Mum 'lost daughter overnight' after she 'just stopped'
A single mum has shared her heartbreak over how she "lost (her) daughter overnight" when her little girl developed a rare disorder that has left her unable to walk or talk. Poppy Allard, who is now 10 years old, appeared to be a perfectly healthy infant, hitting all the usual milestones until she was about 15 months old, when her condition took a dramatic turn for the worse.
Mum Victoria, a 41-year-old nurse, recalled how "alarm bells rang out" as Poppy ceased making sounds, stopped responding to her name, and lost hand function. After being referred to Clinical Genetics at Guy's Hospital in London, Poppy received a diagnosis of Rett Syndrome at two years old. This incurable condition affects brain development and strikes approximately one in every 10,000 girls born each year, as per NHS data.
Rett Syndrome predominantly impacts girls and leads to profound mental and physical disabilities. Despite this, individuals with Rett Syndrome maintain their cognitive abilities, effectively becoming prisoners within their own unresponsive bodies.
In an inspiring act of solidarity and support, Victoria's sister Hannah Prebble is embarking on a gruelling 200km triathlon challenge over a month to fundraise for Reverse Rett, a British charity dedicated to finding treatments and ultimately a cure for Rett Syndrome.
Victoria, also mother of 13-year-old Daisy, recounted the heart-wrenching change in her youngest daughter: "Poppy was about a year old and everything up until that point seemed absolutely normal. All her milestones were coming up as you would expect ... I didn't really think for a minute that there was any problem. One minute, I had this really smiley, babbling baby, and then the next day, it was like she was gone."
Initially, Poppy, who was born in 2014, appeared to be developing like any healthy child. Victoria, from near Folkestone in Kent, said: "She sat up, she was very engaging, she started to smile and babble. She was using her hands to play with toys and pick tiny things up that she found in the carpet that she was not supposed to. I didn't really think for a minute that there was any problem."
However, a few months past her first birthday, Poppy's development took a distressing turn—she stopped making progress at around one year and regressed at 15 months.
"As she passed the year mark... she sat up, but did not move and we were not getting any more development with her motor skills, so she didn't start to pull herself up on furniture and things like that," said Victoria. The situation abruptly worsened, leaving Victoria shaken: "And then on the particular day, it was almost like I lost her overnight, she suddenly just stopped engaging."
The alarming deterioration led to panic and fear, as Victoria noticed drastic changes: "She stopped looking at me, she didn't answer her name – she wasn't making any noises. It was quite terrifying because that's when it really hit that something very serious was wrong."
Rett Syndrome usually manifests between six to 18 months of age, with children often losing previously acquired skills and failing to reach further developmental milestones. When Poppy began showing concerning symptoms, she was initially referred to a physiotherapist who suggested a potential genetic or chromosomal disorder due to her low muscle tone.
Victoria recalled the moment of realisation that Poppy might not develop like other children as hitting her "That's when it hit me like a bus, and I started to realise that she probably wasn't going to be a typical child in the sense that we see a typical child, and that was very emotional,". She described the period of waiting for a diagnosis as a "harrowing time, with many sleepless nights".
Seizures are a common symptom of Rett Syndrome, and Poppy had her first seizure at three years old, although they have been relatively infrequent since then.
"I was actually driving in the car and she was in the back of her car seat, her eyes rolled to the back of her head and she became very, very vacant," Victoria recounted. "I think she stopped breathing momentarily and she was very pale."
Victoria described it as both a "blessing and a curse" that Poppy is cognitively similar to an average child, understanding things easily. She added that it's a "really common misconception" that children with Rett Syndrome can't possess strong cognitive abilities.
To communicate, Poppy uses Eye Gaze technology, which involves looking at symbols on a screen.
Victoria, Poppy's mother, shared: "Her communication has returned – as much as it's not typical, I know exactly what she wants, I know exactly what she needs." Poppy is scheduled for hip surgery this summer and will have metal rods inserted into her spine in the coming years due to scoliosis.
Being a single mum to Poppy and her other child Daisy has been "extra scary", Victoria admitted, despite receiving support from her parents. She expressed her concerns about potential health deterioration that could require round-the-clock care or prevent Poppy from attending school, saying: "For example, if her health really deteriorates and something happens which means that she needs to be cared for 24/7, or she couldn't go to school, then I don't know where that leaves us as a family financially and how we would manage.
"Basically, it makes all of the uncertainties of the condition a lot worse I think, because if there's someone working with you as a team to do things together, it's very different. We don't know what the future holds. We don't know what's coming, but we just have to kind of roll with it and deal with what happens as it comes."
However, Poppy's "very special personality" has endeared her to healthcare professionals involved in her care. Victoria affectionately refers to her daughter as a "I call her a ray of sunshine, because despite everything that she has to face and everything going on for her, she's so cheerful. She wins the hearts of people that she meets... people want to work hard to look after her because of how bright her personality shines through."
Victoria expressed her deep gratitude towards her sister for raising funds for Reverse Rett, stating, "It really means a lot to me," For more information on Hannah's fundraising efforts, visit gofundme.com/f/hannahs-100km-triathlon-mashup-for-reverse-rett-poppy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
3 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
‘Contradiction' in figures makes health experts question NHS data
Experts suggest that more patients are being referred for treatment than leaving the waiting list, despite the overall waiting list coming down. Analysis found that in May, for every 100 referrals for pre-planned care, only 86 patient 'pathways' were complete – a scenario that would expect to see the waiting list getting bigger. But the official figures for May, published last month, show that the waiting list for routine hospital treatment in England had dropped to its lowest level for more than two years. 'There appears to be a contradiction in the data,' analysts from the Nuffield Trust think tank said. Writing a piece for part of the Quality Watch programme, the experts claim that an increase in NHS activity alone has not been enough to cause the reduction in the waiting list. Their new report examines so-called 'unreported removals', which occur when someone is taken off the waiting list for a reason other than that person having received their treatment that month. The report says that over the last two financial years there has been an average of 244,500 unreported removals a month. Though the waiting list has started to go down, unreported removals have gone up, they add. Officials from the Department and Health and Social Care insist that over the last 12 months, the number and percentage of unreported removals are lower than 2019. The new report points out that some of these unreported removals will represent patients that did get treatment but it was not recorded properly at the time. Another issue could be problems with NHS software and data management processes. The authors of the review wrote: 'Improving the data quality of waiting lists is important to ensure that people who should not be on the list, like people who have been treated privately or left the country, are no longer counted among those waiting to be seen. 'However, accusations of gaming the validation process, by removing referrals from the waiting list inappropriately without treatment, are likely to persist in the absence of transparency about what actions the unreported removals materially represent. 'The NHS is delivering more planned care, but still not enough to keep up with demand. 'The planned care that is reported is not enough to explain the reduction in the elective waiting list, and the publicly available data provides little more insight.' Officials estimate that 85% of the reduction in the waiting list is because of increased NHS 'activity' and suggest that 15% is because of unreported removals. According to the latest NHS figures, an estimated 7.36 million treatments were waiting to be carried out at the end of May, relating to just under 6.23 million patients, down from 7.39 million treatments and just over 6.23 million patients at the end of April. These are the lowest totals since March 2023 for treatments and April 2023 for patients. The list hit a record high in September 2023, with 7.77 million treatments and 6.50 million patients. The size of the list had been on an upward trend for much of the last 10 years, passing three million treatments in 2014, four million in 2017, five million in 2021 and seven million in 2022. In February 2020, the last full month before the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, the list stood at 4.57 million treatments. The authors of the latest review add: 'The information available in the public domain is insufficient for independent scrutiny of the elective waiting list, and consequently for holding government to account. 'Removals from the waiting list should be described in publicly available data in a meaningful way; the current process is unduly obscure. 'Until more transparent reporting is provided, accountability around unreported removals remains impossible and the planned care waiting list will continue to be a misleading indicator of how the NHS is dealing with demand.' It comes as the NHS in England is to reveal its latest waiting list figures on Thursday. Commenting on the analysis, an NHS England spokesperson said: 'NHS staff have made significant progress in reducing waiting lists in the last year – down by more than 260,000 since June 2024 – and this is driven by the fact that 2,300 more patients are receiving treatment every day compared to last year.' 'While the validation process has a small impact on the overall waiting list – as is made crystal clear in our published monthly waiting list data – it's right we regularly clinically review those waiting so hospitals can prioritise patients more accurately and deploy their resources efficiently.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson added: 'Our drive to clear the huge waiting list backlog we inherited includes making sure all patients are getting the right treatment as quickly as possible. 'That's why we are supporting GPs to seek specialist advice before making referrals, and screening existing waiting lists to check that all patients need to be on there – freeing up capacity to get more people seen more quickly. 'This is one element of our wider work to cut waiting times for patients and improve productivity through our Plan for Change, through which we have already delivered over four million extra appointments and cut the waiting list by 260,000.'
Leader Live
3 hours ago
- Leader Live
‘Contradiction' in figures makes health experts question NHS data
Experts suggest that more patients are being referred for treatment than leaving the waiting list, despite the overall waiting list coming down. Analysis found that in May, for every 100 referrals for pre-planned care, only 86 patient 'pathways' were complete – a scenario that would expect to see the waiting list getting bigger. But the official figures for May, published last month, show that the waiting list for routine hospital treatment in England had dropped to its lowest level for more than two years. 'There appears to be a contradiction in the data,' analysts from the Nuffield Trust think tank said. Writing a piece for part of the Quality Watch programme, the experts claim that an increase in NHS activity alone has not been enough to cause the reduction in the waiting list. Their new report examines so-called 'unreported removals', which occur when someone is taken off the waiting list for a reason other than that person having received their treatment that month. The report says that over the last two financial years there has been an average of 244,500 unreported removals a month. Though the waiting list has started to go down, unreported removals have gone up, they add. Officials from the Department and Health and Social Care insist that over the last 12 months, the number and percentage of unreported removals are lower than 2019. The new report points out that some of these unreported removals will represent patients that did get treatment but it was not recorded properly at the time. Another issue could be problems with NHS software and data management processes. The authors of the review wrote: 'Improving the data quality of waiting lists is important to ensure that people who should not be on the list, like people who have been treated privately or left the country, are no longer counted among those waiting to be seen. 'However, accusations of gaming the validation process, by removing referrals from the waiting list inappropriately without treatment, are likely to persist in the absence of transparency about what actions the unreported removals materially represent. 'The NHS is delivering more planned care, but still not enough to keep up with demand. 'The planned care that is reported is not enough to explain the reduction in the elective waiting list, and the publicly available data provides little more insight.' Officials estimate that 85% of the reduction in the waiting list is because of increased NHS 'activity' and suggest that 15% is because of unreported removals. According to the latest NHS figures, an estimated 7.36 million treatments were waiting to be carried out at the end of May, relating to just under 6.23 million patients, down from 7.39 million treatments and just over 6.23 million patients at the end of April. These are the lowest totals since March 2023 for treatments and April 2023 for patients. The list hit a record high in September 2023, with 7.77 million treatments and 6.50 million patients. The size of the list had been on an upward trend for much of the last 10 years, passing three million treatments in 2014, four million in 2017, five million in 2021 and seven million in 2022. In February 2020, the last full month before the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, the list stood at 4.57 million treatments. The authors of the latest review add: 'The information available in the public domain is insufficient for independent scrutiny of the elective waiting list, and consequently for holding government to account. 'Removals from the waiting list should be described in publicly available data in a meaningful way; the current process is unduly obscure. 'Until more transparent reporting is provided, accountability around unreported removals remains impossible and the planned care waiting list will continue to be a misleading indicator of how the NHS is dealing with demand.' It comes as the NHS in England is to reveal its latest waiting list figures on Thursday. Commenting on the analysis, an NHS England spokesperson said: 'NHS staff have made significant progress in reducing waiting lists in the last year – down by more than 260,000 since June 2024 – and this is driven by the fact that 2,300 more patients are receiving treatment every day compared to last year.' 'While the validation process has a small impact on the overall waiting list – as is made crystal clear in our published monthly waiting list data – it's right we regularly clinically review those waiting so hospitals can prioritise patients more accurately and deploy their resources efficiently.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson added: 'Our drive to clear the huge waiting list backlog we inherited includes making sure all patients are getting the right treatment as quickly as possible. 'That's why we are supporting GPs to seek specialist advice before making referrals, and screening existing waiting lists to check that all patients need to be on there – freeing up capacity to get more people seen more quickly. 'This is one element of our wider work to cut waiting times for patients and improve productivity through our Plan for Change, through which we have already delivered over four million extra appointments and cut the waiting list by 260,000.'
North Wales Chronicle
3 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
‘Contradiction' in figures makes health experts question NHS data
Experts suggest that more patients are being referred for treatment than leaving the waiting list, despite the overall waiting list coming down. Analysis found that in May, for every 100 referrals for pre-planned care, only 86 patient 'pathways' were complete – a scenario that would expect to see the waiting list getting bigger. But the official figures for May, published last month, show that the waiting list for routine hospital treatment in England had dropped to its lowest level for more than two years. 'There appears to be a contradiction in the data,' analysts from the Nuffield Trust think tank said. Writing a piece for part of the Quality Watch programme, the experts claim that an increase in NHS activity alone has not been enough to cause the reduction in the waiting list. Their new report examines so-called 'unreported removals', which occur when someone is taken off the waiting list for a reason other than that person having received their treatment that month. The report says that over the last two financial years there has been an average of 244,500 unreported removals a month. Though the waiting list has started to go down, unreported removals have gone up, they add. Officials from the Department and Health and Social Care insist that over the last 12 months, the number and percentage of unreported removals are lower than 2019. The new report points out that some of these unreported removals will represent patients that did get treatment but it was not recorded properly at the time. Another issue could be problems with NHS software and data management processes. The authors of the review wrote: 'Improving the data quality of waiting lists is important to ensure that people who should not be on the list, like people who have been treated privately or left the country, are no longer counted among those waiting to be seen. 'However, accusations of gaming the validation process, by removing referrals from the waiting list inappropriately without treatment, are likely to persist in the absence of transparency about what actions the unreported removals materially represent. 'The NHS is delivering more planned care, but still not enough to keep up with demand. 'The planned care that is reported is not enough to explain the reduction in the elective waiting list, and the publicly available data provides little more insight.' Officials estimate that 85% of the reduction in the waiting list is because of increased NHS 'activity' and suggest that 15% is because of unreported removals. According to the latest NHS figures, an estimated 7.36 million treatments were waiting to be carried out at the end of May, relating to just under 6.23 million patients, down from 7.39 million treatments and just over 6.23 million patients at the end of April. These are the lowest totals since March 2023 for treatments and April 2023 for patients. The list hit a record high in September 2023, with 7.77 million treatments and 6.50 million patients. The size of the list had been on an upward trend for much of the last 10 years, passing three million treatments in 2014, four million in 2017, five million in 2021 and seven million in 2022. In February 2020, the last full month before the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, the list stood at 4.57 million treatments. The authors of the latest review add: 'The information available in the public domain is insufficient for independent scrutiny of the elective waiting list, and consequently for holding government to account. 'Removals from the waiting list should be described in publicly available data in a meaningful way; the current process is unduly obscure. 'Until more transparent reporting is provided, accountability around unreported removals remains impossible and the planned care waiting list will continue to be a misleading indicator of how the NHS is dealing with demand.' It comes as the NHS in England is to reveal its latest waiting list figures on Thursday. Commenting on the analysis, an NHS England spokesperson said: 'NHS staff have made significant progress in reducing waiting lists in the last year – down by more than 260,000 since June 2024 – and this is driven by the fact that 2,300 more patients are receiving treatment every day compared to last year.' 'While the validation process has a small impact on the overall waiting list – as is made crystal clear in our published monthly waiting list data – it's right we regularly clinically review those waiting so hospitals can prioritise patients more accurately and deploy their resources efficiently.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson added: 'Our drive to clear the huge waiting list backlog we inherited includes making sure all patients are getting the right treatment as quickly as possible. 'That's why we are supporting GPs to seek specialist advice before making referrals, and screening existing waiting lists to check that all patients need to be on there – freeing up capacity to get more people seen more quickly. 'This is one element of our wider work to cut waiting times for patients and improve productivity through our Plan for Change, through which we have already delivered over four million extra appointments and cut the waiting list by 260,000.'
