A third of companies are looking to scale back on work-from-home option, despite its popularity with employees, survey finds
Orlagh Farrington, head of health and benefits at WTW in Ireland, said the one-third figure was a slight decline on the previous year, adding employers are looking to balance their needs with employee expectations.
'Nearly half of Irish jobseekers say they would turn down a role that doesn't offer hybrid or remote options,' she said.
'This puts employers in a challenging position: while some are eager to bring teams back onsite, they risk losing out on top talent if flexibility is reduced too aggressively.'
The survey also found that rising benefit costs were a top issue, with 61pc of employers saying it was influencing benefit strategies.
Healthcare benefits was identified as the most prevalent cost, with 41pc saying this was the most challenging to implement.
Farrington said Irish employers were 'under increasing pressure to do more with less'.
'Most employers have indicated that rising budget pressures and increasing benefit costs are limiting their ability to enhance or expand their benefits offerings,' she added.
"Unlike in previous years, when benefit enhancements were more common, employers are now focused on maintaining current benefit levels in a cost-neutral way.'
So far, she had not seen widespread cuts to benefits.
WTW's survey included 41 Irish employers, representing over 41,000 employees.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Trump says he thinks Putin is ready to make deal for peace in Ukraine
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and his European allies have intensified their efforts this week to prevent any deal between the US and Russia emerging from Friday's summit in Alaska that leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attack. 'I think President Putin will make peace, I think President Zelensky will make peace,' Mr Trump told reporters at the White House. 'We'll see if they get along.' Mr Trump has downplayed talk of a ceasefire emerging from the summit and speculated about a possible second meeting to come, involving more leaders. 'I think it's going to be a good meeting, but the more important meeting will be the second meeting that we're having. We're going to have a meeting with President Putin, President Zelensky, myself, and maybe we'll bring some of the European leaders along. Maybe not. I don't know that.' Putin earlier spoke to his most senior ministers and security officials as he prepared for a meeting with Mr Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, at 11.30am Alaskan time (8.30pm Irish time) that could shape the endgame to the largest war in Europe since World War II. In televised comments, Putin said the US was 'making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict'. This was happening, Putin said, 'to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole – if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons'. His comments signalled that Russia will raise nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Mr Trump. A Kremlin aide said Putin and Mr Trump would also discuss the 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-US economic ties. A senior Eastern European official, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said Putin would try to distract Mr Trump from Ukraine at the talks by offering him possible progress on nuclear arms control or something business-related. 'We hope Trump won't be fooled by the Russians; he understands all [these] dangerous things,' the official said, adding that Russia's only goal was to avoid any new sanctions and have existing sanctions lifted. Mr Trump said there would be a press conference after the talks, but that he did not know whether it would be joint. He also said in an earlier interview with Fox News that there would be 'a give and take' on boundaries and land. 'This meeting sets up like a chess game,' Mr Trump said. 'This meeting sets up a second meeting, but there is a 25pc chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting.' Mr Trump said it would be up to Putin and Mr Zelensky to strike an agreement, saying: 'I'm not going to negotiate their deal.' Russia controls around a fifth of Ukraine, and Mr Zelensky and the Europeans worry that a deal could cement those gains, rewarding Putin for 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land and emboldening him to expand further into Europe. An EU diplomat said it would be 'scary to see how it all unfolds in the coming hours. Trump had very good calls yesterday with Europe, but that was yesterday'. Mr Trump had shown willingness to join the security guarantees for Ukraine at a last-ditch virtual meeting with European leaders and Mr Zelensky on Wednesday, European leaders said, though he made no public mention of them afterwards. Today's summit, the first Russia-US summit since June 2021, comes at one of the toughest moments for Ukraine in a war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, French president Emmanuel Macron said Mr Trump had said the transatlantic Nato alliance should not be part of any security guarantees designed to protect Ukraine from future attacks in a post-war settlement. However, Mr Trump also said the US and all willing allies should be part of the security guarantees, Mr Macron added. Expanding on that, a European official told Reuters that Mr Trump said on the call he was willing to provide some security guarantees for Europe, without spelling out what they would be. On Wednesday, Mr Trump threatened 'severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting today proves fruitless.
Irish Post
6 hours ago
- Irish Post
Mairead McGuinness withdraws from Presidential race
MAIREAD McGuinness has withdrawn from the upcoming Irish presidential election, citing health concerns following a recent hospital stay. According to a statement from Ms McGuinness, the decision came after medical advice, with the proximity of the election making an arduous campaign untenable. The former MEP and EU Commissioner, who was seen to be in pole position to win the race to the Áras, said that the decision was difficult, but that her health had to come first. She confirmed that it was the right decision for her "and her family". In her statement she said that she had informed the Fine Gael leader, Tánaiste Simon Harris, of her decision. Tánaiste Harris described her withdrawal as 'an awful shock' and praised her exceptional record in both national and European public service. Ms McGuinness is widely respected in Europe, after serving as commissioner in the EU. This was seen as a major strength should she have become President. Fine Gael's Director of Elections for the upcoming Presidential election Minister Martin Heydon, confirmed that Fine Gael's Executive Council will convene in the coming days to determine the next steps. However, it is widely believed that they will press ahead to find a new candidate to contest the election. McGuinness had been the only formally nominated candidate from Fine Gael and was widely seen as the frontrunner in the race. Her departure leaves Independent TD Catherine Connolly, backed by Labour, Social Democrats, and People Before Profit, as the only confirmed contender thus far. See More: Fine Gael, Mairead McGuinness, Presidency, Áras
The Journal
7 hours ago
- The Journal
Millionaire Áras hopeful launches presidential campaign in the Shelbourne - here's what he said
THE MILLIONAIRE MILLENNIAL Gareth Sheridan chose the Constitution Room, the birthplace of the Irish Constitution in 1922, in the Shelbourne Hotel in Dublin as the location to launch his presidential campaign today. It's the second presidential launch we've had this summer, with the pharma tycoon worth €16 million, fielding robust questions from the Irish media as he enters the race. With his wife Heidi and his campaign team seated at the large Cabinet-style table next to the podium, the pharma tycoon (a terms he says he wouldn't use to describe himself) answered questions about the range of controversies that have emerged since his name first entered the race last weekend. The entrepreneur and former CEO of US-based company Nutriband, which describes itself as a 'values-based company' that manufactures abuse deterrent transdermal patches aimed specifically at opioid and fentanyl abuse, took questions on his finances, a united Ireland, the Triple Lock, migration, the Occupied Territories Bill, and housing. Gareth Sheridan answering questions from the media in Dublin today. Christina Finn Christina Finn So what did he have to say? Here's a rundown: How much money does he have? Sheridan's net worth right now is around €16 million and he has €500,000 cash in the bank to fund his presidential campaign. If he wins the election, he would likely place any Nutribrand company interests in a trust fund. He rents an apartment in Dublin with his wife and daughter, paying out over €3,000 per month. He drives a 2021 used Mercedes hybrid. What councils does he claim he has in the bag in terms of a nomination? Sheridan claims he has Tipperary and Laois councils backing his nomination, but stayed coy on the other two councils required. In order to run for president, a person needs at least four local authorities to nominate them or at least 20 Oireachtas members. Would he sign the Occupied Territories Bill into law as president? Sheridan said he would have 'no issue whatsoever' in signing the bill into law. Once the legislation is passed by the Oireachtas, the president must sign it into law. The former pharma boss said that he 'shares the opinions of the majority of the country, if not the entire country, that what's happening now in Palestine is nothing short of a disgrace'. 'When you start weaponising food and water and children are dying. I think it's the utmost finality of evil. Essentially, I think Israel will be on the wrong side of history indefinitely for what's going on over there. So I just want to make that point really clear,' he told The Journal. Advertisement He added that he has no shares that are linked to Israel. Did his company pay an Israeli hospital that trains Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers $50,000 as part of a medical technology deal? The Ditch reported yesterday that his company paid an Israeli hospital that trains Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers $50,000 as part of a medical technology deal. Sheridan told The Journal the 2020 transaction was connected with two doctors who happened to work at the hospital. They had developed a device that liquefied tablets for people that couldn't swallow or were incapacitated. The device would do very well in terms of treating people on the spot, explained Sheridan. 'It was a technology that we thought was very interesting, will be impactful on the world. Essentially, we took a gamble on it. The technology itself needed far more development than we initially thought… We don't have a continuing relationship,' he said. Was he fined in 2018 for making misleading statements about his company? Yes, he was fined $25,000. Nutriband was investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission over company filings in the US. The (SEC) is is an independent federal agency of the US government that is responsible for regulating the securities markets and protecting investors. The SEC fine was related to a disclosure on a product that Sheridan says they were planning to launch with FDA approval. He told reporters they relied upon the advice from two attorneys and the dermatologist advising the company on that particular product. 'It happened to be a wrong opinion, and we basically took our fine and our cease and desist and said he will not do it again. We've had an excellent relationship with the SEC since. It was an honest mistake. You pay your dues and you move on,' he said. Did his mother object to social housing? After a story appeared in the Irish Examiner today, Sheridan confirmed that his mother did object to a housing project through her work. He said his mother 'broke down' when Sheridan asked her about it yesterday. 'It's something that is not in the personality of my mother by any means. My mother grew up in social housing. You know, she is one of my inspirations to tackle the housing crisis, and she's fully behind it. So I'm just really stressed about that. As a family, we find this as a core issue that needs to be tackled,' he said. What does he think about immigration and racist attacks? Asked about the recent attacks on the Indian community, Sheridan said 'it's certainly troubling but has become a 'little bit more prominent' now. 'I really stress that if that's something that you support or get behind, and I'm definitely not your candidate,' he said today. Describing immigration and migration in general as a 'tricky subject', Sheridan said these are 'not statistics at the end of the day. We're talking about people'. 'I think we have a migration problem both ways, right? We have an emigration problem because the youth are leaving in their droves, but we don't have an immigrant problem,' he said. Related Reads The millionaire millennial seeking the presidency: How did Gareth Sheridan get so rich? Catherine Connolly is using American-style grassroots fundraising for her presidential campaign Catherine Connolly, presidential hopeful, has given her first press conference — here's what she said The Journal / YouTube Sheridan said the government were unprepared and lacked foresight with the immigration system, which he said was set up in an inadequate way to deal with the inflow of people that want to move here. 'It should be no surprise to us that Ireland has become a destination where people want to live and want to raise a family and want to grow their life, and we should have seen that coming,' he said. 'But we also have to understand that immigration is healthy for the economy, right? It's a matter of making sure that we all get along,' he added. Is he against removing the Triple Lock? Sheridan said today that he is against changes to the Triple Lock. This is one of the key pieces of legislation that the next president may have to sign off on if government is successful in pushing it through. The triple lock system dictates that Irish troops in groups of more than 12 cannot be deployed abroad without approval from Cabinet, the Dáil and a resolution from the United Nations Security Council. The changes proposed by government include removing the UN Security Council element. 'I think we're Irish first and European second and they need to listen to the people a little bit more,' said Sheridan. 'I think there's an overwhelming objection of the idea that we would move forward with that. And I want to stress that we're militarily neutral, but we've never been morally neutral, and that's important as well,' he said. Would Sheridan like to see a united Ireland? Sheridan said it is something he would love to see in his lifetime, but he said it is a complex issue that cannot be rushed. He told the media that the idea of a united Ireland needs to be 'very seriously thought out', stating that 'the narrative that we need to rush to bring that through is a little bit unprepared'. Is housing going to be one of his key talking points? Yes, Sheridan said he is not going to bring his toolbox and start building houses, but he will champion the issue. My ideal home here is we claim to 'make Ireland home again'. He said there has been complete ignorance to Article 41.21 of the Constitution which enshrines the right to a peoples' domestic needs. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
