'We Have Enough Oil': Hardeep Puri Says India Prepared Amid Escalating Iran-Israel Conflict
Last Updated:
Union minister Hardeep Singh Puri said it will be a cause for worry if the Strait of Hormuz is closed or choked as India imports 1.5 million barrels of crude oil via this route
Even if everything goes wrong, India has enough oil, said Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri amid the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel.
Giving this reassurance, Puri said it will be a cause for worry only if the Strait of Hormuz – described as the 'world's most important oil transit chokepoint" between Oman and Iran – is closed.
'Even if everything goes wrong, we have enough oil. India imports around 5.5 million barrels of crude oil, of which around 1.5 million comes via the Strait of Hormuz route, where Iran is located at the north. The worry will be if the strait is closed or choked," Puri told News18 in an exclusive interview.
'I would use the word anxiety, not worry. For 50 years, the strait has never been shut. There are many countries that would not want it to be shut. There have been many phases of heightened tensions in the region, but energy does not stop flowing," he said.
He, however, made the situation clear due to concerns over rising oil prices or even shortages. 'All I can say is that with the PM (Narendra Modi) at the helm, he is ahead of the game and we have diversified supplies. We have enough, more than enough supplies and we can get more and we also have domestic production," he added.
Excerpts from the interview:
When costs increase, what impact could it have on our infrastructure? It's an election year and we are sensitive to this. Are you worried that if the Israel-Iran faceoff stretches, it could be bad?
Do we have a reason to be worried as far as crude oil prices are concerned because of the faceoff?
I would choose my words carefully. I would choose the word anxiety. Wherever there is tension, wherever the military situation is escalating or devastation is likely, our energy needs could be a cause for this anxiety. A fairly large portion of our energy needs, about 20 per cent, passes through the Strait of Hormuz. The strait has never been closed, but even if it does, it will be re-routed. Costs could go up; insurance costs have gone up but energy does not stop flowing. If the strait is still closed, we don't worry. We consume 5.5 million barrels, about 1.5 comes through this strait. So if we do simple math, we can get more from wherever we are getting the rest of the 4 million.
Do we have enough stock?
Yes, we have enough for three weeks and can get more. We also have domestic supplies and production. We don't need to go through the strait. We have pipelines. Also, if push comes to shove, we can stop the export of our petroleum products. The Prime Minister is at the helm, and he is ahead of the game.
India faced a lot of criticism when it was buying Russian oil during the peak of its conflict with Ukraine. What do you have to say about that?
It was a smart move. There is no such thing as a morality tag. We will buy oil from where it is cheapest and good for the country. The PM's only obligation is to the people of the country. We ensure that oil prices don't go up. No Congress-ruled state has reduced it. We have. Today, oil prices are not peaking and wise counsels will prevail; the situation will de-escalate. Anyone can issue a tender and there was no sanction against Russian oil or Russia.
Has the Prime Minister's diplomatic overture helped to diversify?
Yes, his contribution to transforming India and its energy needs is amazing, we are moving ahead to becoming the third largest economy.
What about biofuels and ethanol?
We have saved Rs 1 lakh crore and we have saved on our imports bill. We are the second largest blending country in the world. We are using 1,100 crore litres and doing well here.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
crude oil Hardeep Singh Puri Israel Iran tension
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 19, 2025, 17:03 IST
News india 'We Have Enough Oil': Hardeep Puri Says India Prepared Amid Escalating Iran-Israel Conflict
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
18 minutes ago
- The Print
Gadkari inaugurates two vehicle scrapping facilities of Tata Motors
'These modern centres mark a progressive step under the National Vehicle Scrappage Policy, which empowers citizens to transition to cleaner, more fuel-efficient vehicles through structured incentives,' Gadkari said while inaugurating the facilities virtually. The state-of-the-art – Recycle with Respect – Registered Vehicle Scrapping Facilities (RVSFs) in Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh) and Raipur (Chhattisgarh) are designed to safely and responsibly dismantle end-of-life vehicles. They are equipped to handle passenger and commercial vehicles across all brands, including two- and three-wheelers, a press release said. Lucknow, Jun 18 (PTI) Union Minister of Road Transport and Highways Nitin Gadkari on Wednesday inaugurated two vehicle scrapping facilities of Tata Motors with a combined capacity of dismantling 40,000 end-of-life vehicles annually. 'These facilities will play a crucial role in the safe dismantling of unfit vehicles while enabling the recovery of valuable materials for scientific recycling. I commend Tata Motors for their steadfast commitment to sustainability and for establishing a nationwide RVSF infrastructure that aligns with global standards. Progressive initiatives like these are vital to building a robust ecosystem that makes vehicle scrappage accessible, efficient, and impactful across the country,' Gadkari said. The Raipur RVSF will be operated by Tata Motors' partner Raipur Green Energy Pvt Ltd and has a capacity to dismantle up to 25,000 vehicles per annum, while the Lucknow facility can scrap up to 15,000 vehicles annually and is operated by Moto Scrapland Pvt Ltd, the release said. In Lucknow, state transport minister Dayashankar Singh said, 'The launch of this advanced vehicle recycling facility will also create valuable employment opportunities and contribute to the economy of the state. We appreciate the efforts of Tata Motors and acknowledge all stakeholders involved in this project.' Girish Wagh, Executive Director, Tata Motors, said, 'Sustainability is not merely a commitment at Tata Motors, it is a foundational pillar shaping the future of mobility.' With this expansion, Tata Motors now operates 10 vehicle scrapping centres, including the ones in Jaipur, Bhubaneswar, Surat, Chandigarh, Delhi NCR, Pune, Guwahati, Raipur, Lucknow and Kolkata. PTI ABN HVA This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Khamenei and Netanyahu are waging a war of symbols too
The gloves are off and the tweets are on in the Israel-Iran conflict that has entered its seventh day. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei , and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are leading the digital charge across social media with evocative symbols from their religious traditions to challenge each other. Khamenei declared 'the battle begins' in a warning post on Tuesday, hours after US President Donald Trump called for Iran's 'unconditional surrender.' 'In the name of #Haider, the battle begins. Ali returns to #Khaybar with his Zulfiqar,' the 86-year-old Khamenei posted to his 1.5 million followers on X in Farsi, referring to Shia Islam 's revered figure and the first imam, Ali, who won the Battle of Khaybar with his sword, Zulfiqar. Khamenei's post framed Iran's attacks as part of a broader religious struggle against Israel. On the other hand, Israel has called its military operation against Iran "Rising Lion", taking the name from a biblical verse that promises a victorious future for a powerful Israel, and also obliquely referring to the pre-Islamic Revolution Iran. Live Events In a post dedicated to the people of Iran, Netanyahu said, 'We are in the midst of one of the greatest military operations in history, Operation Rising Lion . The Islamic regime, which has oppressed you for almost 50 years, threatens to destroy our country, the State of Israel." Both Khamenei and Netanyahu have shared several posts on Twitter (now X), but what stands out is their deliberate use of religious references drawn from history. Khamenei's Khaybar citation Khamenei's declaration of battle on Twitter included a reference to Khaybar that was later used by multiple users in their posts as a hashtag. Khaybar, in the north of Medina, was once home to thousands of Jews who were defeated in a decisive 7th-century battle against the army of Prophet Muhammad. The turning point in the battle came when the Prophet, after earlier attempts to break the stronghold, said, 'Tomorrow I will give the banner to a man who loves God and His Messenger, and God and His Messenger love him. He will conquer it.' The next day, the Prophet gave the banner to Ali ibn Abi Talib, the first Shia Imam. Ali then led the assault on the fortress of Qamus, Khaybar's most fortified stronghold. Ali defeated the Jewish commander Marhab using a door as a shield after losing his own. His leadership resulted in the fall of the fort, effectively ending resistance in Khaybar. The victory marked a strategic and symbolic success for the early Muslim community. In Shia Islam, Ali's role at Khaybar is celebrated as a sign of his divine support. Netanyahu's lion reference Khamenei isn't the only one reaching back to religious history. Netanyahu also flipped through holy pages for symbolism, citing phrases – 'Rising Lion' and 'Cyrus the Great' in his posts. In his message to the Iranian people, Netanyahu said that Israel's conflict was with Iran's Islamic regime, not its people, adding that 'the people of Iran and the people of Israel have been friends since the time of Cyrus the Great .' Cyrus the Great, founder of the first Persian Empire, after conquering Babylon and other cities, allowed the exiled jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild their Temple. Netanyahu also used the phrase 'Rising Lion,' drawn from the biblical line 'the people shall rise up as a lion,' in a note placed into a crack of Jerusalem's Western Wall — a gesture that, in hindsight, appeared to signal the impending strikes on Iran. The phrase comes from Numbers 23:24 in the Bible: 'Behold, the people shall rise up as a great lion, and lift up himself as a young lion: he shall not lie down until he eat of the prey, and drink the blood of the slain.' This verse is part of the first oracle of Balaam, a non-Israelite prophet and diviner, where he foretells the strength and power of Israel, comparing it to a lion that will not rest until it has satisfied its hunger. The Book of Numbers is the fourth book in the Bible. In this part of the story, the diviner named Balaam, who was a kind of prophet or seer known for his ability to bless as well as curse, is being asked by Balak, a king of Moab, to curse the people of Israel, God's chosen people, because Balak sees them as a threat. Instead of cursing them, Balaam ends up blessing them, because God tells him only to speak what He commands. This verse is part of one of those blessings, where Balaam describes the strength and power of Israel in poetic, symbolic language. The verse means that Israel will be strong, fearless, and ready for action, just like a lion rising to hunt. Balaam gives more prophetic speeches, continuing to bless Israel instead of cursing it. He also predicts the downfall of Israel's enemies, including Moab (Balak's people), Edom and others. Most famously, he delivers a prophecy that is often seen as messianic by Jews and Christians: 'A star shall come out of Jacob, and a scepter shall rise out of Israel…' The phrase "Rising Lion' is also linked to the flag of Iran's pre-Islamic Revolution Shah regime. The flag of the Pahlavi dynasty of the Shah had an emblem of a sword-wielding lion and a sun, both drawn from pre-Islamic past of Iran. The clash on Twitter between Netanyahu and Khamenei makes it plain: this isn't just a military conflict, but an ideological tug-of-war with no end in sight.
India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
Why a Calcutta court ordered the Centre to release MGNREGA funds
After nearly three years of political standoff and administrative impasse, the Calcutta High Court on June 18 directed that the 100-day rural employment guarantee scheme (MGNREGA) be resumed in West Bengal from August 1. The verdict comes as a significant breakthrough in a long-running dispute between the Centre and the state, marked by allegations of corruption, political bias and denial of rights to millions of rural conflict began in the wake of corruption allegations in the implementation of MGNREGA in Bengal, prompting the Narendra Modi government to halt all funding to the state under the scheme. Since then, not a single rupee has been released, effectively suspending the programme and impacting the livelihoods of lakhs of rural families dependent on it. While the Centre justified its actions citing misuse of funds, the state government led by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, and even political rivals like the Left, have accused the Union government of engaging in selective non-cooperation and politically motivated high court's intervention may mark a turning point. During the hearing on June 18, Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam offered a stern yet nuanced observation: 'From the beginning, I've said one thing— out of 10 apples, a few may be rotten, but the rest are still fresh.' Acknowledging the past issues but refusing to let them justify continued inaction, he added, 'What has happened is in the past. But the scheme has remained shut for nearly three years. Now it must be restarted. The Centre cannot indefinitely suspend this programme.' He further instructed that the possibility of resuming the scheme from July or August be seriously judgment also clarified that while the Centre has the authority to impose supervisory mechanisms to curb corruption—including conditions or monitoring arrangements—it cannot use such powers to indefinitely stall an entire welfare programme that affects millions. This assertion directly challenges the Union government's prolonged withholding of funds, despite similar corruption charges having emerged in several other states, including in the Hindi belt and even in Gujarat, without those states facing such drastic punitive Reacting strongly to the court's ruling, CM Mamata launched a fierce critique of the Centre's stance. Addressing the media from Nabanna—the state secretariat—she said, 'We will review the petition, but first, they must release the money. It's been four years. Not a single rupee has been given. This is the people's money.' She accused the Centre of inflicting deliberate harm on Bengal's rural poor and declared that the state government had to pay the pending wages of workers from its own funds in the absence of central support. Since 2022, the state government has paid Rs 16,637.03 crore as wages from its own coffers, besides clearing pending wages of Rs 3,732 crore under demanded reimbursement of these expenditures, stating, 'From the day the scheme was stopped, the Centre must calculate and pay the dues. Why was our money diverted to other states? That is a crime.' She also referred to the state's 'Karmashree' initiative, launched to provide employment using state funds as a substitute for its submission to the court, the Union government maintained that it had no intent to punish genuine workers, but raised the issue of verification—questioning who would confirm whether work was indeed carried out. It also insisted that the funds allegedly misused by the state be returned and called for the appointment of a central nodal officer to oversee the programme's implementation in the this argument appeared unconvincing to many observers and legal analysts. The primary question raised was: if the Centre was serious about ensuring oversight and integrity, why did it take nearly three years to propose such mechanisms? Moreover, who bears responsibility for the economic hardship endured by the rural poor during this extended suspension?The state, for its part, argued that no nodal officer was needed, as the entire scheme was administered through centralised digital portals, making discrepancies immediately visible and rectifiable. While this stance underscores the growing role of technology in welfare governance, it does not fully absolve the state government of blame. Repeated allegations of corruption in Bengal's MGNREGA implementation have surfaced over the years, and critics argue the state failed to act with adequate urgency to stem malpractices before the situation escalated into a full-blown intergovernmental despite these mutual shortcomings, the court's directive is being viewed by many as a positive development—a long-awaited reprieve for lakhs of marginalised workers and families in West Bengal's villages. The court has reasserted a crucial democratic principle: even amid allegations and administrative friction, the rights of the people to livelihood and public welfare cannot be indefinitely held its heart, the impasse over MGNREGA funding is not merely a matter of financial disbursement or administrative oversight—it is a microcosm of the increasingly fraught relationship between the Centre and opposition-ruled states. It reflects how welfare, accountability and political rivalry intersect in contemporary India, and how institutional checks—such as the judiciary—remain vital in upholding constitutional guarantees when executive action fails to do August approaches, much will depend on how both governments respond—not only in terms of implementing the court's order, but also in restoring the dignity and stability of a social security scheme that was never meant to be a political to India Today Magazine
