Weston: Get the vulgar "F--- Carney" flags off of Parliament Hill, RCMP
Last Friday, I confronted a protester displaying a 'F— Carney' flag directly in front of the Prime Minister's Office, that historic 1880s building serving Liberal and Conservative leaders since 1975. When he refused to remove it, I gave him two minutes before I'd do it myself.
Article content
Article content
An RCMP officer intervened. Despite my outrage at seeing such vulgarity on the grounds of our highest democratic office, the officer explained the flag was 'private property' and he wasn't 'authorized' to remove it. He mentioned protesters had conducted such activities 'for five years.' As a Vancouver visitor, I was appalled. Is this the capital's welcome to tourists?
Article content
Article content
The officer asked me to stand down to avoid an incident before the Prime Minister emerged. Out of respect for the RCMP — descendants of the Northwest Mounted Police, a Canadian institution that brought civility to our untamed frontiers — I complied. The flag stayed.
Article content
I am a former Conservative MP and my objection transcends partisan politics. I wasn't defending Carney or his party. I was defending the Office of the Prime Minister itself.
Article content
This protester wouldn't target a 60-year-old Ottawa father named 'Carney' if he weren't Prime Minister. He was degrading our nation's highest office using hallowed public space. This distinction matters for democracy's health.
Article content
I champion free expression and founded the Canadian Constitution Foundation to defend Charter rights. In 2022, the Foundation successfully defended a homeowner's right to display a 'F— Trudeau' banner on her private property against municipal bylaws. While crass, and in my opinion an ineffective way to conduct political discourse, such expression on private property may be protected.
Article content
Article content
But rights come with responsibilities and limits. The right to profane expression stops at our most symbolic public spaces. The Prime Minister's Office at 80 Wellington St. isn't just any building. It's a National Historic Site and Classified Federal Heritage Building, representing 140 years of Canadian history and governance.
Article content
Article content
The grounds of democratic institutions aren't neutral venues for unrestricted vulgarity. They embody our collective governance. Protecting such displays signals that we don't value the institutions safeguarding our freedoms. This self-loathing invites international disrespect.
Article content
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted you can't falsely shout 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre. On Liberty author John Stuart Mill observed freedom ends where it harms others. Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl warned: 'Freedom without responsibility is dangerous.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
25 minutes ago
- CTV News
RCMP in London detail charges against man accused of selling components to Russia that could be used for weapons
The RCMP announced in London Friday it has laid charges against a Toronto businessman accused of selling materials to Russia that could be used to make weapons. It's the first charge laid under the Special Economic Measures Act, which placed export controls on Moscow in response to Russian military intervention in Ukraine. The suspect has been identified as Anton Trofimov, aged 43. RCMP would not confirm whether he was shipping parts for drones to Russia to be used in its war effort, saying only that they were 'dual use' components, meaning civilian or military. 'These particular items are on the common high priority list that the Bureau of Industry and Security puts out. These are items that the Russian military does seek to procure,' explained RCMP Cpl. Cap. Martin Williamson. 'It's dual-use components - micro-chips, antennas, semi-conductor materials and whatnot. So, in terms of drones, I can't comment on that.' The case will be back in court at the end of June.
Toronto Sun
25 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
SIMS: CBC set to get more money and power
The CBC building at Front and John Street in Toronto, Sept. 6, 2011. Photo by Alex Urosevic / Toronto Sun file photo Canada's government news organization is set to get fatter and more powerful. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account In the middle of the election campaign, Prime Minister Mark Carney vowed to pay the CBC more money, waving around about $150 million in fresh taxpayer cash. CBC covered that big scoop with a headline calling the CBC 'underfunded.' Think about that scene. Imagine being a CBC employee asking questions at a news conference during the election, with Carney saying that, if he won, the CBC would get more money, while Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said he would defund the CBC. The CBC covered this funding story in the middle of the election. That's a conflict of interest so big it would dwarf Godzilla. Journalists should not be paid by the government and that scene in the election is a perfect illustration of why. In the speech from the throne, the Carney government announced: 'The government is determined to protect the institutions that bring these cultures and this identity to the world, like CBC/Radio-Canada.' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. To get an idea of what that protection could look like, consider the federal government report delivered on Feb. 20, before the election. Former heritage minister Pascale St-Onge said the government should nearly double the amount of money the CBC gets from taxpayers every year. 'The average funding for public broadcasters in G7 countries is $62 per person, per year,' St-Onge said. 'We need to aim closer to the middle ground, which is $62 per year per person.' If the government funded the CBC that way, the CBC would cost taxpayers about $2.5 billion per year. That amount would cover the annual grocery bill for about 152,854 Canadian families. St-Onge also pushed for the CBC mandate to be expanded to 'fight against disinformation.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'I propose to anchor in CBC-Radio Canada's mandate its role in helping the Canadian population fight against disinformation and understand fact-based information,' St-Onge said. Carney's Liberal party platform pledged to 'fully equip them ( CBC) to combat disinformation, so that Canadians have a news source they know they can trust.' What does this mean? Will the CBC play a role as an official 'fact-checker' in Canada, or is this just clunky language urging the CBC to be more fact-based? What is clear is that the federal government is planning to hand the CBC more money and enshrine its funding into law, taking it out of the annual budget vote and clouding transparency. CBC hasn't improved its accountability after years of scrutiny from Canadians. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Former CEO Catherine Tait was being paid about half a million dollars per year. New CEO Marie‑Philippe Bouchard has started her new role where Tait left off, as she is also set to be paid between $478,300 and $562,700. After years of criticism over executive bonuses, the government media company finally said it would get rid of the bonuses but hike the salaries of the executives instead. With so many Canadians struggling to pay for the basics, the CBC needed to read the room and end the bonuses and knock the CEO down a few levels in pay. Taxpayers are forced to spend a lot of money on the CBC, but only a tiny fraction of them choose to watch it. For CBC News Network's flagship English language prime-time news program, the audience is 1.8% of available viewers, according to its latest quarterly report. That means more than 98% of TV-viewing Canadians chose to watch something else. The CBC is a waste of taxpayers' money. Nearly nobody is watching it and it is a severe conflict of interest for journalists to be paid by the government. The CBC doesn't need more money from taxpayers; it needs to be defunded and raise money based on its work. Kris Sims is Alberta director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation and former longtime member of the Parliamentary Press Gallery. Olympics NHL Toronto & GTA Editorial Cartoons Ontario
Global News
43 minutes ago
- Global News
Carney defends public safety minister over ethics ‘screen'
Prime Minister Mark Carney stood by his public safety minister on Friday, saying he had made 'the right decision' to keep a distance from national security decisions in which he could appear to have a conflict of interest. After Global News reported that Gary Anandasangaree had put up an ethics 'screen' around issues related to the Tamil community, Carney praised the minister for his 'standards of integrity.' 'We have a rigorous vetting process and he's taken the right decision, in his judgment and my judgment, to make these arrangements. We will be well covered with respect to all public security decisions,' Carney said. Anandasangaree, who is leading the government's initiative to secure Canada's borders amid White House tariff pressure, announced Thursday that he had effectively recused himself from decisions regarding his community. 'In an abundance of caution, and to ensure that there is no perception of any conflict, I have asked Public Safety officials to implement a screen on any national security issues relating to the Tamil community,' the minister said. Story continues below advertisement A conflict of interest screen is a preventive compliance measure mutually agreed upon by a politician and the federal ethics commissioner. It aims to help MPs avoid conflicts of interest. The screen consists of a statement in which an elected official agrees 'to abstain from any discussions, decisions, debate or votes concerning the matter that forms the subject of the conflict of interest,' according to the commissioner's website. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The minister released the statement after Global News asked questions about his past actions and statements, some of which could put him at odds with the work of the border and national security agencies he now oversees. 0:35 New border bill has elements 'that will strengthen' Canada-U.S. relationship: Anandasangaree Dan Stanton, a former Canadian Security Intelligence Service officer, said the minister was doing his due diligence by removing himself from decisions so there is no perception of conflict. Story continues below advertisement 'So I certainly don't have a problem with it. I think he is just trying to stay ahead of any possible criticisms down the road if there is a national security issue involving Tamil Canadians.' He said the main issue for his former agency was fundraising for the Tamil Tigers, the Sri Lankan rebels that fought a long civil war against government forces until their defeat in 2009. The government responded by placing the Tigers on Canada's list of terrorist entities. The World Tamil Movement, a fundraising front in Toronto, was also outlawed and its assets were seized. 'That was the big issue for many years in the Toronto area, large sums of money going over,' Stanton said, but the conflict has ended and he did not think it was troublesome for the minister to keep away from the topic. 'I think it's just a matter of, there's probably been rumblings on this subject. And so in order to represent himself as Canada's minister of public safety, he's just detaching himself from the community.' Anandasangaree came to Canada from Sri Lanka in 1983 and was a Tamil community activist, Realtor and lawyer before becoming a Liberal MP in the Scarborough area of Toronto in 2015. His father, from whom he is estranged, was the leader of a Tamil political party in Sri Lanka, where the Tamil Tigers fought for independence from the island country. Story continues below advertisement After the war ended, Anandasangaree helped hundreds of Sri Lankan migrants who had paid human smugglers to ferry them to Canada's West Coast on board the ships MV Ocean Lady and MV Sun Sea. He and his wife have also been critical of the national security agencies the minister now oversees, particularly when it comes to their handling of issues related to Tamil refugees from Sri Lanka.
