At least 22 killed in protests against fuel price hikes in Angola
Joao Lourenco's office released the death toll in an official statement and said that 197 people were also injured in the two days of violence that began on Monday and spread from the capital, Luanda, to at least six other provinces in the southern African nation.
Earlier this month, the government said it was removing subsidies on diesel and raising the price by more than 30%.
That prompted minibus taxis, a common method of transport for Angolans, to hike their prices by as much as 50%.
Lourenco's office said dozens of shops were looted and vehicles were damaged in rioting by people angry at the new fuel price and the rising cost of living.
The army was deployed to restore order as the riots "triggered a climate of widespread insecurity," the statement said.
It did not elaborate on how the people died.
Protests against the price hikes in Angola first erupted two weeks ago, when Human Rights Watch accused the police of excessive force against what was a largely peaceful demonstration.
Police unnecessarily fired tear gas and rubber bullets and assaulted protesters in those demonstrations, the rights group said.
Authorities have often been accused of clamping down harshly on protests to silence dissent in Angola, where the People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola party has been in power for 50 years since independence from Portugal in 1975.
Angola is one of Africa's largest oil producers, but the country does not have enough refineries to meet domestic demand, so it imports diesel and gasoline at high prices. — Euronews
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
16 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump's election paved way for Israeli attacks on Iran, intelligence sources say
BRUSSELS — Israel had been planning a full-scale invasion of Iran for many years, but the re-election of Donald Trump coincided with a series of critical events paving the way to the direct attack in June this year, four current and former Israeli intelligence sources told Euronews in separate interviews. Israeli intelligence sources, speaking on condition of anonymity due to security concerns, told Euronews that Mossad agents had identified key strategic factors and political conditions enabling them to prepare for and initiate the attack on Iran. Among these, they cited the intensification of the proxy war, the election of US President Donald Trump, and the momentum of nuclear negotiations with Western powers. On 13 June, Israel launched multiple land and air strikes on Iran, killing senior Iranian military leaders, nuclear scientists and politicians, and damaging or destroying Iranian air defences and nuclear military facilities. Iran retaliated with missile and drone strikes on Israeli cities and military sites, aided by Iran-allied Houthis in Yemen. The US defended Israel from these attacks and, on the ninth day, bombed three Iranian nuclear sites. Iran then struck a US base in Qatar. On 24 June, under US pressure, Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire. Both sides claimed victory following the ceasefire. Israel and the US asserted that they significantly degraded Iran's missile and nuclear programs, while Iranian authorities denied these claims. Independent assessments are currently limited due to the secrecy surrounding Iran's nuclear and the US said that the attack had been in the planning for many years, in parallel with diplomatic engagement with Iran.'Israel has never hidden the fact that it wants to destroy the Iranian nuclear program, and it has never hidden the fact it was also willing to allow it to be resolved diplomatically, as long as the diplomatic solution prevents Iran not only from enriching uranium, but from ever getting the capacity to pose an existential threat to the state of Israel,' a first Israeli intelligence source told engagements were not bringing any tangible results, the sources said, while tensions between the US and Iran grew following Donald Trump's first presidency in the US from 2018, Trump withdrew the US from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA), which had limited Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. Following the US re-imposition of sanctions, Iran began ignoring the deal's nuclear restrictions in the meantime, the proxy war between Israel and Iran was progressively escalating.'I think the pivotal moment was in April 2024, when Iran launched missiles directly from its own territory at Israel. Until then, Iran had primarily relied on proxies to attack Israel, while Israel carried out covert operations inside Iran with plausible deniability, aiming to prevent escalation into full-scale war,' the first intelligence source April 2024, Iran launched missiles at Israel in retaliation for an Israeli strike on its consulate in Syria that killed Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Zahedi. He was the highest-ranking Iranian military official killed since the Iranian General Qassem Suleimani's assassination in 2020 by the US Trump administration. Suleimani was the 'architect' of Iran's proxy war in the Middle East.'I think Israel had to wait from April 2024. It needed time to gather all the intelligence and planning it needed in order to feel confident that, already in the first two or three days of the war, we would be in a position where we had complete control over the situation, minimal casualties at home, and complete control of Iranian airspace, with the ability to attack whenever and wherever we want to,' the source Trump's second election as US president was another key pivotal moment and was welcomed by all the four sources.'The original plan was to attack in October 2024. That was after the second direct missile attack by Iran on Israel following Israel's assassination of Hezbollah's leader Hassan Nasrallah in Lebanon in September,' the first intelligence sources said, but the attack was delayed to wait for the US elections in November.'I think it was very important for Israel that Trump should win those elections. Once Trump was elected, he put the main emphasis on reaching a hostage deal,' said the second source, referring to the Hamas-Israel conflict.'Once the hostage deal was signed around March 2025, Israel was again in a position to attack Iran. But the US and Iran entered into negotiations, to try bringing a peaceful solution to the issue of Iran's enrichment and nuclear program,' the first source March, the US and Iran began indirect negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program. The negotiations did not bring an agreement, although counterparts described them as 'constructive'.'Trump gave 60 days to those negotiations. The day after, Israel attacked Iran. I think that obviously was coordinated with the US administration,' all the current and former Israeli intelligence sources told has never publicly stated that Israel's first attack on Iran was coordinated. However, following the US strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a press conference on June 23 that the operation had been planned for many years.'When we attacked, we were at the end of the 60-day period of negotiations. I think it was very clear to Trump at this stage that the Iranians were not willing to forego enrichment on Iranian soil, even though the negotiations did bring up some interesting solutions to that. For example, some sort of international enrichment agency that would allocate enriched uranium at civilian levels to all countries in the region interested in it,' the first intelligence source said.'Trump realised Iran was engaging in negotiations merely to buy time, with no real intent to reach a resolution. The talks served as a decoy, giving Iran the impression it wouldn't be attacked, especially amid widespread press reports that Israel was on the verge of striking,' the first source Iran claimed victory and celebrated its resilience towards Israel's invasion, Israeli intelligence sources said that Tehran's regime has been left weakened following the attack.'Israel has emerged from several conflicts in a stronger strategic position in the region, but in a more difficult political position with its Western partners, except perhaps Washington. We're at a very delicate moment in which both Israel and Iran have little to gain by pushing further right now,' Ian Lesser, fellow and adviser to the German Marshall Fund's president, told Euronews.'Iran has fewer options now. One option is to return to negotiations. Another is to turn to its traditional methods of responding, which rely on proxies and non-traditional actions, including terrorism. There is also the possibility that, if Iran maintains some ability to develop nuclear weapons, it may see this as another path. But I don't think anyone will let them do that. There may be disagreements about Israeli strategy and policy, but overall, Israel and its Western partners are not willing to tolerate a nuclearised Iran,' the expert the war had gone further, Israel would have probably attacked gas and oil installations, a fourth former Israeli intelligence source told Euronews. However, after the ceasefire, negotiations have resumed at diplomatic 25 July, diplomats from Iran met counterparts from Germany, the UK, and France in Istanbul for talks, the first since Israel's mid-June attack on Iran, amid warnings that these European countries might trigger a 'snapback' of UN sanctions on second intelligence source said that following the conflict, Israel would maintain control over Iranian airspace, in order to 'destroy anything that even suggests that the Iranians are preparing to rebuild any of the capabilities that we have destroyed'. — Euronews
Arab News
5 days ago
- Arab News
Bengali Muslims fear detention amid immigration crackdown in India
NEW DELHI: Bengali-speaking Muslims in India say they are living in fear of detention and deportation amid an increasing police crackdown on 'illegal immigrants' that have seen hundreds being unlawfully forced into Bangladesh, despite many being Indian citizens. More than 1,500 Muslim men, women and children were expelled across the border between May 7 and June 15 without due process, according to a July report by Human Rights Watch, citing Bangladeshi authorities. While crackdowns on alleged illegal immigrants from Muslim-majority Bangladesh are not new in India, the current wave followed a deadly attack in Jammu and Kashmir in April, where gunmen opened fire on visitors at a popular Himalayan tourist hotspot, killing 26 people and critically injuring many others. As Delhi blamed the attack on 'terrorists' from Pakistan, Indian states governed by officials from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party have since rounded up thousands of Bengali Muslims, calling them suspected 'illegal immigrants' and a potential security risk. Khairul Islam, a 53-year-old Indian citizen and former schoolteacher from Assam state, told Arab News he was detained at his home by the police on May 24, and then forced into Bangladesh with 14 other people. 'It was a horrible experience, I was pushed into a no-man's-land between India and Bangladesh. When I tried to enter India the Indian border guards started firing rubber bullets,' he said. Islam was able to return about a week later, after his wife and relatives showed Indian authorities documents to prove his citizenship. 'My grandfather was from India. I have a copy of his schooling in India. His eighth-standard certificate. My father got a gun license from the government in 1952. I was a government employee and got a job as a teacher in 1997,' he said. 'This is simple harassment. Being a Bengali Muslim has become a crime in Assam. Our life has turned into a hell … They call me a foreigner just because I am a Muslim and a Bengali. Many families have been destroyed in this witch hunt … I hope justice will be done to us.' While Bengali is the main language of Bangladesh, there are an estimated 100 million Bengali speakers in India, who mainly reside in the states of Assam, West Bengal, and Tripura. About 35 million of them identify as Muslims. Authorities in Hindu-majority India have claimed that the expulsions were conducted to reverse irregular migration, with Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma saying that 'Muslim infiltration' from Bangladesh is threatening India's identity. 'We are fearlessly resisting the ongoing, unchecked Muslim infiltration from across the border, which has already caused an alarming demographic shift. In several districts, Hindus are now on the verge of becoming a minority in their own land,' he wrote on X on July 29. Meenakshi Ganguly, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch, said India's approach to undocumented migrants is showing the country in a poor light. 'While governments can tackle irregular immigration, it has to be done with due process, as opposed to randomly rounding up Bengali-speaking Muslim workers in various BJP-governed states, and assuming that they are Bangladeshi nationals,' she told Arab News. States like Assam have also seen a recent surge in evictions of thousands of families who Indian authorities accuse of staying illegally on government land. 'The ongoing evictions seem like a state policy to discriminate on religious or ethnic grounds, violating constitutional protections,' Ganguly said. Assam residents like Shaji Ali, who was evicted from his home in Golaghat district, are also questioning the official narrative. 'I was born here. My father came here from Naogaon district (in Bangladesh) more than 40 years ago. It was the previous government that settled us here. 'We have all the government facilities here. How did we become encroachers?' he told Arab News. 'For the (current) government, our Bengali-Muslim identity is a problem.' Minnatul Islam, secretary of the All Assam Minority Students Union, believes that politics is behind the ongoing clampdown. 'An inhumane situation is prevailing in Assam today. Bengali-speaking Muslims are living in great fear … This is a political move and the government of Assam is preparing for the 2026 elections and the eviction is part of the electoral agenda,' he told Arab News. 'The target is Bengali-speaking Muslims. There would be around 9 million Bengali Muslims. It's clear that there is no Bangladeshi in Assam. Whatever the government is doing … is not healthy, it's just targeting Muslims to serve the political interests.'
Saudi Gazette
5 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
Belgian court prohibits transit of military equipment to Israel
BRUSSELS — A court in Belgium has ordered the Flemish government to stop the transit of military equipment to Israel, following the discovery of hardware in the port of Antwerp earlier this year. The Court of First Instance in Brussels ordered the regional government to block the Antwerp shipment and prohibit any future transit of military equipment to Israel, which faces growing criticism in the West for its handling of the war in Gaza. The judge also imposed a fine of €50,000 for any arms shipment sent to Israel. The judgement came in response to a complaint lodged in June by four Flemish associations. Speaking to Euronews, Lichen Ullmann, the coordinator of the Vredesactie movement, which was involved in the complaint, explained that the containers found in Antwerp "included pallets of tapered roller bearings, which are something used in tanks and armoured vehicles." "They are shipped specifically to a company called Ashot Ashkelon in Ashdod in Israel, which is an exclusive supplier to the Israeli army of Merkava tanks, which are used in Gaza in the genocide," Ullmann added. Belgium has banned arms exports to Israel since 2009, with the country's regions responsible for controlling the transit of weapons and their components. However, the hearing in Brussels revealed that the Flemish government only controlled arms when transport companies requested it. Ullmann said the judge cited the Geneva Convention and the Arms Trade Treaty, which prevent countries from exporting military equipment that could be used to commit war crimes or genocide. "So there is a very broad basis for this case and it has been confirmed on all sides, including the ban on the specific container, but also on all other shipments of military equipment to Israel that could potentially be used in genocide," Ullmann noted. Contacted by Euronews, the Flemish government, which can still appeal the decision, did not respond to questions. The Brussels court judgement comes as an increasing number of Israel's allies, including the UK, have expressed concerns about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza after almost two years of Israeli military action. Experts have said that the enclave is experiencing famine, with dozens of people known to have died from malnutrition. The war began when Hamas militants attacked southern Israel on 7 October 2023, killing around 1,200 people, most of them civilians. Hamas took 251 people as hostages, and is currently holding 50, of whom 20 are believed to be alive. A subsequent Israeli offensive has to date killed 61,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry whose figures do not distinguish between fighters and civilians. — Euronews
