators could see differently,' Kogan said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store