‘Did they learn nothing?': Auschwitz survivor to return German honour over AfD vote role
A 99-year-old Holocaust survivor has said he will return his federal order of merit to the German president in protest over MPs passing an anti-immigration motion in parliament with the support of the far-right Alternative für Deutschland.
Albrecht Weinberg, whose parents were murdered in Auschwitz, told the Guardian he was 'horrified' on learning that a proposal submitted by the conservative parties had relied on the anti-immigrant, xenophobic AfD to get it over the line.
On Thursday, Weinberg said: 'You know German history? You know then how some people posing as democrats in 1933 abused the legal political process to get into power? What happened in the Bundestag on Wednesday reminded me of Germany in 1933 of how Hitler and the Nazi party managed to come to power through legitimate means.'
Weinberg, who survived Auschwitz along with his brother and sister, said he had decided 'very spontaneously' to hand back his medal 'because I was very upset about the voting in the Bundestag'.
On Wednesday, the conservative alliance of the Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) submitted a non-binding motion for a plan that aims to make it policy to turn migrants and asylum seekers away at the German border, and to enable security forces to more easily deport foreigners in Germany.
Friedrich Merz, the leader of the CDU and the man likely to become the next chancellor after elections later this month, was urged not to use the AfD to get the motion through by opposition members, who said it breached Germany's longstanding taboo to keep a 'firewall' between the far right and the mainstream.
His decision was even criticised on Thursday by former chancellor and CDU leader Angela Merkel who, in a rare intervention into German politics, rebuked him for reneging on a promise not to cooperate, even 'by accident', with the AfD.
Weinberg, who was given Germany's highest honour for his work in schools raising awareness of the Holocaust, said he was shocked but not surprised by the motion.
He said: 'The Nazis wanted to get rid of my family even though we were German citizens, and they succeeded in murdering my parents and almost killed me and my siblings. Now these politicians want to chase everyone out who they don't like. Did they learn nothing from the second world war? I really wonder whether I should be packing my suitcase again.'
He said he had already been chilled by the historical parallels he saw between the AfD's tactics and those of the Nazi party after recent reports that the AfD had been distributing flyers designed to resemble plane tickets for deportation that were addressed to 'illegal immigrants'.
'It reminded me precisely of how the SA [the paramilitary wing of the Nazi party] had printed small tickets at the local printing press and rang the bell of our house handing one to my father, a one-way ticket … telling him 'don't come back',' he said.
Weinberg, who grew up in the village of Fehndorf Rhauderfehn in East Frisia, northern Germany and will turn 100 in March, was forced into Nazi slave labour in 1939. He and his sister, Friedel, were sent to Auschwitz in April 1943 at the same time as, but separate from, their older brother, Dieter.
Weinberg said he had been shocked to hear that even his own local MP, 'a dear friend' from the CDU, had voted in favour of the motion. He said: 'We're friends. I called her because I was so disturbed – she said she'll come and see me in a week or two to explain why. What can you do?'
Photographer Luigi Toscano from Mannheim, a friend of Weinberg's whose project 'Lest We Forget' documented the stories of 400 survivors of the Holocaust, also said he was returning his order of merit. He was prepared to take Weinberg with him and hand it back to President Frank-Walter Steinmeier in Berlin personally, he said. 'Either the president will receive us or we'll throw the medals into his letter box,' he told broadcaster ARD.
Wednesday's vote came two days after a memorial at Auschwitz on the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi death camp in 1945.
Its controversy led to criticism from all sides of the mainstream political spectrum. In a statement on her website, Merkel said she stood by her longstanding conviction that there should never be any association between the mainstream parties and the far-right populists.
She said: 'I think it is wrong to no longer feel bound to this proposal, thereby allowing a majority with the votes of the AfD in a vote in the German Bundestag for the first time on 29 January 2025.'
Eva Umlauf, 82, who survived Auschwitz and in 2015 told The Guardian the story of how she was deported there with her mother in 1944, also compared the vote to the situation in 1930s Germany.
In a letter to the Süddeutsche Zeitung, she wrote: 'We all know how German politicians once thought they could cooperate with Hitler and the Nazi party. Keep them in check. And how in just a few years, our democracy became a dictatorship. Peace became war.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
We are Nobel laureates, scientists, writers and artists. The threat of fascism is back
On 1 May 1925, with Benito Mussolini already in power, a group of Italian intellectuals publicly denounced his fascist regime in an open letter. The signatories – scientists, philosophers, writers and artists – took a stand in support of the essential tenets of a free society: the rule of law, personal liberty and independent thinking, culture, art and science. Their open defiance against the brutal imposition of the fascist ideology – at great personal risk – proved that opposition was not only possible, but necessary. Today, 100 years later, the threat of fascism is back – and so we must summon that courage and defy it again. Fascism emerged in Italy a century ago, marking the advent of modern dictatorship. Within a few years, it spread across Europe and the world, taking different names but maintaining similar forms. Wherever it seized power, it undermined the separation of powers in the service of autocracy, silenced opposition through violence, took control of the press, halted the advancement of women's rights and crushed workers' struggles for economic justice. Inevitably, it permeated and distorted all institutions devoted to scientific, academic and cultural activities. Its cult of death exalted imperial aggression and genocidal racism, triggering the second world war, the Holocaust, the death of tens of millions of people and crimes against humanity. At the same time, the resistance to fascism and the many other fascist ideologies became a fertile ground for imagining alternative ways of organising societies and international relations. The world that emerged from the second world war – with the charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the theoretical foundations of the EU and the legal arguments against colonialism – remained marked by deep inequalities. Yet, it represented a decisive attempt to establish an international legal order: an aspiration toward global democracy and peace, grounded in the protection of universal human rights, including not only civil and political, but also economic, social and cultural rights. Fascism never vanished, but for a time it was held at bay. However, in the past two decades, we have witnessed a renewed wave of far-right movements, often bearing unmistakably fascist traits: attacks on democratic norms and institutions, a reinvigorated nationalism laced with racist rhetoric, authoritarian impulses and systematic assaults on the rights of those who do not fit a manufactured traditional authority, rooted in religious, sexual and gender normativity. These movements have re-emerged across the globe, including in long-standing democracies, where widespread dissatisfaction with political failure to address mounting inequalities and social exclusion has once again been exploited by new authoritarian figures. True to the old fascist script, under the guise of an unlimited popular mandate, these figures undermine national and international rule of law, targeting the independence of the judiciary, the press, institutions of culture, higher education and science, even attempting to destroy essential data and scientific information. They fabricate 'alternative facts' and invent 'enemies within'; they weaponise security concerns to entrench their authority and that of the ultra-wealthy 1%, offering privileges in exchange for loyalty. This process is now accelerating, as dissent is increasingly suppressed through arbitrary detentions, threats of violence, deportations and an unrelenting campaign of disinformation and propaganda, operated with the support of traditional and social media barons – some merely complacent, others openly techno-fascist enthusiasts. Democracies are not flawless: they are vulnerable to misinformation and they are not yet sufficiently inclusive. However, democracies by their nature provide fertile ground for intellectual and cultural progress and therefore always have the potential to improve. In democratic societies, human rights and freedoms can expand, the arts flourish, scientific discoveries thrive and knowledge grow. They grant the freedom to challenge ideas and question power structures, propose new theories even when culturally uncomfortable, which is essential to human advancement. Democratic institutions offer the best framework for addressing social injustices, and the best hope to fulfil the post-war promises of the rights to work, education, health, social security, participation in cultural and scientific life, and the collective right of peoples to development, self-determination and peace. Without this, humanity faces stagnation, growing inequality, injustice and catastrophe, not least from the existential threat caused by the climate emergency that the new fascist wave negates. In our hyper-connected world, democracy cannot exist in isolation. As national democracies require strong institutions, international cooperation relies on the effective implementation of democratic principles and multilateralism to regulate relations among nations, and on multistakeholder processes to engage a healthy society. The rule of law must extend beyond borders, ensuring that international treaties, human rights conventions and peace agreements are respected. While existing global governance and international institutions require improvement, their erosion in favor of a world governed by raw power, transactional logic and military might is a regression to an era of colonialism, suffering and destruction. As in 1925, we scientists, philosophers, writers, artists and citizens of the world have a responsibility to denounce and resist the resurgence of fascism in all its forms. We call on all those who value democracy to act: Defend democratic, cultural and educational institutions. Call out abuses of democratic principles and human rights. Refuse pre-emptive compliance. Join collective actions, locally and internationally. Boycott and strike when possible. Make resistance impossible to ignore and costly to repress. Uphold facts and evidence. Foster critical thinking and engage with your communities on these grounds. This is an ongoing struggle. Let our voices, our work and our principles be a bulwark against authoritarianism. Let this message be a renewed declaration of defiance. Nobel laureates: Eric Maskin, Roger B Myerson, Alvin E Roth, Lars Peter Hansen, Oliver Hart, Daron Acemoglu, Wolfgang Ketterle, John C Mather, Brian P Schmidt, Michel Mayor, Takaaki Kajita, Giorgio Parisi, Pierre Agostini, Joachim Frank, Richard J Roberts, Leland Hartwell, Paul Nurse, Jack W Szostak, Edvard I Moser, May-Britt Moser, Harvey James Alter, Victor Ambros, Gary Ruvkun, Barry James Marshall, Craig Mello, Charles Rice Leading scholars on fascism and democracy: Ruth Ben-Ghiat, Timothy Snyder, Jason Stanley, Claudia Koonz, Mia Fuller, Giovanni De Luna and Andrea Mammone The full list of signatories can be found here
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Netanyahu's Iran strike 'golden opportunity' as Trump 'unable to control him'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu feels emboldened to act against Iran because he believes he can control Donald Trump - and he will now move to assert Israel's dominance over the Middle East Donald Trump is unable to control Israel's President Benjamin Netanyahu as he lays waste to Iran's nuclear facilities today, an expert has warned. Yesterday, Netanyahu released a video statement in which he declared the ongoing aerial assault as a way to "roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival". A report released by the International Atomic Energy Agency suggested that Iran is no longer abiding by its commitment to only use its uranium enrichment programme for civilian purposes. The "threat" Netanyahu refers to is the fears echoed by the IAEA that Tehran could already have enough Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to build 10 nuclear warheads. "In recent months, Iran has taken steps that it has never taken before, steps to weaponise this enriched uranium," he said. "If not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time. It could be a year. It could be within a few months, less than a year. This is a clear and present danger to Israel's very survival." The attack commenced within hours of dealmaker Trump saying the talks planned for the weekend were set to continue, raising questions over Netanyahu's timing. Professor Anthony Glees, a renowned international defence and security expert, explained this is a "golden opportunity" for Netanyahu to completely destroy the Islamic Republic and assert dominance over the wider region, all under the pretense of keeping Israel safe from Iranian warheads. "Netanyahu has made it clear that he is throwing everything into the destruction of the Islamic Republic of Iran. He's accusing it of preparing to wipe out Israel with nuclear weapons (he says they could make 9 atomic bombs in a 'few months' even a 'very short time') and he won't repeat the errors of the last century when no one took the threat of Nazi extermination of the Jews seriously," he tells The Mirror. "Netanyahu realises that he has a golden opportunity now that Biden and Blinken have gone to redraw the map of the Middle East and assert Israel's total control of the entire region." "He feels he's in a position to manipulate Trump because, although it's clear neither Trump nor Rubio wanted him to strike, neither of them are able politically to control him," he added. During his video, Netanyahu likened Israel to the US state of New Jersey - which Professor Glees believes was a nod to the American audience, who he believes support him fully. Professor Glees believes its unlikely Netanyahu's plan will backfire and he won't get the dominance or security he seeks. It's also likely that the public in other Arab states will not stand for Israel decimating Iran, forcing leaders to act and form a league against Israel. He said: "My guess is that Operation Rising Lion will not sort the problem of Israel's security. Israel cannot even defeat Hamas in Gaza let alone take on a united Arab front. The Iranian counter-attack may kill many Israelis over the next hours and days."
Glasgow Times
4 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Call to remove 'racist' banners from Clydebank bandstand
Jim Bollan of West Dunbartonshire Community Party will present a motion at the full council meeting next week, asking the local authority to take down all banners, posters, flags, flyers and photos at the bandstand. 'You pay, migrants stay' and 'Migrants adored, pensioners ignored' feature on the banners which appear most Wednesdays at the space next to the Clyde Shopping Centre. Call to remove 'racist' banners from Clydebank bandstand. (Image: YouTube) In a video posted on YouTube, a logo for Patriotic Alternative, a far-right group, is seen before photos of the banners at the bandstand are shown. Cllr Bollan is asking the council to agree to remove any of these items from the authority-owned landmark that don't have prior written consent. He has claimed the group congregating there are "spreading far-right, neo-nazi and white nationalist" agenda in the town. Police Scotland has previously stated that they have visited the area on numerous occasions; however, no criminality has been established. Videos posted to Youtube show officers approaching the bandstand. (Image: YouTube) Cllr Bollan said: "Patriotic Alternative (PA) is a racist organisation who are not welcome in West Dunbartonshire. They were at the forefront of harassing and intimidating asylum seekers being housed in the hotel in Erskine by the government recently. "People fleeing violence and possible death in their own country were being bullied and attacked by racist members of the PA because they were non white. "They are now trying to spread their far right, neo nazi, white nationalist agenda in Clydebank and it needs to be confronted by the local council, organisations and the wider community. PA also oppose LGBT rights, which is also divisive and abhorrent. "We have a diverse community in West Dunbartonshire and we need to ensure that no individual or ethnic group are singled out because of the colour of their skin. "The Trade Unions have been at the forefront of exposing the racists locally, and we all need to build on their action to drive the racist PA out of West Dunbartonshire". A statement previously supplied by West Dunbartonshire Council says, without special permission, "notices, posters or flags are not permitted to be affixed to the bandstand and therefore the Council can and will remove these."
