Colombian model María José Estupiñán shot dead outside home
File photo: Columbian social media influencer and model María José Estupiñán (Picture credit: Facebook)
María José Estupiñán
Sánchez, a 22-year-old
social media influencer
and model, was shot dead outside her home in
Cúcuta
, Colombia, on the morning of May 15.
The brutal killing occurred just one day after a court ordered her ex-partner to compensate her over a longstanding
domestic violence case
, reported El Universal.
According to witnesses, the attacker arrived around 8:30 am (local time) disguised as a delivery man. Pretending to hand over a gift, he shot María José in the face and chest at point-blank range when she opened the door.
Surveillance cameras captured the harrowing moment and the suspect's escape. The footage is now key evidence in the police investigation.
As per news outlet Univision, María José's mother was present during the shooting and is believed to have witnessed the crime.
Her screams of agony, recorded by a bystander, later circulated on social media, amplifying public outrage.
The murder came just a day after María José had attended a hearing at the Prosecutor's Office, where she was officially recognised as a victim in a domestic violence case filed in 2018.
Her ex-partner was ordered to pay her 30 million Colombian pesos (around $7,120), according to Caracol Noticias.
Authorities are now investigating the killing as a suspected femicide, with the ex-boyfriend being the prime suspect.
Alejandra Vera, director of the Women's Denounce and Move Corporation, told Caracol Noticias that the young woman had 'activated all protective measures' and sought help from the state. 'He stalked her, he abused her, and she reported it… The Colombian State has failed this young woman,' Vera said.
The
Francisco de Paula Santander University
, where María José was in her seventh semester, condemned the killing, stating, 'We reject all forms of violence and mourn the loss of a young woman full of dreams.'
Her funeral was held on May 17 at Nuestra Señora del Carmen Parish. Hundreds gathered to mourn her death. Univision reported that her sister, who lives abroad, sent a heartfelt letter read aloud during the mass. 'You were always my little princess… Even though you're gone, you'll always live on in me,' it read.
In a heartbreaking moment, María José's dog, Valentino, approached her coffin and whined as if saying goodbye.
Her grieving mother, kneeling by the casket, cried, 'Here I give her to you, Joseph,' La Opinión de Cúcuta reported.
Her murder is being compared to that of Mexican influencer
Valeria Márquez
, who was killed just two days earlier under similar circumstances.
As per El Universal, both cases reflect the urgent need to address the growing threat of gender-based violence across Latin America.
Police Commander Colonel Leonardo Capacho stated that efforts to capture the suspect are 'well advanced.' The case remains under active investigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court Ruling On Gun Companies: Supreme Court Blocks Mexico's Gun Lawsuit Against US Companies, ET LegalWorld
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday spared two American gun companies from a lawsuit by Mexico's government accusing them of aiding illegal firearms trafficking to drug cartels and fueling gun violence in the southern neighbor of the United States. The justices in a 9-0 ruling authored by liberal Justice Elena Kagan overturned a lower court's ruling that had allowed the lawsuit to proceed against firearms maker Smith & Wesson and distributor Interstate Arms. The lower court had found that Mexico plausibly alleged that the companies aided and abetted unlawful sales routing guns to Mexican drug cartels, harming its government. Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis. Download ETLegalWorld App Get Realtime updates Save your favourite articles Scan to download App The justices embraced the argument made by the companies for dismissal of Mexico's suit under a 2005 U.S. law called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that broadly shields gun companies from liability for crimes committed with their products. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had decided in 2024 that the alleged conduct by the companies fell outside these Supreme Court decided that while it has little doubt that U.S. companies are aware of some unlawful sales to Mexican gun traffickers, Mexico's lawsuit failed to allege that the companies had aided and abetted such illegal firearms sales by deliberately helping to bring about the transactions."Mexico's plausible allegations are of 'indifference' rather than assistance," Kagan wrote. "They are of the manufacturers merely allowing some unidentified 'bad actors' to make illegal use of their wares." The case came to the Supreme Court at a complicated time for U.S.-Mexican relations as President Donald Trump pursues on-again, off-again tariffs on Mexican goods. Trump has also accused Mexico of doing too little to stop the flow of synthetic drugs such as fentanyl and migrant arrivals at the lawsuit, filed in Boston in 2021, accused the two companies of violating various U.S. and Mexican laws. Mexico claims that the companies have deliberately maintained a distribution system that included firearms dealers who knowingly sell weapons to third-party, or "straw," purchasers who then traffic guns to cartels in suit also accused the companies of unlawfully designing and marketing their guns as military-grade weapons to drive up demand among the cartels, including by associating their products with the American military and law enforcement. The gun companies said they make and sell lawful avoid its lawsuit being dismissed under the 2005 law, Mexico was required to plausibly allege that the companies aided and abetted illegal gun sales and that such conduct was the "proximate cause" - a legal principle involving who is responsible for causing an injury - of the harms claimed by Mexico. The Supreme Court, which heard arguments in the case on March 4, declined to resolve the proximate cause question after finding that Mexico's suit failed to adequately allege aiding and Arrocha Olabuenaga, the legal adviser for Mexico's Foreign Ministry, vowed that Mexico will continue pursuing its legal fight."While we are disappointed with the decision from this Supreme Court, we are convinced of the strength of our arguments and the evidence that upholds them, and we are encouraged by the support at home and abroad for Mexico's actions," he in the lawsuit had sought monetary damages of an unspecified amount and a court order requiring Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms to take steps to "abate and remedy the public nuisance they have created in Mexico."The Second Amendment Foundation, a gun rights group that backed the U.S. gun companies in the case, welcomed Thursday's ruling."The lawsuit, dreamt up by multiple gun control groups, had one goal - bankrupt the American firearms market by allowing civil liability to apply for the criminal misuse of its products," the group said in a social media post. "Thankfully the Supreme Court stepped in and squashed it."Gun violence fueled by trafficked U.S.-made firearms has contributed to a decline in business investment and economic activity in Mexico and forced its government to incur unusually high costs on services including healthcare, law enforcement and the military, according to the a country with strict firearms laws, has said most of its gun homicides are committed with weapons trafficked from the United States and valued at more than $250 million Perez Ricart, an international affairs researcher at Mexico's Center for Economic Research and Teaching (CIDE), criticized the ruling."Once again, the industry is shielded. It doesn't matter how many bullets cross the border or how many people are killed on the Mexican side. Bullets are not the only things that kill; so does the legal impunity guaranteed by Washington," Ricart said in a social media post.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 days ago
- Business Standard
US arrests 2,200 immigrants in a day as Trump govt intensifies crackdown
On Tuesday, the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) carried out the largest single-day operation in its history, detaining more than 2,200 individuals. According to a NBC News report, the arrests were made as the agency faces intensified pressure from the White House to rapidly increase arrests. The people who have been arrested were listed in ICE's Alternative to Detention (ATD) programme. Under the programme, undocumented migrants who are deemed not to be a threat to public safety are released, but are kept under supervision through ankle monitors, smartphone apps, or other geolocating programmes, along with check-ins at ICE facilities. According to immigration attorneys cited in the report, ICE sent a mass text message that reached numerous individuals enrolled in the Alternatives to Detention (ATD) programme. The message asked people to show up at ICE offices ahead of their scheduled appointments. However, they were arrested when they showed up. The report added that at least seven people who came for check-ins at New York's ICE office were handcuffed and sent away in unmarked cars. Citing an immigration attorney, representing the family of a 30-year-old Colombian man who was taken away, said that the man had gone to every ICE appointment, adding that 'He was, you know, very cooperative with all of the requirements that were made of him.' An ICE spokesperson, commenting on the arrests of immigrants wearing ankle monitors who had appeared for scheduled appointments, told NBC News, 'Those arrested had executable final orders of removal by an immigration judge and had not complied with that order.' The White House deputy chief of staff for policy, Stephen Miller, allegedly threatened ICE leaders in a meeting of firing away senior officials, if the agency does not start making 3,000 arrests per day. Ever since US President Donald Trump returned to office for his second term, his administration has intensified the crackdown on immigrants living in the US. From introducing a self-deportation app to sending scores of immigrants back to their home country, the Trump administration, while calling out his predecessor Joe Biden's 'open border' policy, has vowed to continue the crackdown on immigrants, citing national security risks.
Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
Trump administration arrests a record 2,200 immigrants in a day: Report
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has carried out the most immigrant arrests in a single day in its history, detaining more than 2,200 people on Tuesday, according to a report by NBC News. The mass operation comes amid mounting pressure from top Trump aides, including Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who reportedly instructed ICE to aim for 3,000 arrests a day. Most of those arrested were enrolled in ICE's Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program—a monitoring system intended for undocumented immigrants deemed low-risk. These individuals are typically tracked using ankle monitors, smartphone apps, or GPS technology, and are required to attend periodic check-ins with ICE officials. In an apparent shift in enforcement tactics, ICE sent mass text messages instructing individuals in the ATD program to report to local ICE offices ahead of their scheduled check-ins. Upon arrival, many were arrested without prior notice. In one instance, seven individuals—including a 30-year-old Colombian man described as fully compliant—were handcuffed and transported in unmarked vehicles after attending their check-ins. The move has triggered alarm across legal and advocacy circles. 'He was very cooperative with all of the requirements that were made of him,' said Margaret Cargioli, directing attorney at the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, referring to the Colombian detainee. Many attorneys report that some clients arrested did not have final orders of removal, despite ICE's claim that only those with such orders were targeted. This evolving strategy has created what immigration lawyers describe as a dangerous double bind: if immigrants appear for check-ins, they risk immediate detention; if they don't, they risk being penalised for noncompliance. Greg Chen, senior director of government relations at the American Immigration Lawyers Association, condemned the raids as 'indiscriminate and mass scale' enforcement. 'People are now increasingly afraid and intimidated,' he said. The Biden-era ATD programme was praised for ensuring a high compliance rate—98.5 per cent of participants regularly attended check-ins. Critics argue that targeting this group undermines trust and prioritises optics over security.
